You need a civic blockchain or some-such that guarantee's data integrity and agnosticism of the platform that anyone can verify.
The interface into / mechanics once you have a blockchain which you can issue tokens from is the simple bit. Not sure this is relevant for this list tho. -Joel On 14 November 2016 at 17:52, Alan Corey <alan01...@gmail.com> wrote: > This sounds like heel-dragging to me, or they're trying to do it under > Windows or something: > https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/ > 05/17/more-than-30-states-offer-online-voting-but- > experts-warn-it-isnt-secure/ > > It seems simple to me, you use firewalls and only make the results > writeable by the process that should be writing to it, probably > nothing needs to have read access in the short term. As far as > security after the election, mount the servers in a Brinks truck or > something, it just sounds like a ludicrous excuse. > > Something like: for each election the town government mails you a > random number that's your key to vote that election. You go to a > website and put in your town, name, SSN, and the key. If somebody > steals the mail they won't have your SSN. If Russian hackers or > whoever tries to impersonate you online they won't have the key. It's > bringing those 2 pieces of information plus your name and town > together that makes it secure. Just guessing. Did I overlook anything? > > -- > Credit is the root of all evil. - AB1JX
