Convocatorias Compranet 5.0 en Diciembre

2011-11-24 Thread Marta Solis
476525 [IMAGE] Manejo Sptimo de la Plataforma Compranet 5.0 9 de Diciembre, Cd. de Mixico y 16 de Diciembre Guadalajara, Jalisco. Sin lugar a duda la plataforma COMPRANET 5.0 a revolucionado el acercamiento y la comunicacisn de la empresa hacia el area gubernamental, pudiendo mostrar nuestras

spamd question

2011-11-24 Thread bofh
looked through spamd (8) and /etc/mail/spamd.conf. Is it better to use /etc/mail/nospamd or /var/db/override.txt? -- http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk "This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." -- Sandhurst officer cadet eval

Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c

2011-11-24 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
If you haven't subscribed to tech@ yet: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=132218680527474&w=2

Re: Dennis Ritchie

2011-11-24 Thread Thomas de Grivel
On 10/14/11 03:22, Tito Mari Francis Escaqo wrote: Dennis Ritchie should be the patron saint of software development and engineering. :) No matter how disgusting the notion of patron is to me, I feel Ada Lovelace would have to be considered too. She's not as freshly dead but is Den's father t

Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c

2011-11-24 Thread sven falempin
Sometimes people ask you do to things, like a bsd kernel without ipv6 code, and those guys pay you for doing this (ROFL) it happened to me, i only have a couple of arrangements(mostly userland) to do, back in the day (4.8 or something like that). 2011/11/24 STeve Andre' > On 11/24/11 17:46, Stu

ritiro auto e furgoni invia da GIOVANNI

2011-11-24 Thread autocarrozzeriaoffic...@gmail.com
Salve,cerco auto e furgoni, sono interessato a ritirare qualsiasi tipo di auto, e furgoni, anche da riverniciare e mal ridotti. Si effettua passaggio di propriet` immediato in sede ACI delle vostre vicinanze e trasporto a mio carico. La ditta non e' disposta a pagare altro, ma solo il passaggio

Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c

2011-11-24 Thread STeve Andre'
On 11/24/11 17:46, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2011-11-24, Paul Irofti wrote: On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:09:31AM +, Julien Crapovich wrote: Hello. Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error. I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file, not other hack. This is in

Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c

2011-11-24 Thread Vitali
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011-11-24, Paul Irofti wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:09:31AM +, Julien Crapovich wrote: >>> Hello. >>> Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error. >>> I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file

Re: DNS Google ?

2011-11-24 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-11-24, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:18:29 + (UTC) > Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> On 2011-11-23, Gregory Edigarov wrote: >> > so when unbound is going to hit the base? >> >> when someone who is capable of and interested in integrating it has >> the time to do the

Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c

2011-11-24 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-11-24, Paul Irofti wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:09:31AM +, Julien Crapovich wrote: >> Hello. >> Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error. >> I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file, not other hack. > > This is indeed a bug. Other people should s

Re: correct netmask on carp interfaces

2011-11-24 Thread Henning Brauer
* Russell Garrison [2011-11-22 18:28]: > I have set up my system accordingly and my advice is to set your carp > primary IP to the proper network mask (especially if it is using the > carp IP to provide a gateway to the connected network) and then any > other IP/interfaces to /32 per subnet. if y

Re: correct netmask on carp interfaces

2011-11-24 Thread Henning Brauer
* Kapetanakis Giannis [2011-11-23 14:13]: > Also Henning proposed the exact opposite in that old thread (ie /32 > on the carp interface) which seems more logical to me, but then I > get those errors (arp_rtrequest: bad gateway value) ignore them. at one point we'll have to clean that up. -- He

Re: altq on a variable bandwidth interface

2011-11-24 Thread Henning Brauer
* Jussi Peltola [2011-11-24 15:18]: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 02:21:57PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: > > that changes the order how exactly? > > the only valid point is that the modem drops packets regardless of > > their priority while we would drop low prio first. > There won't be an appreciabl

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-24 Thread Florian Rehnisch
o sc...@web.de: > As Florian noted, not even in the corresponding mailing lists are > done the announcements. The 5.0 release announcement (and some b4) is missing on gmane, but it happened, as it is on marc (and now on cuboa ...[1]) flori [1] qbrf gung zrna gung V tb ba nf zbq sbe phobn, yrg

Question about toxa.livejournal.com

2011-11-24 Thread Tom Price
Hello, I was wondering if it would be possible to suggest a link for your website at; http://toxa.livejournal.com/521497.html Our site Frixo (http://www.frixo.com/) is a road travel reporting website, that provides our users with the most up-to-date road traffic information. Our data is update

Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c

2011-11-24 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:42:15 -0200 "Christiano F. Haesbaert" wrote: > Is there any point in keeping INET6 as removable option ? > Can't we just get rid of all the #ifdef INET6 goo ? Wy is it there, untill it was stable? All I know is it saved me from having to upgrade a firewall and from having

Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c

2011-11-24 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:09:31AM +, Julien Crapovich wrote: > Hello. > Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error. > I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file, not other hack. http://cvs.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#ProbIPv6 That should answer your question. The f

Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c

2011-11-24 Thread Christiano F. Haesbaert
On 24 November 2011 10:59, Bret S. Lambert wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:20:29PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:12:10 +1100 >> "Rod Whitworth" wrote: >> >> > You are the only one who knows exactly what you did. Maybe. >> > Why should we waste time guessing? >> > >> >

Taller sobre técnicas de neuroventas. Mejore resultados en estas fechas.

2011-11-24 Thread Uruguay 7/12/11
7 de diciembre en Montevideo No visualizas bien este mensaje? Ver Online Miircoles 7 de diciembre de 19 a 23 horas. Ticnicas y estrategias de NeuroVentas/NeuroMarketing Mejore sus estrategias de venta, atencisn al cliente o marketing y lograr resultados mas alla del promedio, en una fecha del aqo

Re: altq on a variable bandwidth interface

2011-11-24 Thread Jussi Peltola
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 02:21:57PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: > that changes the order how exactly? > the only valid point is that the modem drops packets regardless of > their priority while we would drop low prio first. There won't be an appreciable queue on a router that is not next to the c

[no subject]

2011-11-24 Thread Julien Crapovich
Hi, I'm under OpenBSD 5.0, and I would like to compile a kernel without INET6. # cd /usr/src # wget ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/5.0/sys.tar.gz # tar zxvf sys.tar.gz I edited /usr/src/sys/conf/GENERIC, and disabled INET6 (line 59, #INET6) # cd /usr/src/sys/arch/`arch -s`/conf # config GEN

Re: altq on a variable bandwidth interface

2011-11-24 Thread Henning Brauer
* Christopher Zimmermann [2011-11-24 12:28]: > On 11/23/11 20:58, Henning Brauer wrote: > > * Jussi Peltola [2011-11-20 04:09]: > >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 08:58:46PM -0500, quartz wrote: > >>> is there a way to set up altq+priq on an internet connection with highly > >>> variable/unknown bandwi

Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c

2011-11-24 Thread Bret S. Lambert
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:20:29PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:12:10 +1100 > "Rod Whitworth" wrote: > > > You are the only one who knows exactly what you did. Maybe. > > Why should we waste time guessing? > > > > It's a pretty damn stupid thing to do anyway when it is

set mouse cursor in the first xterm window when startx?

2011-11-24 Thread f5b
when # startx the mouse cursor is in the middle of the screen? why not set mouse cursor in the first xterm window when startx?

Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c

2011-11-24 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:12:10 +1100 "Rod Whitworth" wrote: > You are the only one who knows exactly what you did. Maybe. > Why should we waste time guessing? > > It's a pretty damn stupid thing to do anyway when it is so easy to > block v6 traffic using GENERIC and, BTW, your kernel is NOT GENER

Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c

2011-11-24 Thread Andres Perera
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Rod Whitworth wrote: > On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:09:31 +, Julien Crapovich wrote: > >>Hello. >>Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error. >>I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file, not other hack. >> > You are the only one who know

Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c

2011-11-24 Thread Paul Irofti
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:09:31AM +, Julien Crapovich wrote: > Hello. > Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error. > I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file, not other hack. This is indeed a bug. Other people should stop bashing.

Re: altq on a variable bandwidth interface

2011-11-24 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
On 11/23/11 20:58, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Jussi Peltola [2011-11-20 04:09]: >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 08:58:46PM -0500, quartz wrote: >>> is there a way to set up altq+priq on an internet connection with highly >>> variable/unknown bandwidth? >>> >>> I'd like to create a simple one layer queue

Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c

2011-11-24 Thread Rod Whitworth
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:09:31 +, Julien Crapovich wrote: >Hello. >Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error. >I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file, not other hack. > You are the only one who knows exactly what you did. Maybe. Why should we waste time guessi

Re: original sendmail.cf, mc ?

2011-11-24 Thread Wesley M.
Thank you very much for your help ! Now all works fine. I just configured the smart host my mc file. On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:12:17 +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:54:17AM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote: >> Looking more closely at how I set this up, hostname.mc is actually

Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c

2011-11-24 Thread Julien Crapovich
Hello. Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error. I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file, not other hack. > To: misc@openbsd.org > From: s...@spacehopper.org > Subject: Re: Kernel without INET6 error on pipex.c > Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:19:46 + > > diffs mig

Necesita incrementar sus ventas?

2011-11-24 Thread i...@manadmon.com
?Encontrar nuevos clientes? ?Llegar a mas gente? E-mail Marketing 1.0 es un software capaz de encontrar contactos y enviarles email. Con ello usted tendra mas compradores para sus productos o servicios. http://www.emailmasivo.com Entre a nuestra web para probar gratis el software o plantear cua

Re: original sendmail.cf, mc ?

2011-11-24 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:54:17AM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote: > Looking more closely at how I set this up, hostname.mc is actually in > /etc/mail with a symlink to /usr/share/sendmail/cf and sendmail.cf is > a symlink to /usr/share/sendmail/cf/hostname.cf. This way, my /etc > backup backs up the

Re: DNS Google ?

2011-11-24 Thread Gregory Edigarov
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:18:29 + (UTC) Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011-11-23, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > > so when unbound is going to hit the base? > > when someone who is capable of and interested in integrating it has > the time to do the work. > well, if i understand it correctly, steps

Re: original sendmail.cf, mc ?

2011-11-24 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:30:51PM +0400, Wesley M. wrote: | Hi, | | I use OpenBSD 5.0 | I know the *.mc files are in : | /usr/share/sendmail/cf/ | And sendmail.cf file is in /etc/mail, but it comes | from which mc file ? /usr/share/sendmail/cf/openbsd-proto.mc | I just want to modify the orig

Re: original sendmail.cf, mc ?

2011-11-24 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:30:51PM +0400, Wesley M. wrote: > Hi, > > I use OpenBSD 5.0 > I know the *.mc files are in : > /usr/share/sendmail/cf/ > And sendmail.cf file is in /etc/mail, but it comes > from which mc file ? $ grep VERSIONID /etc/mail/*cf -- Antoine

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-24 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:21:40AM +, sc...@web.de wrote: > > Speaking of which... > > You are as free to put me in your killfile, but then you > behave like a child without rational arguments. > > [...] > I have a rational argument: YOU want announcements forwarded to usenet, YOU forward

original sendmail.cf, mc ?

2011-11-24 Thread Wesley M.
Hi, I use OpenBSD 5.0 I know the *.mc files are in : /usr/share/sendmail/cf/ And sendmail.cf file is in /etc/mail, but it comes from which mc file ? I just want to modify the origin mc file to allow me to send email from a real domain instead of his hostname. Or perhaps, there an easiest way to

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-24 Thread scire
> Speaking of which... You are as free to put me in your killfile, but then you behave like a child without rational arguments. To resume: gmane is a bidirectional gateway list to nntp, it is an archive. The aim of usenet is something very different: to efficiently propagate news. It is not a ga