Hi,
I'm thinking about getting a new laptop, and I want to get something with good
OpenBSD support. I know ThinkPads have had good support historically, and I'm
wondering if that holds for recent machines. In particular, I've been eyeing
the L13. Does anyone have a similar machine running OpenB
Hi,
I'm thinking about getting a new laptop, and I want to get something with good
OpenBSD support. I know ThinkPads have had good support historically, and I'm
wondering if that holds for recent machines. In particular, I've been eyeing
the L13. Does anyone have a similar machine running OpenB
Thank you to everyone who helped make openbsd work on the rpi4.
Although I won't be needing xorg/x11 on this particular machine, I tried
installing it anyway out of curiosity and was surprised how easy it was
to get it all working. I thought firefox might bog it down but no. Very smooth.
Instal
Hello,
On 2021-01-09 22:20:26 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021-01-09, Wolf wrote:
> > I have small suggestion for improving man page for acme-client.conf.5.
> > Basically just adding "comma separated" to clarify on the format of the
> > list for alternative names. I had to dig into the pa
On 2021-01-09, Wolf wrote:
> I have small suggestion for improving man page for acme-client.conf.5.
> Basically just adding "comma separated" to clarify on the format of the
> list for alternative names. I had to dig into the parser.y to figure
> this out, so it would be nice to have it documented
Hello,
I have small suggestion for improving man page for acme-client.conf.5.
Basically just adding "comma separated" to clarify on the format of the
list for alternative names. I had to dig into the parser.y to figure
this out, so it would be nice to have it documented.
diff --git a/acme-client.
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 12:05:31AM -0800, William Ahern wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 07:09:01PM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > I've noticed some surprising behaviour from cmp(1) when using the '-s'
> > flag.
> >
> > It appears that cmp -s is ignoring the byte offset ar
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 12:05:31AM -0800, William Ahern wrote:
> Interestingly, DragonflyBSD and FreeBSD already do it this way[3][4], yet I
> can confirm FreeBSD still has the problem. (DragonflyBSD has nearly
> identical code.) But that implementation duplicates the short-circuit, along
> with t
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 07:09:01PM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I've noticed some surprising behaviour from cmp(1) when using the '-s'
> flag.
>
> It appears that cmp -s is ignoring the byte offset arguments I'm giving
> it.
> Not sure what to make of this, I noticed this same
9 matches
Mail list logo