Re: Pflow netflows exported twice for each connection?

2011-01-15 Thread Daniel C. Sinclair
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 03:38:44PM -0800, Daniel C. Sinclair wrote: >> I gave up trying to twist inside/outside to fit my situation. All my >> firewalls block in all with pass in exceptions on some interfaces, and >> pass out all with pflow

Re: failure to mount: "invalid argument"

2011-01-15 Thread Ed Ahlsen-Girard
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:25:43 -0600 Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: Disregard. Forgot to newfs. > New disk for backups (1TB, first 250G NTFS for a Windows box, 500G > ffs, remainder unpartitioned, so: > > # /dev/rsd0c: > type: SCSI > disk: SCSI disk > label: HDS721010CLA332 > duid: 8f7cc589a5b8d0d1 >

pham Phamvantuan0934221598 đã gửi cho bạn một Yêu cầu Kết bạn qua hi5

2011-01-15 Thread pham Phamvantuan0934221598
hi5 Phamvantuan0934221598 pham hi5 Phamvantuan0934221598 pham == [IMAGE] Cha:%p nha:n la;i ma;i [IMAGE] pham Phamvantuan0934221598 DC# thC*m ba:!n lC m ba:!n bC( trC*n hi5. ChC:ng tC4i ca:'n xC!c nha:n ra:1ng ba:!n bia:?t pham Phamvantuan0934221598 Da; cC!c ba:!n

Re: failure to mount: "invalid argument"

2011-01-15 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:23:09AM +1100, Brett wrote: > On 01/16/11 09:25, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: > >New disk for backups (1TB, first 250G NTFS for a Windows box, 500G ffs, ^^^ > >remainder unpartitioned, so: > > > > > > >16 partitions: > >#size offs

Re: failure to mount: "invalid argument"

2011-01-15 Thread Jacob Meuser
I have gotten reports that multiple filesystems on umass(4) doesn't work, but haven't had a chance to look into it. apparently you are hitting the same issue. On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 05:22:40PM -0600, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:25:43 -0600 > Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: > > For

Re: failure to mount: "invalid argument"

2011-01-15 Thread Brett
On 01/16/11 09:25, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: New disk for backups (1TB, first 250G NTFS for a Windows box, 500G ffs, remainder unpartitioned, so: 16 partitions: #size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg] a: 1024015040512007616 4.2BSD 4096 327681

Re: failure to mount: "invalid argument"

2011-01-15 Thread Ed Ahlsen-Girard
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:25:43 -0600 Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: Forgot dmesg: OpenBSD 4.8-current (GENERIC) #614: Mon Jan 10 00:15:18 MST 2011 dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2.66 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86

failure to mount: "invalid argument"

2011-01-15 Thread Ed Ahlsen-Girard
New disk for backups (1TB, first 250G NTFS for a Windows box, 500G ffs, remainder unpartitioned, so: # /dev/rsd0c: type: SCSI disk: SCSI disk label: HDS721010CLA332 duid: 8f7cc589a5b8d0d1 flags: bytes/sector: 512 sectors/track: 63 tracks/cylinder: 255 sectors/cylinder: 16065 cylinders: 121601 tot

Re: high cpu load on small pcmcia ethernet loads

2011-01-15 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
On 01/15/11 21:26, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Christopher Zimmermann > wrote: >> I experience very high cpu loads when using my pcmcia ethernet card >> with more than 4Mbit/s. I get the same behaviour for a ep(4) 100MBit >> fast ethernet and ne(4) 10MBit ethernet card. B

Re: high cpu load on small pcmcia ethernet loads

2011-01-15 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > I experience very high cpu loads when using my pcmcia ethernet card > with more than 4Mbit/s. I get the same behaviour for a ep(4) 100MBit > fast ethernet and ne(4) 10MBit ethernet card. Both 16bit pcmcia. > The distribution between

Very OT, amiga accelarator

2011-01-15 Thread Marco Peereboom
I have been looking all over the place for an Amiga 3000 accelerator, either a 68040 or 68060 and I can't really find anything useful. Anyone got a spare one for sale or closet cleaning? Contact me off list please.

high cpu load on small pcmcia ethernet loads

2011-01-15 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
Hi! I experience very high cpu loads when using my pcmcia ethernet card with more than 4Mbit/s. I get the same behaviour for a ep(4) 100MBit fast ethernet and ne(4) 10MBit ethernet card. Both 16bit pcmcia. The distribution between interrupt and system load seems to be a bit strange, also the load

HOT Deal 2beds in GOLDEN MILE-2

2011-01-15 Thread BEAUFORT ESTATES NEWS
[IMAGE] Golden Mile - 2 The Palm Jumeirah AED 1,690,000 Area: 1,780 sq ft Located next to the Sea, this charming and inviting Apartment benefits from great views, beautiful water features and peaceful surroundings. rus...@beaufortestates.com www.beaufortestates.com Welcome Home Beautiful and B

Join Us Step 3

2011-01-15 Thread Ningbo Lina
Dear Tradingamp.net's Member, Thank you for registering with Tradingamp.net. Please click on the link below to activate your account. If the page does not display, you may copy and paste the link to your browser. http://www.tradingmap.net/reg.php?c=0033630814 www.tradingmap.net is a B2B we

News

2011-01-15 Thread bayrit bijoux
Speciale San Valentino basta poco per renderla felice non farti trovare impreparato www.bayrit.com La semplicit` del particolare. Bijoux e fashion per tutti. in due clic ed il regalo h fatto.

Business Inquiry

2011-01-15 Thread Qasim Younas
Dear Sir/Madam, We are leading manufacturer of hand embroidered Military uniform products, blazer badges, Cap Badges Epaulettes, Shoulder Boards, Chevron, Dress Cord, Aiguillette, Lanyards, Sword Knot, Buttons, Hand embroidery coats of arms, Family Crust, Masonic Regalia

CASA ANNONCES NUMERO 829

2011-01-15 Thread CASA ANNONCES
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octetstream which had a name of CASA ANNONCES NUMERO 829.pdf]

Re: DNSSEC validating resolver

2011-01-15 Thread Josh Smith
On Saturday, January 15, 2011, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011-01-14, Josh Smith wrote: >> Has anyone had any luck configuring the bind included with 4.7 (named >> -v indicates it is 9.4.2-p2) as a DNSSEC validating resolver? B Some >> digging around the web indicates it might be to old to hand

Re: DNSSEC validating resolver

2011-01-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-01-14, Martin Schr?der wrote: > 2011/1/14 Chris Cappuccio : >> nsd is already part of the tree and unbound will join it at some point to >> replace bind. they are well documented, fairly easy to use, and unbound is >> available through ports. use it. > > But a DNSSSEC validiating resolver

Re: DNSSEC validating resolver

2011-01-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-01-14, Josh Smith wrote: > Has anyone had any luck configuring the bind included with 4.7 (named > -v indicates it is 9.4.2-p2) as a DNSSEC validating resolver? Some > digging around the web indicates it might be to old to handle this > properly. If so is the version included with 4.8 an

Re: DNSSEC validating resolver

2011-01-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-01-14, Brynet wrote: > BIND10 will be written in a combination of Python and C++, not really a > suitable upgrade for OpenBSD's base resolver/nameserver. Don't forget it uses boost! :-) (And for those who are wondering, no this is not a joke)