Got approached by a head hunter.
If anyone in the community is interested and read it as is, I am just copy
pasting, and I know NOTHING about this job or the head hunter that sent me
the bellow email:
Hii There!
Greetings of the day!!
I found your resume from one of the job portal and just
t I can see - is
> solvable.
>
> One resource I know of for vmx syntax is http://sanbarrow.com/vmx.html.
>
> -Adam
>
>
>
>
> On August 19, 2014 8:18:32 PM CDT, Dan Shechter wrote:
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> I do mean about re-arrange them. Or to be mo
Thanks.
I do mean about re-arrange them. Or to be more precise, to make the
aligned to what is configured in VMWare's vmx file.
Do you think its not possible?
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Adam Thompson wrote:
> On 14-08-19 06:48 PM, Dan Shechter wrote:
>>
>> I am insta
Hi All.
I am installing amd64 snapshot from aug 8 on vmware workstation.
This VM has 5 interfaces.
I have changed them all to use vmxnet3 NIC.
vmx0 on openbsd is not ethernet0 in vmware, so are all other interfaces.
Any idea how to match the VMware's ethernet NIC order to OpenBSD's NIC's order
Hi All,
Running OpenBSD in VMWare workstation 10.
OpenBSD 5.4 amd64 do not recognize VMXNET3, but it does recognize VMXNET:
"VMware Virtual VMXNET3" rev 0x01 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 not configured
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks,
Dan
OpenBSD 5.4 (GENERIC.MP) #41: Tue Jul 30 15:30:02 MDT 2
Slightly OT:
Set aside LACP, which is just there to establish the trunk and got
nothing to do with the actual packet forwarding on the trunk, Brocade
has a technology that should be able to load balance a single TCP
session on all the trunk links
http://community.brocade.com/community/blogs/data_
You can't filter OSPF routes inside an area. It will break the OSPF
shortest path tree.
I don't know about ospfd, but on Cisco IOS you can filter routes
(LSAs) between areas and you can also prevent prefixes from being
inserted to the routing table of the router where the filtering
commands are en
P/UDP checksum reduce the latency?
Best regards,
Dan
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 11 February 2013 12:53, Dan Shechter wrote:
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Are there any other tips to reduce latency?
>>
>
> Using pcap means copying packets, so I'
Thanks,
Are there any other tips to reduce latency?
Best regards,
Dan
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 11 February 2013 12:19, Dan Shechter wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have a very latency sensitive application. I need to move packets
>> fr
Hi All,
I have a very latency sensitive application. I need to move packets
from one interface to another
I am using a quad 1000/pro Intel NIC. pcidump shows 82571EB
My latency sensitive application reads packets from one em interface
using libpcap and sends packet to another em interface using
My product, which is a networking virtual appliance, is running on ESXi
without any problems.
I ran it as 32 bit since I also run the product on an HW appliance which do
not run 64bit.
Best regards,
Dan
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Bogdan Andu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A few questions related to
I have never tried trunk on OBSD, and maybe I am miss reading the
manual, but even with failover mode you should be careful from having
a link connected to a switch which it's uplinks are disconnected from
the core.
Broadcom and Intel usually provide NIC teaming drivers for
Linux/Windows which pro
You have all failed to mention that the ALIX devices come with Swiss
chocolates in the package!
Best regards,
Dan
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:36 AM, James Shupe wrote:
> On 1/3/2013 8:26 PM, Aaron Mason wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:52 AM, James Shupe wrote:
>>> On 1/3/2013 1:08 PM, Gene wro
: maximum SINGLE CORE "turbo" speed. Disable the other cores,
> they're not helping you at all; in theory you want the biggest,
> fastest cache possible, but perhaps not necessary depending on how much
> software you're running.
>
> - Fast RAM might help, but
at 7:36 PM, Johan Beisser wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Dan Shechter wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> A windows 2008 server is receiving TCP traffic from a stock exchange
>> and sends it, almost as is, using UDP multicast to automated high
>> frequancy t
When I was saying money is not a problem, it was related to server
component costs... :)
Best regards,
Dan
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Ariel Burbaickij
wrote:
> I know that you have an impression I am getting caustic :-) but these
> ideas are pretty obvious once money is not a problem fiel
Hi All,
A windows 2008 server is receiving TCP traffic from a stock exchange
and sends it, almost as is, using UDP multicast to automated high
frequancy traders.
StockExchange --TCP---> windows2008 ---MCAST-UDP>
On average, the time it take to do the TCP to UDP translation, using
winsock, i
>From my experience with high speed rs232 on Cisco devices it doesn't
work too well, and very dependent on distance and cable type.
19200 was always safe and fast enough for _my_ use.
BTW, 192600 is not a "standard" speed.
HTH,
Dan #13685 (RS/Sec/SP)
The CCIE troubleshooting blog: http://dans-n
Hi David,
Do you see high CPU during transfer?
If you you don't see high CPU, it _could_ be related to round trip
time and window size.
HTH,
Bring order to your Private VLAN network: http://marathon-networks.com
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:58 AM, David Diggles wrote:
>
> encryption. :-/
>
> An
Have anyone who also ordered the SSH book got their pre-orders ?
Best regards,
Dan
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:56 AM, wrote:
>
> Just received OpenBSD 5.1 CDs in Auckland, New Zealand.
> Many thanks to everyone who put their time and efforts into such a nice
> operating system!
>
> Regards,
> Al
Hi, Sorry for the newbe question, but what is wrong with what he is doing?
Best regards,
Dan
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Apr 01 21:30:58, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> > After a long long time. Sigh.
>
> Please stop spreading this. All it does is give wrong
> instruc
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Dan Shechter wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I have noticed something regarding routing, and I want to make sure its
> the expected behavior.
>
> Lets say I have interface em0 with IP 10.1.1.10/24 and a default route of
> 10.1.1.1, then I change e
Hi All.
I have noticed something regarding routing, and I want to make sure its the
expected behavior.
Lets say I have interface em0 with IP 10.1.1.10/24 and a default route of
10.1.1.1, then I change em0 IP to 10.1.1.10/31 then change it back to
10.1.1.10/24.
I have noticed that my OBSD 5.0 d
Hi All,
Sorry about the OT.
In x86 I know (or think I know) that the idle loop is implemented with
the HALT command. I could not find any HALT command in MIPS assembly.
I tried to read the idle loop in MIPS asm, but as I don't know mips
assembly I could not follow the logic in it.
And fi
24 matches
Mail list logo