I'm assuming I'm not the first to encounter this -
the scenario is a group of admins who have so far run mainly Linux and some
Solaris,
and who have a fairly well developed Puppet setup for maintaining among other
things
local users for admins to log in and fix, running sudo as required. For
no
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:39:43AM +, David Dahlberg wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2016, 15:29 -0500 schrieb Samir Parikh:
> > I am running version 5.8 (amd64) on a Lenovo Thinkpad T450s
> > with a fairly default installation.
>
> The T405s is a Broadwell.
>
> > I have a few issues to sor
On 02/04/16 15:41, Tarkan Açan wrote:
Thank you for your replies. i realised that i did not explain my issue clearly.
No worries, I hope you found the replies useful anyway.
what i want to achieve is, say we have a parent queue of 10M. when 5 users
connect, they should all receive 2M bandwid
On 02/04/16 13:37, Marko Cupać wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:45:23 +0100
I guess it should be obvious what I want to achieve: If both hosts
request max bandwidth at the same time, throttle them both to 5M. While
host2 sits idle, give host1 10M. If host2 requests max bandwidth while
host1 downloads
Hi David -- Thanks for your reply!
On 02/04/16 03:39, David Dahlberg wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2016, 15:29 -0500 schrieb Samir Parikh:
I am running version 5.8 (amd64) on a Lenovo Thinkpad T450s
with a fairly default installation.
The T405s is a Broadwell.
I have a few issues to sort
Hi Marcus -- Thank you for the quick reply. I'll try to provide some
additional details and answers to your questions below:
On 02/04/16 03:12, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
Hello Samir,
spytho...@gmail.com (Samir Parikh), 2016.02.03 (Wed) 21:29 (CET):
Hi Everyone! This is my first post to the mail
I found out what the issue was.
As an example, this is valid with "pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf" but will throw
"pfctl: DIOCGETQSTATS: Bad file descriptor" with "pfctl -s queue":
queue test on egress bandwidth 1M default
This works properly with "pfctl -s queue" as well:
queue test on em0 bandwidth 1M
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:27:32PM +0100, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 06:24:42PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > This AP does not comply with the 11n standard I'm reading (802.11 2012)
> > because it does not support all of MCS 0-7.
> >
> > We currently require
Hey,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 06:24:42PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> This AP does not comply with the 11n standard I'm reading (802.11 2012)
> because it does not support all of MCS 0-7.
>
> We currently require RxMCS starting with 0xff (MCS 0 to 7 supported).
> Looks like we need a better str
Beacon from my home AP in case it helps:
20:29:53.785848 802.11 flags=0<>: beacon, timestamp 6134271936059,
interval 100, caps=21, ssid (DATENMOPED), rates 6M 9M 12M
18M 24M 36M 48M 54M, ds (chan 36), tim 0x0002, country 'US ',
channels 36-39 limit 17dB, channels 52-55 limit 23dB, channels 149
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 06:24:42PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:59:09PM +0100, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote:
> > RxMCS 0xfc00>
>
> This AP does not comply with the 11n standard I'm reading (802.11 2012)
> because it does not support all of MCS 0-7.
>
> W
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:59:09PM +0100, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote:
> RxMCS 0xfc00>
This AP does not comply with the 11n standard I'm reading (802.11 2012)
because it does not support all of MCS 0-7.
We currently require RxMCS starting with 0xff (MCS 0 to 7 supported).
Looks like
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:15:25PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Sorry, this capture is incomplete. Can you please add the -s 1500 option?
No problem:
15:57:46.601094 802.11 flags=0<>: beacon, timestamp 164743741446,
interval 102, caps=10021, ssid (eduroam),
rates 18M 24M 36M 48M 54M, tim 0x000
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 02:55:06PM +0100, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:56:30AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > For starters, beacons from this AP.
> >
> > While associated: tcpdump -n -i iwn0 -y IEEE802_11_RADIO -vvv subtype beacon
> >
> > Send me one of the
hi everyone,
Thank you for your replies. i realised that i did not explain my issue clearly.
what i want to achieve is, say we have a parent queue of 10M. when 5 users
connect, they should all receive 2M bandwidth each. when 5 more users connect,
i want to bog down their bandwidth to 1M each. w
Found it in dmesg buffer:
Stopped at Debugger+0x9: leave
RUN AT LEAST 'trace' AND 'ps' AND INCLUDE OUTPUT WHEN REPORTING THIS PANIC!
IF RUNNING SMP, USE 'mach ddbcpu <#>' AND 'trace' ON OTHER PROCESSORS, TOO.
DO NOT EVEN BOTHER REPORTING THIS WITHOUT INCLUDING THAT INFORMATION!
ddb{0}> tra
Hey,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:56:30AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> For starters, beacons from this AP.
>
> While associated: tcpdump -n -i iwn0 -y IEEE802_11_RADIO -vvv subtype beacon
>
> Send me one of the lines this prints.
Here you go:
14:52:00.658304 802.11 flags=0<>: beacon, timestam
I was able to re-produce this panic with similar stack trace.
Unfortunately 'trace/show regs/ps' are not in txt format, but are
screenshots.
//mxb
> On 4 feb. 2016, at 12:42, mxb wrote:
>
>
> Hey,
> see those again on 5.8-STABLE.
>
> This is a 2-node CARP setup within VMWare ESX.
> Both machines
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:45:23 +0100
"Peter N. M. Hansteen" wrote:
> On 02/04/16 12:19, Marko Cupać wrote:
>
> > If you need something more advanced, like granting minimum bandwidth
> > with the ability to borrow from other queues up to maximum bandwidth
> > when other queues are empty, I am afraid
Hey,
see those again on 5.8-STABLE.
This is a 2-node CARP setup within VMWare ESX.
Both machines are rebooting after this and it happens quite often.
Any ideas?
panic: mtx_enter: locking against myself
Starting stack trace...
panic() at panic+0x10b
mtx_enter() at mtx_enter+0x60
sofree() at sofre
On 02/04/16 12:19, Marko Cupać wrote:
If you need something more advanced, like granting minimum bandwidth
with the ability to borrow from other queues up to maximum bandwidth
when other queues are empty, I am afraid you won't be able to do it
with current queueing system. However, I'm still hop
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 23:09:39 +
Tarkan Açan wrote:
> hello misc,
>
> i am using openbsd 5.8 amd64 on my apu 1d4 with success but i have
> one big problem. the queue mechanism in pf allows some traffic
> shaping but what i really need is to give users their share of the
> bandwidth. for this i n
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:40:30AM +0100, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> manually setting the mode helps with the speed problems, thanks!
That's good. At least there's a workaround.
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 08:54:51PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Does this diff help?
>
> This diff
Sorry, wrong dmesg.
OpenBSD 5.9 (GENERIC.MP) #0: Thu Feb 4 11:31:35 CET 2016
r...@kobol.lan:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 8335577088 (7949MB)
avail mem = 8078761984 (7704MB)
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2
On 04.02.16 01:09, Tarkan Açan wrote:
hello misc,
i am using openbsd 5.8 amd64 on my apu 1d4 with success but i have one big
problem. the queue mechanism in pf allows some traffic shaping but what i
really need is to give users their share of the bandwidth. for this i need
some connection based
Hey,
manually setting the mode helps with the speed problems, thanks!
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 08:54:51PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Does this diff help?
This diff + the one you posted in tech@ this morning does not seem to
help with the 11n mode, though.
Anything I can provide to help?
dm
On 2016-02-03, Mariano Baragiola wrote:
> Have you tried opening them without uBlock Origin?
>
> There was a known error in 5.8 amd64 with Chromium and uBlock Origin,
> but the crash victim was the extension and not the browser, at least on
> my case (I found some people saying the entire browse
Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2016, 15:29 -0500 schrieb Samir Parikh:
> I am running version 5.8 (amd64) on a Lenovo Thinkpad T450s
> with a fairly default installation.
The T405s is a Broadwell.
> I have a few issues to sort out but my first concern is that I cannot
> exit out of FVWM. I launch it
Hello Samir,
spytho...@gmail.com (Samir Parikh), 2016.02.03 (Wed) 21:29 (CET):
> Hi Everyone! This is my first post to the mailing list as I am new to
> OpenBSD.
> I am running version 5.8 (amd64) on a Lenovo Thinkpad T450s with a
> fairly default installation.
> I have a few issues to sort ou
29 matches
Mail list logo
