Or maybe
ps | grep [a]uthmail
Em ter, 25 de jun de 2019 às 14:42, Chris Bennett <
cpb_m...@bennettconstruction.us> escreveu:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 02:14:12PM -0400, Jacob Adams wrote:
> >
> > rukey# ps | grep authmail
> > 17035 p0 Ip 0:00.01 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/authmail
> > 25162
Hi,
I had this pf rules
int_if = "trunk1"
cosmo = 172.16.99.249
pass in on $int_if from to ! route-to $cosmo@$int_if
However, when I issue a pfctl -sr, I get
pass in on trunk1 inet from to ! flags S/SA route-to
172.16.99.249@$int_if
Shouldn't this @$int_if be translated to trunk1 ?
Is th
2012 at 4:33 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere
wrote:
> Le Thu, 1 Nov 2012 13:28:18 -0200,
> Fernando Braga a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> > pass in on $int_if from to ! route-to
> > $cosmo@$int_if
> >
> > However, when I issue a pfctl -sr, I get
> >
> > pass i
Hi,
I had this pf rules
int_if = "trunk1"
cosmo = 172.16.99.249
pass in on $int_if from to ! route-to $cosmo@$int_if
However, when I issue a pfctl -sr, I get
pass in on trunk1 inet from to ! flags S/SA route-to
172.16.99.249@$int_if
Shouldn't this @$int_if be translated to trunk1 ?
Is th
Hi,
I'm having trouble pinpointing this problem.
We got two CARPed OpenBSD boxes running for a very long time now, and I've
been updating the machines up to 4.6. The last time we had hardware
maintenance was over a year ago.
One of them, zeca, crashed suddenly while it was the CARP master. Every
Hello,
I'm setting up some queue discipline on one firewall, and I'm facing a
strange problem: the rules aren't assigning the packets to the correct
queue. As you can see below, they are going to inexistent qids, and
are ending in default queues.
I use this setup with assymetrical links, and it h
Hi,
Since I've upgraded to OpenBSD 4.4, I'm noticing authpf is leaving
some cruft behind. See:
cosmo:1763:$ w
4:13AM up 34 days, 18:38, 3 users, load averages: 0.25, 0.26, 0.25
USERTTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT
f_polo p0 a.b.d.f24Nov0811days -authpf: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
f_nels
tid 2: input=3, output=0, feature=0
uhid1 at uhidev3 reportid 3: input=1, output=0, feature=0
dkcsum: sd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
root on sd0a swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
bnx1: address 00:19:b9:eb:75:d1
brgphy0 at bnx1 phy 1: BCM5708C 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 6
bnx0: address 00:19:b9:eb:
e interrupts are around 33%
> on a amd64 2.2GHz.
>
> --
> Calomel @ http://calomel.org
> Open Source Research and Reference
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:05:54PM -0300, Fernando Braga wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I've setup a bridge over a 200Mb link, a
Hi,
I've setup a bridge over a 200Mb link, and everytime I turn ALTQ on,
top shows interrupts at 99.2%. If I flush queue (pfctl -Fq), interrupt
usage drop to 35% instantly. I've also noticed that only cpu0 is able
to handle interrupts.
Is there a way to minimize interrupts usage in this configura
On 10/15/07, Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2007/10/15, Fernando Braga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I'm failing to use vic(4) driver on ESX 3.0.2 and OpenBSD 4.2. I've
> > configuredethernet0.virtualDev = "vmxnet&q
Hi,
I'm failing to use vic(4) driver on ESX 3.0.2 and OpenBSD 4.2. I've
configuredethernet0.virtualDev = "vmxnet" as instructed on
vic(4) man page.
dmesg follows:
OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #1: Fri Oct 12 16:00:29 BRT 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0:
Hi,
I'm having a bit of trouble using kern.watchdog.period. Every time I
set it, my DELL 1850 turns off.
In two different SSH sessions, I did the following:
cefeu:2642:$ sysctl kern.watchdog
kern.watchdog.period=0
kern.watchdog.auto=1
cefeu:2644:$ sudo sysctl kern.watchdog.period=300
kern.watch
Hi,
We've got OpenBSD running as firewall and router for a 100Mbps connection.
Our internal network is working OK.
However, when someone from outside tries to reach one of our servers,
there is a delay and the initial packets get lost. For example:
$ sleep 20 && ping -c 10 2.4.1.2 ; sleep 1 ; p
On 6/9/06, Fernando Braga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, when booting OpenBSD, OpenBoot returns me this:
Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/SUNW,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:a File and args:
Boot load failed.
The file just loaded do
On 6/9/06, Miod Vallat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/SUNW,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:a File and args:
> Boot load failed.
> The file just loaded does not appear to be executable
>
> I didn't had this problem booting
Hi,
I came across an old Ultra5 SUN, and decided to install OpenBSD 3.9 on it.
I managed how to install, and everything seemed to work.
However, when booting OpenBSD, OpenBoot returns me this:
Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/SUNW,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL
On 5/16/06, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
and also, please try newer code.
Yes, it is running with -current:
OpenBSD 3.9-current (GENERIC) #741: Sun May 14 23:14:16 MDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: AMD Duron(tm) Processor ("AuthenticAMD" 686
On 5/16/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which
had a name of dmesg.GENERIC]
>
> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which
had a name of dmesg.RAMDISK]
You might want to post
Hi,
I just upgraded my firewall to OpenBSD 3.9, and it crashes upon boot.
However, RAMDISK kernel doesn't crash. I'm attaching DMESG for GENERIC-3.8,
RAMDISK-3.9, and GENERIC-3.9 (at least what comes at screen).
TIA,
Fernando
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream
On 12/16/05, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Every attempt to access any host on the Internet gets to gwA
> > int_wireless, but doesn't goes out on ext_if. gwB can't even ping gwA
> > external address 1.2.3.2.
>
> I assume gwA and gwB can ping each other on the internal interface,
On 12/16/05, Bryan Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> traceroute is your friend. I'm sure you've tried it, just didn't post
> the results?
It doesn't show any hop. Like ping, we only see packets coming into
wireless interface of gwA, and they don't ever come out of it.
--
Fernando M. Braga
Hi,
I'm facing an unusual problem with routing. I can access an internal
server (with real IP) thru an OpenBSD gateway (gwA). Everything works
when connection is initiated from the Internet. But gwB can't make its
way back to the Internet.
Every attempt to access any host on the Internet gets to
On 5/31/05, Anderson Nadal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have 2 Dell 1850 running OpenBSD 3.7 whith this controllers.
> In the 3.6 the raid controller does not work, but in the 3.7 the
> support for this raid controller is very nice.
I wonder if any of you tried Jun 3rd snapshots on these ser
Hi,
I run two squid servers and their main process keeps crashing every
time data size tries to go over 1GB.
Looking vmparam.h, I see maximum data size for a process is limited to 1GB.
As these servers came with 4GB RAM (and I really need this memory),
I'd like to know if it is possible to raise
25 matches
Mail list logo