Re: carp: packet too short 40 on carp0

2006-07-21 Thread Alex Strawman
]> wrote: On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:50:04PM +1000, Alex Strawman wrote: > I'm experiencing some weird carp issues - it is working ok, however my > logs are being filled with this: > > the systems are in an environment with ciscowned vrrp traffic - is > that the cause?

carp: packet too short 40 on carp0

2006-07-20 Thread Alex Strawman
I'm experiencing some weird carp issues - it is working ok, however my logs are being filled with this: the systems are in an environment with ciscowned vrrp traffic - is that the cause? # tail -f /var/log/messages Jul 21 09:46:36 fw1 /bsd: carp: packet too short 40 on carp0 Jul 21 09:46:36 fw1

Re: carp + no ip address on iface (only master can receive acks)

2005-11-17 Thread Alex Strawman
> Traffic shouldn't even be getting OUT on the backup in this situation. i agree - there is no correct solution without using an ip addr for each real interface. would be nice to for example use an external ntp server to sync with, but unless it uses another route (rather than ip-less carp'd inte

carp + no ip address on iface (only master can receive acks)

2005-11-16 Thread Alex Strawman
one small problem with carp and ip-less interfaces.. scenario: you have no ip address bound to each of the real interfaces, and carp is sharing the one address for you (isp only gives you 1 address). only the master can craft packets out (assuming this shared carp'ed address is the external). ok