Re: mailx : mime handling?

2013-09-27 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Predrag Punosevac writes: > hru...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Predrag Punosevac wrote: > > > > > On 2013-09-26 Thu 10:15 AM |, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote: > > > > I use mutt basically because it has threading support, and I cannot > > > > live without it. > > > > > > > NetBSD version of mailx

Re: Snapshots of Sep 24

2013-09-27 Thread Gregor Best
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:44:23PM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > Hello! > > I was updating my amd64 laptop with September 24 snapshot's bsd.rd, and it > didn't let me select etc and xetc sets - they were simply missing in the list > of sets. Is it a glitch? Or may be I missed some news? > [.

Re: Snapshots of Sep 24

2013-09-27 Thread Nigel Taylor
On 09/27/13 21:44, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > Hello! > > I was updating my amd64 laptop with September 24 snapshot's bsd.rd, and it > didn't let me select etc and xetc sets - they were simply missing in the list > of sets. Is it a glitch? Or may be I missed some news? > Install allows the selec

Re: Freescale i.MX 6

2013-09-27 Thread Christer Solskogen
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Patrick Wildt wrote: > Thanks to Christer I have just placed an order for an Utilite, too. :) > > Thank you very much! > My pleasure. Now we just need to wait six weeks :) -- chs,

Re: Freescale i.MX 6

2013-09-27 Thread Patrick Wildt
Thanks to Christer I have just placed an order for an Utilite, too. :) Thank you very much! \Patrick Am 27.09.2013 um 21:54 schrieb Christer Solskogen : > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Patrick Wildt wrote: >> Hey, >> >> I have added support for the i.MX6 SoC to the tree. The platform is

Snapshots of Sep 24

2013-09-27 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Hello! I was updating my amd64 laptop with September 24 snapshot's bsd.rd, and it didn't let me select etc and xetc sets - they were simply missing in the list of sets. Is it a glitch? Or may be I missed some news? -- Dmitrij D. Czarkoff

Re: Freescale i.MX 6

2013-09-27 Thread Christer Solskogen
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Patrick Wildt wrote: > Hey, > > I have added support for the i.MX6 SoC to the tree. The platform is now > called armv7 > instead of beagle. There might be some changes needed to support the > Utilite, too. > Apart from that it should be usable. > Okay, which i

Re: mailx : mime handling?

2013-09-27 Thread Predrag Punosevac
hru...@gmail.com wrote: > Predrag Punosevac wrote: > > > On 2013-09-26 Thu 10:15 AM |, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote: > > > I use mutt basically because it has threading support, and I cannot > > > live without it. > > > > > NetBSD version of mailx does support threading as well > > > > http

Re: Freescale i.MX 6

2013-09-27 Thread Amit Kulkarni
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Christer Solskogen < christer.solsko...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > There was a mention of this platform earlier, but is this platform > usable yet? I'm getting myself a Utilite, and was hoping I could use > OpenBSD in it. This is ARM, but as far as I understood th

Re: Freescale i.MX 6

2013-09-27 Thread Patrick Wildt
Hey, I have added support for the i.MX6 SoC to the tree. The platform is now called armv7 instead of beagle. There might be some changes needed to support the Utilite, too. Apart from that it should be usable. \Patrick Am 27.09.2013 um 13:04 schrieb Christer Solskogen : > Hi! > > There wa

Re: Freescale i.MX 6

2013-09-27 Thread Alexey E. Suslikov
Christer Solskogen gmail.com> writes: > There was a mention of this platform earlier, but is this platform > usable yet? I'm getting myself a Utilite, and was hoping I could use > OpenBSD in it. This is ARM, but as far as I understood the platform is > beagle, am I right? > http://marc.info/?l=

Freescale i.MX 6

2013-09-27 Thread Christer Solskogen
Hi! There was a mention of this platform earlier, but is this platform usable yet? I'm getting myself a Utilite, and was hoping I could use OpenBSD in it. This is ARM, but as far as I understood the platform is beagle, am I right? -- chs,

Block with reply-to

2013-09-27 Thread Dariusz Binkul
Fellow users, do I understand correctly that RST replies to packets blocked with pf cannot be arbitrarily routed? pf.conf(5) says that "(...) reply-to is useful only in rules that create state". Since 'block' and 'match' rules seem to (understandably) not create state entries, there is no apparen

Re: how to compare ipsec.conf and isakmpd.conf settings?

2013-09-27 Thread Camiel Dobbelaar
On 9/27/13 10:46 AM, Daniel Polak wrote: What would have helped me solve this is a way to see what the current configuration of isakmpd looks like (irrespective of whether it was loaded from isakmpd.conf or from ipsec.conf). It appears there is no equivalent of a "C get all" command to the FIFO t

Re: how to compare ipsec.conf and isakmpd.conf settings?

2013-09-27 Thread Daniel Polak
Original message from Stuart Henderson at 26-9-2013 23:58 On 2013-09-26, Daniel Polak wrote: I'd like to see how isakmpd interprets the settings in ipsec.conf and isakmpd.conf and would like to compare those interpretations. ipsecctl -nvf /etc/ipsec.conf shows the settings from ipsec.conf

Re: mailx : mime handling?

2013-09-27 Thread hruodr
Predrag Punosevac wrote: > On 2013-09-26 Thu 10:15 AM |, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote: > > I use mutt basically because it has threading support, and I cannot > > live without it. > > > NetBSD version of mailx does support threading as well > > http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?mailx++Ne