Predrag Punosevac writes: > hru...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Predrag Punosevac <punoseva...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On 2013-09-26 Thu 10:15 AM |, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote: > > > > I use mutt basically because it has threading support, and I cannot > > > > live without it. > > > > > > > NetBSD version of mailx does support threading as well > > > > > > http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?mailx++NetBSD-current > > > > > > and it does have the right license :) > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Predrag > > > > Heirloom mailx also supports threads and has BSD license. Who wants such an > > mailx, can install the port. If you make from OpenBSD mailx a mailx > > similar to heirloom mailx, then there will be no small mail client > > anymore. > > I would suggest that you compare man pages for Heirloom mailx and NetBSD > version of mailx. Heirloom mailx does so much more than attachments and > threading. It is still the smallest fully featured MUA in existance. > > To be frank with you I was checking your claim about Heriloom license. > Makefile has indeed this line > #BSD > I would sware that it was custom license but you might be actually right > on that one. I was wondering if William Yodlowsky can confirm licensing.
If we're talking about s-nail, yes, it is BSD-licensed. cd /usr/ports/mail/s-nail && make extract then look at the individual source files under WRKOBJDIR. Of course, there are several small bits (MD5, etc) that are external contributions. -- Anthony J. Bentley
