On Jan 14, 2008, at 5:10 PM, Brian wrote:
--- Max Hayden Chiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps this problem is specific to my configuration (or specific to
DOCSIS cable modems). But if it makes Brian (or someone else's
problem) go away, then it is likely that this problem is not unique.
I
--- Max Hayden Chiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps this problem is specific to my configuration (or specific to
> DOCSIS cable modems). But if it makes Brian (or someone else's
> problem) go away, then it is likely that this problem is not unique.
>
> --MHC
>
Let me read through the docu
On Jan 14, 2008 5:00 PM, Max Hayden Chiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cause the latency issue. By contrast if I limit the number of
> connections, BitTorrent can consume almost all of the bandwidth and
> the issue will not appear.
>
> Perhaps this problem is specific to my configuration (or specif
I've always had consistent success with a crossover cable and ssh. Serial
connections with Wrap and Alix can be hit and miss and it's hard to see
why it worked yesterday but not today. You may consider spending the
pesos on the cable instead of coffee, cigarettes or aspirin.
Are you in BA? What
On Jan 14, 2008 6:30 PM, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My theory is that you're using a ... uh... well, not very good
> connection that bogs down easily.
My connection normally works fine; even when I max out my 7Mb/512Kb
line. Running BitTorrent (even with a fraction of the bandwidth
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Calomel wrote:
Dan,
The "blocked while grey listed" number of 8 is dependent on the amount of
retries the remote mail server attempted while grey listed. Comcast servers
for example will try once per minute to deliver their mail. For example, if
you grey listed comcast for
On Jan 14, 2008 4:06 PM, Max Hayden Chiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian,
>
> After your post (and several others), I tried BitTorrent out on my
> network (sparc64 router + DOCSIS 2.0 cable connection; see
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=120019379210857&w=2)
>
> After some experimentation,
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 05:07:35PM -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> Marc Balmer wrote:
> >Nikns Siankin wrote:
> >
> >>Facts about OpenBSD:
> >>
> >># Stable release cycle. If you want to run latest bugfree ClamAV or
> >>FireFox - upgrade to CURRENT! But don't forget to buy release CD's!!!
>
Brian,
After your post (and several others), I tried BitTorrent out on my
network (sparc64 router + DOCSIS 2.0 cable connection; see
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=120019379210857&w=2)
After some experimentation, I was able to determine that running
BitTorrent with a large number of connectio
On Jan 14, 2008 6:00 PM, Billy B. Bilano <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See, we have the audit happening here at the bank this time and it's
> causing me a lot of headaches and pains. A whiles back I replaced Cisco
> stuff here with OBSD and pf and OpenBPG and all that jazz because you
> (you = The
http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Bilano
Excerpt:
"Last name of "Billy B. Bilano" troll genius. Mr. Bilano posts
incredibly plausible-sounding pleas for help on various alpha geek
mailing lists..."
Is January some kind of official troll month? Why can't it be the
shortest month of the yea
On 01/14/08 12:27, Richard Stallman wrote:
> And who controls GPL? What will you do when all GPL software and
> subsequent
> developments are "kept" on servers out of reach of users (BSD
> situation...)?
>
> You are making an extreme projection, which I doubt will happen.
I see more r
***
Analogy: You're on a highway with a posted speed of 100 km/h. You want
to operate your car and your car only 25 km/h only on the 100 km/h
highway.
***
And for this happy privilege, you want to impose the attendant nuisance
(highway analogy), read overhead (o/s analogy), on all the other cars
Hey guys!!! (with special request for Theor pls!)
Theo, I need a favor big guy! (only an easy one this time, I swear to it
sir! LOLSLS)!
See, we have the audit happening here at the bank this time and it's
causing me a lot of headaches and pains. A whiles back I replaced Cisco
stuff here wit
Dan,
The "blocked while grey listed" number of 8 is dependent on the amount of
retries the remote mail server attempted while grey listed. Comcast servers
for example will try once per minute to deliver their mail. For example, if
you grey listed comcast for 25 minutes the blocked number would be
Jason George wrote:
My spamd-setup always takes 20-30 minutes on two servers (4.1 and 4.2).
This is not normal? When I run it manually; most of the time is
spent downloading traplist.gz
You are all connecting to beck@'s machine at the University of Alberta
(www.openbsd.org) ?
I use the sa
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:53:35 -0800
johan beisser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bitching and whining get you nothing.
When will you people stop responding to whiners like this!? He's
bitching and your just bitching back.
Leave the ignorant fool alone, and he will stop barking up your three!
It's n
On Jan 14, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Nikns Siankin wrote:
If you get money from selling CDs/soft, its just clearly unfair to not
support it. Yes, I'm talking about stable ports.
Actually, the OpenBSD OS is supported. Your argument is pointless.
Stable ports are NOT supported because, well, it's not
I think what you're referring to is called "process accounting." I
don't know about OpenBSD's support for this, though.
RJ
On Jan 14, 2008 10:09 PM, Nikns Siankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:39:15PM -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> > you are correct that some of the issues you brought up are actual
> > shortcomings in openbsd. however, **bitching** that these are problems
> that
> > need t
Maybe it would be feasible to run your ideal user space in a virtual
environment (i.e. qemu), where the guest user space thinks it can use
the CPU for itself when in fact it's just 50-75% of the actual
machine.
On Jan 14, 2008 10:27 PM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 14/01/2008,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:39:15PM -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> you are correct that some of the issues you brought up are actual
> shortcomings in openbsd. however, **bitching** that these are problems that
> need to be fixed is about as rude as you can get. a number of the issues
> you co
On 1/14/08 7:58 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 06:27:24AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
>
What will be in GPLv4?
GPLv4 will be basically the same as all previous versions: it will
grant the four freedoms to everyone, and protect them for everyone, as
best as we can ach
On 1/14/08, Nikns Siankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, before you ask for diffs,
> I have to hear from devs, that these ARE
> considered to be issues that MUST be fixed.
they are not issues that must be fixed.
Nikns Siankin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:58:17PM +0100, Thordur I. Bjornsson wrote:
Lots of whining.
Where are your diffs to fix these issues ?
Well, before you ask for diffs,
I have to hear from devs, that these ARE
considered to be issues that MUST be fixed.
Until that, i can
On Monday 14 January 2008 11:30:11 Nikns Siankin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:58:17PM +0100, Thordur I. Bjornsson wrote:
> >Lots of whining.
> >
> >Where are your diffs to fix these issues ?
>
> Well, before you ask for diffs,
> I have to hear from devs, that these ARE
> considered to be iss
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Daniel Barowy wrote:
I would greatly appreciate it someone would help me diagnose this spamd
problem. We've been running spamd since last October, and until this past
Thursday, it was working great. I may be mistaken, but I don't think I've
ever seen entries like the fol
Hi,
Has anyone been able to get X (xenocara?) working properly with an nvidia
8800GT (not GTS or GTX).
It worked right out of the box with my 8600GTS but so far, not the 8800GT.
Would it help if I include any logs or anything specific or any
recommendations as to what I can try to get full suppo
I really tried resisting replying to this but this is simply too much.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 06:27:24AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> And who controls GPL? What will you do when all GPL software and
> subsequent
> developments are "kept" on servers out of reach of users (BSD
> situ
On 1/14/08, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I said, I don't have a good reason for wanting to do this. It just
> seemed like something someone might want to do. But let me dream up
> three examples: Sometimes firefox (or whatever program) goes a bit
> haywire and brings the machine t
Hello Marcos,
Monday, January 14, 2008, 7:18:27 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Evgeniy,
> You can try this how-to, this might work for you:
> Solution for ZendOptimizer to work under OpenBSD 4.1/i386
> 1. Download the file for OpenBSD 3.x as distributed by Zend
> currently ZendOptimizer-3.2.8-openbsd3.
Hello everyone,
My apologies if you get this twice-- it just occurred to me that I sent
my original message out using the wrong email address.
I would greatly appreciate it someone would help me diagnose this spamd
problem. We've been running spamd since last October, and until this past
Hello everyone,
I would greatly appreciate it someone would help me diagnose this spamd
problem. We've been running spamd since last October, and until this past
Thursday, it was working great. I may be mistaken, but I don't think I've
ever seen entries like the following before (email add
Just checking if anyone has made any progress thus far getting dual
screens to function ?
On 05/11/2007, Paulo Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi misc,
>
> Just wondering about any success stories getting dual-screen/xinerama
> running under OpenBSD 4.2-release with nVidia cards (G73) under
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 05:35:25PM +0100, Martin Toft wrote:
> After a bit of poking around, I've discovered that the error only occurs
> if I define one or more short cuts using xbindkeys that use the same
> keys as the short cuts in cwm do. I guess this behaviour should be
> expected, even though
Hello Evgeniy,
You can try this how-to, this might work for you:
Solution for ZendOptimizer to work under OpenBSD 4.1/i386
1. Download the file for OpenBSD 3.x as distributed by Zend
currently ZendOptimizer-3.2.8-openbsd3.4-i386.tar.gz
2. Untar (tar -xzf ZendOpt*), and fetch the files
-> ZendOpt
Evgeniy Sudyr schreef:
Hi all,
I want use Zend optimizer with apache and php5.
I downloaded ZendOptimizer-3.3.0a-openbsd3.4-i386.tar.gz from Zend
website (latest version is only for 3.4) and unpacked archive and copied PHP
module from /data/5_2_x_comp/ZendOptimizer.so to /var/www/lib/ZendOpti
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 03:54:33PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Jan 14 14:55:32, Martin Toft wrote:
> > cwm echoes the error message above and terminates if xbindkeys is
> > running. My solution at the moment is to not use xbindkeys...
>
> This is strange. I am running xbindkeys and it never bothe
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:58:17PM +0100, Thordur I. Bjornsson wrote:
>Lots of whining.
>
>Where are your diffs to fix these issues ?
Well, before you ask for diffs,
I have to hear from devs, that these ARE
considered to be issues that MUST be fixed.
Until that, i can stick my diffs in your ass.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:34:13PM +, Andreas Kahari wrote:
> On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 14, 2008 1:30 PM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:10:12 +0100
"Martin SchrC6der" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/1/14, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > What I mean is what I wrote in my first email: "For example, I would
> > want the build of the qt4 port to use a maximum of 25% of the
> > available CPU, leaving th
On Jan 14, 2008 9:27 AM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is not quite the same because a process, even running at niceness
> level 20, will grab as much CPU as it can (unless it has to wait for
> data).
>
> What I mean is what I wrote in my first email: "For example, I would
> want t
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 04:10:12PM +0100, Martin Schr?der wrote:
| 2008/1/14, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| > What I mean is what I wrote in my first email: "For example, I would
| > want the build of the qt4 port to use a maximum of 25% of the
| > available CPU, leaving the CPU 75% idle if
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 03:20:46AM +, Wim Lewis wrote:
> How much should I expect Bluetooth to be working on OBSD 4.2? I can get some
> things to work, but I can't successfully open an RFCOMM connecton.
The ubt(4) driver was fixed in -current, -r1.10 of sys/dev/usb/ubt.c.
Uwe
On Mon 2008.01.14 at 14:17 +0100, Didier Wiroth wrote:
> How can I make this to work:
> pflogd -s 116 -i pflog1 -f /var/log/pflog1 -p /var/log/pflogd1.pid
you want:
pflogd -s 116 -i pflog1 -f /var/log/pflog1 -p pflogd1
which will write /var/run/pflogd1.pid .
2008/1/14, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What I mean is what I wrote in my first email: "For example, I would
> want the build of the qt4 port to use a maximum of 25% of the
> available CPU, leaving the CPU 75% idle if nothing else is happening
> on the machine."
This not possible in OpenB
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 01:10:01PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> If users don't normally install microcode in the CPU, then ethically
> it may as well be a circuit. It is not built as a circuit, but that's
> a different question.
That may as well be an ethically confusing sentence.
If users d
On Jan 14 14:55:32, Martin Toft wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 08:32:50PM +0100, Martin Toft wrote:
> > when starting X (and thereby cwm due to my .xinitrc), I get the
> > following error:
> >
> > cwm: root window unavailable - perhaps another wm is running?
> cwm echoes the error message a
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2008 2:34 PM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Jan 14, 2008 1:30 PM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 14/01/2008, Al
Hi Folks,
I would like to know what web traffic analyzer should I use on my
network. I mean, what do you recommend.
Thanks in advance.
--
Joao Salvatti
Undergraduating in Computer Science
Federal University of Para - UFPA
web: http://www.openbsd-pa.org
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 14, 2008 2:34 PM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 14, 2008 1:30 PM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Jan 14, 2008 11:
Lots of whining.
Where are your diffs to fix these issues ?
Oh, no wait. you want *other* people todo the work for you,
its not enough that you got what they gave already you want
more, you ungrateful whining dick.
--
Wer nicht liebt Wein, Weib und Gesang / Der bleibt ein Narr sein Lebelang.
(W
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 08:32:50PM +0100, Martin Toft wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when starting X (and thereby cwm due to my .xinitrc), I get the
> following error:
>
> cwm: root window unavailable - perhaps another wm is running?
>
> It happens right after boot up, where I'm sure no other wm is runnin
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2008 1:30 PM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > >
Merhaba,
Sizi XING C'evreme davet etmek isterim!
Kararlar sC6zkonusu olduDunda iliEkiler gittikC'e daha C'ok C6nem kazanD1yor.
XING Chttp://www.xing.com/go/inv/14755969.b7b977
ArtD1k XING davetiyesi almak istemiyorum:
http://www.xing.com/go/opt_out_invite/U2FsdGVkX189MreMiOactwZ
Hello,
I'm running current (a few days old).
I would like to log some traffic to the pflog1 interface. Everything works
fine except a problem with pflogd and the -p switch.
I use the following as default:
1) pflogd -s 116 -i pflog0 -f /var/log/pflog
The process is:
$ cat /var/run/pflogd.pid
929
On Jan 14, 2008 1:30 PM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there a way of limiting the amount of CPU given to a particular
> > > p
Nikns Siankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hahaha. yeah. different vulnerable mirror, while I'm MITM'ing your ISP.
> see ya
the other option of course is to just buy the CDs.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.datadok
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a way of limiting the amount of CPU given to a particular
> > process or process group? For example, I would want the build of the
> > qt4 por
Nikns Siankin P=P0P?P8QP0:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:14:07PM +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Nikns Siankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
When we will meet in Riga, I will like to hear from you explanation,
how does putting md5 checksum file *along* with installables on the
same vuln
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:14:07PM +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>Nikns Siankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> When we will meet in Riga, I will like to hear from you explanation,
>> how does putting md5 checksum file *along* with installables on the
>> same vulnerable channel, helps to make
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:11:13PM +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> # Secure Distribution.
>>> The most secure operation system gets distributed on FTP servers
>>> as unsigned binaries.
>>
>> You should create your own binaries if you want secure binaries.
Nikns Siankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When we will meet in Riga, I will like to hear from you explanation,
> how does putting md5 checksum file *along* with installables on the
> same vulnerable channel, helps to make sure, that they are not backdoored ;]
you don't have to wait that long. f
On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM, Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way of limiting the amount of CPU given to a particular
> process or process group? For example, I would want the build of the
> qt4 port to use a maximum of 25% of the available CPU, leaving the CPU
> 75% idle
Hi all,
I want use Zend optimizer with apache and php5.
I downloaded ZendOptimizer-3.3.0a-openbsd3.4-i386.tar.gz from Zend
website (latest version is only for 3.4) and unpacked archive and copied PHP
module from /data/5_2_x_comp/ZendOptimizer.so to /var/www/lib/ZendOptimizer.so
I put lines bel
Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> # Secure Distribution.
>> The most secure operation system gets distributed on FTP servers
>> as unsigned binaries.
>
> You should create your own binaries if you want secure binaries.
He's also conveniently forgetting about the MD5 sums, conveniently
provided
Hi,
Is there a way of limiting the amount of CPU given to a particular
process or process group? For example, I would want the build of the
qt4 port to use a maximum of 25% of the available CPU, leaving the CPU
75% idle if nothing else is happening on the machine.
I know about 'nice', but it does
67 matches
Mail list logo