Hi,
in dhcpd.c we have:
if (is_udpsock && packet->packet_type != DHCPINFORM) {
log_info("Unable to handle a DHCP message type=%d on UDP "
"socket", packet->packet_type);
return;
}
Why do we not want to process normal dhcp messages like discover
On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 06:42:18 p.m. GMT+9, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
On 2022-10-19, All wrote:
> Hi,
> Thank you for a quick reply! That is a bit sad that we only have coldStart,
> but I udnerstand.
> It would be great to have traps for CPU/temperature threshold breaches for
Sorry about that.Was trying to keep all lines short.
>Are the tables also used or did you add the persist keyword to them?
>If not the optimiser will remove them and empty snmp tables will return
>the noSuchObject exception.
Hmm, I have about 15 tables, some are empty some have 20,000 IP addresses
Hi,
I wanted to ask about two things related to MIBs.
1) I noticed that in OPENBSD-PF-MIB.txt we have entries like pfTblAddrTblIndex
pfTblAddrTblIndex OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (1..2147483647)
MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
Hi,
Thank you for a quick reply! That is a bit sad that we only have coldStart, but
I udnerstand.
It would be great to have traps for CPU/temperature threshold breaches for
general stuff and addition (especially) as well as deletion of IP addresses
from a given table.
On Wednesday, October
Hi,
Does anyone know where I can find the list of snmp traps that are supported by
OpenBSD?
7;d be happy to provide more
information if necessary.
Thanks,
Alec
What, you mean OpenBSD hasn't been superseded by MenuetOS yet?
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:50 AM, jirib wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:20:19 +0800
> igor denisov wrote:
>
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I installed avr-binutils and tried to use it on some code and
>> something strange happened. When I tri
The English language is dead.
Long live Logban[1]
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logban
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Daniel Villarreal
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Tomas Bodzar
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>> > I wo
I heard that the Government built a backdoor into every OpenBSD distro
giving them remote root access to any machine
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
wrote:
> On 14 September 2011 02:38, lancebaynes87 wrote:
>> Recently hacked sites..:
>>
>>
>> http://www.linuxfoundation.
What's the project?
I know about ~1000 open-source projects, so if you tell me the task it
solves, I can give you a couple of open-source projects which
implement the required feature-set.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> somebody actually wrote their own open source rep
Sounds like fun.
Here's what you're looking for:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diameter_%28protocol%29
Open-source implementation: http://diameter.sourceforge.net/
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Matt S wrote:
> I don't know how adventurous you feel, but as long as the the old gear
> supports L
Precisely.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Peter Hessler wrote:
> On 2011 Sep 07 (Wed) at 09:35:14 -0500 (-0500), Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> :> Just like every single Firefox running on OpenBSD/amd64
> :>
> :> On 2011 Sep 07 (Wed) at 23:37:18 +1000 (+1000), Alec Taylor wr
Personally I'm using the Nightly builds (version 9). They're great
because they're available in native 64-bit.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>> Without having an endless crab session about Firefox, I'd like to
>> know if Firefox 6 seems any better for you. Firefox 4+ se
ne of the largest banks in
the country.
Thanks for all suggestions+advice,
Alec Taylor
I just tried to contact Intel about the Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG
firmware, but my email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the suggested
contact in iwi(4)) bounced because it's now invalid. Does anyone know
the new official contact point?
(Please cc me on replies; I am not subscribed)
Bernd Schoeller on 2006-02-16 10:22:00 +0100:
> If I use supersede (in dhclient.conf) or dhclient.conf.tail, this work
> fine, but the information gathered by dhclient is lost.
You want 'prepend'.
Giancarlo Razzolini on 2006-02-15 10:09:50 -0200:
> I do had some rules using the time patch in the iptables, and they
> worked well. Now that i migrated to openbsd, i want to do the same. I
> will have to use cron and anchors, as someone suggested once ago, or
> someone already implemented or ma
Nuzaihan Kamalluddin on 2005-08-13 23:51:02 +0800:
> I've tried googling but with little success, I am trying to use
> virtual terminals (console), but I could get ctrl+alt+f1 to
> work. From what I see in the dmesg, it detects those keys such as F1
> as a device for brightness and sound volume.
Dave Feustel on 2005-06-13 17:59:14 -0500:
> > What about OpenOffice on OpenBSD? *ducks*
>
> It's too big for me to even try to port.
I've never tried it under Linux emulation, but you might want to give
that a go. In my experience, OpenOffice can open some spreadsheets
Gnumeric can't. Try the
On Jun 11, 2005, at 4:47 PM, Alec Berryman wrote:
>
> >Rob Foster on 2005-06-11 16:49:09 -0400:
> >
> >
> >>I've been searching google if the OpenBSD kernel can boot off CCD. Is
> >>this supported?
> >>
> >>My requirements for settin
Rob Foster on 2005-06-11 16:49:09 -0400:
> I've been searching google if the OpenBSD kernel can boot off CCD. Is
> this supported?
>
> My requirements for setting up any new servers are that they have
> fault tolerant disks. In this case, there is no option for hardware
> RAID because it's a blad
smith on 2005-06-02 18:20:07 -0700:
> Has any one configured Zope with Apache with chroot?
I highly doubt that having Apache in a chroot or not will make a
difference; generally Apache is used to proxy requests with
mod_rewrite and mod_proxy. The Zope site (and the Plone site) have a
several exa
Jo?o Salvatti on 2005-05-20 10:24:58 -0300:
> As the OpenBSD 3.7 was released, I've got some doubts about the OpenBSD
> releases.
I highly suggest you read the FAQ - http://cvs.openbsd.org/faq/
> Do the OpenBSD 3.6 packages run under OpenBSD 3.7?
No.
> Is the kernel different one another?
Yes
Mikhail Malamud on 2005-05-13 18:12:29 -0700:
> 1. Will such server significantly benefit from
> multiple processors where most applications are not
> threaded but rather separate processes (vmware
> images)?
If you are running multiple VMWare instances simultaneously as
separate processes, you w
25 matches
Mail list logo
