On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:15:02 -0400
"stuart van Zee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> > Marco Peereboom
> > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 2:28 PM
> > To: Rico Secada
> > Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> > Subject: Re: SSHJail patch for OpenBSD
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:17:16PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:30:03 -0700
> > > "Ted Unangst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On 4/27/07, Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:34:52 -0500
> > > > > Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > What's the point again?
> > > > >
> > > > > What part didn't you understand?
> > > > 
> > > > why are you asking this list about somebody else's patch?  
> > > 
> > > Because I was looking for people using OpenBSD who might have 
> > issues with 
> > > this patch.
> > 
> > If this was a good idea don't you think someone who is actually involved
> > in OpenSSH code would have done this already?
> > 
> > > 
> > > > ask the somebody else if their patch works.
> > > 
> > > If I could benefit from that, I would.
> > 
> 
> I don't know if it is a good idea or not, but I read about
> this patch yesterday and at first, I was pretty excited. I
> have been handed the requirement to move an FTP server to
> "something" more secure.  All the other requirements that 
> have been given to me for this have very strongly pointed
> right to SSH/SFTP.  However, I have yet to figure out how
> to chroot users into their home folders with SFTP and that
> is unfortuneately what the boss wants.  If someone knows
> how to do this without patches like these Please let me 
> know.  Otherwise, I will have to keep looking.  I certianly
> know enough from lurking on this list to know that if there
> are this many people on the list opposed to something there
> has got to be something wrong with it and I don't want it.
> 
> No patch for me please!

Hi Stuart

I don't want to be rude, in any way, but this is no way to judge this patch, 
or any other patch for that matter. The list has a major number of readers, 
only so many actually knows what they are talking about.

A lot of good ideas has been rejected, not because the idea was bad, or 
because the patches was bad, but because of the lack of resources.

> s

Reply via email to