Hi,
On Feb 10, 2016 6:35 PM, "Ingo Schwarze" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Paco Esteban wrote on Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 05:14:09PM +0100:
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Ville Valkonen wrote:
> >> On Feb 10, 2016 5:16 PM, "Paco Esteban" wrote:
>
> >>> I've one machine that has 5.8-current (20th of October snapshot)
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Luke Small wrote:
> It seems to complicate things. Is there a security reason to use those
> functions?
style(9) is about much more than security, of course.
The queue(3) macros have proven to be correct, even in corner cases
that people sometimes get wrong when
Luke Small wrote:
> It seems to complicate things. Is there a security reason to use those
> functions?
They've been around for forever and have been audited. If someone rolls
their own ADT implemenation, it's far more likely to have security
problems.
Hi!
I have read the documentation for setting up the network configuration
in Qemu, README files of Qemu package, but especially did not
understand how to do it :(
1. Documentation mainly oriented to Linux
2. Settings bridges & etc. in openbsd for me so far not clear.
Can you give generic guide t
It seems to complicate things. Is there a security reason to use those
functions?
On February 10, 2016 7:10:17 PM GMT+01:00, Raf Czlonka
wrote:
> You can not run -current (or a snapshot), then decide you are
> living too dangerously, and step back to -stable.
As stated, you can step *forward* to -stable, though. I want to emphasize that.
/Alexander
> And the ports might not be opened on the machine itself, but on the
> provider's routers. Test running nmap on localhost when logged in on
> the machine too.
That was the right guess!
Thank you, mate!
Best,
Romain
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:19:03 +0100
Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri w
0
C Canada
P Alberta
T Calgary
Z T2G 1N1
O Consultant
I Nicholas Janzen
A 816 21 Ave S.E.
M n...@obsd.com
U http://www.obsd.com/
B 403-809-5584
X No fax Number
N Over 15 years of OpenBSD experience with most major components.
Software development as well as extensive pf and ipsec skills including
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Adam Wolk wrote:
>
> I stand corrected, sorry Paco for misguiding you. Don't know why I
> didn't think about or notice the STATUS change in newvers.sh.
>
> Will fact check next time before spreading FUD ;)
No problem.
Luckily we've some developers here watching us ;-)
Cheers
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:20:41 +0100
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Adam Wolk wrote on Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 05:18:45PM +0100:
>
> > The exact day of when a release snapshot is taken is not
> > announced.
>
> Wrong. Looking at the CVS repo, you can see every single change
> in all branches, so
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 05:29:51PM GMT, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Raf,
Hi Ingo,
> Raf Czlonka wrote on Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 04:51:12PM +:
>
> > If you take enough care, i.e. make sure you follow current.html[0]
> > and the update guide once it becomes available[1] after 5.9 gets
> > released
Hi Raf,
Raf Czlonka wrote on Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 04:51:12PM +:
> If you take enough care, i.e. make sure you follow current.html[0]
> and the update guide once it becomes available[1] after 5.9 gets
> released,
To go to 5.9-release or 5.9-stable, upgrade59.html is sufficient.
There is no ne
Hi,
Adam Wolk wrote on Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 05:18:45PM +0100:
> The exact day of when a release snapshot is taken is not announced.
Wrong. Looking at the CVS repo, you can see every single change
in all branches, so it is possible to figure out which exact state
of the code went into -release,
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > downgrading is not supported.
>
> That snapshot is from *before* the snapshot which is to become 5.9, so
> that's *not* downgrading.
>
> If you take enough care, i.e. make sure you follow current.html[0] and
> the update guide once it becomes available[1
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Yes. There is no problem with that whatsoever. Going from X-current
> to (X+1)-stable is supported in exactly the same way as going from
> X-stable to (X+1)-stable. Equivalently, you can consider (X+1)-release
> as the latest version of X-current that
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 04:18:45PM GMT, Adam Wolk wrote:
> Everything else is unknown state. You won't be sure which following
> current steps to execute. Your current base OS could be well past or
> before the snapshot used for the release.
Technically, that's not true - STATUS changes[0][1] are
On 2016-02-10, Ville Valkonen wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2016 5:16 PM, "Paco Esteban" wrote:
>> Is it possible to go from 5.8-current to 5.9 (when it's available) using
>> the installer ?
Sure. That's just a regular upgrade.
> downgrading is not supported.
True, but 5.8-current to 5.9 is not a down
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 03:58:38PM GMT, Ville Valkonen wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2016 5:16 PM, "Paco Esteban" wrote:
> >
> > Hi misc@,
> >
> > I've one machine that has 5.8-current (20th of October snapshot).
> > This is a "hardly-ever-touched" machine and I would prefer to have it
> > following -stable
Once you have ssh'd into your machine, run netstat.
netstat -af inet
If you are not already familiar with the FAQ and man pages, I would
recommend those over other resources on the internet.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Romain wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a stupid question. Sorry abo
Hi,
Paco Esteban wrote on Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 05:14:09PM +0100:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Ville Valkonen wrote:
>> On Feb 10, 2016 5:16 PM, "Paco Esteban" wrote:
>>> I've one machine that has 5.8-current (20th of October snapshot).
>>> This is a "hardly-ever-touched" machine and I would prefer to
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Adam Wolk wrote:
> The exact day of when a release snapshot is taken is not announced. So
> if you are keeping it on the October snapshot in the hope that it will
> be considered an upgrade then please don't do that. You have 2 courses
> of action.
>
> 1. Install a fresh snaps
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 08:57:01AM -0600, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> Check with your provider the 513/14 may be for Vpn access or something
> similar.
And the ports might not be opened on the machine itself, but on the
provider's routers. Test running nmap on localhost when logged in on
the machine
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:07:10 +0100
Paco Esteban wrote:
> Hi misc@,
>
> I've one machine that has 5.8-current (20th of October snapshot).
> This is a "hardly-ever-touched" machine and I would prefer to have it
> following -stable.
> Is it possible to go from 5.8-current to 5.9 (when it's availabl
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Ville Valkonen wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2016 5:16 PM, "Paco Esteban" wrote:
> >
> > Hi misc@,
> >
> > I've one machine that has 5.8-current (20th of October snapshot).
> > This is a "hardly-ever-touched" machine and I would prefer to have it
> > following -stable.
> > Is it possib
On Feb 10, 2016 5:16 PM, "Paco Esteban" wrote:
>
> Hi misc@,
>
> I've one machine that has 5.8-current (20th of October snapshot).
> This is a "hardly-ever-touched" machine and I would prefer to have it
> following -stable.
> Is it possible to go from 5.8-current to 5.9 (when it's available) using
Check with your provider the 513/14 may be for Vpn access or something
similar.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 10, 2016, at 8:20 AM, Romain wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a stupid question. Sorry about that.
>
> My provider just set up my brand new OpenBSD VPS/VDS.
> So I did not proceed to
> On 09/02/16(Tue) 23:28, Christoph R. Murauer wrote:
>> Hello !
>>
>> Sorry if the format of the message is not, as it should be.
>>
>> I tried today the latest snapshot on a PowerMac G5. The installation
>> worked without problems but at the installer the first question
>> about to choose the key
Hi misc@,
I've one machine that has 5.8-current (20th of October snapshot).
This is a "hardly-ever-touched" machine and I would prefer to have it
following -stable.
Is it possible to go from 5.8-current to 5.9 (when it's available) using
the installer ?
I've been using OpenBSD since 3.4 but never
On 09/02/16(Tue) 23:28, Christoph R. Murauer wrote:
> Hello !
>
> Sorry if the format of the message is not, as it should be.
>
> I tried today the latest snapshot on a PowerMac G5. The installation worked
> without problems but at the installer the first question about to choose the
> keymap i
Hello everyone,
I have a stupid question. Sorry about that.
My provider just set up my brand new OpenBSD VPS/VDS.
So I did not proceed to the install myself.
To check, I proceeded to a nmap on my OpenBSD server:
<<
$ nmap -A -Pn xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org )
On 2016-02-10, Marc Peters wrote:
> Am 02/10/16 um 10:44 schrieb Kapetanakis Giannis:
>> Maybe iwn0 does not support vlan?
Not sure if I've tried it with iwn but it should do. Certainly wlan
interfaces in general do normally support vlans (e.g. I am running
multiple vlans over radio with ubnt kit
Am 02/10/16 um 10:44 schrieb Kapetanakis Giannis:
> Maybe iwn0 does not support vlan?
>
> I don't see anything relative on it's product brief sheet.
> http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/product-briefs/centrino-advanced-n-6205-brief.pdf
>
>
> Did you try to start vlan 6 o
On 10/02/16 09:45, Marc Peters wrote:
Hi list,
for my laptop, i created a trunk(4) interface with em0 and iwn0 as
members. IPv6 is provided on a separate vlan for now. Without trunking
the interfaces, the vlan interface comes up and everything's working fine:
~ $ sudo /bin/sh /etc/netstart vla
33 matches
Mail list logo
