> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Javier Bassi wrote:
>> lists is not to comply about spam, but since we are already offtopic
comply--->complain
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Scott Learmonth wrote:
> That would be like judging yourself by the amount of spam directed at you,
> unsolicited. I d
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:49:31 +0430, Hassan Monfared wrote:
>I agree completely,
>I'm volunteer too cleansing and moderating emails queue from
>none-subscribers.
>also spam reporting form is good idea I think.
>good idea.
>
NO IT ISN'T.
STFU, you don't have a clue.
Read http://www.openbsd.org/mail.
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Javier Bassi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Hassan Monfared
> wrote:
> > don't spam please!!
> >
>
> Replying to phishing isn't gonna help. I know rule n:1 of mailing
> lists is not to comply about spam, but since we are already offtopic
> in this thread
I agree completely,
I'm volunteer too cleansing and moderating emails queue from
none-subscribers.
also spam reporting form is good idea I think.
good idea.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Javier Bassi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Hassan Monfared
> wrote:
> > don't spam please!!
>
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:39:47 +0430, Hassan Monfared wrote:
>don't spam please!!
And you had to copy everything to the mail list AND the innocent party
whose address was forged as sender?
The one person you did NOT send it to was the original sender
That makes YOU a spammer and a wanker.
See htt
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Hassan Monfared wrote:
> don't spam please!!
>
Replying to phishing isn't gonna help. I know rule n:1 of mailing
lists is not to comply about spam, but since we are already offtopic
in this thread, I just wanted to tell that when I first saw the misc
archives at ma
don't spam please !
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Speakeasy.net wrote:
> Dear Valued Customer,
>
> You Have One New Security Message Alert
>
> Log In into your account and resolve this problem.
>
> Click here to Log in
>
> Regards,
>
> The Speakeasy Administration Team
>
>
> *
don't spam please!!
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Westpac Online Banking <
accou...@westpac.com.au> wrote:
> - This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. -
>
> As a result of too many incorrect attempts to access and Sign-in failures.
> Your Westpac Online banking has be
Does Openbsd support the Intel Gigabit ET2 Quad Port Server Adapter -
E1G44ET2BLK
I have searched extensively but I cant for the life of me find the chipset
number (usually begining with an 8 for Intel network cards) so I cant cross
check with the supported list at
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/m
Szanowni PaEstwo.
==
SzanujDc PaEstwa prywatnoED oraz majDc na uwadze przepisy Ustawy o
Ewiadczeniu usEug drogD elektronicznD, zwracam siD z zapytaniem o
moE
- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. -
As a result of too many incorrect attempts to access and Sign-in failures.
Your Westpac Online banking has been terminated. Restore your
account
below:
http://www.westpac.com.au/
Westpac
Online Banking.
All rights reserved.
..
Dear Valued Customer,
You Have One New Security Message Alert
Log In into your account and resolve this problem.
Click here to Log in
Regards,
The Speakeasy Administration Team
*
SPEAKEASY.NET - "The Road to the Inte
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011, Benny Lofgren wrote:
On 2011-09-04 07.39, David Vasek wrote:
No, Marco, it is not true. There is a difference between unloading the
heads in a controlled way and by an emergency retract. Doing emergency
retract repeatedly is not good, really.
That used to be true in the da
I have read through some of the Hitachi documents for my hard disk, and
came across this, in the Hard Disk Drive Specification (available
on-line as TS5K500.B_OEMSpec_r12a.pdf). Does this provide any useful
information?
6.3.6 Load/unload
The product supports a minimum of 600,000 normal load/un
after reading that fbsd thread it seems that it's problem of shitty hw
where acer can be count for sure. I saw a lot of them with fine
numbers in specs, but together it was worse then some older laptop
from ibm or similar vendor. Slow buses, cheap hw, missing specs and so
on. In the end expensive s
Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> Didn't know about the TERM variable pass over ssh...
>
> ...anyway, on those systems with many screen consoles like i386/amd64, one
> could have a tty with vt220 to go ssh and another to deal correctly with
> keyboard, that would be cool. So, still having that layout inside
On 2011-09-04 07.39, David Vasek wrote:
> No, Marco, it is not true. There is a difference between unloading the
> heads in a controlled way and by an emergency retract. Doing emergency
> retract repeatedly is not good, really.
That used to be true in the dark ages, when disk drives were as large
Lies
On Sep 4, 2011, at 0:39, David Vasek wrote:
> No, Marco, it is not true. There is a difference between unloading the heads
in a controlled way and by an emergency retract. Doing emergency retract
repeatedly is not good, really.
>
> Regards,
> David
>
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2011, Marco Peereboom wr
18 matches
Mail list logo