On 2022-07-13 17:23 -06, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> Christer Solskogen wrote:
>
>> This happens every time with dhcpleased and my ISP and it didn't with
>> dhclient, and what I do see now, that I didn't see with dhclient,
>> is that during the negotiation ifconfig says that the interface has
>> "st
Christer Solskogen wrote:
> This happens every time with dhcpleased and my ISP and it didn't with
> dhclient, and what I do see now, that I didn't see with dhclient,
> is that during the negotiation ifconfig says that the interface has
> "status: no carrier" for 2-3 seconds. Which explains why I
On 7/13/22 1:11 PM, Vincent Legoll wrote:
Hello,
I was trying to autoinstall OpenBSD 7.1 on a VM when I stumbled upon
something unexpected (to my uneducated eyes) in the installer.
What I'm trying to do may very well fall in the "unsupported" basket,
just tell me. But still, I think I can at le
On 7/13/22 12:05 AM, Courtney wrote:
This is definitely an unveil issue. Not an issue though, it's by
design. If you try to download a file both Firefox and Chromium won't
know where to save it. By default, they can read/write to ~/Downloads
like others have said. However, I think I know the is
Hello,
I was trying to autoinstall OpenBSD 7.1 on a VM when I stumbled upon
something unexpected (to my uneducated eyes) in the installer.
What I'm trying to do may very well fall in the "unsupported" basket,
just tell me. But still, I think I can at least ask if this is
actually intended behavio
> [...] I have not had time to upgrade any of my APU systems to anything newer
> than 6.8, so I
> cannot personally attest that mSATA definitely works in 6.9+
This is one reason that incompatibilities sleeps thru: people run old
versions of software, the new ones don't reach the specific hardware
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 7:33 AM Jan Stary wrote:
> This is current/amd64 on an APU2D0, dmesg below
> Everything runs just fine from a SD card.
>
> My problem is it does not boot with this mSATA disk in.
> The leds of the mSATA and the leds of the APU keep blinking,
> the console keeps repeating
>
Heho,
> Looking at the show nexthop output it seem bgpd does not get the RTM_IFINFO
> message with the IFP_UP flag set. It still thinks the interface is down. This
> is a bug
> in wg(4) which probably sends the rt message before applying the flag.
This makes a lot of sense; I am sadly not good
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:01:09AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022-07-13, Tobias Fiebig wrote:
> > Heho,
> >
> > When doing what i described in my message, I get the below messages.
> >
> > When I set static routes, packet forwarding works fine, i.e.:
> >
> > gw02.dus01.as59645.net ~ # ro
Heho,
As mentioned, I gave it a shot with eoip, and that worked as intended. What I
noticed though, is that wg0 seems to stick around in bgpd, even after an
ifconfig wg0 destroy; I fixed this by using another ip range for transfer and
rebooting the downstream to make sure; In any case, with an
On 2022-07-13, Tobias Fiebig wrote:
> Heho,
>
> When doing what i described in my message, I get the below messages.
>
> When I set static routes, packet forwarding works fine, i.e.:
>
> gw02.dus01.as59645.net ~ # route add -inet6 2a06:d1c2::/48
> 2a06:d1c0::dead:beef:c02
> add net 2a06:d1c2::/4
Heho,
When doing what i described in my message, I get the below messages.
When I set static routes, packet forwarding works fine, i.e.:
gw02.dus01.as59645.net ~ # route add -inet6 2a06:d1c2::/48
2a06:d1c0::dead:beef:c02
add net 2a06:d1c2::/48: gateway 2a06:d1c0::dead:beef:c02
bgp-test.test /
12 matches
Mail list logo
