On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:53:01 +0700, Philip Guenther
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Insan Praja SW
wrote:
...
I always got a;
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: wrote 202.abc.de.fgh 64 chars, ret=-1
To quote a message on this list from Claudio Jeker:
I think I mentio
A quick update. It has just come to my attention that our group
discount code (details on the registration page) will expire on January
9, 2009. We've been able to take advantage of the Hotel room block
savings through our affiliation with ShmooCon, but all good things must
come to an end.
If yo
* Philip Guenther [2009-01-06 00:40]:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Claudio Jeker
> wrote:
> ...
> > Any DB that needs human help after a crash is in my opinion a bad choice.
>
> So that would rule out the ldbm backend, no? Last I checked the libc
> btree code, a crash while writing out a
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
...
> Any DB that needs human help after a crash is in my opinion a bad choice.
So that would rule out the ldbm backend, no? Last I checked the libc
btree code, a crash while writing out a page split would corrupt the
subtree.
> If a server
On 2009-01-05, ppruett-lists wrote:
>
> So choices for those with older openbsd port of openldap with bdb flavor
> are:
> * don't upgrade ( bad choice)
> * upgrade to openbsd 4.4 or current using the official port and renter
> data storing in the obsolete backend ldbm (ughhh)
> * Or go ahead and
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 10:49:06PM +0100, Patrick Oeschger wrote:
> gumstix support for the PXA270 (ARM based) seems to be included in the
> current cvs sources..
> ...as you know there is a new board from gumstix with the OMAP3503
> processor from Texas Instruments
> any plans to support this boar
gumstix support for the PXA270 (ARM based) seems to be included in the
current cvs sources..
...as you know there is a new board from gumstix with the OMAP3503
processor from Texas Instruments
any plans to support this board in the near future?
i would be glad to test and support (but am no kernel
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Bryan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have this new box, and the thing has an Nvidia 9300GE for a video
> card.
If you have some 'return if unsatisfied' option, you should use it to
get another graphics card if possible. Intel and ATI beeing the most
open-source friendly
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 01:46:30PM -0500, ppruett-lists wrote:
>> >If your LDAP environment is anything at all like the majority I've
>> seen >you will not notice any difference whatsoever (except you'll be
>> free >from BDB corruption during a crash).
>>
>
> Yep since I am not write heavy the
Time is getting short for registrations to DCBSDCon 2009. We have less
than four weeks remaining before we formally close registrations. Don't
miss out and lose your seat.
DCBSDCon 2009 will be held February 5th and 6th at the Marriott Wardman
in Washington, DC. We've been announcing speakers p
For OpenBSD 4.4 and current the flavor "bdb" is broken on openldap
BROKEN=OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
So, what to do? My experience is that compiling BDB and OpenLDAP
yourself isn't hard,
yep, I remember compiling apache back in the middle 90's
For security and la
>If your LDAP environment is anything at all like the majority I've seen
>you will not notice any difference whatsoever (except you'll be free
>from BDB corruption during a crash).
Yep since I am not write heavy then the non bdb could be okay,
but as an afore mentioned in this thread I am co
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:30 AM, P.Pruett wrote:
> For OpenBSD 4.4 and current the flavor "bdb" is broken on openldap
> BROKEN=OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
>
> Most past articles have strongly suggested haveing openldap use "bdb"
> as its storage method. Seeing that even t
Damn, forgot to send my response to list:
Message-ID: <49624a88.3020...@raapid.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:59:36 -0600
From: tico
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "P.Pruett"
Subject: Re: OpenLDAP w/o bdb okay?
References: <49620b86.4020...@webengr.com
Laurens Vets schrieb:
> Laurens Vets wrote:
>> Good morning,
>>
Hello
>>> have you read man compat_freebsd and tried the suggestions (i.e.
>>> download libc.so.1 from somewhere and also ldd and some other files)
>>
>> I was not aware of that man page... I've been trying to set things up
>> using
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Insan Praja SW wrote:
...
> I always got a;
> ping: sendto: No buffer space available
> ping: wrote 202.abc.de.fgh 64 chars, ret=-1
To quote a message on this list from Claudio Jeker:
> I think I mentionened this already a few times but I'll do it again.
> "sendto
P.Pruett wrote:
For OpenBSD 4.4 and current the flavor "bdb" is broken on openldap
BROKEN=OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
Most past articles have strongly suggested haveing openldap use "bdb"
as its storage method. Seeing that even the current port is not ready
to implemen
For OpenBSD 4.4 and current the flavor "bdb" is broken on openldap
BROKEN=OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
Most past articles have strongly suggested haveing openldap use "bdb"
as its storage method. Seeing that even the current port is not ready
to implement OpenLDAP 2.4 su
On 21:54, Mon 05 Jan 09, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> When I running OpenBSD under kvm, process time aways 0 !
>
> [dongsh...@dl:~/kvm]% cat OpenBSD-x64/start.sh [09-01-05
> 21:53:50]
> #!/bin/sh
>
> cd /home/dongsheng/kvm/OpenBSD-x64
>
> kvm -name OpenBSD-x64 -m 1024M -hda hda.img \
>
When I running OpenBSD under kvm, process time aways 0 !
[dongsh...@dl:~/kvm]% cat OpenBSD-x64/start.sh [09-01-05 21:53:50]
#!/bin/sh
cd /home/dongsheng/kvm/OpenBSD-x64
kvm -name OpenBSD-x64 -m 1024M -hda hda.img \
-cdrom ../../var/iso/openbsd-amd64-4_4-20081215.iso \
-net
On 08:12, Mon 05 Jan 09, Jim Razmus wrote:
> * Dieter [090105 00:13]:
> > > I have two build vms running on my home kvm server, one to compile and
> > > create releases for amd64 and one for x86.
> >
> > Wouldn't a chroot tree be sufficient for this?
> >
>
> Wouldn't that require cross compilin
* Dieter [090105 00:13]:
> > I have two build vms running on my home kvm server, one to compile and
> > create releases for amd64 and one for x86.
>
> Wouldn't a chroot tree be sufficient for this?
>
Wouldn't that require cross compiling? Last I knew, that didn't work
and was not advised.
Jim
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:29:01 +0700, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:03:47PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
Hi Misc@,
is there anything on man (8) how to set irq allocation for certain
devices like NICs? I tried apropos but I can't find userland application
on base to change this
Laurens Vets wrote:
Good morning,
have you read man compat_freebsd and tried the suggestions (i.e.
download libc.so.1 from somewhere and also ldd and some other files)
I was not aware of that man page... I've been trying to set things up
using it as a guide, but I'm unsuccesfull at the mome
On 2009-01-05, Sergey Khentov wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
>> scrub out on $adsl_if all max-mss 1352
>> scrub out on pppoe0 max-mss 1440
>
> thanks a lot, the solution works :) Both values (1440 & 1352) are OK,
> I've left 1440.
>
> This is pretty weird to me - I thought MTU can be set with ifconfig
Hello everyone,
> scrub out on $adsl_if all max-mss 1352
> scrub out on pppoe0 max-mss 1440
thanks a lot, the solution works :) Both values (1440 & 1352) are OK,
I've left 1440.
This is pretty weird to me - I thought MTU can be set with ifconfig -
and that is what I have done.
And yes, it looks
Good morning,
have you read man compat_freebsd and tried the suggestions (i.e.
download libc.so.1 from somewhere and also ldd and some other files)
I was not aware of that man page... I've been trying to set things up
using it as a guide, but I'm unsuccesfull at the moment. The man page
me
On 2009-01-04, patrick keshishian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm curious about why privileges are revoked before executing
> ip-{up,down} scripts?
>
> "ROUTING" section of pppd(8) says:
>
> +--- pppd(8)
> | When IPCP negotiation is completed successfully,
> | pppd will inform the kernel of
Hi Nick,
this sounds great. That's exactly what I was searching for. I wonder why I
didn't hat this idea ;)
Anyway, thanks for your reply!
best regards,
Marian
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:58:13 -0600, Nick Templeton
wrote:
> I'm doing what you're describing with a couple 4-port NICs. I assign an
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:48:57PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:29:01 +0700, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:03:47PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Misc@,
>>> is there anything on man (8) how to set irq allocation for certain
>>> devices like
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:03:47PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
> Hi Misc@,
> is there anything on man (8) how to set irq allocation for certain devices
> like NICs? I tried apropos but I can't find userland application on base
no. but some bioses allow it.
> to change this.
> Thanks,
>
>
>
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:29:01 +0700, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:03:47PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
Hi Misc@,
is there anything on man (8) how to set irq allocation for certain
devices like NICs? I tried apropos but I can't find userland application
on base to change this
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:03:47PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
> Hi Misc@,
> is there anything on man (8) how to set irq allocation for certain
> devices like NICs? I tried apropos but I can't find userland application
> on base to change this.
> Thanks,
In general allocating IRQs is a kernel
Hi Misc@,
is there anything on man (8) how to set irq allocation for certain devices
like NICs? I tried apropos but I can't find userland application on base
to change this.
Thanks,
Insan,
--
insandotpraja(at)gmaildotcom
34 matches
Mail list logo
