- Original Message
> From: Kevin Chadwick
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Tue, October 19, 2010 9:32:39 AM
> Subject: Sed error message on latest ramdisk_CD #164
>
> At the last part of the install, just after timezone entry using
> install48.iso.
>
> "(Ramdisk_CD) #164 Oct 18 17:42:33
- Original Message
> From: Stuart Henderson
> To: James Peltier
> Cc: Andre Keller ; misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Wed, September 22, 2010 12:31:43 PM
> Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs [solved]
>
>
> the "livelock" counter means a timeout wasn't reached
- Original Message
> From: Stuart Henderson
> To: James Peltier
> Cc: Andre Keller ; misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Wed, September 22, 2010 12:31:43 PM
> Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs [solved]
> > I, unfortunately, am still experiencing livelocks on my em interfa
- Original Message
> From: Stuart Henderson
> To: Andre Keller
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Wed, September 22, 2010 8:44:26 AM
> Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs [solved]
>
> On 2010/09/22 17:38, Andre Keller wrote:
> > Hi Stuart
> >
> > On 21.09.2010 01:28, schrieb Stuart Henderson:
> > >
- Original Message
> From: James Peltier
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Tue, September 21, 2010 9:51:05 AM
> Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs
>
> - Original Message
>
> > From: James Peltier
> > To: misc@openbsd.org
> > Cc: misc@openbsd.org
- Original Message
> From: James Peltier
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Tue, September 21, 2010 9:46:40 AM
> Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs
>
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Joerg Goltermann
> > To: Andre Keller
&g
- Original Message
> From: Joerg Goltermann
> To: Andre Keller
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Tue, September 21, 2010 12:21:28 AM
> Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs
>
> On 20.09.2010 19:15, Andre Keller wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > I have some odd packet loss on a openbsd based router (running -
- Original Message
> From: Andre Keller
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Cc: James Peltier
> Sent: Mon, September 20, 2010 3:51:16 PM
> Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs
>
> Am 20.09.2010 19:54, schrieb James Peltier:
> > I see you are using LACP as your trunk protocol. You
- Original Message
> From: PP;Q Q P(P8P?P8QP8P=
> To: James Peltier
> Sent:
Mon, September 20, 2010 1:40:16 PM
> Subject: Re: CARP-ed dns server ?
>
> if
you have nothing to say except RTFM, can you do everybody a favour
> and be
silent, please ?
>
&
- Original Message
> From: Andre Keller
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Mon, September 20, 2010 10:15:58 AM
> Subject: em(4) ierrs
>
> Hi
>
>
> I have some odd packet loss on a openbsd based router (running -current
> as of the beginning of september) .
>
> The router has 6 phys
- Original Message
> From: PP;Q Q P(P8P?P8QP8P=
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Mon, September 20, 2010
2:04:18 AM
> Subject: Re: CARP-ed dns server ?
>
> hello!
>
> can you
provide more details ?
>
> 1. what is dns software ?
> 2. how two copies of
dns server (on master and backup
please disregard. i found that i wasn't capturing symon/mux stats for lo0.
Since i focused too much on the physical interfaces, i overlooked the logical
ones. ;)
---
James A. Peltier james_a_pelt...@yahoo.ca
- Original Message
> From: James Peltier
> To: OpenBS
Hi All,
I'm testing trying to get symon working before putting it onto my production
server. I've created a OpenBSD-current KVM based virtual machine which has two
interfaces (pcn0 & re0). I'm now trying to get the symon pf.layout file to
create a graph similar to the right side graph located
Anyone using the Dell Latitude E6500 with the built in Broadcom wireless
adaptor? I see that marco@ mentions he owns a E6500 here
http://www.mail-archive.com/source-chan...@openbsd.org/msg04064.html
but I don't see reference to it in the bwi device or elsewhere. I'm running
-current
--
Jame
- Original Message
> From: "pet...@schwertfisch.de"
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Mon, September 13, 2010 3:11:39 PM
> Subject: aucat on OpenBSD 4.8 current exits in monitoring mode
>
> Hi,
>
> I am enjoying aucat on OpenBSD 4.8 current (snapshot from end of August),
> but sometimes
- Original Message
> From: Jason Dixon
> To: James Peltier
> Cc: OpenBSD Mail List
> Sent: Tue, September 7, 2010 4:03:09 AM
> Subject: Re: Bridge Monitoring
>
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:26:09PM -0700, James Peltier wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
>
e user. (and of course use the remaining unused bandwidth).
>
> There is another way?
>
> Thanks for the reply
> On 07/09/10 15:14, James Peltier wrote:
> > - Original Message
> >
> >
> >> From: Hermes Ojeda Ruiz
> >> To: misc@openb
- Original Message
> From: Hermes Ojeda Ruiz
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Tue, September 7, 2010 12:09:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Distribute bandwidth by IP's
>
> Sorry, if my explanation don't have enough details.
>
> - The internet connection is an E1
> - There are ~150 users (IPs)
> -
Hi All,
Now that I have my new bridge in place and happily filtering away I would like
to look at monitoring and graphing it. I'd like to setup a "monitor port"
style
so that I can send the traffic over to another box for processing.
I was thinking of installing symon on the bridge itself and
- Original Message
> From: "open...@e-solutions.re"
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Cc: Christer Solskogen
> Sent: Fri, August 13, 2010 12:41:36 AM
> Subject: Re: MTA choice
>
> I only want to know what is better (easiest way, most secure) to use.
> And have your advice.
>
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2
- Original Message
> From: Daniel Melameth
> To: OpenBSD Mail List
> Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 12:42:13 PM
> Subject: Re: OpenBSD performance numbers
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:12 PM, James Peltier
> wrote:
> > Hello fellow OpenBSD'ers.
> >
- Original Message
> From: Christiano F. Haesbaert
> To: James Peltier
> Cc: OpenBSD Mail List
> Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 12:29:48 PM
> Subject: Re: OpenBSD performance numbers
>
> Could you perform the same test using tcpbench between two openbsd boxes ?
- Original Message
> From: Robert
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 12:18:24 PM
> Subject: Re: OpenBSD performance numbers
>
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
> James Peltier wrote:
> > I would just like to share some informati
Hello fellow OpenBSD'ers.
I would just like to share some information with the list about our new
firewall/bridge and perhaps get some input as to where I might be able to look
to squeeze some additional performance improvements. I must say though, I am
very impressed with the performance impr
- Original Message
> From: Jason Dixon
> To: C. Bensend
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Tue, August 10, 2010 12:58:50 PM
> Subject: Re: which monitoring do you use (on OpenBSD)
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:41:26PM -0500, C. Bensend wrote:
> > > nagios is shit. misdesigned, horrible c
- Original Message
> From: Henning Brauer
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 3:32:01 AM
> Subject: Re: CARP technical paper
>
> * Steven Moncayo [2010-07-29 08:30]:
> > My request goes for a tech paper with specifications for the CARP protocol,
> > just like a RFC. I G
Ouch. I like IRIX. ex-SGI employee 43951. :)
---
James A. Peltier james_a_pelt...@yahoo.ca
- Original Message
> From: Theo de Raadt
> To: Jan Stary
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 2:40:37 PM
> Subject: Re: traffic management
>
> > > Hello Misc,
> >
> > Are t
I'm trying to configure OpenBSD with trunking using LACP but I can't
seem to get it to work correctly. I have an HP Procurve 5304XL connected to a
Dell 1750 with an Intel PRO/1000MT QP (82546EB). I am unable to get trunking
and LACP to work together for some reason. Any help would be greatly
--- On Tue, 2/16/10, Corey wrote:
> From: Corey
> Subject: VLANs and security (was:network performance
problems)
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Received: Tuesday, February 16, 2010, 8:54
PM
> >>I did put all interfaces
> (in,out,pfsync,management) through VLANs in
msk0
>
> Throwing out a topic for di
--- On Thu, 2/11/10, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> From: Claudio Jeker
> Subject: Re: routing and pf at 10Gbps
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Received: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 5:24 PM
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 03:07:28PM
> -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> > On 2/11/10 2:46 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > >d
--- On Sat, 2/6/10, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> From:
Predrag Punosevac
> Subject: Re: Building a
High-performance Computing Cluster Using OpenBSD
> To: misc@openbsd.org,
list-...@designtools.org
> Received: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 10:56 AM
>
"J.C. Roberts"
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 05 Feb 201
--- On Sat, 2/6/10, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
>
From: Kenneth R Westerback
> Subject: Re: Download
rate and sysctl settings
> To: "Sebastiano Pomata"
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Received: Saturday,
February 6, 2010, 11:33 AM
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 04:09:08PM
> +0100,
Sebastiano Pomata wrote:
--- On Sat, 2/6/10, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> From:
Claudio Jeker
> Subject: Re: Download rate and
sysctl settings
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Received: Saturday, February 6, 2010,
9:12 AM
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 01:27:12PM
> +0100, Sebastiano Pomata wrote:
> > Il 06/02/10 03:55, Stuart Henderson ha
--- On Sat, 2/6/10, Daniel Dickman wrote:
> From: Daniel Dickman
> Subject: Re: Building a High-performance Computing Cluster Using OpenBSD
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Cc: punoseva...@gmail.com
> Received: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 1:01 AM
> > Could anybody kindly point me to
> any literature reg
--- On Tue, 2/2/10, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> all the cool kids are going:
>
> match out on vlan301 nat-to vlan301 received-on vlan303
>
>
I just got around to testing this rule and it didn't work for me as I would
have expected. The output of pfctl -nv -f /etc/pf.conf expanded to the inet6
--- On Tue, 2/2/10, Lars Nooden wrote:
> From: Lars
Nooden
> Subject: Re: pf and apache: to stop a
scripter
> To:
> Cc: "Jacob Yocom-Piatt" , "OpenBSD
general usage list"
> Received: Tuesday, February 2, 2010,
6:58 AM
> > Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> >> there is a website protected by pf
and run
--- On Tue, 2/2/10, David Gwynne wrote:
> > match out on
vlan301 from vlan303:network nat-to
> vlan301
>
> all the cool kids are
going:
>
> match out on vlan301 nat-to vlan301 received-on vlan303
>
>
You've got to be kidding me. This makes me all giddy inside! Woot! Woot!
---
James A. Peltie
--- On Mon, 2/1/10, Scott Learmonth wrote:
> From:
Scott Learmonth
> Subject: Re: -CURRENT, VLANs, NAT
>
To: misc@openbsd.org
> Received: Monday, February 1, 2010, 10:04 PM
> On Mon,
Feb 01, 2010 at 06:02:07PM
> -0800, Scott Learmonth wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 01,
2010 at
--- On Mon, 2/1/10, James Peltier wrote:
> From:
James Peltier
> Subject: -CURRENT, VLANs, NAT
> To:
"OpenBSD Mail List"
> Received: Monday, February 1, 2010,
7:27 PM
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to setup a new router/firewall for multiple
> VLANs including
Hi All,
I'm trying to setup a new router/firewall for multiple VLANs including one VLAN
that must be NAT and I seem to be running into an odd issue.
OS is OpenBSD 4.7-BETA; Jan 27, 2010 snapshot from ftp.openbsd.org
/etc/hostname.em0
--
up
/etc/hostname.em0
--
u
--- On Thu, 1/14/10, Jean-Francois wrote:
> From: Jean-Francois
> Subject: Re: Maximizing File/Network I/O
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Received: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 12:53 PM
> Le mardi 05 janvier 2010 09:04:53,
> nixlists a icrit :
> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Bret S. Lambert
> wrot
--- On Thu, 1/14/10, Graeme Lee wrote:
>
> Check that
you are not tagging the incoming traffic as vlan
> 301. The ports need to be
in trunk mode.
>
It so funny that you should mention this, yesterday we had
a 7 hour outage due to our Cisco 6506 failing to route anything on our
network. It too
--- On Thu, 1/14/10, Graeme Lee wrote:
> From: Graeme Lee
> Subject: Re: VLANs, OpenBSD, Cisco HP
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Received: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 3:27 AM
> > inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.0 NONE vlan 301 vlandev em0
> description "Uplink"
> Like this:
>
> # cat /etc/hostname.vlan0
>
--- On Thu, 1/14/10, James Peltier wrote:
> /etc/hostname.vlan301
> --
> inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.0 NONE vlandev em0 description
> "Uplink"
Please note that I've typed this wrong and it actually has
inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.0 NONE vlan 301 vlandev em
Hi have an OpenBSD -current installation as of today that I'm trying to get
VLANs working on. I have an link from a Cisco 6506 (interface 5/8) to a HP
ProCurve 5408XL port B4. The Cisco port 5/8 is configured to the following
set trunk 5/8 on dot1q vlan 301
on the HP ProCurve I have added the
--- On Wed, 11/18/09, Bryan wrote:
> From: Bryan
> Subject: OT: Have you hugged your local OpenBSD dev lately?
> To: "Misc OpenBSD"
> Received: Wednesday, November 18, 2009, 7:05 PM
> So glad we don't have these kinds of
> issues...
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534047
>
>
--- On Thu, 11/12/09, Brent Jones wrote:
> From: Brent Jones
> Subject: Relayd relayctl reload error on 4.6
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Received: Thursday, November 12, 2009, 6:55 PM
> It seems the 'relayctl' command
> returns an error code when used on
> several systems of mine (all i386 4.6)
>
>
--- On Tue, 9/22/09, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> From: Gregory Edigarov
> Subject: Simpliest issue tracking software?
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Received: Tuesday, September 22, 2009, 5:09 AM
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am looking for an advice of which issue tracking system
> to use for a
> small team
http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/index.html
---
James A. Peltier james_a_pelt...@yahoo.ca
--- On Fri, 9/4/09, Sha'ul wrote:
> From: Sha'ul
> Subject: router/firewall
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Received: Friday, September 4, 2009, 4:33 AM
> Where can I find some information or
> some sort of guide
--- On Thu, 5/7/09, Vivek Ayer wrote:
> From: Vivek Ayer
> Subject: Recommendation for Beowulf/Apache Setup
> To: "misc"
> Received: Thursday, May 7, 2009, 12:36 PM
> Hey guys,
>
> This is a very general question, but I'm sure not exactly
> sure how to
> proceed. I'll be getting a lot of hardw
There was mention of calomel.org recently. This is a great resource, however,
it needs to be a bit more updated. For example the following page advises
*not* to use the GENERIC.MP kernel, however, considering how much work has
gone into the MP work and fact that MP will become default I think it
--- On Thu, 4/23/09, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> From: Thomas
Pfaff
> Subject: Problem with slow disk I/O
> To:
misc@openbsd.org
> Received: Thursday, April 23, 2009, 9:27 AM
> I'm getting
horrible disk performance
> compared to Ubuntu on my system.
>
> I noticed
this when extracting ports.tar.gz on
--- On Wed, 4/22/09, James Records wrote:
> From: James Records
> Subject: Re: OpenBSD relayd and public addresses
> To: "FRLinux"
> Cc: "James Peltier" , misc@openbsd.org
> Received: Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 1:25 PM
> Just curious, does this work
--- On Tue, 4/21/09, FRLinux wrote:
> From: FRLinux
> Subject: Re: OpenBSD relayd and public addresses
> To: "James Peltier"
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Received: Tuesday, April 21, 2009, 6:20 PM
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:32 PM,
> James Peltier
> wrote:
>
I hate it when I have to reply to my own e-mail. I was able to get it to work
and it was due to syntax. I've now gotten it working and am very excited at
the possibilities.
---
James A. Peltier james_a_pelt...@yahoo.ca
---
On Tue, 4/21/09, James Peltier wrote:
> From:
James
Hi All,
I'm trying to setup an OpenBSD HTTP load balancer and am failing miserably. I
think this is because I am trying to setup a load balancer that uses public IP
addresses for all the hosts including the load balancer which is not supported.
Is this true? Can I not use public IP addresses
Hi All,
I'm looking at replacing a Cisco 6506 with an OpenBSD machine serving a
university network. The current Cisco setup is basically providing routing and
VLAN trunks to our HP ProCurve switches with some basic firewall services. I'd
like to look at replacing it with an OpenBSD based solu
http://xkcd.com/378/
---
James A. Peltier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.site-fx.net
--- On Wed, 5/7/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Editing C with...
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Received: Wedne
58 matches
Mail list logo
