Maybe look at Meshcentral as an alternative to Rustdesk. It allows proxying
over https OOTB.
On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 at 19:30, Kasak wrote:
>
>
> > 3 марта 2024 г., в 00:46, Joel Wirāmu Pauling
> написал(а):
> >
> > ssh can work in tap VPN mode (ssh -w) and will tunnel
ssh can work in tap VPN mode (ssh -w) and will tunnel udp fine ; I'm not
sure what you are trying to achieve but perhaps ssh tunnels might be an
option for your use case. You are probably better off setting up something
like wireguard, but in a pinch if the target and host already have ssh.
https:
Just a personal anecdote that might be worth something.
On both my AMD chipsets motherboards ( x570/x670E Proart Wifi ) ; I was
getting microstutters and odd hangs occasionally for the last year or so,
reboots would often power off rather than power cycle - which I mostly
wrote off as odditiy with
Just be aware that if you are looking at 4k monitors ; you will be likely
be limited to 30hz refresh rate via most adaptors using DP mode over USBC.
Thunderbolt3 and 4 can do 4kp60 as can DP 1.4 - but there are various
factors involved including the adaptors SoC, your GPU/Motherboard output.
Thing
Also SFP28 ports are backwards compatible with SFP+ optics.
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 9:12 PM Joel Wirāmu Pauling
wrote:
> SFP28 (25gbit) is the way to go for density on x86 as it matches CPU
> bound bus architecture well. QSFP28 to 4*SFP28 offers the best price per
> port density
SFP28 (25gbit) is the way to go for density on x86 as it matches CPU bound
bus architecture well. QSFP28 to 4*SFP28 offers the best price per port
density both for interconnects (the DAC TwinAX 'squid' cables are cheap as
chips)
Network Stack Throughput through CPU on modern Intel x86 _64 even on
But - The thing that isn't mentioned here is basically Power Cost and
Consumption vs PPS(Packet Processing Speed).
IMNSHO running on anything that doesn't ;
A) Have passive Cooling
B) Is older than a couple of years (in intel/amd terms anything with a
TDPW above 65W)
- is probably not a great i
Hi Aaron - I have a Rangely c2xxx sitting on my desk right now. It's a
lanner rebadged as Nuage NSG-E.
This platform is able to do around 3.6gbit through it without
encryption (and around 1.3gbit total if encryption is turned on
everything). This one has 4 Intel igb 345 cards and 2 i210's - it's
d
either, so once you start
playing with VPN it get's pretty bad in comparison. (Some of the newer
arms do have AES offloads but - implementations are varied, the H3/H5
sunxi platform is where I am focused on at the moment - but not for
network stuff)
>
> On August 27, 2018 5:51 PM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
>> I do actually have an rk3399 (firefly) - like you I also had high hopes for
>> it.
ly was twice as expensive.
On 28 August 2018 at 00:15, Joseph Mayer wrote:
> On August 26, 2018 3:16 PM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
> ..
>> I have a bunch of various SBC and they all suck pretty bad for network
>> tasks. Fine for random server tasks but don't put them i
Yeah I got excited about the MachiattoBin when I first saw it - it's
possibly the first non-x86 SOHO router that can actually do 14MPPS
needed for 10G in the home.
BUT
The Copper ethernet situation is problematic, the original design
shares the PCI Bus with the SFP Slots to provide copper 10G opt
hines lack
Management Engine or SMT - which at least makes them slightly less
dire than more beefy SoC's from Chipzilla.
On 26 August 2018 at 23:00, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018-08-26, Carlos López wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 26/08/2018 11:46, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
>&g
netboot works fine. However almost all of the Arm platforms including
the Rpi3 make terrible gateways and in general l3 packet path
machines.
I have a bunch of various SBC and they all suck pretty bad for network
tasks. Fine for random server tasks but don't put them in your network
path unless yo
I would suggest bme280 sensor.
If you have a spare VGA port you can use the d2c bus as i2c and plug
directly into it with a modified VGA cable. Other wise yeah esp8266 module
+ bme280 for 5$ is going to give you the best result.
On Fri., 18 May 2018, 4:01 pm Base Pr1me, wrote:
> I roll SHT31-Ds
8 at 12:48, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Not at 150$ ... sorry will u get 10G kit let alone line rate 10G kit...
>
>
> On Fri 13 Apr 2018, 01:46 Joel Wirāmu Pauling, wrote:
>
>> Can they do 14MPPS aka 10GBIT ?
>>
>> That's what I am looking for in pretty much in anything
Can they do 14MPPS aka 10GBIT ?
That's what I am looking for in pretty much in anything I would vaguely
consider to replace the n3160's I have as my target devices at the moment.
On 13 April 2018 at 11:28, Sterling Archer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Joel Wirāmu Pau
Not that I am shitting on the e350 platform but;
a) Where are you finding 4 Gigabit port versions of the MB's with APU?
b) When I had one of these to test a few years ago they have some quite bad
Bus performance, which caused quite a lot of jitter/contension delay when
using PCI-E peripherals - wo
That sounds bang on what MIPS64 Qualcomm AR7xxx platforms can do
~400-500mbit slow path operations is pretty much peak you see with them
regardless of implementation.
-Joel
On 10 April 2018 at 20:38, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I did some brief testing on 6.1/ 6.2
> simple routing 780Mb.
You can get 4 ports j1900's for sub $100 off ali-express. If you don't
care about AES-NI they do 5gbit duplex slow path l3 forwarding just fine:
If you want AES-NI then these are the Cheapest :
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/Minisys-4-Lan-pfsense-minipc-Intel-atom-E3845-quad-core-mini-itx-mother
Agree with the j1900 experiences. The n3160's can be had for roughly
same price (2 port) variants and are a generation newer 14nm and
support AES-NI and are far more capable for mixed workloads.
On 18 December 2017 at 11:48, Oliver Marugg wrote:
> On 14 Dec 2017, at 20:24, gro...@grompf.net wrote
You can get barebone c3xxx series atom boards from Supermicro.
My personal interest is the variants that come with dual SFP+
interfaces. It's a pity that there is no thunderbolt3 on them by
default (free 10/40gbit networking).
On 3 December 2017 at 08:54, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> Do you have an
, Maksym Sheremet wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 23:46:14 +1200
> > Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
> >
> >> Run NTPd on the hypervisor and NTP client In VM. Run ntpdate at boot
> before
> >> starting NTPd on the client to ensure the stepping is not too far off
> &
That works too -
On 15 September 2017 at 21:28, Maksym Sheremet
wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 23:46:14 +1200
> Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
>
> > Run NTPd on the hypervisor and NTP client In VM. Run ntpdate at boot
> before
> > starting NTPd on the client to ensure the ste
at 03:46, Rui Ribeiro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does NTPDd supports "tinker panic 0" as the linux one?
>
> On 14 September 2017 at 12:46, Joel Wirāmu Pauling
> wrote:
>
>> Run NTPd on the hypervisor and NTP client In VM. Run ntpdate at boot
>> before
>> sta
Run NTPd on the hypervisor and NTP client In VM. Run ntpdate at boot before
starting NTPd on the client to ensure the stepping is not too far off
first.
On 14 Sep. 2017 11:35 pm, "Aaron Marcher" wrote:
Hi all,
I have a weird problem on my OpenBSD server. It is a virtualized guest
under QEMU-KVM
t?
>
> Anyhow sure that is an effective workaround if needed.
>
>
> On 2017-06-02 02:20, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
>
>> There are several ways of doing this.
>>
>> I suggest just using a bridge and adding a bunch of sub-devices into
>> it.
>>
>> On 2
If someone hasn't already mentioned it : Lanner http://www.lannerinc.com/
On 19 December 2016 at 18:08, Aaron Mason wrote:
> Thanks for some additional fleabay search terms :)
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Nick Holland
> wrote:
> > On 12/14/16 20:39, Aaron Mason wrote:
> >> All
> >>
> >>
On 15 November 2016 at 09:47, gwes wrote:
> On 11/15/2016 00:55, Joel WirÄmu Pauling wrote:
>
>> So yes, back to my original point. A Civic's blockchain, one that does not
>> rely on the integrity (or rather is resilient to) the system it runs on,
>> or
>> the security of the transmission media
So yes, back to my original point. A Civic's blockchain, one that does not
rely on the integrity (or rather is resilient to) the system it runs on, or
the security of the transmission media ; as a platform for use in civic's -
needs to exist first.
Block-chains are relatively new and we are still
You need a civic blockchain or some-such that guarantee's data integrity
and agnosticism of the platform that anyone can verify.
The interface into / mechanics once you have a blockchain which you can
issue tokens from is the simple bit.
Not sure this is relevant for this list tho.
-Joel
On 14
Pipe through uniq and you'll get what you are after.
Design intent for sort, as others point out this behaviour is documented.
On 4 November 2016 at 11:47, Christian Gruhl wrote:
> Hi minek,
>
> On 11/04/2016 04:41 PM, minek van wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > # strings /dev/arandom | grep -o '[[:pri
I've been playing with the Lanner FW7525 - It's a Nice piece of Kit. Can
be had for just under 400$ Depends on what your purposes are - but for
Firewall appliance it's pretty hard to beat at the moment.
On 12 June 2016 at 14:25, wrote:
> There's some reports of Minnowboard Max working with Open
ed()
QED.
On 18 May 2016 at 14:33, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > acme(1)
>
> Or sam(1) if you are a purist.
In New Zealand - 802.11ad VLAN's are stripped at the fibre Side of the ONT
and the Layer2 (whatever it is ) is preserved throughout the access network
to the ISP handover. If you get VLAN's (802.1q) on the customer ethernet
port side, it will be entirely entirely dependent on the service that you
âOh one other caveat; your dhcpclient MUST support dhcp-option-82 in some
situations.
On 27 April 2016 at 11:20, Joel WirÄmu Pauling wrote:
> In New Zealand - 802.11ad VLAN's are stripped at the fibre Side of the ONT
> and the Layer2 (whatever it is ) is preserved throughout the access networ
Has any one used the Melanox X3 or the Intel 720's? I ask for the vxlan
offload features, which are pretty useful if you are going the SDN way (or
potentially might do)
-Joel
On 9 April 2016 at 09:54, Kapetanakis Giannis
wrote:
> On 08/04/16 19:35, Joe Crivello wrote:
>
>> Intel X520 cards seem
You could try using Linux Binary emulation layer to connect using the cisco
vpnc client. For the old proprietary Cisco IPSec implementation:
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/slack2k11-on_compat_linux.pdf
I've recently been using softether for my personal VPN's it's on Github I
haven't tried to compi
I've had problems with Hetzner and v6 also.
When I was configuring v6 sub-subnets from the /64 they give out, on
containers, I would get the same behavior. From what I could tell because
the container bridges also use the fe80::1 link local route for the
sub-subnets hetzners next-hop would get con
It is still CDDL with all the (dis)advantages that brings; depending on your
perspective - nothing has changed in that respect.
I.e it's purely a branding relaunch from what I can see.
-Joel
patric conant wrote:
>http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/Announcement
>
>It supposed to be open-er. I didn't
Also given dns is a user of UDP by default you need to use some other tunnel
mechanism other than ssh.
-Joel
Johan Beisser wrote:
>DNS proxy uses less bandwidth on your end.
>
>There are a dozen DNS proxy services out there for media, they all
>work on the same basic principle.
>
>On Sun, Sep 1
t; --
> Cordialement,
> Loïc BLOT, expertise en systèmes UNIX, sécurité et réseaux
> Frost Sapphire Studios
>
> Le mercredi 05 décembre 2012 à 10:15 +1300, Joel Wirāmu Pauling a
> écrit :
>
>> Kia ora/hello,
>>
>> I am currently redesigning one of our border edge
Kia ora/hello,
I am currently redesigning one of our border edge Firewalls and want
to split the existing SPARC64 v215 into several DL140's in an HA -
Active/Load-balanced configuration.
The Sparc64 hasn't been without issues - and is currently running 4.9
release + some patches and is due for a
Have Soekris put out a Gbit NIC platform yet? I stopped using them because
of this reason.
-Joel
On 16 November 2012 11:02, Justin Mayes wrote:
> Check out http://soekris.com/. I have a low end one and it works great.
> Little costly though.
>
> Justin Mayes
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
As someone working for a 'Carrier' vendor - I can tell you straight
up that LSN(Large Scale) or CGN(Carrier Grad) NAT are big sell points
(i.e customers are asking for them).
Personally out of the various RFC's and schemes i've had the
displeasure of perusing for V6 to V4 access NAT64 to me seems
On 16 October 2012 19:48, David Coppa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Jay Patel wrote:
>> Hi ... i copied the libskype.so under /usr/local/purple/ but it wont
>> show up under adding account or in plugin options ...how to link this
>> library to pidgin to get access to skype.. let me
use mosh or LFTP with pget
i.e lftp -c pget -n10 sftp://someuser@someserver:somefile
mosh is a bit weirder in that it will multiplex transfers via udp
sessions... Try lftp first IMHO it is the best swiss army knife of
filetransfer utils.
-JoelW
@aenertia
46 matches
Mail list logo
