On Fri, 16 May 2008 17:48:47 -0400
Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rico Secada wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 May 2008 22:35:00 +0200
> > chefren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I know at time it was said that OpenBSD is not for everything, but
On Fri, 16 May 2008 22:35:00 +0200
chefren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know at time it was said that OpenBSD is not for everything, but
> so far, I still haven't find anything that I need that OpenBSD
> can't shine doing.
I can almost second that except for the few cases in which we really
nee
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:45:14 +0200
"Jernej Makovsek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please just ignore this post!
> As I said in my first post "Now with this post I don`t want to start
> any wars. I know that nothing
> is bullet proof and so on but as a wannabe OBSD user I`m "just"
> interested in if
Hi.
A customer with very limited resources needs to set up a high available
system running apache, mysql, postfix and dovecot and I have gotten the
task.
I have only two Pentium 4 machines at my disposal, and I have begun
researching how to make them work with load balancing and fail safe
operati
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 08:41:18 +1300
"Joel Wiramu Pauling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but to me sounds like your making a non-issue into a mole hill. Even
> the most limited of hardware can run decent browsers. Why you are
> insisting on using your access box, when you have another machine is
> be
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:17:54 -0500
"Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 05:11:53PM -0500, STeve Andre' wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 January 2008 03:42:38 pm Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > > I have a box that I want to keep as secure as I can but I also
> > > need to be
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:53:35 -0800
johan beisser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bitching and whining get you nothing.
When will you people stop responding to whiners like this!? He's
bitching and your just bitching back.
Leave the ignorant fool alone, and he will stop barking up your three!
It's n
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:33:57 -0600
"Tony Abernethy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nikns Siankin wrote:
> > I see people keep repeating nonsense like this
> > instead of talking about topic.
> At least he can read. And think.
Leave the troll alone, he wants someone to play with, and he got that.
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:46:43 -0700
L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Richard Stallman wrote:
> >>
> >> I hope that the other OpenBSD developers
> >> will repudiate such conduct.
>
> You said "the other openbsd developers".
>
> In this context, it implies that I am an OpenBSD developer. "The
> ot
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 20:14:27 +0100
"Jacob Grydholt Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You're missing the point why somebody is calling OpenBSD non-free.
> > Or supposedly why emacs runs on non-free.
>
> And you apparently missed the posts where the leading developers of
> OpenBSD stated that t
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 12:27:15 -0800
Kirk Ismay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rico Secada wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:06:39 -0600
> > "David Higgs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Dec 22, 2007 5:53 PM, Rico Secad
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 17:01:54 -0500
Jon Radel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rico Secada wrote:
> > Again lets ask Boing.
> >
>
> I'm fully aware that spelling flames are terribly tasteless, but the
> image of planes loaded with Ada code going boing, boing, boing
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 09:11:55 -0600
Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is a constant: your code is a bad as the developer.
I agree :-), and here is another constant:
#define strlcpy "Theo de Raadt"
>From lwn.net in 2003:
Years of buffer overflow problems have made it clear that t
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 21:11:50 +1100
"Christopher Vance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have used and taught Ada, for what that's worth. I also looked at
> Ada for writing OS kernel code, but the quality of the compilers
> forced me back to the C family.
What compilers?
> Question for the proponen
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:06:39 -0600
"David Higgs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2007 5:53 PM, Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It is my understanding that C is the hackers tool while Ada is the
> > tool of the engineer. I think it i
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 17:04:05 +0530
Girish Venkatachalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1. If security is a major concern, or perhaps The Main Concern, why
> > not use Ada? I specifically mention Ada since one of the most
> > security demanding industries are building aircrafts and they use
> > Ada.
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 15:08:05 +0100
Erik Wikstrvm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not very familiar with Ada so I do not know if it allows for the
> same kinds of low-level programming (which is necessary when writing
> an OS or code that interacts with hardware) that C does.
It does.
> Again, I
C++ over C from a security
perspective, IMO not really. C++ has some "better" ways to do some
things to prevent some of the "errors" of C, but then it has its own
problems. The language is bloated with functions, it is constantly
changing making backwards compatibility difficult, and really.. Its
just C "and then some" more crap. You cannot beautify what is
born "ugly".
Rico Secada.
dress the above mentioned issues, in
context of the e-mail from Theo, you will look hypocritical! You say
what you don't do yourself.
Best regards.
Rico Secada.
> > I see you are being your usual friendly self ;-}.
>
> Yes, and you are being the usual slimy hypocritical asshole.
I really fail to see, how a response like this serves OpenBSD or any
other good purpose at all!
If Richard Stallman is a hypocrite his answers and statements will show
this by t
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 06:21:02 +0100
Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Never mind! I found htmldoc which converts HTML into PDF very nicely.
So Docbook -> HTML ->PDF.
It does the job and without Java like FOP needs!
> Hi.
>
> Are there any tools that can be instal
Hi.
Are there any tools that can be installed using packages or ports for
converting docbook xml files into PDF?
Normally I would use FOP, but I would pref. not having to install that
from source.
Best regards.
Rico.
Hi.
I looked at the http://openbsd.org/i386.html#hardware, but ofcourse it
doesn't say anything about printers :-)
Does the OpenBSD 4.2 package of ghostscript support Brother HL1430? Is
it possible to get this printer running without having to patch
ghostscript?
Best regards.
Rico.
our interview that
the ports tree contains non-free software. It does not. It is just a
scaffold of Makefiles containing URLs, and an occasional patch here or
there.
Lets wrap this up in a nice manner.
Best and kind regards.
Rico Secada.
Hi.
I have just listed to the interview of Richard Stallman on BSDTalk:
http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/2007/10/bsdtalk132-richard-stallman.html
In the interview he states: "I am unhappy with the various
distributions of BSD, because all of them include, in their
installation systems, the ports syste
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 00:28:08 +0200
Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Rico Secada wrote:
>
> > What do you think of The BSD Certification Group at bsdcertification.org?
>
> It is as useless as MSCE and all the other vendor certificates. I would
> even go so fa
Hi
What do you think of The BSD Certification Group at bsdcertification.org?
Is this a good idea? From my perspective it looks like a smart marketing
way. A way to make money from people who think this would
help in some way.
Taking a certification doesn't prove anything imho. And the way that
is jailed even if he
> logs in manually.
>
> I have tried to find articles on this, but haven't been succesfull.
>
> Does anyone know of a good tutorial on how to do this on OpenBSD?
>
> Best and kind regards.
>
> Rico Secada.
Hi
Anyone with experience in setting up and using Gluster from GNU on OpenBSD?
Rico
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 02:35:06 +0100
"mal content" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 28/04/07, Maurice Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 23:45:51 +0200, Maurice Janssen wrote:
> > >Some progress was made in the last couple of days. First results are up
> > >at ftp:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:27:58 -0500
Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:17:16PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:30:03 -0700
> > "Ted Unangst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> &
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:38:48 +0200
Renaud Allard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rico Secada wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Before I testrun this http://paradigma.pt/~gngs/sshjail/ does anyone
> > already know if this patch would work with OpenSSH on OpenBSD > 3.9?
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:14:32 -0500
Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 09:08:31PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:27:58 -0500
> > Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > &
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:15:02 -0400
"stuart van Zee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> > Marco Peereboom
> > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 2:28 PM
> > To: Rico S
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:27:58 -0500
Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:17:16PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:30:03 -0700
> > "Ted Unangst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> &
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:44:03 +0800
"Jeffrey 'jf' Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jeffrey
> On 4/28/07, Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:30:03 -0700
> > "Ted Unangst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:54:44 -0400
"STeve Andre'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 27 April 2007 14:41:14 Steven Harms wrote:
> > That is the most ignorant statement I have ever seen.
> >
> > I guess we can assume there will be no future versions
> > of openssh because openssh developers hav
y
> thought of everything.
>
> Good luck with that attitude.
Try to understand the subject first. The guy who made the patch are not
using OpenBSD and hasn't done any testing on OpenBSD hence no benefit.
> On 4/27/07, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:30:03 -0700
"Ted Unangst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/27/07, Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:34:52 -0500
> > Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > What&
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:34:52 -0500
Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the point again?
What part didn't you understand?
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 03:13:12AM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Before I testrun this http:/
Hi
Before I testrun this http://paradigma.pt/~gngs/sshjail/ does anyone
already know if this patch would work with OpenSSH on OpenBSD > 3.9?
Best regards
Rico
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:22:05 -0700
"Darren Spruell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/23/07, Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Messages should look like:
> > >
> > > Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:33:10 +0200
Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 12:48:46AM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:05:51 +0200
> > Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:43:53 -0400
Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 12:48:46AM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:05:51 +0200
> > Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:05:51 +0200
Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:28:53PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I need some comments from you guys on using sshfs as a solution at
> > work.
> >
> > I n
Hi
I need some comments from you guys on using sshfs as a solution at work.
I need to make some of our NFS servers available for employees at their homes
(where they live). I have been looking at both IPSec together with VPN, but I
really like SSH better. At debian mailinglist I got a suggest
by CPUID; using exception 16
> fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2
> biomask fffd netmask fffd ttymask
> pctr: user-level cycle counter enabled
> mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
> wd0c: aborted command, interface CRC error reading fsbn 64 (wd0 bn 64; cn 0
> tn 1 sn 1), retrying
> wd0: transfer error, downgrading to Ultra-DMA mode 5
> wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
> wd1(pciide0:0:1): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 6
> wd0c: aborted command, interface CRC error reading fsbn 64 (wd0 bn 64; cn 0
> tn 1 sn 1), retrying
> wd0: soft error (corrected)
> dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
> dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81
> root on wd0a
> rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
> WARNING: / was not properly unmounted
> wd0: transfer error, downgrading to Ultra-DMA mode 4
> wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 4
> wd1(pciide0:0:1): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 6
> wd0a: aborted command, interface CRC error reading fsbn 96 of 96-0 (wd0 bn
> 159; cn 0 tn 2 sn 33), retrying
> wd0: transfer error, downgrading to Ultra-DMA mode 3
> wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 3
> wd1(pciide0:0:1): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 6
> wd0a: aborted command, interface CRC error reading fsbn 96 of 96-0 (wd0 bn
> 159; cn 0 tn 2 sn 33), retrying
> wd0: soft error (corrected)
> wd0: transfer error, downgrading to Ultra-DMA mode 2
> wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
> wd1(pciide0:0:1): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
> wd0a: aborted command, interface CRC error writing fsbn 16 of 16-0 (wd0 bn
> 79; cn 0 tn 1 sn 16), retrying
> wd0: soft error (corrected)
> cd0(atapiscsi0:0:0): Check Condition (error 0x70) on opcode 0x0
> SENSE KEY: Not Ready
> ASC/ASCQ: Medium Not Present
>
>
>
> # Han
>
>
--
Best and kind regards
Rico Secada
Hi all.
At work I am experiencing with setting up some distributed file system, at the
current moment working with NFS. The problem is that it is being setup at work
and people, from their homes, need to be able to mount the system.
I have no prior experience in this, except for setting up and
Hi,
I have been trying to find some information on setting up a AFS server on
OpenBSD, is it even possible?
Rico.
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:16:41 -0400
Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not to put the burning on anyone here, but if that was going to be done,
> I would love to be sure it is done properly, meaning with some guidance
> of devs to follow the same standard as the project if possible.
Any
Hi all.
"Funny" story..
At home I installed OpenBSD on some old i386 hardware years ago. Since I do a
lot of work at home I have a small homenetwork. From time to time I upgrade
hardware, and sometimes I change the disks as well, when I get some bigger ones.
Anyway, my old OpenBSD installation
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:43:56 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to all for the kind and enlightening answers. When I read that it was
mainly due to lack of people and so, and not because that it was a bad idea, I
then hope OpenBSD will keep expanding, and one day have all the resources which
tch and other solutions, but why isn't there an official
> > > OpenBSD way?
> > >
> > > Last week management decided to go back to using Debian on some of
> > > our servers
> > > due to them being easy to upgrade including kernel and basesystem
> > >
other solutions, but why isn't there an official
> > OpenBSD way?
> >
> > Last week management decided to go back to using Debian on some of
> > our servers
> > due to them being easy to upgrade including kernel and basesystem
> > upgrades.
> >
>
Hi all.
I have noticed that the OpenBSD team puts a lot of emphasis on using binary
packets rather than building from ports, which I think IMHO is good, but why is
it that there is no binary kernel updates, rather than patching the kernel from
source?
I am asking this not from a point that we
Hi,
I am brushing up a bit on my assembly language skills, I used to work on MIPS
but are now looking on x86.
I have a problem choosing between "following" a book using the (as) AT&T syntax
and another using (nasm) Intel syntax.
I know that this isn't directly OpenBSD related but I would ap
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:47:38 -0800
"Greg Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/10/07, Francisco Valladolid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have 202 days using OpenBSD 3.6 as router/firewall/ PPPOE.
> >
> > I want to share this screenshot.
> >
> > http://farm1.static.flickr.com/147/353353577_
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:48:05 -0700
Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's true. What all the people say about our mailing
> lists is exactly true. There really are about 30-40 people here who
> carry out an agenda of hate, quite successfully.
Couldn't have been said better!!
Hi
I am curently studying the Ada programming language and I read about the
different safety demands, which has been made a standard, upon compilers.
I read about how Ada is been used in all areas where safety is of great issue,
and about how it's being used in rockets, Boing Airplanes and so
Hi
I don't want to start a religios thread and I don't want general personal
opinions :-)
Why has OpenBSD developers decided to run ksh as the default shell and not for
example bash or zsh?
The question is being asked because of a debate at our datacenter about the
three shells and I would li
Hi
I would like recommendations on solutions like Plesk for OpenBSD.
The main fokus is to make it easy for people (clients) to log on to OpenBSD
servers and administer their webhotels, change FTP password and so on.
What are people, if any, on the list using?
Best and kind regards!
Rico
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:27:42 +0200
Mackan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> Is there any UTF-8-aware text editor (for terminal use) available
> for OpenBSD? Vi(m) and similar is out of question for me, I never
> learned those.
>
> I tried to compile latest nano from CVS, which support UT
Hi
I have been looking into encrypting my e-mails and was thinking about GPG
together with Sylpheed, since I am using Sylpheed.
But I am wondering is there another and "stronger" or "better" way than GPG.
Any recommendations?
Best and kind regards,
Rico
Hi
I have been thinking about encrypting some private files on my laptop, in case
it gets stolen.
I have no prior experience in this field.
I have been thinking about using "mcrypt" with blowfish, but is this a good way
to go about? Are there a better alternative? And is blowfish the best way
Don't respond to this mail. Problem got solved, a powercut and a toasted
exports file.
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:44:51 +0200
Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am having problems with one of our NFS servers at our datacenter.
>
> I have just set it u
Hi
I am having problems with one of our NFS servers at our datacenter.
I have just set it up.
I have edited /etc/rc.conf and changes the portmap and nfs_server to YES.
I have created the /var/db/mountdtab file.
I have made an entry to /etc/exports
When I reboot the machine and take a look wi
66 matches
Mail list logo
