Henning Brauer wrote:
I am not aware of anyone actively working on any igmp-related stuff,
the lack of v3 comes probably down to "nobody did it". well written
diffs in reasonably small chunks will certainly be considered.
Thought it was a licensensing issue. After posting my message here I di
caso nco visualize correctamente este e-mail, clique aqui
Outras fantasticas sugestues para as suas
PRENDAS DE NATAL:
Encomende ja online, por telefone ou por e-mail
www.loja21.com|214 151 490 |ap...@loja21.com
Morada: Alameda Antsnio Sirgio, Ed. Empresarial, n:
caso nco visualize correctamente este e-mail, clique aqui
Outras fantasticas sugestues para as suas
PRENDAS DE NATAL:
Encomende ja online, por telefone ou por e-mail
www.loja21.com|214 151 490 |ap...@loja21.com
Morada: Alameda Antsnio Sirgio, Ed. Empre
We are proud to announce the opening of registration for DCBSDCon 2009!
DCBSDCon 2009 will be held February 5th and 6th at the Marriott Wardman
in Washington, DC. This is the inaugural event, but we already have an
awesome lineup of speakers and events. If you haven't already, check
out the deta
> Hi
>
> I have a intel pro/wireless 2200 card in my laptop, and the man page for
> iwi don't say if it support wpa.
>
> Now, i'm doing this.
>
> $ sudo ifconfig iwi0 nwid mywireless wpa-psk 0xmywpapskwkey
> $ sudo dhclient iwi0
> no link
>
> Regards.
>
> ---
>
> ---
74D0 8D66 A68D B866 0326 204E 3F42 004A
http://todd.fries.net/pgp.txt
Penned by Aaron Martinez on 20081219 12:40.38, we have:
| I am running 4.4 stable on i386 for the sole purpose of running nagios.
| So that I could get visualizations on the statusmap, nagios docs
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Francisco Valladolid Hdez.
wrote:
> $ sudo ifconfig iwi0 nwid mywireless wpa-psk 0xmywpapskwkey
> $ sudo dhclient iwi0
> no link
Hello Francisco,
As discussed earlier this week on this link, you'll need -current to
get this working.
Cheers,
Steph
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:40:38PM -0600, Aaron Martinez wrote:
> I am running 4.4 stable on i386 for the sole purpose of running nagios.
> So that I could get visualizations on the statusmap, nagios docs say that
> gd is required.
>
> I have performed just a minimal install, bsd, base44, etc44
Hi
I have a intel pro/wireless 2200 card in my laptop, and the man page for iwi
don't say if it support wpa.
Now, i'm doing this.
$ sudo ifconfig iwi0 nwid mywireless wpa-psk 0xmywpapskwkey
$ sudo dhclient iwi0
no link
Regards.
---
---
ficovh - http://bsd
8D66 A68D B866 0326 204E 3F42 004A
http://todd.fries.net/pgp.txt
Penned by jul on 20081219 20:08.11, we have:
| Stuart Henderson wrote on 18/12/08 21:14:
| > On 2008-12-18, jul wrote:
| >> a small question, is there any way to check integrity of installed
| >> package
Hi guys,
I tried generating random numbers with the _relayd user without a problem :
[_rel...@myserver /etc/ssl]$ od -D -A n /dev/random | head -2
2530374051 2874409472 1650458018 3736200264
1776311775 448067355 3385764049 245858356
[_
Stuart Henderson wrote on 18/12/08 21:14:
> On 2008-12-18, jul wrote:
>> a small question, is there any way to check integrity of installed
>> packages'binaries ?
>
> yes, by (ab)using pkg_create:
>
> for i in `find /var/db/pkg -name +CONTENTS`; do
> pkg_create -nf $i > /dev/null
> done
ex
I am running 4.4 stable on i386 for the sole purpose of running nagios.
So that I could get visualizations on the statusmap, nagios docs say that
gd is required.
I have performed just a minimal install, bsd, base44, etc44 and man44.
When i try installing gd i come up with the following error:
#
recebemos um pedido de remogco do seu enderego misc@openbsd.org na lista
Novos. Por favor, clique no seguinte enderego para confirmar que pretende
anular a sua subscrigco:
http://www.mktid.com/pub/rn.php?dodel=dodel&u=2d50b65318&l=1491
Thanks for your replies.
systat, of course, is solution, but I like and got used pftop :-)
I wrote message to Can Acar, but there're no replies yet.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Incorrect-output-from-pftop-on-OpenBSD-4.4-tp21057551p21094413.html
Sent from the openbsd use
Penned by Stephan A. Rickauer on 20081219 16:44.47, we have:
| On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 08:13 -0600, t...@fries.net wrote:
| > | > Wrong. Try this instead:
| > | >
| > | > rdr pass inet6 proto tcp from lan:network -> lan port 8081
| > |
| > | > You cannot redire
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 08:13 -0600, t...@fries.net wrote:
> | > Wrong. Try this instead:
> | >
> | > rdr pass inet6 proto tcp from lan:network -> lan port 8081
> |
> | > You cannot redirect to `::', a wildcard address. You must redirect to
> | > a specific address.
> |
> | Oh, yes. This is wr
hi,
I'm trying to get relayd to work with ssl and I'm having quite a hard
time. I get the error message : "SSL library error: httpproxy:
relay_ssl_accept: error:140B512D:SSL routines:SSL_GET_NEW_SESSION:ssl
session id callback failed relay", which is involves /dev/random
issues.
So test if it was
Penned by Stephan A. Rickauer on 20081219 11:01.16, we have:
| Thanks a lot for your help, Todd.
|
| On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 13:01 -0600, Todd T. Fries wrote:
| > | The ipv6 only client gets its ipv6 address via the rtadvd running on the
| > | gatway's internal interface. The gateway
* Tobias Wigand [2008-11-28 14:05]:
> hi,
>
> lately my ip-tv provider switched from igmp v2 to v3 and my openbsd
> setup with igmp-proxy from ports stopped working. if i get the v3 rfc
> correctly, it4s not conform to the igmp standard to cut support for
> older igmp versions but they did i
On Fri, 19.12.2008 at 10:38:28 +0100, Toni Mueller
wrote:
> "Ping" with oversized packets (I see 1548 bytes with tcpdump, and the
> user set a packet size of slightly more than 1500 bytes) from
The user uses this command to test from his desktop computer:
ping 1.2.3.4 -l 1500 -n 1
with 1.2.3.
Thanks a lot for your help, Todd.
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 13:01 -0600, Todd T. Fries wrote:
> | The ipv6 only client gets its ipv6 address via the rtadvd running on the
> | gatway's internal interface. The gateway's external interface is ipv4
> | only.
>
> So however you've managed it you have an I
Hi,
I have a VPN running which, for this problem, looks roughly like this:
net-West - West - East - net-East
|
+--- South - net-South
"West" is the central site, and "East" and "South" are quite similarly
configured branch offices. Esp., regarding the packe
Alexander Hall wrote:
Jeremy Bowen wrote:
Doh!
After sleeping on this overnight I've discovered a misconfigured server.
All working as desired now.
Too embarrassing to share for the archives? :-9
Well, almost. But here we go :-)
I think I know what the problem was but I'm not 100% sure of
24 matches
Mail list logo
