On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 09:43:27AM +0300, Andrej Elizarov wrote:
> > * What other utilities do you find useful, any "dockapps" or similar
> > applets? personal customizations?
> unclutter
I'm idle enough to google for "unclutter". I hereby thank you for directing
me to yet another great utility.
-
love it. from first sight and 3.7-around.
oh, what is it? tears?! no, just rain.
> * Do you use one of the bundled window managers like
> cwm(1)/twm(1)/fvwm(1) or something else?
awesome. and it is. really.
with dual monitors.
> * What other utilities do you find useful, any "dockapps" or similar
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 6:22 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i have noticed that my hw sensors ouput is changing
> in a disturbing way (notice temp0):
>
> day 1:
> hw.sensors.it0.temp0=255.00 degC
> hw.sensors.it0.fan0=5625 RPM
> hw.sensors.it0.fan1=0 RPM
> hw.sensors.it0.fan2=0 RPM
>
>
Brynet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know not everyone uses OpenBSD for a desktop OS,
I personally run only OpenBSD on all my desktops. I spend no less than
5 hours a day working on them and no I am not a software developer.
I must admit though I enjoy writing a nice AWK or a shell script.
> but I ha
On 2010-01-04, Nick Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> I use default fvwm(1) and I'm happy with that. I tried cwm(1) after
>> this post http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20090502141551
>> and I found it very clean and useful, but I still use fvwm(1).
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> I use default fvwm(1) and I'm happy with that. I tried cwm(1) after
> this post http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20090502141551
> and I found it very clean and useful, but I still use fvwm(1). Anyway
> I plan to try this one http://ww
hi there,
i have noticed that my hw sensors ouput is changing
in a disturbing way (notice temp0):
day 1:
hw.sensors.it0.temp0=255.00 degC
hw.sensors.it0.temp1=26.00 degC
hw.sensors.it0.temp2=36.00 degC
hw.sensors.it0.fan0=5625 RPM
hw.sensors.it0.fan1=0 RPM
hw.sensors.it0.fan2=0 RPM
hw.sensors.it0
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 08:07:58PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I'll take patches. There are several features I don't use but still
> committed; the only requirements I have are:
> * ISC licensed
> * not in the way of current behavior
> * well written and within the scrotwm style
I'll see what
I'll take patches. There are several features I don't use but still
committed; the only requirements I have are:
* ISC licensed
* not in the way of current behavior
* well written and within the scrotwm style
If you need things like tags write the patch an it'll go in provided
you meet the re
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 07:41:04PM -0500, Ryan Flannery wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > On Jan 3, 2010, at 8:23, Chris Bennett
> >> Josh Rickmar wrote:
> [snip]
> >>> This may have changed in more recent version of scrotwm, but back when I
> >>> last tried it,
Ryan Flannery wrote:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Jan 3, 2010, at 8:23, Chris Bennett
Josh Rickmar wrote:
[snip]
This may have changed in more recent version of scrotwm, but back when I
last tried it, the statusbar also was not able to show you
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2010, at 8:23, Chris Bennett
>> Josh Rickmar wrote:
[snip]
>>> This may have changed in more recent version of scrotwm, but back when I
>>> last tried it, the statusbar also was not able to show you which
>>> workspaces currently
I had it on the status bar before and hated it. I have never found any
use for tagging.
On Jan 3, 2010, at 8:23, Chris Bennett
wrote:
Josh Rickmar wrote:
I tried out scrotwm, wasn't all that impressed. I really don't
understand why the devs decided to remove dwm's tagging features.
This
On Jan 2, 2010, at 20:08, Brynet wrote:
Hi,
I know not everyone uses OpenBSD for a desktop OS, but I have been for
nearly 5 years and I'm quite curious about some of your opinions? do
you
embrace minimalism or pure aesthetics? are the two mutually exclusive?
When I started using OpenBSD (.
NTPD does its own rotating if you tell it to. See e.g.
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/monopt.html
Cheers,
Andreas
2010/1/3 Lars Kotthoff :
> Hi list,
>
> is there any way to use newsyslog with ntpd (not the OpenBSD one) without
> having to restart it? Just rotating the log causes subs
It takes either a masochist to run original NTPD, or you are being tortured.
Anders Langworthy wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Brynet wrote:
* Do you use one of the bundled window managers like
cwm(1)/twm(1)/fvwm(1) or something else?
I wasn't going to reply, but I couldn't believe that cwm hasn't
received any love yet. It's glorious. Powerful keyboard contr
Si no puedes ver la imagen click en este link
Hi list,
is there any way to use newsyslog with ntpd (not the OpenBSD one) without
having to restart it? Just rotating the log causes subsequent log messages to be
lost and killing ntpd with SIGHUP causes it to exit.
I've had a look at the manpages and on the interwebs, but didn't find anything.
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Brynet wrote:
> * Do you use one of the bundled window managers like
> cwm(1)/twm(1)/fvwm(1) or something else?
I wasn't going to reply, but I couldn't believe that cwm hasn't
received any love yet. It's glorious. Powerful keyboard control,
neat features, and fa
Josh Rickmar wrote:
I tried out scrotwm, wasn't all that impressed. I really don't
understand why the devs decided to remove dwm's tagging features.
This may have changed in more recent version of scrotwm, but back when I
last tried it, the statusbar also was not able to show you which
workspace
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 08:15:55 + Josh Rickmar
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:31:55AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> > > Long
> > > time ago I did try development versions of NetBSD and FreeBSD
> > > because I needed support for hardware that -stable didn't have,
> > > and they were quite shak
Sorry for the duplicate again... I really have to get used to using
mutt's list-reply.
- Forwarded message from Josh Rickmar -
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 08:30:26 +
From: Josh Rickmar
To: Tomas Bodzar
Subject: Re: What does your environment look like?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:31:55AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> > Long
> > time ago I did try development versions of NetBSD and FreeBSD because
> > I needed support for hardware that -stable didn't have, and they were
> > quite shaky. Or do you guys just want more people to use -current for
> > th
Am 03.01.10 04:11, schrieb Bryan:
http://imagebin.ca/view/3JllgShA.png
I will kill to learn how to use mutt... It looks great...
That's vim used as editor for messages in mutt. But yes, mutt is great.
On 2010-01-03, Jeff Simmons wrote:
> Probably a bit premature to be asking this since I won't be able to
physically
> access the machine until Monday, but here goes ...
>
> I have a machine that I admin remotely running 4.6 with all the patches.
It's
> a firewall only machine with 6 ethernet inter
I use scrotwm with dual monitors.
I really like scrotwm since it works well on even really old hardware.
I adjust to make home, end, delete=delete forward work in xterm
I force keypad to work numbers only
I use colorls
I have aliases to swap between english and spanish
I have emu card so I use au
Tomas Bodzar wrote:
Did you try current? Anyway man pages says that this chip is supported
in both release and current. What says 'usbdevs -v' about your device?
Thanks very much. I will set up -current and report back to you and the
list.
I get the following with usbdevs -v
Controller /de
On 2010-01-02, nixlists wrote:
> If I upgrade to -current, don't I risk stability and security issues;
"stable" mostly refers to API changes; neither -current nor
-stable should be particularly unreliable (and security should
be the same or better in -current).
On 2010-01-03, Jeff Simmons wrote:
> Probably a bit premature to be asking this since I won't be able to
> physically
> access the machine until Monday, but here goes ...
>
> I have a machine that I admin remotely running 4.6 with all the patches. It's
> a firewall only machine with 6 ethernet
On 2010-01-02, Steven M. Caesare wrote:
>
> I've found some cable/antenna assemblies that might allow me to remote
> an antenna to a good spot in the house for coverage, and I'm thus
> re-considering going with a FW based AP setup once again.
>
> According to the OpenBSD site, the following 802.11
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010, Scott McEachern wrote:
The second was your suggestion, and interestingly, it produces the error.
Partition "e" starts at 43 022 070, the "problem" is at 268 435 455, so we'll
skip 225 413 380 to start just before that spot:
# dd if=/dev/rwd0e of=/dev/null skip=225413380
d
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 18:45:00 -0500 nixlists wrote:
> If I upgrade to -current, don't I risk stability and security issues;
> or are the chances of that are very low as far as this OS goes?
(sigh)
If you run *any* software, you are running the risk of stability
and security issues! --It's just a
I use default fvwm(1) and I'm happy with that. I tried cwm(1) after
this post http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20090502141551
and I found it very clean and useful, but I still use fvwm(1). Anyway
I plan to try this one http://www.scrotwm.org/
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Josh Rickmar
Did you try current? Anyway man pages says that this chip is supported
in both release and current. What says 'usbdevs -v' about your device?
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Vijay Sankar wrote:
> I am trying to use a USB 2.0 Gigabit Ethernet adapter
>
> axe0 at uhub1 port 1 configuration 1 interf
But this post says that - pcc can now build a bootable OpenBSD
-current x86 kernel. So I suppose that you will have better chance
with current and not release/stable.
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Jesus Sanchez wrote:
> As anounced in undeadly.org i've started trying pcc for little things
> and
36 matches
Mail list logo
