Re: VU#649219 and Bitrig

[ropers]

On 13 June 2012 20:15, Chris Cappuccio <ch...@nmedia.net> wrote:
> I'm sure that when WABPL is ported from NetBSD to Bitrig, someone might 
> consider

*WAPBL, not WABPL
 (for the archives: http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?wapbl++NetBSD-current )