On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 06:01:58AM +0400, Alexander Pakhomov wrote:
> Got it with gdb.
> I restricted access to /dev/audio* to wheel (tried to restrict anybody else
> to hear my laptop mic),
> this causes sndiod to fail after privdrop().
you could start a private sndiod process to get exclusive a
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 04:19:55AM +0400, Alexander Pakhomov wrote:
> Hi.
> sndiod -r on fails with
> snd0: rsnd/0: failed to open audio device.
> All other programs are capable to play sound, but they lock device.
> aucat -i test.wav -d says it uses snd0. That's strange, sndiod can't open the
> s
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:57:06AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> machine hangs and such. you will figure out if you're affected or not
> pretty quickly. :) cause unknown.
Good to know. I'll try it out and see what happens. Thanks.
Bryan
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 21:33, 'Bryan Vyhmeister' wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:16:05PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> The ipmi driver is disabled by default because it does bad things on
>> some systems. If you don't go out of your way to enable it, the not
>> configured line is all you'll see
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:16:05PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> The ipmi driver is disabled by default because it does bad things on
> some systems. If you don't go out of your way to enable it, the not
> configured line is all you'll see.
Thanks for the clarification. I wasn't aware of that. What
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> I am trying to get my head wrapped around securing LDAP so please
> forgive me this n00b questions. My final goal is to replace our current
> NFS+NIS with NFS+LDAP+[Kerberos] set up.
>
> I see by default OpenLDAP clients are authenticating via SASL. I also
> see the Ke
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:16:05PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> The ipmi driver is disabled by default because it does bad things on
> some systems. If you don't go out of your way to enable it, the not
> configured line is all you'll see.
That's what I was going to say, but you beat me to it ;).
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 18:59, 'Bryan Vyhmeister' wrote:
> (running 5.4, by the way). The ipmi(4) driver shows up in my dmesg but
> as:
>
> ipmi at mainbus0 not configured
>
> A few years back I had an X7SPA-HF or similar board in the barebones
> system you can buy but I don't have a dmesg from i
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:38:33PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> I managed to escalate the integrated graphics question high enough to
> find somebody who knew what they were talking about, he said, as you
> confirmed, that they work fine with this motherboard other than that
> you cannot use the
Got it with gdb.
I restricted access to /dev/audio* to wheel (tried to restrict anybody else to
hear my laptop mic),
this causes sndiod to fail after privdrop().
21.11.2013, 04:23, "Alexander Pakhomov" :
> 21.11.2013, 04:21, "Alexander Pakhomov" :
>
>> Hi.
>> sndiod -r on fails with
>
> sorry,
> From: 'Bryan Vyhmeister' [mailto:br...@bsdjournal.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:51 PM
>
> Very interesting. There is some ambiguity in the specs. Looking at the
> SC510L-200B chassis which is what's included with the SYS-5017C-LF
> system you linked to, it also says 65W TDP.
Well,
21.11.2013, 04:21, "Alexander Pakhomov" :
> Hi.
> sndiod -r on fails with
sorry, sndiod -a on
> snd0: rsnd/0: failed to open audio device.
> All other programs are capable to play sound, but they lock device.
> aucat -i test.wav -d says it uses snd0. That's strange, sndiod can't open the
> same sn
Hi.
sndiod -r on fails with
snd0: rsnd/0: failed to open audio device.
All other programs are capable to play sound, but they lock device.
aucat -i test.wav -d says it uses snd0. That's strange, sndiod can't open the
same snd0
azalia device.
Any ideas? Are there any other software mixer working wi
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 01:31:23PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> Hmm, I guess I was actually looking at the SuperServer 5017C-LF page:
>
> http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5017/SYS-5017C-LF.cfm
>
> It has the X9SCL-F motherboard, a similar chassis with a 200w power supply,
> and indi
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:35:35PM -0800, 'Bryan Vyhmeister' wrote:
> From looking at Supermicro's CSE-510-203B page, it says 65W TDP and
> every CPU I've mentioned below except for the Xeon E3 1220 (80W) and
> Xeon E3 1230v2 (69W) fall below this.
Hmm, I guess I was actually looking at the Super
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:26:49PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> With the 200W power supply in the small form factor chassis,
> supermicro says the max processor TDP supported by the motherboard is
> 45w. I guess if you put one in that potentially uses greater power but
> never push it to do so it
> From: Stuart Henderson
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:54 AM
>
> One thing to note, which may be irrelevant, but may be very important,
> is which CPUs support AES-NI - the LGA1155 Pentium/i3 don't.
Yeah, you've got to bump up to a much more expensive Xeon to get that :(.
Thanks for the h
> From: Bryan Vyhmeister [mailto:br...@bsdjournal.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 9:46 PM
>
> I have lots of X9SCL-F, X9SCL+-F, X9SCM-F, X9SCI-LN4, X9SCI-LN4F,
> X9SCM-iiF boards running OpenBSD in production. Both network interfaces
> work flawlessly.
Cool, thanks much for the info.
> Al
Erling Westenvik writes:
> I'd love to see LaTeX support BLINK though.
I always wondered how the development of flashing ink was going, back
in the day
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
On 20/11/13 3:11 PM, Dan Shechter wrote:
Hi All,
Running OpenBSD in VMWare workstation 10.
OpenBSD 5.4 amd64 do not recognize VMXNET3, but it does recognize VMXNET:
"VMware Virtual VMXNET3" rev 0x01 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 not configured
Am I doing something wrong?
Yes, your expectation. 5
Hi All,
Running OpenBSD in VMWare workstation 10.
OpenBSD 5.4 amd64 do not recognize VMXNET3, but it does recognize VMXNET:
"VMware Virtual VMXNET3" rev 0x01 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 not configured
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks,
Dan
OpenBSD 5.4 (GENERIC.MP) #41: Tue Jul 30 15:30:02 MDT 2
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:09:46PM +0200, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Does anyone here run Open/FreeBSD on mac mini ?
>
as mike said in the post below there are many models.
i also run it on a macppc macmini and everything works
like a charm. dmesg included.
> Does the OS fully supports macmini hadr
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:09:07PM -0200, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Does anyone here run Open/FreeBSD on mac mini ?
>
> Does the OS fully supports macmini hadrwared ?
>
> Thank you for the answers.
>
> Fried.
>
I'm typing this on OpenBSD on the last generation of powerpc mac
mini's if that help
There are many generations of Mac Mini.
I have a i386 Core Duo (read: old) that ran OpenBSD. I have a macppc
(read: older) that also runs OpenBSD quite well. I have wired
Ethernet, so I wasn't concerned with wireless. I can't comment on
that.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Friedrich Locke
w
On Nov 20 16:09:07, friedrich.lo...@gmail.com wrote:
> Does anyone here run Open/FreeBSD on mac mini ?
> Does the OS fully supports macmini hadrwared ?
It works fine for me.
Haven't tried the bwi(4) though.
Jan
OpenBSD 5.4-current (GENERIC) #79: Thu Nov 14 02:48:44 MST 2013
dera...@
Does anyone here run Open/FreeBSD on mac mini ?
Does the OS fully supports macmini hadrwared ?
Thank you for the answers.
Fried.
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 09:05:14AM +0100, Didier Wiroth wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm not familiar with mail daemons and I'm trying to setup opensmtpd.
>
Hi,
> Here is what I would like to do:
> 1) the mail server should accept mails for the 3 following domains:
> - kma.mydomain.net
> - prv.mydomain.net
>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:54:36PM +, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
> On 2013-11-19 Tue 21:23 PM |, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > That is the score you get when you don't leverage "all the latest new cool
> > but heavy shit".
>
> +12 votes for flat static HTML without client scripts.
I'd love to see LaT
On 2013-11-19 Tue 21:23 PM |, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> That is the score you get when you don't leverage "all the latest new cool
> but heavy shit".
>
+12 votes for flat static HTML without client scripts.
On 2013-11-20, anon ymous wrote:
> Hello list!
> If anyone could shed some light to the following i would be thankful..
> i have 2 5.4-current boxes, one acting as an npppd server over ipsec
> and the other one wishing to be a client.
> My understanding is that to accomplish that the client needs
On 2013-11-20, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> You'll have no issues at all. It's a great combination. I tell my
> customers and everyone else to just go with an X9SC{L,M} board, an
> LGA1155 Pentium, Core i3, or Xeon E3 (if absolutely necessary) and be
> done with it. The cheaper Pentium chips and Core
On 2013-11-20, Marc Peters wrote:
> When i started dovecot, i got out of memory errors right at startup from
> the master process:
>
> Nov 20 10:50:55 master: Fatal: pool_system_realloc(8589934592): Out of
> memory
Misc is the wrong place for this really. Anyway from the error message
it looks li
Hi List,
i wanted to move my main mailserver from one to another. To avoid update
hassles i jumped directly to a recent -current from the beginning of
this month (full dmesg below):
OpenBSD 5.4-current (GENERIC.MP) #145: Sun Nov 10 22:55:43 MST 2013
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch
* Nicolai [2013-10-24 18:49]:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:35:51AM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
>
> > We are looking to move to something little bit more secure with DNSSEC
> > support out of box.
>
> The "security" you'd get with DNSSEC would be tiny in comparison to
> problems in reliabilit
On 18/11/2013 15:09 CET, Gianfranco Gallizia wrote:
Hello everyone, I have a question regarding relayd(8) in OpenBSD 5.3
I was playing a little with relayd as a transparent proxy with URL
filtering using this relayd.conf:
http protocol httpfilter {
# Return HTML error pages
35 matches
Mail list logo
