Hello,
I have the follwing setup on a single machine:
RELAYD[PUBLIC IP]:443
-> WEB_SERVER[127.0.0.1]:8080
pf is disbaled for testing purposes
relayd is
configured like this (snip):
/etc/relayd.conf:
###
table { 127.0.0.1}
http protocol
www_ssl_prot {
# h
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Ville Valkonen wrote:
> On 13 November 2012 00:09, Joerg Zinke wrote:
>>
>> Are you really on latest -current?
>> There was a fix committed for a descriptor leak, which results in the
>> problems you describe.
>> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sbin/dhc
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Walter Neto wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I have two internet connections, and I want to make load balancing and
> failover service, I had read about pf load balancing and multi-path route,
> what is the difference between them.
>
> Which is the better to use in my sce
On 11/12/2012 at 5:20 PM Nick Holland wrote:
|On 11/12/12 15:37, Robin Björklin wrote:
|
| [snip]
}
|"compromise". That is almost always an evil word.
|
| [snip]
|
=
Agreement abounds.
"Compromise" takes two good ideas and results in a mediocre idea that
is in the average of those
The reason was actually intellectual property based between AT&T and the
proprietary BSD/386 if your talking BSD4.4. That was the core reason for
why FreeBSD and NetBSD started.
So really it isn't that crazy, more highly unlikely that your going to get
the core developers of each project to abandon
On Monday, 12 November 2012 at 21:37:41 +0100, Robin Björklin wrote:
> First and foremost I'd like to present myself, I'm a young and naive
> junior sys admin that think people should be able to compromise and
> see the bigger picture and the good of the cause.
It shows :-)
> As all of you prob
You seem to be laboring under the misapprehension that the Linux
world is unified. It isn't.
The big difference between Linux and the BSDs is that it alienates
itself from the BSDs and many other projects by using a viral,
business-hostile license. The BSDs can draw on one another's work
beca
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> - Then DragonflyBSD split from FreeBSD. Mainly personality driven
> AFAICT. Again, this doesn't imply any criticism of the founder of
> the new project.
There were some very valid technical reasons at the time as well, IMHO.
Your clear solution is Tru64.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012, at 06:04 PM, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> i am planning to write a simple web server. My initial ideia for this
> server is that it will only serve static content.
> So, i would like to have the best possible performance.
>
> I don't
If there's to be any hope of a rational discussion, we need to remember to CC
each list as the OP did.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012, Tony wrote:
>Ain't that what OpenBSD is though - the best from all worlds?
Especially with comments like these..
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Robin Björklin
wrote:
>
> Am I bat crap crazy for thinking it could be good to merge the four largest
> BSD variants out there, take the best bits and pieces out of each and
> create a Unified BSD?
>
Ain't that what OpenBSD is though - the best from all worlds?
T
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Robin Björklin
wrote:
>
>
> Am I bat crap crazy for thinking it could be good to merge the four largest
> BSD variants out there, take the best bits and pieces out of each and
> create a Unified BSD?
>
you are not crazy for thinking this, and fortunately there
On 11/12/12 15:37, Robin Björklin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> First and foremost I'd like to present myself, I'm a young and naive junior
> sys admin that think people should be able to compromise and see the bigger
> picture and the good of the cause.
"compromise". That is almost always an evil word.
In
On 13 November 2012 00:09, Joerg Zinke wrote:
>
> Are you really on latest -current?
> There was a fix committed for a descriptor leak, which results in the
> problems you describe.
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sbin/dhclient/kroute.c.diff?r1=1.12;r2=1.13;f=h
Noup, and thanks for th
Hello guys,
I have two internet connections, and I want to make load balancing and
failover service, I had read about pf load balancing and multi-path route,
what is the difference between them.
Which is the better to use in my scenario?
And for failover, the best solution is ifstated(8)?
thank
Am 12.11.2012 um 23:01 schrieb Ville Valkonen :
> Hello all,
>
> I was surfing on a Web when suddenly all traffic stopped. Closer examination
> revealed "Too many open files" failure with the dhclient. Since there have
> been
> improvements in the dhclient lately, could this be related?
Are yo
On 12 November 2012 22:37, Robin Björklin wrote:
> As all of you probably know there's a lot of buzz around Gnu/Linux these
> days and I'm pretty sure you couldn't care less. What I'm wondering is why
> the BSD community which from what I can gather isn't as big as the Linux
> community have deci
Sorry for the last message. I did not finnish and hitted send wrongly.
Hello all,
I was surfing on a Web when suddenly all traffic stopped. Closer examination
revealed "Too many open files" failure with the dhclient. Since there have been
improvements in the dhclient lately, could this be related?
Tried to do pkill -TERM dhclient && sudo dhclient trunk0 but no cigar
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:40:51PM +0100, Jean-François SIMON wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am sorry, I can't work out finding gdm or running Gnome with OpenBSD 5.2,
> could someone please send a link or some informations ?
> I used to have it working before, just now I would like xdm to launch gnome
>
Hi!
First and foremost I'd like to present myself, I'm a young and naive junior
sys admin that think people should be able to compromise and see the bigger
picture and the good of the cause.
Now over to the reason for my post.
As all of you probably know there's a lot of buzz around Gnu/Linux th
Dear all,
I am sorry, I can't work out finding gdm or running Gnome with OpenBSD 5.2,
could someone please send a link or some informations ?
I used to have it working before, just now I would like xdm to launch gnome
but starting gnome-session ends up with various errors and back to xdm
console.
James Woodward
> Thank you,
> James
Thank you.
While it's expected that universities will support the wider community
it's probably entirely optional. Thank you for supporting us.
In this case you happen to be supporting something very cool ...
>> nnpfs (ie arla) has been discontinued in openbsd.
>>
>> > is afsd working in 5.2?
>> >
>> > If yes, where can I read about the error "arla[13196]:
>> > kern_open /dev/nnpfs0: Operation not supported by device" besides
>> > in /var/log/daemon?
>> > If no, where can I read about why?
>
> So now it
Den Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:52:17 +0100
skrev Janne Johansson :
> nnpfs (ie arla) has been discontinued in openbsd.
>
> 2012/11/12 Anders Trobäck :
> > Hi,
> >
> > is afsd working in 5.2?
> >
> > If yes, where can I read about the error "arla[13196]:
> > kern_open /dev/nnpfs0: Operation not supported
nnpfs (ie arla) has been discontinued in openbsd.
2012/11/12 Anders Trobäck :
> Hi,
>
> is afsd working in 5.2?
>
> If yes, where can I read about the error "arla[13196]:
> kern_open /dev/nnpfs0: Operation not supported by device" besides
> in /var/log/daemon?
>
> If no, where can I read about why
The issue in the datacenter was resolved around 2:00am last night. Everything
should be back up now.
James
On 2012-11-11, at 5:38 PM, James Woodward wrote:
> There is an issue at the U of A hosting site. The servers hosted in that data
> center will unavailable.
>
> I will do my best to post
Hi,
is afsd working in 5.2?
If yes, where can I read about the error "arla[13196]:
kern_open /dev/nnpfs0: Operation not supported by device" besides
in /var/log/daemon?
If no, where can I read about why?
Thanks!
Br/Anders
On 2012-11-11, Jiri B wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:20:53AM +, hepta tor wrote:
>> Thanks for the pointer. Do you know if there are any guidelines on how
>> to configure FDE with what's implemented in -current?
>> At
>> http://geekyschmidt.com/2011/01/19/configuring-openbsd-softraid-fo-
Hello,
Is here anyone who got Microsoft Wireless Mobile mouse to work on
OpenBSD? Before OpenBSD 5.2 wouldn't even recognise device and disable
USB port whenever transceiver was plugged in. Now it seems to recognise
device just fine:
uhidev0 at uhub1 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 "Micro
Does OpenBSD ypserv serve multiple nis domain simultaneously ?
Thanks in advance.
Rod Whitworth wrote:
> >I have a Thinkpad T430s with sandybridge (or ivybridge, I can never
> >remember), and life isn't too bad. I can suspend/resume, watch
> >(smaller) movies and dvds, and generally use it.
>
> Thanks for replying Peter.
>
> Can you switch from X to a virtual console and ba
32 matches
Mail list logo
