I am running 4.7-current amd64, not sure what this means, I am guessing it is
an issue with xf86-video-mga driver
Tpo"; exit 1; fi
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/usr/xenocara/driver/xf86-video-mga/src -I..
-I/usr/X11R6/include/xorg -I/usr/X11R6/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/X11R6/in
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:52:39AM +0200, Roger Schreiter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we've been running a BGP router on OpenBSD for
> the months without problems.
>
> Now it crashed two times within 4 days. After the
> second crash, I could have a look on the screen:
>
>uvm_fault (0xd088cfc0, 0x6c4e20
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 07:15:07PM -0700, TimH wrote:
> I have tried a number of ways to allow icmp6, as the notes in my
> pf.conf (look for #) explain below. What few examples I could find
> online (http://www.benzedrine.cx/pf.conf) seemed to suggest it
> shouldn't be hard, but I'm not having
On Mon, 24 May 2010 12:46:21 +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
>On Sun, 23 May 2010 19:15:07 -0700, TimH wrote:
>
>>My home OpenBSD machine acts as my home router for NAT and for my HE
>>ipv6 tunnel. Everything works great except that I can't figure out how
>>to allow inbound ping6. HE has an IPv6 por
On Sun, 23 May 2010 19:15:07 -0700, TimH wrote:
>My home OpenBSD machine acts as my home router for NAT and for my HE
>ipv6 tunnel. Everything works great except that I can't figure out how
>to allow inbound ping6. HE has an IPv6 portscan function that can never
>manage to ping6 me. If I tell i
My home OpenBSD machine acts as my home router for NAT and for my HE
ipv6 tunnel. Everything works great except that I can't figure out how
to allow inbound ping6. HE has an IPv6 portscan function that can never
manage to ping6 me. If I tell it to not ping (-PN) it does indeed
succeed to scan ju
On Mon, 24 May 2010 00:00:07 +0200 patrick kristensen
wrote:
> I have managed to get a working connection with the following script
>
>
> /etc/ppp/ppp.conf
>
> default:
> set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command
> set device /dev/cuaU0
> set speed 460800
> set dial "ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\\
mount_portal work? if yes, then give some working(tested) example for fs, please
ps: sorry for english
on current 20 may
ext->gw->int
block
match in proto tcp to (self) port 23 rdr-to 192.168.2.2 tag PASS
pass tagged PASS
-connection established(its bug?)
block tag ANYTAG
match in proto tcp to (self) port 23 rdr-to 192.168.2.2 tag PASS
pass tagged PASS
-connection rejected(is absurd, and therefo
Hi,
we've been running a BGP router on OpenBSD for
the months without problems.
Now it crashed two times within 4 days. After the
second crash, I could have a look on the screen:
uvm_fault (0xd088cfc0, 0x6c4e2000, 0, 1) -> e
kernel: page fault trap, code=0
Stopped at pool_do_get+0x
On Thu, 20 May 2010 15:40:07 +0200
Henning Brauer wrote:
> From: Henning Brauer
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: DISKLESS kernel for moving an install to a larger disk
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 15:40:07 +0200
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
>
> there is plain no need for a special di
2010/5/23 J.C. Roberts :
> On Sat, 22 May 2010 22:08:57 +0200 patrick kristensen
> wrote:
>> Thanks for taking the time to answer and your fast replies.
>>
>
> Actually, ppp and TDMA/CDMA are nice break from the other headaches I've
> been trying to solve. ;)
>
> First of all, you either haven't m
I am having the same problem on a Lenovo R60e running snapshots from
May12th and May 22nd.
Looks like it may be "fixed":
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=127457255931742&w=2 , will try the
next snapshot.
Thanks.
>From /var/log/messages:
May 17 14:11:42 CN212314 /bsd: render error detected, EIR
2010/5/24 Rene Maroufi :
> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 08:07:38PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
>> * Rene Maroufi [2010-05-23 14:04]:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > i update my firewall to 4.7 and changed my rdr and nat rules. But there
>> > is one thing i don't understand: I use a transparent proxy (Squid) on
>>
Wow, just wow.
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Rene Maroufi [2010-05-23 14:04]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i update my firewall to 4.7 and changed my rdr and nat rules. But there
> > is one thing i don't understand: I use a transparent proxy (Squid) on
> > the same machine and in
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 08:07:38PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Rene Maroufi [2010-05-23 14:04]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i update my firewall to 4.7 and changed my rdr and nat rules. But there
> > is one thing i don't understand: I use a transparent proxy (Squid) on
> > the same machine and in pf.con
Nick Holland wrote:
jean-francois wrote:
Hello,
May I use with peace of mind the softraid device of OpenBSD 4.7 in
'small production' (personal servers for home use actually) ?
NO. (or at least, for no more than about six months. :)
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade47.html#softraid
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
>
> to my knowledge the kernel should always have build during that range.
> This means that you have done something wrong.
>
> cvs up -D "" in sys/dev/pci/drm should be
> sufficient.
>
>
I was over-complicating things with stupid pet tricks
* Eduardo Meyer [2010-05-23 13:51]:
> Hello,
>
> I have 3 simple but yet annoying doubts. First, it's about localpref.
> Today I have a /23 prefix which I announce only to one peer and which
> I also go upstream to this very only peer. However the upstream policy
> I had to use "pf route-to" to a
* Mihai Popescu B.S. [2010-05-23 14:55]:
> panic: pool_do_get(mcl2k): free list modified : page 0xd1d42000; item
> addr 0xd1d42000; offset 0x0=0xefffded2
> Stopped at: [some empty space displayed here] Debugger+0x4 [other
> empty space] leave
>
> I run ps and trace, got the output on a digicamera
* Rene Maroufi [2010-05-23 14:04]:
> Hi,
>
> i update my firewall to 4.7 and changed my rdr and nat rules. But there
> is one thing i don't understand: I use a transparent proxy (Squid) on
> the same machine and in pf.conf this rdr-rule:
>
> pass in quick on $ifklan proto tcp from $klan to ! po
B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B VerifedbyvisaVerifedbyvisa
B
B
Bonjour client de Visa Card ,
Votre Carte BancaireB est suspendue , Car Nous avons remarquer un
probleme sur votre Carte.
Nous avons determiner que quelqu'un a peut-etre utiliser Votre
CarteB sans votr
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:28 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
>
> OTOH, *directing* the muddled masses to HIS machine [even if by mistake]
> would give pause, would it not? Doesn't seem like a good policy security
> to me, ..
>
>Lee
>
>
Uhh. Security through Obscurity is no Security.
Is http:/
jean-francois wrote:
> Hello,
>
> May I use with peace of mind the softraid device of OpenBSD 4.7 in
> 'small production' (personal servers for home use actually) ?
NO. (or at least, for no more than about six months. :)
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade47.html#softraid
(yeah, perhaps not the
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 02:28:47PM -0700, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> After I upgraded to OpenBSD 4.7, my dual head configuration stopped
> working on my Radeon HD 2600 PRO. This has been working for about a
> year and a half with no problems since I got the video card.
>
> I tried various xrandr incan
Hello,
It's the first time on getting panic: on openbsd. I have an old
computer without display in a not so accessible place. Many times I
got not ping response after some usage, and no keyboard feedback so I
suspected a panic. This was with -current before 4.7 version
modification ( the files hav
We are looking for one more origin 350, specifically for the upcoming
hackathon in edmonton so that SMP support can be added.
Anyone have any lying around?
Hi,
i update my firewall to 4.7 and changed my rdr and nat rules. But there
is one thing i don't understand: I use a transparent proxy (Squid) on
the same machine and in pf.conf this rdr-rule:
pass in quick on $ifklan proto tcp from $klan to ! port 80
rdr-to 127.0.0.1 port 3128
This works fine.
Hello,
I have 3 simple but yet annoying doubts. First, it's about localpref.
Today I have a /23 prefix which I announce only to one peer and which
I also go upstream to this very only peer. However the upstream policy
I had to use "pf route-to" to achieve the desired behavior. I could
not arrange
2010/5/22, Don Reis :
> I have the idea that to make DHCP work over IPSec on my VPN gateway, I have
> to make dhcpd listen on lo0, and then have dhcrelay listen on enc0 and relay
> to lo0. (dhcpd runs on same machine)
>
> Why doesn't dhcrelay find enc0? And Is this the proper way to make this
> w
2010/5/22, dontek :
> Yes, thanks, I've read the man pages. I've even made the proposed
> connection
> work both ways. (less the DHCP working) What I was hoping for was a few
> that
> have more experience than I do to share their experiences and tell me some
> of
> the potential benefits and/or d
31 matches
Mail list logo
