It looks like vport0 is down. Add "up" to hostname.vport0 and ifconfig
vport0 up.
On Thu, 12 May 2022 at 15:40, David Demelier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to setup vms using the wonderful vmd and private addresses
> on 10.0.0.0 range. Following the various entries in the FAQ (faq16) and
> the
On 2022-05-12, David Demelier wrote:
> (vm) #
> ping 8.8.8.8
> PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes
> ping: sendmsg: Can't assign requested address
> ping: wrote 8.8.8.8 64 chars, ret=-1
> (vm) #
> # ftp http://5.135.187.121/index.html
> Trying 5.135.187.121...
> ftp: connect: Can't assign requ
Hello,
I'm trying to setup vms using the wonderful vmd and private addresses
on 10.0.0.0 range. Following the various entries in the FAQ (faq16) and
the examples using bridge/vether I just wanted to adapt to using
veb/vport instead since it's designed as a newer and more performant
replacement.
I
William Ahern wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 04:54:02PM +0100, james palmer wrote:
> > i have a local dhcp server running which gives out three nameservers:
> >
> > - 192.168.0.2 (resolves some local machine names)
> > - 9.9.9.9
> > - 149.112.112.112
> >
> > on linux, android, and windows the
f.holop wrote:
> Stuart Henderson - Mon, 09 May 2022 at 17:17:57
> > Currently, you can either set it manually to low speed
> > (hw.perfpolicy=manual, hw.setperf=0), modify the kernel (e.g. with the
> > diff below), or use obsdfreqd from packages. The latter is only in
> > -current packages not 7
Stuart Henderson - Mon, 09 May 2022 at 17:17:57
> Currently, you can either set it manually to low speed
> (hw.perfpolicy=manual, hw.setperf=0), modify the kernel (e.g. with the
> diff below), or use obsdfreqd from packages. The latter is only in
> -current packages not 7.1, but it could be built f
Tobias Fiebig - Sat, 07 May 2022 at 13:18:45
> I also very faintly remember people complaining about similar issues
> with Mac hardware some years ago (non OpenBSD related, though). The
> solution for them back then was soldering together a small plug with
> some resistors to make the board 'think'
Hi Tom
On 5/11/22 21:32, Tom Smyth wrote:
We are updating some course material for an upcoming PF firewall course,
and I would like to put a call out to those who use PFsync in a
redundant firewall cluster
The one thing that immediately comes to mind is to NOT use a crossover
cable for the pfs
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 04:54:02PM +0100, james palmer wrote:
> i have a local dhcp server running which gives out three nameservers:
>
> - 192.168.0.2 (resolves some local machine names)
> - 9.9.9.9
> - 149.112.112.112
>
> on linux, android, and windows the local nameserver takes priority over t
On 5/11/22 3:32 PM, Tom Smyth wrote:
Hello Folks,
We are updating some course material for an upcoming PF firewall course,
and I would like to put a call out to those who use PFsync in a
redundant firewall cluster
about your user experience, have you come across any edge cases?
have you any tips
Hello Folks,
We are updating some course material for an upcoming PF firewall course,
and I would like to put a call out to those who use PFsync in a
redundant firewall cluster
about your user experience, have you come across any edge cases?
have you any tips or tricks about PFSync.
have you come
On 5/9/22 4:56 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
Hello.
Just a rant, not for ports@.
I am installing OpenBSD 7.1 right now; this is only a VM, and
i want to create / manage ports there.
Until now whenever i wanted to do this i had to install xbase,
otherwise the port makefile complained some. (I am a
> ... just a rant ...
This is not the list you are looking for. Move along, please.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BmhHyyzh9o
Theo de Raadt wrote in
<74991.1652133...@cvs.openbsd.org>:
|I looked very closely, it started like this
|
| "Just a rant"
|
|And I knew the email was coming from a self-centered individual who is
|unhappy with the entirely volunteer work done by others, yet not unhappy
|enough to quit Open
14 matches
Mail list logo
