"Satadru Pramanik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a way to enable greylisting based upon the subnet mask of the
> sending mailhost without patching spamd & spamlogd?
Well, like Bob Beck pointed out, there is a real chance that this will
open the floodgates a little too much.
It's alway
We host our own web-servers so DSR shouldn't be a problem. Will probably
get rid of the co-located balancers and bring them inside our network as
we dont really gain anything from co-locating. Might just use something
simple like lbnamed !
Adam wrote:
Linden Varley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-14 02:04]:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> >
> >Now I am back in Hamburg and would like to continue that work. There
> >is quite a lot more performance to gain, but I need to be able to measure,
> >profile etc. For that I need two (preferably identical) 1u r
* Martin Schrvder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-14 01:24]:
> 2007/6/13, Matt Olander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >Where is Henning located? Shipping free stuff out of country is sometimes a
> >pain and takes longer.
>
> Hamburg, Germany.
>
> Henning, is DENIC still using OpenBGPD?
DECIX, yes, but they
Linden Varley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Load-balancers were co-located for redundancy reasons I believe. Its
> just a shame traffic in/out is paid-for so even if web-servers were also
> co-located then traffic will still be metered.
If your web servers and load balancers aren't on the same n
> On 6/13/07, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I have been reading a thread on opensolaris.org regarding the
> > open-sourcing of 4front's OSS. After explaining why CDDL licensing is
> > unsuitable for OpenBSD, some of the developers have expressed an
> > interest to cont
Load-balancers were co-located for redundancy reasons I believe. Its
just a shame traffic in/out is paid-for so even if web-servers were also
co-located then traffic will still be metered.
We could bring the load-balancers into our network to stop this problem
but we have two-sites on differen
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> >
> > Now I am back in Hamburg and would like to continue that work. There
> > is quite a lot more performance to gain, but I need to be able to measure,
> > profile etc. For that I need two (preferably identical) 1u rackmount,
> > very fast single-CPU machines here in
I get the following messages during the snapshot bsd.rd install from:
OpenBSD 4.1-current (RAMDISK_CD) #382: Tue Jun 12 20:35:47 MDT 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD
snip-
rd0: fixed, 3800 blocks
dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
r
On 6/13/07, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys,
I have been reading a thread on opensolaris.org regarding the
open-sourcing of 4front's OSS. After explaining why CDDL licensing is
unsuitable for OpenBSD, some of the developers have expressed an
interest to contact Theo regarding lice
Hi,
route add -mpath use with pf.conf could do load balancing from internal
to public network.
my question is how to setup pf.conf or kernel, so that from the public
network can access the public interfaces.
it seem to me that the first default route/ interface will send out all
traffic regardl
Linden Varley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only reason we need DSR is our load-balancers are co-located and we
> have a limit on data usage so the connection needs to be offloaded to
> the server/client and not proxied as this would get quite expensive with
> the traffic flowing through our
I have current running under VMWare Server using both single and multiprocessor
raidframe enabled kernels (dmsgs below). As far as I can tell everything is
working and softraid is not causing any issues with raidframe autoconfiguration.
I'll try and test on VMWare ESX tomorrow - that emulates an
* Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070613 20:02]:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> >
> >Now I am back in Hamburg and would like to continue that work. There
> >is quite a lot more performance to gain, but I need to be able to measure,
> >profile etc. For that I need two (preferably identical) 1u rackm
* Satadru Pramanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-13 16:00]:
> I have OpenBSD 4.0 setup with spamd doing greylisting for a mail
> server, and I am having a problem with more and more companies sending
> mail that is getting stuck in spamd from having a pool of mail servers
> sending mail from several
The only reason we need DSR is our load-balancers are co-located and we
have a limit on data usage so the connection needs to be offloaded to
the server/client and not proxied as this would get quite expensive with
the traffic flowing through our co-location pipe.
Might have to move to Linux w
Henning Brauer wrote:
Now I am back in Hamburg and would like to continue that work. There
is quite a lot more performance to gain, but I need to be able to measure,
profile etc. For that I need two (preferably identical) 1u rackmount,
very fast single-CPU machines here in Hamburg, asap, sinc
Hi guys,
I have been reading a thread on opensolaris.org regarding the
open-sourcing of 4front's OSS. After explaining why CDDL licensing is
unsuitable for OpenBSD, some of the developers have expressed an
interest to contact Theo regarding licensing and OpenBSD.
I do not know much about licensi
2007/6/13, Matt Olander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Where is Henning located? Shipping free stuff out of country is sometimes a
pain and takes longer.
Hamburg, Germany.
Henning, is DENIC still using OpenBGPD?
Best
Martin
Hi,
Thank you very much.
netstat -ni will not show a single error on any of the three interfaces.
I do not think it has anything to do with PF, because the problem
happens even with a pass quick rule.
I use dlink DGE-530T nics and one onboard vr0.
sk0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr 00:13:
On 2007/06/13 16:38, Jeff Santos wrote:
> I keep getting these "punt RTM_ADD without gateway" in my /var/log/messages
> from the routed daemon. Once in a while, I get RTM_LOSING as well.
RTM_LOSING happens when TCP segments are lost, look for packet loss
somewhere. The usual suspects are bad cable
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 12:36:33PM -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> Such as Distributed computing environments where you have your HAL4
> service VIP on the same segment/subnet as your distributed server farm.
>
so they should redesign their network instead of inventing crazy
features. this DSR
I have OpenBSD 4.0 setup with spamd doing greylisting for a mail
server, and I am having a problem with more and more companies sending
mail that is getting stuck in spamd from having a pool of mail servers
sending mail from several addresses in the same subnet.
I searched the archives and notice
Hi,
I keep getting these "punt RTM_ADD without gateway" in my /var/log/messages
from the routed daemon. Once in a while, I get RTM_LOSING as well.
I noticed that, even with a static default route, every now and then I
try to ping the default gateway, I get ping: sendto: No route to host.
I saw a
John Nietzsche wrote:
> Dear gentleman,
>
> i am trying to install openbsd 4.1 on dell poweredge 2900. Everything
> from turnning on the machine to cd booting was ok, but when i get to
> the point of installing it (that part when i am given the options:
> Upgrade, Install and Shell? ) its usb keyb
On 6/13/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007/06/13 02:00, Kian Mohageri wrote:
> Is my best option to kill syslogd from rc.local or manually edit /etc/rc?
How about leaving them both running, and binding syslog-ng to just
the relevant IP address?
Thank you all for the sugg
> > Anyway, how about underclocking your Duron some? Reset the BIOS timings
> > and power levels to failsafe? The old K7+VIA Chipset boards were a rough
> > crowd.
>
> This is a custom white box server, all put together.
> It is not an HP.
> I will try to reset the bios timings and power level
On 6/13/07, David Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the example given here:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html
Each physical interface has two IPv4 addresses, one for a shared IP and
one for the interface address. That would require a /29 or shorter to
accommodate these two addresses,
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 10:26 am, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:02:42 -0600, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> On 6/13/07, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > very fast single-CPU machines here in Hamburg, asap, since I have some
> >> > time for such develop
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:01:47 -0600, "Theo de Raadt"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > Oh, a directed spam campaign. perfect. that will endear us to our
> > > users. Please return to marketing school from whence you came, and
> > > think
> > > before you suggest such things.
> >
> > A open sourc
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Jason Dixon wrote:
I'm probably going to lose a friend over this, but I'd like to
challenge iXsystems to step up and donate a couple systems for this
purpose. It would benefit everyone for you guys to donate the hardware
to further optimize PF. We all know that PF has be
On Jun 13, 2007, at 11:57 AM, David Newman wrote:
Each physical interface has two IPv4 addresses, one for a shared IP
and
one for the interface address. That would require a /29 or shorter to
accommodate these two addresses, plus at least one address on the
other
side of the link.
Is there
I have an OpenBSD box at my office, it's hooked up to a cable modem
and does NAT.
We had a DSL modem put in yesterday that we want to use for certain
users or certain ports or if the cable dies.
In order to properly NAT out on the ADSL link I know I can use a pf
rule with route-to but I'm wonder
> Or maybe we need 20 more people like Jason Dixon, to make an appeal to a
> company where they have contacts, where the message will at least be
> read. That's directly targetted, and therefore more meaningful, and I
> think has a higher chance of success.
>
> Anyone out there know companies usin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What is the longest v4 prefix length CARP supports?
In the example given here:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html
Each physical interface has two IPv4 addresses, one for a shared IP and
one for the interface address. That would require a /29 or
On 6/13/07, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree. I sent two Bluetooth cards and $100 cc donation in the past
twelvemonth.
right, but it's a $100 per suggestion per email. by my count you're
$400 in the hole (-:
Hi,
I suddenly had a weird wlan lockup during a big file transfer over wlan.
The access point is a WRAP.2E, 1 LAN, 128 MB with a ral0 card. See dmesg
below for more infos.
The client is an IBM X41 notebook with iwi0 and I am using an IPsec VPN
between the two machines. Just after the lockup I had
Florin Andrei wrote:
I'm building several firewalls that need to be able to sustain 1000 Mbit
throughput. We're using AMD64 processors a lot, so that's the kind of
architecture I'm looking at right now. I will use OpenBSD 4.1 64 bit
version.
The set of rules on the firewalls will be relatively
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 12:07:45PM -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> Your point however that it takes work is a justified point. You've
> got a www@ responsponsible party. Maybe an appeals@ responsible
> party to make webbage, write surveys, and spawn begging campaigns?
Or maybe we need 20 more peopl
> > All fundraising suggestions should be written on the back of a $100
> > bill
> > and sent to Theo.
>
> I agree. I sent two Bluetooth cards and $100 cc donation in the past
> twelvemonth.
Yes, such small contributions help a lot -- in the places where individuals
can help.
But when big thin
> > No campaign will fix that.
>
> I dunno, marketing seems to work sometimes.
You plain don't get it! You want us to do MORE. We don't want
to do more.
Keep suggesting it, and I promise we'll do LESS.
I'm building several firewalls that need to be able to sustain 1000 Mbit
throughput. We're using AMD64 processors a lot, so that's the kind of
architecture I'm looking at right now. I will use OpenBSD 4.1 64 bit
version.
The set of rules on the firewalls will be relatively small and simple.
At
On Jun 13, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Will H. Backman wrote:
> All fundraising suggestions should be written on the back of a $100
> bill
> and sent to Theo.
I agree. I sent two Bluetooth cards and $100 cc donation in the past
twelvemonth.
--
Jack J. Woehr
Director of Development
Absolute Performance
On Jun 13, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> No campaign will fix that.
I dunno, marketing seems to work sometimes. Maybe it can never
work *for OpenBSD*, because when some CIO or MIS manager hits
the list to ask a question they get roasted by the fachidiot of the
day. End of corporate do
> > Oh, a directed spam campaign. perfect. that will endear us to our
> > users. Please return to marketing school from whence you came, and
> > think
> > before you suggest such things.
>
> A open source entity asking for donations from commercial entities
> with whom they already
> have
On 6/13/07, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
These performance enhancements will not affect regular private users,
but will be of particular benefit to companies who use our software in
larger installs. Companies should stand up when such requests are
made, or they and their employees s
* Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070613 13:27]:
> On Jun 13, 2007, at 11:02 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> >However I wish there were some large companies out there using and
> >relying in pf, who could just decide (right now)
>
> Suggestion for tapping the Large Company resource for OpenBSD:
>
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Theo de Raadt
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 1:30 PM
To: Jack J. Woehr
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Org
Subject: Re: hardware needed for network stack performance work
> On Jun 13, 2007, at 11:02 AM, Theo de Raadt w
Dear gentleman,
i am trying to install openbsd 4.1 on dell poweredge 2900. Everything
from turnning on the machine to cd booting was ok, but when i get to
the point of installing it (that part when i am given the options:
Upgrade, Install and Shell? ) its usb keyboard is not working. I left
with
On Jun 13, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Bob Beck wrote:
>
> Oh, a directed spam campaign. perfect. that will endear us to our
> users. Please return to marketing school from whence you came, and
> think
> before you suggest such things.
A open source entity asking for donations from commercial ent
On 13/06/07, Simon Kuhnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I just got a Gigabyte WI01GS MiniPCI and booted OpenBSD-current
on my Thinkpad T40:
~% dmesg | grep ral
ral0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 "Ralink RT2561S" rev 0x00: irq 11, address
00:1a:4d:26:bb:1a
ral0: MAC/BBP RT2561C, RF RT2527
Works lik
>3) Use info garnered through survey to
> a) craft appeals on website
Don't need a survey for this. we have a pretty good idea what biggies
are using it.
> b) create email appeals to self-identified users in correct
> classes.
Oh, a directed spam ca
> On Jun 13, 2007, at 11:02 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > However I wish there were some large companies out there using and
> > relying in pf, who could just decide (right now)
>
> Suggestion for tapping the Large Company resource for OpenBSD:
>
> 1) Create an OpenBSD User Survey
> a
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:02:42 -0600, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 6/13/07, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > very fast single-CPU machines here in Hamburg, asap, since I have some
>> > time for such development right now. If you can help, please drop
> deraadt@
>> > an
md5.exe and md5sum.exe can also be found for windows.
~BAS
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 23:10 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2007/06/13 07:48, John Tate wrote:
> > I am downloading OpenBSD 4.2
>
> 4.2, that's impressive (-:
>
> > I know how to use everything in that but being
> > young I am not t
On Jun 13, 2007, at 11:02 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
However I wish there were some large companies out there using and
relying in pf, who could just decide (right now)
Suggestion for tapping the Large Company resource for OpenBSD:
1) Create an OpenBSD User Survey
a) should include question
Thank you guys!
I am looking for a new modem. Unfortunately is it hard to find
your suggested ones in Sweden...
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:51:14AM -0700, Matthew Clarke wrote:
> Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Raimo Niskanen may have written:
>
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I have an old laptop o
> On 6/13/07, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > very fast single-CPU machines here in Hamburg, asap, since I have some
> > time for such development right now. If you can help, please drop deraadt@
> > and me an email.
>
> Got me a t-shirt, a 4.1 CD set, and $100 to you.
Thanks a lot.
Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Raimo Niskanen may have written:
> Hi all!
>
> I have an old laptop on whith I want to use ppp
> to connect to Internet, using a PCMCIA modem
> 3Com 3CXM756 "Global GSM & Cellular Modem PC Card"
>
> First, I _think_ it shows up as /dev/cua03. In
> dmsg it p
Such as Distributed computing environments where you have your HAL4
service VIP on the same segment/subnet as your distributed server farm.
Or HA databses
~BAS
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 17:49 +0200, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
> best pf network stack cannot solve.
--
Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROT
On 6/13/07, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
very fast single-CPU machines here in Hamburg, asap, since I have some
time for such development right now. If you can help, please drop deraadt@
and me an email.
Got me a t-shirt, a 4.1 CD set, and $100 to you.
--
"This officer's men seem
Hi,
I just got a Gigabyte WI01GS MiniPCI and booted OpenBSD-current
on my Thinkpad T40:
~% dmesg | grep ral
ral0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 "Ralink RT2561S" rev 0x00: irq 11, address
00:1a:4d:26:bb:1a
ral0: MAC/BBP RT2561C, RF RT2527
Works like a charm. Associated with my local AP and surfing the
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:05:44 +0200
Reyk Floeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i don't like the idea about "DSR", it sounds like an evil hack to get
> some performance at the wrong place. it is better to focus on
> improving the pf/network stack performance itself and to be able to do
> traffic fi
This is like "Local Triangulation" in Radware-speak? (Don't know what
F5) calls it. Basically you bring up an alias on lo0 or lo1 primary as
the inet4 of your HAL4 address and as long as everything is in the same
subnet...
~BAS
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 12:25 +1000, Linden Varley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A
Jens Mayer wrote:
Dear all,
sorry to break the thread, but I did not have the originating message in my
mailinglist folder anymore. Nonetheless, I want to reply to "carlopmart" who
wrote on 2007-Jun-07:
Last night my openbsd 4.1 has crashed and I don't know why. I am using
this openbsd as
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:42:24AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:54:58 +0800
> Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Linden Varley wrote:
> > > Anyone know of any load balancing software for OpenBSD that can do
> > > direct-server return? (our load balancers
modify /etc/rc (this looks questionable anyway -- looks like someone
snook the named stuff in there because it needs aprivate log device in
the chroot):
echo 'starting system logger'
rm -f /dev/log
if [ X"${named_flags}" != X"NO" ]; then
rm -f /var/named/dev/log
syslogd_flags="
Good catch on this guys. We should remember that most modern NAT is
PAT, or hybrid NAT+PAT. You should ask your ISP for more space to NAT
to (A NAT+PAT hybrid pool).
Cisco calls it overloading. Reminds me of a Soundgarden song.
~BAS
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 12:03 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Hello,
I have one of these cards. It won't work unless you use the 3Com
drivers on Windows, and even then it doesn't work right. If you use a
standard US Robotics external modem, preferably a Sportster, or even
possibly a Zoom PCMCIA modem, they should work.
Mitch
-Original Message-
Fr
Dear all,
sorry to break the thread, but I did not have the originating message in my
mailinglist folder anymore. Nonetheless, I want to reply to "carlopmart" who
wrote on 2007-Jun-07:
> Last night my openbsd 4.1 has crashed and I don't know why. I am using
> this openbsd as a part of two ca
Matt wrote:
My ultimate goal is to run both php4 and php5 concurrently on a single
machine and I have been looking at the various options.
You probably could use mod_fastcgi from ports, and specify for any
location or virtual host custom php config or version. I never tried
this on OpenBSD c
Raimo Niskanen wrote:
Hi all!
I have an old laptop on whith I want to use ppp
to connect to Internet, using a PCMCIA modem
3Com 3CXM756 "Global GSM & Cellular Modem PC Card"
First, I _think_ it shows up as /dev/cua03. In
dmsg it pops up as device pccom3, and when trying
with tip it appears that
Hi all!
I have an old laptop on whith I want to use ppp
to connect to Internet, using a PCMCIA modem
3Com 3CXM756 "Global GSM & Cellular Modem PC Card"
First, I _think_ it shows up as /dev/cua03. In
dmsg it pops up as device pccom3, and when trying
with tip it appears that while the card is in
it
On 2007/06/13 12:01, Geraerts Andy wrote:
> >> Jun 13 11:05:01 spock /bsd: pf: NAT proxy port allocation (50001-65535)
> >> failed
> >>
> >> Can this be the cause of my errors?
>
> >Yes, you have run out of available ports to NAT from.
>
> >The straightforward answer is to NAT from a larger pool
I am rather unexperienced in this field so any advice is highly appreciated!
(including other relatively safe php4+php5 methods that might work on
OpenBSD)
both lighttpd and apache allow you to have both php4 and php5 side by
side. in apache one has to be a FCGI process the other can be either
Matt wrote:
...
> So I am trying to have another instance of the OpenBSD version of Apache
> 1.3 - chrooted and all.
>
> I *think* it can be done by downloading src.tar.gz and compile it again
> from there with instructions so it does not overwrite the existing httpd.
> Just changing the /usr/sr
>> Jun 13 11:05:01 spock /bsd: pf: NAT proxy port allocation (50001-65535)
>> failed
>>
>> Can this be the cause of my errors?
>Yes, you have run out of available ports to NAT from.
>The straightforward answer is to NAT from a larger pool of addresses
>i.e. nat ... -> { 1.1.1.1, 2.2.2.2, 3.3.3.0
Hello,
My ultimate goal is to run both php4 and php5 concurrently on a single
machine and I have been looking at the various options.
Easiest way seems to be to install something like LightHTTPd or Apache2
on the side, along with php4.
But I do not like the idea of non-chrooted webservers runn
On 2007/06/13 11:12, Geraerts Andy wrote:
> Brian,
>
> Despite the fact that I get tons of State Failures I see this strange message
> :
>
> Jun 13 11:05:01 spock /bsd: pf: NAT proxy port allocation (50001-65535)
> failed
>
> Can this be the cause of my errors?
Yes, you have run out of availabl
>> Jun 13 11:05:01 spock /bsd: pf: NAT proxy port allocation (50001-65535)
>> failed
>this almost sounds like you have something else which grabs these
>ports. do you, intentionally?
Well I can't find anything that could block it. There is no ftp daemon or ftp
proxy or whatever running on the bo
"Geraerts Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jun 13 11:05:01 spock /bsd: pf: NAT proxy port allocation (50001-65535)
> failed
this almost sounds like you have something else which grabs these
ports. do you, intentionally?
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation te
On 2007/06/13 02:00, Kian Mohageri wrote:
> Is my best option to kill syslogd from rc.local or manually edit /etc/rc?
How about leaving them both running, and binding syslog-ng to just
the relevant IP address?
Brian,
Despite the fact that I get tons of State Failures I see this strange message
:
Jun 13 11:05:01 spock /bsd: pf: NAT proxy port allocation (50001-65535)
failed
Can this be the cause of my errors?
Andy.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Brian A. Seklecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verz
Hello,
I was setting up a central logserver this afternoon and some of the
functionality I need wasn't in the stock syslogd(8), so I chose to use
syslog-ng.
I noticed that you cannot specify syslogd=NO or syslogd_flags=NO to
disable it (in rc.conf.local), and I was mostly curious why.
I'm sure
Hello,
Your current /etc/dhcpd.conf configuration will not work no matter how hard you
test it
. Hint? You should not create a shared-network amongst two different ip blocks
and
rather instead allocate a specific subnet per ip blocks. Trust me, this will
work
because I been there done that.
D
Maybe try to check and possibly replace the interfaces involve as well as the
cables and
let us know if this issue still occur.
> pfctl -x loud && tail -f /var/log/messages
>
> ~BAS
>
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Geraerts Andy wrote:
>
>>
We have an OpenBSD firewall running for a while now. Since
As some of you might have noticed, I worked on network stack and
especially pf performance in calgary. This lead to quite massive
improvements - one diff in particular doubled pf performance in
our test scenario; undeadly covered that:
http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20070528213858
Rafa3 Brodewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does OpenBSD still require to install at first 8GB of hdd?
See http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#LargeDrive - which I read as
'only if your hardware is old and/or weird'
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
h
> > pass in on $ext_if route-to { $webh1, $webh2 } round-robin proto
> > tcp \ from any to $virt_ip port http no state
> > pass out on $int_if from any to $virt_ip port http no state
>
> Wouldn't you need some kind of state here? Otherwise there's no
> guarantee of the packets for a given connec
Hi.
Does OpenBSD still require to install at first 8GB of hdd?
Is there some way to bypass it?
Regards.
--
Rafa3 Brodewicz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
90 matches
Mail list logo
