Re: problems with carp and vlans

about take over all interfaces with net.inet.carp.preempt=1 enabled. nevertheless, thanks a lot for all replies. > --- Urspr|ngliche Nachricht --- > Von: Marco Pfatschbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Kopie: Lars Weste <[EMAIL PR

Re: problems with carp and vlans

I am wondering whether I have to use ifstated, and to check all interfaces, or whether there is some new feature, that will do the trick. lars > --- Urspr|ngliche Nachricht --- > Von: Marco Pfatschbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: Lars Weste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Kopie: m

Re: PF/CARP load balancing

Hi, > Say the webservers are named internally 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2. Is it possible > to create two CARP interfaces, say 10.0.0.3 and 10.0.0.4, where server > 10.0.0.1 is master of CARP 10.0.0.3 and 10.0.0.2 is master of CARP 10.0.0.4. > Then, use rdr load balancing on the firewall to hit

Re: pf and pmtu discovery

Hi, sent the message with the wrong subject, therefore here again. >> with scrub in all set at the firewall, will openbsd handle icmp packets >> of type unreach code needfrag automatically, because of the statefulness? >> as far as i know, icmp packtes like port/host/network unreachable are >

Re: Keep carp interfaces in sync, WAS: problems with carp and vlans

Hi, >> with scrub in all set at the firewall, will openbsd handle icmp packets >> of type unreach code needfrag automatically, because of the statefulness? >> as far as i know, icmp packtes like port/host/network unreachable are >> allowed by the keep state statements, does this also apply for

Re: Keep carp interfaces in sync, WAS: problems with carp and vlans

Hi, >> hostname.carp2 >> !ifconfig bge0 up >> !ifconfig vlan0 create >> !ifconfig vlan0 vlan 3 vlandev bge0 up >> vhid 1 carpdev vlan0 192.168.0.1 192.168.1.255 netmask 255.255.254.0 > I use the seperate hostname.if files instead of loading raw ifconfig > commands. /etc/netstart does start physic

pf and pmtu discovery

Hi, with scrub in all set at the firewall, will openbsd handle icmp packets of type unreach code needfrag automatically, because of the statefulness? as far as i know, icmp packtes like port/host/network unreachable are allowed by the keep state statements, does this also apply for the need fra

Re: Keep carp interfaces in sync, WAS: problems with carp and vlans

> > Try a 3.9 kernel and 3.9 ifconfig binary and see what happens > i'm using 3.9-current from the snapshots right now to great effect > > Lars Weste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have some problems with carp and vlans, at least I

problems with carp and vlans

Hi, I have some problems with carp and vlans, at least I think so. I found this: http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/cvs/2005-04/0996.html so my assumption may be wrong, as I use openbsd 3.8. I have four physical interfaces in my two firewalls, one for pfsync, one to the Internet,

dhcp option 82

Hi, I do not think so, but does the openbsd dhcpd can handle dhcp requests that contain that option 82, that can be added by dhcp relays on switches to the originating dhcp request from the client. haven't found anything on that in the manual, so I want to make sure that i am right, or better w

Kernelpanic: Re: upl(4) interface not working

Hi, i had an other ethernet interface configured and the default route via the other interface. I removed this hostname.if and restarted. then i did the following: # ifconfig upl0 inet 10.200.200.1 10.200.200.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 up # route add default 10.200.200.2 # ping 10.200.200.1 PING

Re: upl(4) interface not working

Hi all, >On Wednesday 01 March 2006 21:09, Lars Weste wrote: >> I configured it on the first machine: >> ifconfig upl0 inet 10.200.200.1 10.200.200.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 up > >Wrong netmask. point-to-point links usually use 255.255.255.252 (a /30). I tried with differe

Re: upl(4) interface not working

Hi Sebastian, Henning, > --- Urspr|ngliche Nachricht --- > Von: Sebastian Schmitzdorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: misc@openbsd.org > Kopie: Lars Weste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Betreff: Re: upl(4) interface not working > Datum: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:15:07 +0100 > > I

upl(4) interface not working

Hi list, first I was happy to find this upl(4) device. after connecting it to the usb port, the device shows up as: upl0 at uhub0 port 2 upl0: Prolific Technology Inc. PL2302 Host-Host Interface, rev 1.00/0.01, addr 2 I configured it on the first machine: ifconfig upl0 inet 10.200.200.1 10.200

Ethernet via USB cable

Hi list, I am trying to setup a network between two OpenBSD 3.8 hosts via a USB interface. I wanted to use the Interface as a pfsync device. I thought it have read somewhere it is possible but cannot remember where, so when I issue a: apropos usb | grep -i ether I feel I will need a USB Etherne

Re: openbsd on irix

Hi, > > You take it out of context. > > "OpenBSD/sgi is a fully featured 64 bit port and will thus only run on > systems based on 64 bit processors, i.e. R4000 and up." > > Currently only O2s are supported which start at r5k. The port could > be enhanced to support older machines based

openbsd on irix

hi, reading http://www.openbsd.org/sgi.html, confuses a bit. at the top it is stated that the port will run at r4000 and up. at the bottom, in supported hardware, the r5000 is the smallest supported processor. Which statement is right? lars -- Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch

how to load debugging symbols into gdb

Hi, I have a problem debugging a core file of a web application server with the gdb. The application server is written in objective c, running in a GNUstep environment, the binary is compiled with debugging information and is not stripped. when I try to examine the file I load it