Hello !
> This is my first message on the list so, first of all, hello
> everybody! :)
>
> I've recently bought a dedicated PC, planning to use it as a firewall
> by
> installing OpenBSD on it.
>
> I have downloaded the install80.iso, checked the sha sum, and read the
> installation guide.
> I hav
This is my first message on the list so, first of all, hello everybody! :)
I've recently bought a dedicated PC, planning to use it as a firewall by
installing OpenBSD on it.
I have downloaded the install80.iso, checked the sha sum, and read the
installation guide.
I have burned the iso to a cd-ro
the program overwrites ONLY the installpath variable(s) in /etc/pkg.conf.
The rest of the variables will remain.
PKG_PATH environment variable takes precedence over any installpath
initializations.
I'm running 5.8. I don't know how to pledge it. I will make sure to, past
the 5.9 release. I'm sure
Patrick,
To sum up, neat to see that (from what we can see without having tested
it,) there is (even inexpensive) hardware for this on the market, neat!
My last question related to this would be, what if drives start breaking
down (storage or CacheCade drives), would the OpenBSD system learn
I noticed some odd behavior by httpd that isn't clear from reading the
httpd and httpd.conf man pages.
I'm running the Jan 21 snapshot on an amd64 box. I have a very minimal
httpd.conf that contains no logging directives, so it should use the
default /var/www/logs/access.log and /var/www/logs/erro
> Do you know any MegaRaid that a) supports that, b) is modern and not
archaic, and c) is supported by OpenBSD?
>
It appears the MFI driver provides support for the MegaRAID SAS 9260-8i
Pleas note Iâve not tested the 9260-8i on openbsd
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man
Thank you for your help Stuart. I'll just use curl for now. Actually use
torsocks seems a bad practice for any situation, I should just set a
transparent proxy (but the pf.conf from torproject.org does not work, I'll need
to write is myself some day).
Thanks again.
Patrick,
On 2016-02-01 07:10, Patrick Dohman wrote:
There is some hardware solution, e.g. Intel made the
http://ark.intel.com/products/70029/Intel-RAID-SSD-Cache-Controller-RCS25ZB04
0LX using the "Nytro MegaRAID" chip.
Someone would need to port its driver to OpenBSD.
Also in the past there
I suspect I'm not going to appease the C or scripting purists out there.
The ridiculous "you should rewrite in in perl" folks and the C people that
think calling ftp() from C, which cuts down on code complexity, etc. will
be looked down upon. It will probably be like how corporate Linux users
like
Paul, thanks for the patch. It worked!
Jonathan, thanks for fixing the model identifier in CVS.
Christian and Stuart, my Vaio (model and BIOS versions earlier in
thread) does not have any BIOS setting for non-RAID mode. The Intel
storage controller BIOS only allows the two 128 GB drives to be
con
mail.com> writes:
>
> Thanks.
> Yes, it does core dump on "Abort trap".
> Any idea on how I can force ftp(1) to socks5? The man page say nothing
about proxy other than http or ftp, and I
> have not set a transparent proxy yet...
>
> Good to know that pledge is doing his job. So far, no other
On 2016-01-31, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> Hi Naddy,
>
> I need to verify this, but I believe things stop working (i.e. kernel
> boots but no longer gets to userland because no block device is found)
> when i switch modes in the BIOS. This suggests that the PCI ID *does*
> change when fiddling around
> There is some hardware solution, e.g. Intel made the
http://ark.intel.com/products/70029/Intel-RAID-SSD-Cache-Controller-RCS25ZB04
0LX using the "Nytro MegaRAID" chip.
>
> Someone would need to port its driver to OpenBSD.
>
> Also in the past there was a "Adaptec MaxIQ". Those are the only two "R
Hi Naddy,
I need to verify this, but I believe things stop working (i.e. kernel
boots but no longer gets to userland because no block device is found)
when i switch modes in the BIOS. This suggests that the PCI ID *does*
change when fiddling around in the BIOS. I'm not at home for a couple
of da
Hi misc@
Can anyone point me at a USB device that attaches in two different ways,
so I can use it as a template for attaching the Xadow GSM:
1. Off - mass storage
2. On - 2 com's 1 for Debug (com4 on Windows) and 1 for modem (com5 on
Windows)
The dmesg output for 1. is shown in [1] below, a
> I still experienced hangup on reboot after rebuilding 5.9-beta amd64 ...
> So a switch has to be manually flipped for restarting the box after /bsd
> upgrade.
>
> Do you have the same ?
[OT] I experience the flaky reboot issue (usually after running for a
few days) on my apu2b2 with 5.8-stable.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 07:36:50AM -0500, Jay Hart wrote:
> If you apply the ssh patch (patch #10 for 5.8), then you do not also have to
> add "UseRoaming no"
> to your /etc/ssh/ssh_config file, correct.
>
> I've applied the patch, did not add that line to the config file, want to
> make sure I'
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:24:03PM -0500, Josh Grosse wrote:
> The folowing "update" script is what I use to update systems which
> are already at an older -stable. I don't use this when
> transiting releases; for that I use the bsd.rd upgrade script.
For clarity, the script is only used with a r
On 31 Jan 2016, tro...@kagu-tsuchi.com wrote:
> Yeah, you should follow the entire update process (unless you know exactly
> what changed). Replace your kernel, reboot, unpack the tarballs, run
> sysmerge, etc.
>
> Looks like someone already tweaked the FAQ.
Thank you to everyone who helped me h
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 02:38:59PM +, Mark Carroll wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2016, Mark Carroll wrote:
>
> > I thought that one option might be to update my sources to the latest
> > OPENBSD_5_8 revision, build and install the update on one, then make the
> > release on it and copy and unpack it to t
On Sun, January 31, 2016 7:04 am, Mark Carroll wrote:
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Release tells me at the end that,
>
>> ... if updating a machine to a new -stable, simply unpack the tar
>> files in the root directory of the target machine.
>
> Am I right to worry that this approach woul
Le 28.01.16 23:12, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
On 2016-01-27, Kapfhammer, Stefan wrote:
thanks for all the hints with the WiFi problem on an
(beta testing) APU2b4 with a Compex WLE200NX
wireless mini PCIE card.
[..]
At the time I bought the board, the mSATA SSD, WiFi card, pigtails and
dual a
On 31-01-16 17:13, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
LÉVAI Dániel @ 2016-01-31T14:10:21 +0100:
Stuart Henderson @ 2016-01-30T23:01:54 +0100:
On 2016-01-30, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
Hi!
My ISP recently enabled ipv6 on their network, and started sending
router advertisements (offering a /64 prefix) on their pppo
Hello Mathias,
on -stable it runs fine and I've no reboot issues.
Regards,
Stefan
Originalnachricht
Von: Mathias Schmocker
Gesendet: Sonntag, 31. Januar 2016 16:56
Cc: Kapfhammer, Stefan
Betreff: Re: [SOLVED] with pain / was: APU2 WLE200NX ATHN0: Device timeout
Le 28.01.16 23:12, Stuart Hend
LÉVAI Dániel @ 2016-01-31T14:10:21 +0100:
> Stuart Henderson @ 2016-01-30T23:01:54 +0100:
> > On 2016-01-30, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > My ISP recently enabled ipv6 on their network, and started sending
> > > router advertisements (offering a /64 prefix) on their pppoe end. So now
>
DY -
First things first. Can you please post a printout of the certificate in text
and PEM format? Clearly the OS X machine doesn't like the subjectAltName, but
there may be other issues as well.
--Paul
> On Jan 31, 2016, at 1:16 AM, Dot Yet wrote:
>
> Forgot to mention that I know the probl
If you apply the ssh patch (patch #10 for 5.8), then you do not also have to
add "UseRoaming no"
to your /etc/ssh/ssh_config file, correct.
I've applied the patch, did not add that line to the config file, want to make
sure I've
interpreted the sig file correctly.
Thanks for your time,
Jay
On 2016-01-31, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> BTW, is there a difference between writing 'inet6 autoconf' or 'rtsol'
> in /etc/hostname.pppoe0?
If you read /etc/netstart, you can see that "rtsol" translates to
ifconfig $if up
ifconfig $if inet6 autoconf
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber
On 31 Jan 2016, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:04:50 + Mark Carroll
>> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Release tells me at the end that,
>>
>> > ... if updating a machine to a new -stable, simply unpack the tar
>> > files in the root directory of the target machine.
>>
On 31 Jan 2016, Mark Carroll wrote:
> I thought that one option might be to update my sources to the latest
> OPENBSD_5_8 revision, build and install the update on one, then make the
> release on it and copy and unpack it to the other machines so that they
> could then have the patches too.
I sho
Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:04:50 + Mark Carroll
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Release tells me at the end that,
>
> > ... if updating a machine to a new -stable, simply unpack the tar
> > files in the root directory of the target machine.
>
> Am I right to worry that this approach wouldn
Stuart Henderson @ 2016-01-30T23:01:54 +0100:
> On 2016-01-30, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > My ISP recently enabled ipv6 on their network, and started sending
> > router advertisements (offering a /64 prefix) on their pppoe end. So now
> > I have an autoconf'd v6 address on my pppoe0 device
IMHO it's for misc.
So, yes, feel free to donate to either OpenBSD foundation or directly
to interested developer. I'm sure your donation will be appreciated.
In your list you omitted two other options how to speed your hdd access:
- buy more RAM and increase caching, on AMD64 it would probably
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Release tells me at the end that,
> ... if updating a machine to a new -stable, simply unpack the tar
> files in the root directory of the target machine.
Am I right to worry that this approach wouldn't include all the patches
because it won't actually update
Ah, I now understand that this problem is mindbogglingly complex because
of tons and tons of work needed to make it work, including the storage
format on the SSD cache, and tools for "fsck":ing it etc etc. In a way
that maybe answered my question, thanks!
On 2016-01-31 19:00, Tinker wrote:
I
If there is nothing like this implemented in software in OpenBSD,
* If someone implemented it, would there be interest to actually
include the patch in OpenBSD?
* Could a direct personal donation (separate from the normal donations
to the OpenBSD project) to a developer be of use for making
This could be made in software with benefit, as a Softraid patch.
So the frequently accessed stuff ends up cached on the SSD for faster
read speed.
ZFS on FreeBSD etc. does it in its "ARC"/"ARC2L" feature?
There is some hardware solution, e.g. Intel made the
http://ark.intel.com/products/7
37 matches
Mail list logo
