On 13 June 2012 20:15, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> I'm sure that when WABPL is ported from NetBSD to Bitrig, someone might
> consider
*WAPBL, not WABPL
(for the archives: http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?wapbl++NetBSD-current )
Lines leading up the errors:
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/home/ports/pobj/webkit-1.6.1/webkit-1.6.1'
/usr/ports/infrastructure/bin/libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile c++
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -W -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts
-Wreturn-type -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-format-y2k -Wundef
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Jun 13 19:39:46, Jan Stary wrote:
>> Through my smtpd, I am sending an email to an address
>> in the fjfi.cvut.cz domain. The email get delivered alright,
>> but the maillog message is strange:
>>
>> Jun 13 19:32:08 mini smtpd[7138]: 93fe4a4f:
Tomas Bodzar [tomas.bod...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> It's obvious that you were not reading FAQ/man pages, because you
> modified files which are not supposed to be modified because of
> experience from some other OS or because you were reading some "howto
> install OpenBSD/Linux/BSD/Unix" somewhere o
[IMAGE]
Convención Nacional Secretarias Ejecutivas y Asistentes 20 y 21 Julio Los
Cabos 2012
El evento más Impactante en Latinoamérica para Secretarias y Asistentes!
5 años consecutivos de Calidad y Éxito! 5 Speakers invitados!
2 días Espectaculares llenos de Tip´s, Estrategias y Armonía!
Mauricio
On Jun 13 19:39:46, Jan Stary wrote:
> Through my smtpd, I am sending an email to an address
> in the fjfi.cvut.cz domain. The email get delivered alright,
> but the maillog message is strange:
>
> Jun 13 19:32:08 mini smtpd[7138]: 93fe4a4f: from=,
> size=427, nrcpts=1, proto=ESMTP, relay=0@local
¡Muy Importante!
Si no puede visualizar correctamente este correo, le pedimos que lo arrastre a
su Bandeja de Entrada
Apreciable Ejecutivo:
TIEM de México
Empresa Líder en Capacitación y Actualización de Capital Humano
Pone nuevamente a su disposición este exitoso curso denominado:
"Comunicación
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Dominguez, Roland
wrote:
> I just came across this article and was wondering if it's legit:
>
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/OpenBSD-forked-to-create-Bitrig-161695
> 4.html
"They also plan to port libc++ and the compiler-rt runtime library in
order to rem
On Jun 13 20:45:07, Eric Faurot wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:39:46PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > Through my smtpd, I am sending an email to an address
> > in the fjfi.cvut.cz domain. The email get delivered alright,
> > but the maillog message is strange:
> >
> > Jun 13 19:32:08 mini smtpd[
On Jun 13 21:21:37, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Are you running -current ?
>
> I cannot reproduce on -current and IIRC eric@ simplified code
> in that area a while ago
it's yesterday's macppc snapshot from ftp5.eu.openbsd.org
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 05:51:46PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > ouc
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Dominguez, Roland
wrote:
> I just came across this article and was wondering if it's legit:
> http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/OpenBSD-forked-to-create-Bitrig-161695
> 4.html
Yes, it's legit and it reflects the reality of the facts
Are you running -current ?
I cannot reproduce on -current and IIRC eric@ simplified code in that area a
while ago
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 05:51:46PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> ouch, will look into it
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 05:37:52PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > On my current/macppc, t
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:39:46PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> Through my smtpd, I am sending an email to an address
> in the fjfi.cvut.cz domain. The email get delivered alright,
> but the maillog message is strange:
>
> Jun 13 19:32:08 mini smtpd[7138]: 93fe4a4f: from=,
> size=427, nrcpts=1, prot
I just came across this article and was wondering if it's legit:
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/OpenBSD-forked-to-create-Bitrig-161695
4.html
Gasko, Peter [gaskopeter0...@postafiok.hu] wrote:
>
> 2)
> https://www.bitrig.org/index.php?title=FAQ
> A NEW OpenBSD fork! Will OpenBSD profit from this project?? :)
>
Yes, quite probably.
If you diff -ur openbsd bitrig you'll find the changes are almost all related
to either removing AFS, r
On Jun 13 19:39:46, Jan Stary wrote:
> Through my smtpd
sorry: current/macppc
> I am sending an email to an address
> in the fjfi.cvut.cz domain. The email get delivered alright,
> but the maillog message is strange:
>
> Jun 13 19:32:08 mini smtpd[7138]: 93fe4a4f: from=,
> size=427, nrcpts=1, p
Through my smtpd, I am sending an email to an address
in the fjfi.cvut.cz domain. The email get delivered alright,
but the maillog message is strange:
Jun 13 19:32:08 mini smtpd[7138]: 93fe4a4f: from=,
size=427, nrcpts=1, proto=ESMTP, relay=0@localhost [IPv6:::1]
Jun 13 19:32:10 mini smtpd[6586]:
the back story
It seems that everyone of the USB serial devices I purchase nowadays
is based on WinChipHead CH340 chipset. The sad thing is the last
two orders I've placed for usb serial dongle have indicated they were
Prolific pl2303 based, but when they show up they are CH340 based.
Sadly non
ouch, will look into it
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 05:37:52PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> On my current/macppc, trying to remove message from the queue
> kills the whole smtpd:
>
> # mailq
> MTA|d4c2da0cc94048ad|ENQUEUED|r...@mini.stare.cz|jan.st...@fjfi.cvut.cz|1339601616|345600|3|450
> 4.1.8 : Send
On my current/macppc, trying to remove message from the queue
kills the whole smtpd:
# mailq
MTA|d4c2da0cc94048ad|ENQUEUED|r...@mini.stare.cz|jan.st...@fjfi.cvut.cz|1339601616|345600|3|450
4.1.8 : Sender address rejected: Domain not found
# smtpctl remove d4c2da0cc94048ad
command succeeded
But
Si no podes visualizar este mail, ingresa a:
http://news1.bonuscupon.com.ar/r.html?uid=1.16.29hh.ks.0chpppibb6
æ¨æ渤åç¡å°æ[ç¦æ®è³ª-åéå²]纫/è¹ è»/è³
æ[è¯å¢æ¤-é å¼å¼]å±±/段
æªåæ
ç§å-å
°ç¥¨èµ-æ¦æ¡æè¿æ¶-åä¾å¸é»ç¾
è´è¯ç³ç³»è®æ¹ä»å¼èï¼åï¼é¡ï¼è
ï¼å¯ï¼å®ï¼ç¦ï¼æ¯ï¼ç
ï¼
度ï¼é¢ï¼è±¢ï¼æ¸¸ï¼ä¾ï¼å èå¼µå¸å°éå§ç
©
å¤ï¼±é °ï¼±æ°ï
291936
[IMAGE]
Taller de Licitaciones Públicas para la Ley de Adquisiciones,
Arrendamientos y Servicios
28 de Junio, Cd. de México.
Un taller totalmente práctico guiado por un experto.
Optimice sus procesos y ahorre dinero con esta práctica herramienta!
¡Reciba la información completa, Inscríbase y
hello misc-ers,
while reworking my /etc/hotplug/* scripts I noticed, that I get
ucom* devices as class 0 = generic:
dmesg snip:
uftdi1 at uhub6 port 4 "ELV AG ELV FHZ 1000 PC" rev 1.10/2.00 addr 4
ucom1 at uftdi1 portno 1
syslog snip:
hotplugd[10633]: ucom1 attached, class 0
hotplugd[10633]: u
2012/6/13 Gasko, Peter :
> Just a fyi, or maybe a starting of a discussion:
Read the archives and stop trolling.
Just a fyi, or maybe a starting of a discussion:
1)
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/byvendor?searchview&Query=FIELD+Reference=649219&SearchOrder=4
SYSRET 64-bit operating system privilege escalation vulnerability on
Intel CPU hardware
Does someone can prove that OpenBSD amd64 is not affected??
2)
h
On 06/11/12 19:25, Jens A. Griepentrog wrote:
Dear Mailing Listeners,
Let me know, please, whether it makes sense to modify disk geometry
for solid state disks?
no
Which meaning have the default values of cylinders,
heads, and sectors for these devices?
roughly the exact same thing it has me
Am 2012-06-13 09:55, schrieb Insan Praja SW:
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:07:31 +0700, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
On 2012-06-12, Simon Perreault wrote:
On 2012-06-12 14:08, Bernd wrote:
I've got two OpenBSD 5.1-stable/amd64 boxes employed which do all
the
routing for our AS (OpenBGPd and OpenO
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012, bj.perso wrote:
>
> FreeBSD and NetBSD seem affected, how about OpenBSD ?
>
Nope. The necessary check(s) for setting bogus return addresses has been
in place since, uh, 2004. Ditto for always returning from signal handlers
using iretq instead of sysretq.
Philip Guent
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:07:31 +0700, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
On 2012-06-12, Simon Perreault wrote:
On 2012-06-12 14:08, Bernd wrote:
I've got two OpenBSD 5.1-stable/amd64 boxes employed which do all the
routing for our AS (OpenBGPd and OpenOSPFd). I see asymmetric traffic
(I
thought
Hi Misc@,
I was upgrading my 5.0 i386 -stable to 5.1 i386 -stable. We use ECMP using
ospfd, and asymmetric routing with bgpd. Strangely, "keep state (sloppy
source-track) flags any" can't no longer pass icmp traffic. Traceroute,
browsing etc works, though. Then, I decided to upgrade it to -curren
ÎΡÎΣÎ
ÎÏαÏικÎÏ Î¤ÎÏνεÏÎ,Ïι ÏÏειάζεÏÏε
για Ïην ÎνÏÏ
Ïη
εÏικοινÏνία ÏαÏ
Τηλ.: 210 2710312
ÎÏαιÏικά Folders αÏÏ 119â¬
ÎγÏÏÏμη εκÏÏÏÏÏη με θήκη για ÎνÏÏ
Ïα και
κάÏÏα.
ÎÏαγγελμαÏι
Hello,
FreeBSD and NetBSD seem affected, how about OpenBSD ?
Bye,
ben.
___
Trouvez des idées cadeaux pour la fête des pères sur Voila.fr
http://shopping.voila.fr/vitrine/hi-fi-photo-video
33 matches
Mail list logo
