On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:10:29PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:02:01PM -0400, Ryan Flannery wrote:
> >> With the recent work done to the audio system on OpenBSD, a buddy of
> >> mine and I figured it should be
I recently tested a Neutrino netbook and sent the dmesg data in.
I had to boot with -c and disable acpi in order to do that. It now
occurs to me that it might be useful if I sent the contents of both
acpidump and pcidump. Is there a place to do that? Do the folks
doing acpi development want s
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:02:01PM -0400, Ryan Flannery wrote:
>> With the recent work done to the audio system on OpenBSD, a buddy of
>> mine and I figured it should be easy to setup two-way voice-chat
>> between two OpenBSD clients using
Hello!
Below script checks and displays PERMIT_DISTFILES_CDROM and
PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP values of 'all' print-build-depends and
print-run-depends ports --- which is very usefull (i think) before
compiling a port.
If someone find it usefull and review the code, i aprreciate.
Regards,
Cem
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 05:13:44PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
> Hi Misc@ and Claudio,
> I've a new compiled-from-the-last-source OpenBSD Router, lookin' at new
> cool features. I see a default rib are installed (Loc-RIB and
> Adj-RIB-In), I can see both with "bgpctl sh rib table Adj-RIB-in" an
* x x [2009-06-06 18:04]:
> The spam we seem to be getting as being part of this mailing list, is it
> just an unfortunate thing have to live with? Is there someway to make
> sure only get legit discussions/questions?
Yes, kick all the idiots off and only allow members to post.
O
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 06:56:13PM -0400, x x wrote:
> The spam we seem to be getting as being part of this mailing list, is it
> just an unfortunate thing have to live with? Is there someway to make
> sure only get legit discussions/questions?
There is no way because the problem is not turing-com
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 18:56:13 -0400 (EDT)
"x x" wrote:
> The spam we seem to be getting as being part of this mailing list, is
> it just an unfortunate thing have to live with? Is there someway to
> make sure only get legit discussions/questions?
>
http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html#spam
Regards,
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 05:01:26PM -0400, Ryan Flannery wrote:
Could that be why "-b 1" is working?
Also, with "-b 1024", the delay is around a half-second... not too bad.
Counter-intuitive as it seems, keep your buffer -b 1024, and increase
the sampling rate to 44100. Tell me if latency does
The spam we seem to be getting as being part of this mailing list, is it
just an unfortunate thing have to live with? Is there someway to make
sure only get legit discussions/questions?
You are invited to "CONFIDENCIAL PROPOSAL".
By your host Ashraf Cotu:
Date: Saturday June 6, 2009
Time: 9:00 pm - 10:00 pm (GMT +00:00)
Location: Cher Ami Bonjour, Je suis le Directeur en charge de
l'audit Banque section de compte etrangee de
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 05:01:26PM -0400, Ryan Flannery wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:34:08PM -0400, Ryan Flannery wrote:
> >
> >> aucat -b 1 -l
> >
> > this '-b 1' bugs me. you're telling aucat to process each frame
> > individually ..
On 2009-06-06, Lars Kotthoff wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after upgrading to 4.5, I've had problems with the memory usage of the box
> increasing continuously until if starts to swap and performance becomes so bad
> that I have to reboot the box. This does not seem to be related to a specific
> program,
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:34:08PM -0400, Ryan Flannery wrote:
>
>> aucat -b 1 -l
>
> this '-b 1' bugs me. you're telling aucat to process each frame
> individually ... sort of.
>
> it really means "as small as possible". in server mode, you'l
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:34:08PM -0400, Ryan Flannery wrote:
> aucat -b 1 -l
this '-b 1' bugs me. you're telling aucat to process each frame
individually ... sort of.
it really means "as small as possible". in server mode, you'll
get the smallest buffer that the hardware supports, so the res
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:34:08PM -0400, Ryan Flannery wrote:
>
> I had forgot to mention the following in my original post...
> Obviously, when piping the aucat output through ssh, ssh itself is
> going to introduce some delay. However, just trying the following...
>
> aucat -l
> aucat -o - |
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:02:01PM -0400, Ryan Flannery wrote:
>> With the recent work done to the audio system on OpenBSD, a buddy of
>> mine and I figured it should be easy to setup two-way voice-chat
>> between two OpenBSD clients using
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:02:01PM -0400, Ryan Flannery wrote:
> With the recent work done to the audio system on OpenBSD, a buddy of
> mine and I figured it should be easy to setup two-way voice-chat
> between two OpenBSD clients using nothing more than aucat(1) and
> ssh(1). As we found out, it
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Jacob L. Leifman wrote:
> On 6 Jun 2009 at 12:11, Donald Allen wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Lars Nooden
wrote:
>> > Can't the legacy system be modified to work with FFS or EXT2?
>>
>> Hi --
>>
>> Are you addressing that question to me? If so, I'm real
>> find /data -name "*.dat" -exec chown user:group {} \;
> chown -youroptionshere `find . -name "what_you_are_looking_for"`
Oh well, why do you suggest bad solutions when good ones have already
been brought up?
find -print0 | xargs -0 is quick and safe
find -print | xargsis quick b
> something with find(1).
>
> Try
> find /data -name "*.dat" -exec chown user:group {} \;
>
> But understand it first. Understand the quoting. man find.
Or you could do something like
chown -youroptionshere `find . -name "what_you_are_looking_for"`
Note the inverted marks: `
Pau
> Dave
On 6 Jun 2009 at 12:11, Donald Allen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Lars Nooden wrote:
> > Can't the legacy system be modified to work with FFS or EXT2?
>
> Hi --
>
> Are you addressing that question to me? If so, I'm really not sure I
> understand your question. What do you mean by "
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Lars Nooden wrote:
> Can't the legacy system be modified to work with FFS or EXT2?
Hi --
Are you addressing that question to me? If so, I'm really not sure I
understand your question. What do you mean by "the legacy system"? If
so, are you suggesting that perhaps
Boletmn Cientmfico Coband
Si no ve correctamente este boletmn puede acceder a la versisn online
_
2005-2009
4 aqos difundiendo psicologma cientmfica en Argentina
El Proyecto COBAND es una organizacisn sin fines de lucro formada por
estudiantes, graduados, docentes,
Can't the legacy system be modified to work with FFS or EXT2?
-Lars
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 04:05:49PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> I've a problem with the network speed.
> If I download the a file with openbsd,
> it has only a speed round about 250 kBit/s
>
> I could start several downloads with the same speed.
> So that a program like aget has a speed from 600 ti
Jan Klemkow wrote:
> hi,
>
> I've a problem with the network speed.
> If I download the a file with openbsd,
> it has only a speed round about 250 kBit/s
>
> I could start several downloads with the same speed.
> So that a program like aget has a speed from 600 till 900.
>
> I've this effect wit
Thank you all for the clearing this up for me. The presence of
mount_ntfs suggested to me that ntfs was supported, but apparently
not. I'll either work around this with two machines and pscp on the
Windows side, or build a kernel with ntfs support enabled.
Thanks again --
/Don Allen
On Sat, Jun
hi,
I've a problem with the network speed.
If I download the a file with openbsd,
it has only a speed round about 250 kBit/s
I could start several downloads with the same speed.
So that a program like aget has a speed from 600 till 900.
I've this effect with all programs like
Firefox, wget and
Hello!
Is there any quick way to restrict compilation of ports such that only
ports with 'permit_cdrom=Yes' or 'permit_ftp=Yes' are compiled?
Regards,
Cem
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 09:10:28AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote:
> I've got OpenBSD 4.5 installed on a Thinkpad X61, dual-booted with
> Windows XP. XP is at the beginning of the disk, starting at sector 63.
> The XP slice, to use BSD terminology, is about 10 Gb (the disk is 100
> Gb). The OpenBSD slic
Hi all,
after upgrading to 4.5, I've had problems with the memory usage of the box
increasing continuously until if starts to swap and performance becomes so bad
that I have to reboot the box. This does not seem to be related to a specific
program, at least the usual tools don't indicate that one
I've got OpenBSD 4.5 installed on a Thinkpad X61, dual-booted with
Windows XP. XP is at the beginning of the disk, starting at sector 63.
The XP slice, to use BSD terminology, is about 10 Gb (the disk is 100
Gb). The OpenBSD slice occupies the rest of the disk. During the
OpenBSD install, I created
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:44:35 -0400
"STeve Andre'" wrote:
> On Friday 05 June 2009 11:29:00 Pawlowski Marcin Piotr wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm a little bit curious about why there is place in bin for tmux(1)
> > and there is no place for wake(8). In my opinion it's a little bit
> > unfair. Could som
Thanks for your reply to my message.
This is WAG, but did/do you have PKG_CACHE defined?
I've never set it explicitly, and it isn't defined on either system.
$ env | grep PKG
PKG_PATH=ftp://openbsd.mirror.frontiernet.net/pub/OpenBSD/4.5/packages/i386
$
Locate on the upgrad
Hi Misc@ and Claudio,
I've a new compiled-from-the-last-source OpenBSD Router, lookin' at new
cool features. I see a default rib are installed (Loc-RIB and Adj-RIB-In),
I can see both with "bgpctl sh rib table Adj-RIB-in" and "bgpctl sh rib
table Loc-In". But still, it's always returns nothi
I'm following STUDY AND REVERT BACK TO ME and think you'll be
interested in it as well. To check it out, follow the link below:
http://mrchrisanderson100.blogspot.com/?psinvite=ALRopfVa2vB4OIuZqjnbA4RlsQqjCJDGWhbTvtvN7i4Up2pv0cdiF4zGDM83CiKI2XptAUcoQKJoBx_qduC0Yv4VxmZ0sMnYCg
"CLICK THE LINK ABOVE
37 matches
Mail list logo
