Yes, this works with ppp mode, nevertheless this modem has a newer
interface cdce0 that's not recognized with this modification. Original
kernel recognize this but not the cuau interfaces, therefore it's useless.
On May 5, 2015 6:27 AM, "Martin Pieuchot" wrote:
> On 02/05/15(Sat) 12:23, Cristián
Model is MU609
On May 5, 2015 6:27 AM, "Martin Pieuchot" wrote:
> On 02/05/15(Sat) 12:23, Cristián Edwards wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In order for OpenBSD 5.7 to recognize a Huawei 609 mini PCIe Modem , I
> did
> > these kernel modifications:
> >
> > Added to usbdevs this line:
> >
> > product HU
Hello,
In order for OpenBSD 5.7 to recognize a Huawei 609 mini PCIe Modem , I did
these kernel modifications:
Added to usbdevs this line:
product HUAWEI MU6090x1573 HUAWEI MU 609
# make usbdevs.h
Then added to umsm.c this line:
{{ USB_VENDOR_HUAWEI, USB_PRODUCT_HUAWEI_MU
Hello,
I've noticed that there is no support for MU609, it would be great if a
nice developer could add support for this card.
Dmesg:
https://gist.github.com/crised/21ac828798fa45d855bf
Lsusb descriptor:
https://gist.github.com/crised/a090e8adb342cbc03314
Linux driver:
http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~ba
Problem is that only the ugen driver is present... so I think there is no
chance of speaking with the modem.
Will read the link thoruoughly
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Zé Loff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:34:12PM -0300, Cristián Edwards wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > How to configure c
On older modems a configuration with these similar values worked properly:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man4/umsm.4?query=umsm
&sec=4
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Fred wrote:
> On 04/29/15 16:34, Cristián Edwards wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> How to configure cdce0 devi
Hello,
How to configure cdce0 device in OpenBSD?
Dmesg:
cdce0 at uhub1 port 1 configuration 2 interface 0 "Huawei Technologies
HUAWEI Mobile" rev 2.00/0.00 addr 2 cdce0: address 00:a0:c6:60:85:70
ugen0 at uhub1 port 1 configuration 2 "Huawei Technologies HUAWEI Mobile"
rev 2.00/0.00 addr 2
cdce0
Hello,
If I want to introduce URL Blacklist to my edge firewall, Should I use
SquidGuard or just pf tables?
The amount of domains is in the number of millions, like 1.5 million
entries.
Blacklists that I've found:
http://www.squidguard.org/blacklists.html
In Addition, I *believe* PF only handle
Hello,
I have a umsm modem, that connects to the internet with pppd, need to
always dial up the connection on boot.
Added a simple hostname.if, like this:
# cat /etc/hostname.ppp0
dhcp
!pppd call ac875
This approach does work, but it feels weird because it does not really uses
dhcp. Also I ge
9 matches
Mail list logo
