thanks for skinner.
owing to you , i manage to send mail at remote PC ,
1) dynamic dns' mx problem
i set mx following http://www.mhserv.info/co5/mydns.php .
(sorry , real name is not a.mydns.jp , but a?.mydns.jp .)
so
# dig a.mydns.jp MX +short
10 a.mydns.jp
On 2015-05-26 Tue 11:39 AM |, Felipe Scarel wrote:
>
> after reading some documentation on the NSD manpage and online, it
> seems there's no support for views as offered with BIND.
It can sort of be done via an unbound stub (proxy)
to a different NSD served zone for internal hosts
5.5:
http://m
0
C Egypt
P Masr EL-Gdida
T Cairo
F irregular
O Egypt OpenBSD Group
I Hossam EL-Mansy
M noobsia...@yahoo.com
U
N OpenBSD
On 26 May 2015 at 10:44, Laurence Tratt wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:21:19PM +0100, Bojan Nastic wrote:
>
> > Anyone having much luck with 5.7 or -current on Thinkpad X1 Carbon 2nd
> gen
> > (Haswell chip)?
>
> It works pretty well (including wireless), although on my machine the lack
> of
Does not work with static address either - although it answers it's
own ping but does not communicate with other systems on the net, nor
answer an arping.
Booted up a live Fedora to test hardware and it works fine.
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Sonic wrote:
> Just installed the 5-25-15 snaps
Hi,
im still trying to run openbsd on my (quite special) 86duino educake.
i am making some progress, but right now i could need some directions.
the device boots to some piont, then it does nothing. but plugging in
a usb stick in it produces output.
i can not get a login.
i've tested 5.4-5.6, same
Just installed the 5-25-15 snapshot on a Supermicro server with an
X10SLL-F board. The board has two Ethernet ports, one i210-AT and one
i217-LM. The i217-LM does not accept the offers from the DHCP server.
I also was not prompted to set the up the i217-LM (em0) when
installing the OS.
The DHCP se
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:27:23PM +0200, Janne Johansson wrote:
> > ..or, if it really is important for you, why not set up a test and
> > benchmark it?
> >
> > I have no idea if or when amd64 would have surpassed i386 in performance,
> >
On Tue, 26 May 2015, Peter Fraser wrote:
> I put OpenBSD 5.7 up, but because we make use of the SpamHaus I didn't want
> to move to smtpd.
>
> It was easy enough to put sendmail in but I found I could not rebuild my
> /etc/mail/access.db
>
> makemap did not like the "To:" prefix in the /etc/ma
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:11:24PM +, Peter Fraser wrote:
> I put OpenBSD 5.7 up, but because we make use of the SpamHaus I didn't want
> to move to smtpd.
>
> It was easy enough to put sendmail in but I found I could not rebuild my
> /etc/mail/access.db
>
> makemap did not like the "To:" p
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:27:23PM +0200, Janne Johansson wrote:
> ..or, if it really is important for you, why not set up a test and
> benchmark it?
>
> I have no idea if or when amd64 would have surpassed i386 in performance,
> and if it is better how much better.
> But if this was an important
I put OpenBSD 5.7 up, but because we make use of the SpamHaus I didn't want to
move to smtpd.
It was easy enough to put sendmail in but I found I could not rebuild my
/etc/mail/access.db
makemap did not like the "To:" prefix in the /etc/mail/access file.
being somewhat slow to took me a couple
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 7:31 AM, M Wheeler <
> > > b9dcbd36df10828fdb237104a05fd...@refn.eu> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 07:19:19AM -0400, bofh wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Unless you are in India, or Pakistan, or any of the other
> > > > > countries where Blackberry basically
I have it in my X220. Recognised properly according to dmesg, but never got
around to look up the setup for my mobile provider, so take that with a
grain of salt.
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015, Alex Shupikov wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Somebody uses Qualcomm Gobi 2000 OpenBSD?
>
> It works?
>
> --
> /ssh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:06:57 +0200
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 08:01:47AM -0400, bofh wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 7:31 AM, M Wheeler <
> > b9dcbd36df10828fdb237104a05fd...@refn.eu> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2015
Hello all,
after reading some documentation on the NSD manpage and online, it
seems there's no support for views as offered with BIND. I've gathered
that the general suggestion is to run two separate instances (running
on 127.0.0.1, for example), and divert traffic from pf depending on
the connect
..or, if it really is important for you, why not set up a test and
benchmark it?
I have no idea if or when amd64 would have surpassed i386 in performance,
and if it is better how much better.
But if this was an important topic worthy of the science, then by all means
do test it on your particular
> Le 2015-05-26 00:10, Miod Vallat a écrit :
> > It is not the responsibility of the operating system to protect its
> > users against software which assumes using the pid as a random source
> > is
> > a bright and wise idea.
>
> Isn't this the whole goal of random PIDs, to put a defense at OS
Hi all
Somebody uses Qualcomm Gobi 2000 OpenBSD?
It works?
--
/ssh
On 2015-05-24 Sun 22:19 PM |, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote:
> On May 24, 2015, at 9:36 PM, Tuyosi Takesima wrote:
>
> > it is very sorry that in the previou setting ,
> > from outside(namely not intra-net) sylpheed can recieve mail but can not
> > send mail to u...@a.mydns.jp .
> >
> > and more
> >
Don't use PID for seeding ever, in fact don't use seeding. If you want
a random integer use arc4random(), if you want a random buffer use
arc4random_buf(). There is more even to arc4random(3) which is up to
you to read in the manpage system.
Sincerely,
-peter
System boots just fine - (previously it would hang on probing CPU, 4 months ago)
Sleep /Wake works
X11 works
OpenBSD 5.7-current (GENERIC.MP) #894: Mon May 25 17:48:34 MDT 2015
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
cpu0: Genuine Intel(R) CPU 1400 @ 1.66GHz ("Genuin
Le 2015-05-26 12:58, Boudewijn Dijkstra a écrit :
Op Tue, 26 May 2015 11:07:06 +0200 schreef Simon
:
Le 2015-05-26 00:10, Miod Vallat a écrit :
It is not the responsibility of the operating system to protect its
users against software which assumes using the pid as a random source
is
a bright a
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 08:01:47AM -0400, bofh wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 7:31 AM, M Wheeler <
> b9dcbd36df10828fdb237104a05fd...@refn.eu> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 07:19:19AM -0400, bofh wrote:
> > >
> > > Unless you are in India, or Pakistan, or any of the other countries where
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 7:31 AM, M Wheeler <
b9dcbd36df10828fdb237104a05fd...@refn.eu> wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 07:19:19AM -0400, bofh wrote:
> >
> > Unless you are in India, or Pakistan, or any of the other countries where
> > Blackberry basically gave them the backdoor. Which also means
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 07:19:19AM -0400, bofh wrote:
>
> Unless you are in India, or Pakistan, or any of the other countries where
> Blackberry basically gave them the backdoor. Which also means the US,
> essentially.
>
This is to do with the encryption used for BBM services and not BlackBerry
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
wrote:
> M Wheeler said:
> > Android is the most targeted platform by malware by a massive degree.
> > Whatever you do, don't get an android.
>
> This is not supported by evidence. Actually, only vendors of
> "antivirus" software for android r
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 5:46 AM, John Long wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 12:51:39PM +0530, Jay Patel wrote:
> > Blackberry for security? or something else.
>
> BlackBerry has notably fewer exploits than other platforms, especially
>
Unless you are in India, or Pakistan, or any of the other co
Op Tue, 26 May 2015 11:07:06 +0200 schreef Simon
:
Le 2015-05-26 00:10, Miod Vallat a écrit :
It is not the responsibility of the operating system to protect its
users against software which assumes using the pid as a random source
is
a bright and wise idea.
Isn't this the whole goal of rando
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:21:19PM +0100, Bojan Nastic wrote:
> Anyone having much luck with 5.7 or -current on Thinkpad X1 Carbon 2nd gen
> (Haswell chip)?
It works pretty well (including wireless), although on my machine the lack
of a specific video driver means that things in X can be painfull
Hello Marko,
marko.cu...@mimar.rs (Marko Cupa?), 2015.05.24 (Sun) 10:17 (CEST):
> I am running recent snapshot on my laptop ThinkPad T440. Power button
> does not initiate shutdown. I have apmd_flags="-A" in rc.conf.local.
I thought the same about the power button of my X200s until I
accidentall
Gareth Nelson said:
> Is it theoretically possible to boot an OpenBSD kernel on an average
> android device?
TLDR: this requires a lot of work and provides much less then expected
in exchange.
That would require a lot of drivers which we don't have. Even
aftermarket Android firmware uses binary
Le 2015-05-26 00:10, Miod Vallat a écrit :
It is not the responsibility of the operating system to protect its
users against software which assumes using the pid as a random source
is
a bright and wise idea.
Isn't this the whole goal of random PIDs, to put a defense at OS level
protecting so
2015-05-25 22:37 GMT+02:00 Gareth Nelson :
>
> Is it theoretically possible to boot an OpenBSD kernel on an average
> android device?
>
>
Most android device run on ARM, with a few running on intel.
ARM processor up to Cortex A17 use the ARMv7 instruction set, the same as
the OpenBSD ARM Port.
S
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:40:05PM +0530, Jay Patel wrote:
> Thanks John for in dept detail... BB seems good. be cause i travel lot and
> mail usually using mobile only. keyboard seems better idea.
Nobody cares about your personal stuff, so back to OpenBSD or
STFU. Thx.
j.
35 matches
Mail list logo
