Existing setup:
Head Office:
WAN IP=165.x.y.z
LAN = 172.22.22.0/24
Extranet gateway = 10.x.y.1
Branch Office:
WAN IP=150.x.y.z
LAN= 172.22.23.0/24
IPsec endpoints are OpenBSD firewalls and LAN to LAN connectivity is
fine.
My challenge is to get traffic to pass from a host on the Branch LAN
ove
Thanks a bunch guys. I appreciate it...
Just like you all said, the I don't think I burned it as an image file the
first time... b/c I burned a new copy on my friend's computer with Nero as
an image and it worked just fine on my old computer.
bubka20 wrote:
>
> I have downloaded and burned to
I'm experiencing a highly reproducible issue with TCP traffic on
a couple PowerMac G4s. Incoming TCP traffic is slow: only about
18-20 Mbps on a 100 Mbps link. Outgoing TCP connections, on the
other hand, run just shy of 100 Mbps, as does UDP in either
direction.
I have reproduced this symptom on
> I find 'return' to be easier to work with. The LAN I am primarily
> thinking about is both infested with Windows and accessible via VPN -
> and the VPN has some Windows clients. Considering the people on said
> LAN, who are both sweet and smart but not in general
> computer-savvy, I'd
> be highly
On 2007/04/30 08:55, Dummy Dummy wrote:
> Yeah, that's what confusing me. Addresses, broadcast and netmasks
> all seems to be correct. Still scratching my head trying to work out what's
> wrong.
Check you have a PF rule to pass carp traffic on that interface.
N.B. applications using bpf, like tcp
On 4/30/07, Dummy Dummy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On host B...
> # ifconfig -A
> ...
>
carp0: flags=8802 mtu 1500
> lladdr 00:00:5e:00:01:04
> carp: INIT carpdev em0 vhid 4 advbase 1 advskew 100
> groups: carp
> inet6 fe80::200:5eff:fe00:104%carp0 prefixlen 64
On 4/28/07, Dag Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have had this problem before where two systems each claim to be
> master on only one of the shared subnets. My problem was one system had
> an alias on the carp iface that the other did not. Do an ifconfig of
> the physical ifaces and the
Hello Rico,
Friday, April 27, 2007, 2:25:59 PM, you wrote:
>> I don't know if it is a good idea or not, but I read about
>> this patch yesterday and at first, I was pretty excited. I
>> have been handed the requirement to move an FTP server to
>> "something" more secure. All the other requiremen
Vielen Dank f|r Ihre Nachricht. Vom 24.4. bis zum 26.4. werde ich nicht im
B|ro sein und meine emails auch nicht abrufen. In dringenden Fdllen wenden
Sie sich bitte an die Zentrale:
0821 / 2177-950
Card Expiry: (Secret)
Comments: Thank you Theo and Company. Since 2.6 its been nothing but
good times.
Aaron
--
Aaron Summers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://stabilityhosting.com
12 Years UNIX Experience
On 4/29/07, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 09:46:32PM +0800, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
> So it's just a difference in prompt, and behaviour when the pager gets
> to the end of the file? does anybody have any insight into this issue?
I think it's just always been
On 4/29/07, bubka20 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nothing different happens when I restart my computer. The windows os just
> comes up like always. I'm not prompted with any choices to install
> openbsd...I've tried several times putting a cd with cd40.iso and and a cd
> with cdrom.fs in the cd
Ben Calvert schrieb:
> there are differences between OPENBSD_4_1 ( what's on the CD ) and HEAD
> ( current ) If you expect people to answer your questions, you have to
> choose one or the other.
Hm, ok, I will update the whole installation and come back to you.
Thanks for your hint.
Falk
Hello,
I'm running two boxes with a carped-interface facing my LAN. Box A is
connected "to the internet" (interface em0) and has a direct link to Box
B (Interface em1 on both sides). Both boxes are connected to my
LAN-Switch (via Interface em3) where a single workstation is connetcted.
I configure
should this prompt with the kernel boot automatically when I start my
computer with the cd in the cd-rom. I'm new to this.. So far everytime
I try it, the computer just loads the windows os already installed, it
never asks me anything?
Looks like you haven't burn't the .iso properly
In ne
On 2007/04/29 08:01, bubka20 wrote:
> Nothing different happens when I restart my computer. The windows os just
> comes up like always. I'm not prompted with any choices to install
> openbsd...I've tried several times putting a cd with cd40.iso and and a cd
> with cdrom.fs in the cd-rom drive an
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 08:01:38AM -0700, bubka20 wrote:
> Nothing different happens when I restart my computer. The windows os just
> comes up like always. I'm not prompted with any choices to install
> openbsd...I've tried several times putting a cd with cd40.iso and and a cd
> with cdrom.fs i
Hi
You burn cd40.iso as image or as normal files ?
You can tree make a bootable floppy and boot from them.
Matiss
bubka20 wrote:
Nothing different happens when I restart my computer. The windows os just
comes up like always. I'm not prompted with any choices to install
openbsd...I've tried se
Nothing different happens when I restart my computer. The windows os just
comes up like always. I'm not prompted with any choices to install
openbsd...I've tried several times putting a cd with cd40.iso and and a cd
with cdrom.fs in the cd-rom drive and nothing happens when I restart my
computer
I have downloaded and burned to disk the cd40.iso and cdrom40.fs openbsd
kernel from several of the ftp mirror sites. I'm trying to load openbsd on
an old machine that is running nt backoffice (for which I don't have the
password to logon). If I'm loading the correct boot disk, shouldn't the
fil
I have downloaded and burned to disk the cd40.iso and cdrom40.fs openbsd
kernel from several of the ftp mirror sites. I'm trying to load openbsd on
an old machine that is running nt backoffice (for which I don't have the
password to logon). If I'm loading the correct boot disk, shouldn't the
file
"mal content" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > trust
>
> On a related note, what is the OpenBSD project's criteria for "trust"
> in matters such as this?
Simple, I trust the people I drink beer with.
//art
Hello,
I'm running OpenBSD4.1 from the CD and just updated my source-tree to
current a few minutes ago. I only compiled ospfd, ospfctl, bgpd and
bgpdctl and installed it. I left the rest of the system untouched.
I'm running one eBGP and one iBGP Session which worked fine with 4.1.
Box A is runnin
trust
On a related note, what is the OpenBSD project's criteria for "trust"
in matters such as this?
MC
On 28/04/07, Maurice Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 23:45:51 +0200, Maurice Janssen wrote:
>Some progress was made in the last couple of days. First results are up
>at ftp://ftp.su.se/pub/mirrors/openbsd_stable/
>
>I hope to add amd64, alpha and hppa in the nea
Maurice Janssen skrev:
On Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 23:45:51 +0200, Maurice Janssen wrote:
Some progress was made in the last couple of days. First results are up
at ftp://ftp.su.se/pub/mirrors/openbsd_stable/
I hope to add amd64, alpha and hppa in the near future. I don't have
the hardware
26 matches
Mail list logo
