2009/11/3 Luis Useche :
>
> I read in the 4.6 changelog that his was part of the release.
>
> Am I missing something? Do I have to recompile? Or this is just a bug?
Yeah you are missing something. Listen to the *whole* presentation and
read the *whole* changelog. This is *not* in 4.6
It is in cu
2009/11/3 Gilles Chehade :
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 04:58:25PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> [bcc'd to Dan Goodin @ theregister]
>>
>> If anyone wants a choice quote from me about the recent Linux holes,
>> this is what I have to say:
>>
>> Linus is too busy thinking about masturabating monke
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
> >
> >
> >
> I replaced Linux around '01 or '02 with OpenBSD both at companies I've
> worked for since and at home. I don't really care what other people use
> for their needs, and I've been neutral in my opinio
Theo de Raadt wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950
I replaced Linux around '01 or '02 with OpenBSD both at companies I've
worked for since and at home. I don't really care what other people use
for their needs, and I've been neutral in my opinion about Torvalds and
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez
wrote:
> 2009/11/3 Claire beuserie :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Theo de Raadt
> wrote:
>>
>>> 2) At least three of our developers were aware of this exploitation
>>> method going back perhaps two years before than the co
My interpretation is that yes, they identified it as a possibility, but
due to limitations of the Intel platform, there wasn't an obvious,
clean, "correct" way to fix it.
I don't think this is a "primary" exploit, however. You would have to
have a buffer overflow or something in some other ap
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 02:57:59AM +0100, Claire beuserie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > 2) At least three of our developers were aware of this exploitation
> > method going back perhaps two years before than the commit, but we
> > gnashed our tee
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:24 AM, FRLinux wrote:
> I am doing some testing on OpenBSD 4.6-release and when i insert that
> Linksys Wireless key (WUSB600N), if I assign a wep key to it to
> connect to a test access point (due to some situation, I cannot change
> the access point just now), i get a p
[bcc'd to Dan Goodin @ theregister]
If anyone wants a choice quote from me about the recent Linux holes,
this is what I have to say:
Linus is too busy thinking about masturabating monkeys, he doesn't
have time to care about Linux security.
For the record, this particular problem was reso
GLOBAL TRADUZIONI PROFESSIONALI
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
1.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
2.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
3.jpg]
[demime 1.01d
On 2009-10-19, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> Just since upgrade46.html mentions the new syntax for packet scrubbing
> and specifically describes the behavior of the no-df flag, perhaps it
> should mention that the 4.6-release (and 4.6-stable?) kernel uses the
> opposite semantics for this setting? (Se
On 2009-11-03, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> Because I need queuing for outgoing traffic on vlan* interfaces.
> When keep state is used then queues for outgoing traffic do not work.
this (and variations) keep coming up (and has been answered 3 or 4
times in various mailing lists), but it's incorrect
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 04:58:25PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> [bcc'd to Dan Goodin @ theregister]
>
> If anyone wants a choice quote from me about the recent Linux holes,
> this is what I have to say:
>
> Linus is too busy thinking about masturabating monkeys, he doesn't
> have time to
Hi Guys,
Today I watched the presentation by Bob Beck about the OpenBSD VFS
hacking where he talked about the buffer cache and how it recently
changed (among many other things). Following his advice, I tried to
increase my buffer cache size with no success. The commands I am
running:
$ sysctl ker
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 01:43:08AM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:44:08PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2009-11-03, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> > > Because I need queuing for outgoing traffic on vlan* interfaces.
> > > When keep state is used then queues for ou
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:44:08PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009-11-03, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> > Because I need queuing for outgoing traffic on vlan* interfaces.
> > When keep state is used then queues for outgoing traffic do not work.
>
> this (and variations) keep coming up (and
2009/11/3 Claire beuserie :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
>
>> 2) At least three of our developers were aware of this exploitation
>> method going back perhaps two years before than the commit, but we
>> gnashed our teeth a lot to try to find other solutions.
Henning Brauer wrote:
how about reading the manpages for a change. sometimes i wonder why we
write them.
Please, PLEASE don't stop :)
Seriously, this is one area where OpenBSD (and probably other BSDs, too)
romp on Linux. I was debugging my pf syntax last weekend and took the
time to
Gentile Cliente, l abbiamo provata a contattare telefonicamente senza
nessun esito, in rif alla sua carta n 4539 la banca dove
addebita l estratto conto ha stornato l addebito del mese di settembre.
La preghiamo di confermare i dati in nostro possesso accedendo ai servizi
on line
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> 2) At least three of our developers were aware of this exploitation
> method going back perhaps two years before than the commit, but we
> gnashed our teeth a lot to try to find other solutions. Clever
> cpu architectures don't ha
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:34:24 -0500
Luis Useche wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Today I watched the presentation by Bob Beck about the OpenBSD VFS
> hacking where he talked about the buffer cache and how it recently
> changed (among many other things). Following his advice, I tried to
> increase my buffer c
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 22:08 +0100, C. Diego Raffaelli A. wrote:
> Any idea? Am i right using OpenBSD and trying to use Radius and/or
> NAS??
RADIUS Authentication and RADIUS Accounting are what you want, but
that's off-topic for this list.
Look in ports for RADIUS servers.
Good luck.
~BAS
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 12:01 -0700, Lawrence-Sporkton wrote:
> I believe its the Gobi 1000 or Gobi UNDP-1 which appear to be the same
> device
Very odd. This is a CDMA/3G/GSM/EVDO modem?
Normally they show up as PCMICIA, USB, or PCI Serial devices.
A lot of times the PCMCIA ones present a USB Ho
Please let me know if you were still looking for directories of US doctors or
dentists.
I have US medical professional lists, let me know what you need and I will get
you some more info, samples and a very reasonable price.
you can reach me at: ste...@bestchoiceformed.org
For your subscrip
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> dmesg, trace, ps.
>
Device is at home but will provide that tomorrow.
Cheers,
Steph
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 05:00:39PM +0300, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > Does anyone know how to disable this? Thanks in advance!
>
> 1. Why do you want to disable this? Did you even noticed actual problems?
>
> 2. See pf.conf(5), particularly part about "ruleset-optimization" option.
> But better you
On 3 November 2009 G. 16:32:29 Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have strange behavior of pf on my 4.6 box.
>
> Filtering rules are present in pf.conf in next order:
> block in all
> pass in quick on $ext_if proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port ssh
> pass out quick on $ext_if
> pass in quick
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 02:49:36PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 03:32:29PM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> | Hello!
> |
> | I have strange behavior of pf on my 4.6 box.
> |
> | Filtering rules are present in pf.conf in next order:
> | block in all
> | pass in quick on $
* Alexander Shikoff [2009-11-03 14:40]:
> I have strange behavior of pf on my 4.6 box.
no.
> Filtering rules are present in pf.conf in next order:
> But after they loaded pfctl -sr shows another order:
how about reading the manpages for a change. sometimes i wonder why we
write them.
oh sorry
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 03:32:29PM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
| Hello!
|
| I have strange behavior of pf on my 4.6 box.
|
| Filtering rules are present in pf.conf in next order:
| block in all
| pass in quick on $ext_if proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port ssh
| pass out quick on $ext_if
| p
Hello!
I have strange behavior of pf on my 4.6 box.
Filtering rules are present in pf.conf in next order:
block in all
pass in quick on $ext_if proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port ssh
pass out quick on $ext_if
pass in quick on $ext_if no state
pass in quick on vlan609 from vlan609:network to a
On 2009-11-03, FRLinux wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am doing some testing on OpenBSD 4.6-release and when i insert that
> Linksys Wireless key (WUSB600N), if I assign a wep key to it to
> connect to a test access point (due to some situation, I cannot change
> the access point just now), i get a panic th
]hracat Pazarlar} ve M|~teri Ar
]hracat
Pazarlar} ve M|~teri Ara~t}rma Teknikleri
Epitimi
Epitimin Amac}
Epitimimizin temel amac} depi~en d|nya pazarlar
Hello,
I am doing some testing on OpenBSD 4.6-release and when i insert that
Linksys Wireless key (WUSB600N), if I assign a wep key to it to
connect to a test access point (due to some situation, I cannot change
the access point just now), i get a panic then get put in dbd. Does
anyone know of tha
* Siju George [2009-11-03 07:07]:
> I have 2 interfaces rl1 and sk0. I would like to see their logs separately
> using
>
> #pfctl -s info
can't.
> if I put
>
> set loginterface rl1
> set loginterface sk0
>
> in /etc/pf.conf and type
>
> #pfctl -s info
>
> it only shows log for sk0
yes, th
On 11:34, Tue 03 Nov 09, Siju George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 interfaces rl1 and sk0. I would like to see their logs separately
> using
>
> #pfctl -s info
>
> if I put
>
> set loginterface rl1
> set loginterface sk0
>
> in /etc/pf.conf and type
>
> #pfctl -s info
>
> it only shows log for
36 matches
Mail list logo
