On 2009-10-19, Matthew Dempsky <matt...@dempsky.org> wrote: > Just since upgrade46.html mentions the new syntax for packet scrubbing > and specifically describes the behavior of the no-df flag, perhaps it > should mention that the 4.6-release (and 4.6-stable?) kernel uses the > opposite semantics for this setting? (See r1.120 of > sys/net/pf_norm.c.)
I think it would make more sense to push the fix in r1.120 to 4.6-stable (then maybe after that's done, change upgrade46 to point out the problem and the fix)...
