On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:15:22PM BST, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> > > Updated to lattest shapshot from yesterday. The path pointed
> > > to 5.8 directory, which did not exist. I changed it to correct
> > > one, pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64 and installed just fine.
> >
> > https://marc.info/?m=14255
Hi all .
i look at http://centossrv.com/snort.shtml
pkg_add p5-Time-modules-2006.0814p0
download SnortSnarf-1.0.tar.gz
and tar xvzf SnortSnarf-1.0.tar.gz
no need make or so , simply ./snortsnarf.pl .
but two errors appear .
correct them by comment # .
at last
shell script
On 07/30/15 16:42, Joel Rees wrote:
Which is preferred, newfs_ext2fs or mke2fs from the e2fsprogs package?
I'd certainly go for what's in base unless there is some functionality
missing from it. If there are bugs we want to know about them.
/Alexander
Joel Rees
Computer memory is just fa
If you are doing it right your CA private key is on a different machine
without network connectivity.
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Giancarlo Razzolini
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 9:34 AM
To: Peter Hessler; li...@wrant.com
Cc:
> > > bios0: Supermicro X10SLM+-LN4F
> >
> > this might be interesting for some misc readers, but don't forget
> > to send it to dmesg@ as well.
>
> Can you please try a recent snapshot and dmesg too?
Maker:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon/C220/X10SLM_-LN4F.cfm
Related:
On 31.7.2015. 19:42, Joe Crivello wrote:
> Awesome! Thanks so much.
>
> So C22X gets detected as an Intel 8 series chipset then (which makes
> sense). We are initially thinking about using a couple of Super Micro
> 5018D-MR servers with Intel X520 cards as routers, so the lack of onboard
> Etherne
> > Updated to lattest shapshot from yesterday. The path pointed
> > to 5.8 directory, which did not exist. I changed it to correct
> > one, pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64 and installed just fine.
>
> https://marc.info/?m=142554965809503
Can be dealt with by PXE boot, by providing this in the
MAC_ad
> Hello everybody
Hello, anonymous.
> How do you customize your environment?
Reading man pages mostly, and teraforming using (brain) farts.
> What aliases or custom functions do you use?
On the blog over 15 pages across several years, just kidding.
> Here's my /etc/profile I think you can fin
Hello everybody
How do you customize your environment?
What aliases or custom functions do you use?
Here's my /etc/profile I think you can find one or two interesting things
in it.
Show us yours!
(in case wordwrapping breaks long lines: http://pastie.org/10322761)
> > bios0: Supermicro X10SLM+-LN4F
>
> this might be interesting for some misc readers, but don't forget
> to send it to dmesg@ as well.
This is interesting indeed.
Can you please try a recent snapshot and dmesg too?
Thank you.
> one more thing waiting to
> bite you in the ass
Correct, and resource wasteful maintainership is not that valuable to
end users who stumble in their feet anyway.
If trying to solve it, please show a solution that is not burning
developer time, as it will get abandoned soon or later, there is no
On 2015-07-31, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
> bios0: Supermicro X10SLM+-LN4F
this might be interesting for some misc readers, but don't forget
to send it to dmesg@ as well.
The presentations were impressive, I wish I knew earlier and went there.
Thanks again,
-Yang
-Original Message-
From: Adam Thompson [mailto:athom...@athompso.net]
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 2:09 PM
To: XU, YANG (YANG)
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: rdomain with BGP dynamic route
T
looking forward to your dmesg then
OpenBSD 5.7 (GENERIC.MP) #881: Sun Mar 8 11:04:17 MDT 2015
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 17121136640 (16327MB)
avail mem = 16661458944 (15889MB)
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.7
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:14:15PM BST, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> Updated to lattest shapshot from yesterday. The path pointed
> to 5.8 directory, which did not exist. I changed it to correct
> one, pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64 and installed just fine.
> I need more time to see what makes me think that g
Then you should have been at BSDCan last month!
Olivier Cochard-Labbé of Orange(?) is deploying something like this but
using FreeBSD (http://www.bsdcan.org/2015/schedule/events/555.en.html),
and Peter Hessler talked at length about rdomains in OpenBSD
(http://www.bsdcan.org/2015/schedule/even
Awesome! Thanks so much.
So C22X gets detected as an Intel 8 series chipset then (which makes
sense). We are initially thinking about using a couple of Super Micro
5018D-MR servers with Intel X520 cards as routers, so the lack of onboard
Ethernet support is not a problem for us. That said, if ther
On 2015-07-31, Joe Crivello wrote:
> Does anyone have any experience with running OpenBSD on the Intel C61X or
> C22X series chipsets?
My main amd64 box at home is a Dell PowerEdge T20 with a C226
chipset.
> In particular I am also curious if the SATA ports would be
> supported in AHCI mode.
a
Updated to lattest shapshot from yesterday. The path pointed
to 5.8 directory, which did not exist. I changed it to correct
one, pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64 and installed just fine.
I need more time to see what makes me think that graphics acts
a bit different on this snapshot.
Best regards all
Does anyone have any experience with running OpenBSD on the Intel C61X or
C22X series chipsets? These chipsets are used frequently by Super Micro in
their newer line of very common and (relatively) affordable rack mountable
servers. In particular I am also curious if the SATA ports would be
support
Adam,
That's good suggestion, thanks and I will give it a try. I plan to use OpenBSD
as a PE from a service provider point of view, I guess that's not a popular use
case.
Regards,
-Yang
-Original Message-
From: Adam Thompson [mailto:athom...@athompso.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 20
Em 31-07-2015 03:07, Peter Hessler escreveu:
> this is a real problem for real people.
Which was pretty much solved with PKP [0]. As I mentioned, custom CA's
have their uses, but in the end, they are just one more thing waiting to
bite you in the ass. You can pretend to have a decent OPSEC for a wh
> What's your useful idea to bring to other readers?
Since the thread is already broken and dead, I would like to ask who
the hell are you lists-wrant-com user?
I use to read the threads on marc and most of them (maybe all) are
interrupted by emails from this address. The answers are meaningless,
Off-the-shelf yes, home no, it's just a specialized setup with some odd
requirements. We're fine with paying for good quality components but
there's no need to overpay for something that offers a bunch of stuff we
don't need, especially when we're going to be building several of these.
I'm just tr
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:52:32PM +0500, Артур Истомин wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:51:38AM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:02:47AM +0500, Артур Истомин wrote:
> > > Is it supported? I mean exactly USB-N10 NANO, not USB-N10
> >
> > Yes.
> >
>
On 07/28/2015 09:35 AM, Theo Buehler wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:44:00PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
On July 27, 2015 3:22:13 PM GMT+02:00, Theo Buehler
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:13:55PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:40:53PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:51:38AM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:02:47AM +0500, Артур Истомин wrote:
> > Is it supported? I mean exactly USB-N10 NANO, not USB-N10
>
> Yes.
>
> https://wikidevi.com/wiki/ASUS_USB-N10_Nano
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:53:31AM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> [...]
> there is still stutter on disk activity on mp amd64 which is mostly in
> media players depending on gtk libs, it is embarrassing to say the
> least.
> [...]
I've seen something similar when my cvsync cronjob kicks in. I can
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:53:31AM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> > > Sorry for wasting yout time.
>
> there is still stutter on disk activity on mp amd64 which is mostly in
> media players depending on gtk libs, it is embarrassing to say the
> least.
You mean that audio on a mostly idle box, wi
> > Sorry for wasting yout time.
there is still stutter on disk activity on mp amd64 which is mostly in
media players depending on gtk libs, it is embarrassing to say the
least.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:02:47AM +0500, Артур Истомин wrote:
> Is it supported? I mean exactly USB-N10 NANO, not USB-N10
Yes.
https://wikidevi.com/wiki/ASUS_USB-N10_Nano
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man4/urtwn.4
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
> Perhaps cert.pem should just move to examples/ with no default in /etc/ssl.
No. (I know you're ironic.)
On 2015-07-30, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> Well, I see four scenarios:
>
> 1. Using the defaults supplied with OpenBSD only. Typical for home/personal
> use.
>
> 2. Use the defaults supplied with OpenBSD, and one or more additional
> CAs. Typical for corporate use.
>
> 3. Use personal set of CAs. Usual
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:05:40AM +0200, Alexander Shendi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after rebooting the GENERIC.MP kernel supplied with the 5.8 snapshot I had
> been using previously everything works fine.
>
> I don't actually know why -- I'll assume it was a hardware glitch.
>
> Sorry for wasting yout
> We have directories like this (but without removing locally-added
> files).
Finally some body addressed file management, meaning a template system
or formalisation is about to be forming.
> The single-file approach at least makes things simple for the majority
> who don't edit the file though,
On 2015-07-31, Benny Lofgren wrote:
> So I borrowed an idea from how the Courier MTA/IMAP/POP3 server manages
> some of its configuration files:
>
> The system could check whether /etc/ssl/cert.pem (or whatever path any
> particular application provides) is a regular file, in which case
> business
> What threat models do we want to address
The one addressing your maintenance of the certification
infrastructure.
2015/07/31 15:33 :
>
> everyone on the carousel? why not rework the trust model.
Okay, I'll play.
What threat models do we want to address
uhm,
at the library level?
> this is a real problem for real people.
so, expecting a real solution, uhm yes, it's a potion of soluble metal.
40 matches
Mail list logo
