Oh btw I am running -stable kernel now. But I had to run on -release
kernel when I built the -stable userland.
2007/3/10, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Trying to follow 4.0-stable branch here.
I have updated the source tree, and rebuilt the kernel.
But I was not able to build the userland with -s
Scott Radvan wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:57:37 -0600
Jeff Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have listed my dmesg and ifconfig at the end of this post for
reference. The problem I'm having is that any ftp or lynx traffic
to an external (ie. outside of my LAN) host comes in
Trying to follow 4.0-stable branch here.
I have updated the source tree, and rebuilt the kernel.
But I was not able to build the userland with -stable kernel, the make
build process just hangs.
I rebooted using -release kernel, which built userland successfully.
But I am not sure if this is the
On 3/7/07, Ramdas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/7/07, Ramdas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/7/07, Pablo Halamaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 05/03/07, Ramdas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Group,
> > >
> > > I have a server with two lan cards both with valid ips . One interface
> >
Peter schrieb am Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 11:08:30PM -0500:
> Le Vendredi 9 Mars 2007 18:24, Joachim Schipper a icrit :
>> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:05:58PM -0500, Peter wrote:
>>
>>> On 4.0, besides uninstalling ports, updating the ports tree, and
>>> re-installing is there any other way to do this?
On 3/9/07, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4.0, besides uninstalling ports, updating the ports tree, and
> > re-installing is there any other way to do this? What is standard
> > practice?
>
> # pkg_add -ui
Are you serious? I thought that was only for straight packages. It actually
f
Le Vendredi 9 Mars 2007 18:24, Joachim Schipper a icrit :
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:05:58PM -0500, Peter wrote:
> > On 4.0, besides uninstalling ports, updating the ports tree, and
> > re-installing is there any other way to do this? What is standard
> > practice?
>
> # pkg_add -ui
Are you se
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:57:37 -0600
Jeff Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have listed my dmesg and ifconfig at the end of this post for
> reference. The problem I'm having is that any ftp or lynx traffic
> to an external (ie. outside of my LAN) host comes in at 200KB/sec.
Hello,
I have listed my dmesg and ifconfig at the end of this post for
reference. The problem I'm having is that any ftp or lynx traffic to
an external (ie. outside of my LAN) host comes in at 200KB/sec.
Meanwhile, my Windows boxes which are on the same switch, router and
cable modem, can
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:05:58PM -0500, Peter wrote:
> On 4.0, besides uninstalling ports, updating the ports tree, and
> re-installing
> is there any other way to do this? What is standard practice?
# pkg_add -ui
> Also, is there any global way to change the default destination
> (/usr/po
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:31:38PM -0800, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> I'm running poptop on my home firewall, but I can't see any of the
> machines on that network (though I can see indivudal machine on
> friends network that are connected via isakmpd). Running tcpdump I
> can see the packets going into
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 09:40:40AM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 3/9/07, J. A. Landamore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I know the sector numbers where the errors are, hence I know the partition.
> >To find the file affected by the bad sectors can I assume that there is
> >one inode per 16 sectors
Hello,
since I had some issues with azalia sound on OpenBSD 4.0, I decided to
follow -current. The good news: the system doesn't crash anymore when
typing in 'audioctl -a'. The bad news: sound still doesn't work.
When I type in:
# cat /bsd > /dev/audio
I get
ksh: cannot create /dev/audio: Inva
On 4.0, besides uninstalling ports, updating the ports tree, and re-installing
is there any other way to do this? What is standard practice?
Also, is there any global way to change the default destination
(/usr/ports/packages//all) of the eventual binary package that is
created when a port is
I'm running poptop on my home firewall, but I can't see any of the
machines on that network (though I can see indivudal machine on
friends network that are connected via isakmpd). Running tcpdump I
can see the packets going into those machines but they don't make it
back.
I'm assuming I'm going
> Read the article more carefully;
And you should check more sources before making assumptions.
thought #2: maybe you are misinterpreting what the article is saying?
"OpenSSH 4.6 has just been released. It will be available from the
> mirrors
> listed at http://www.openssh.com/ shortly."
>
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 20:42:37 +0100, "Sebastian Rother"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Guys...
>
> It`s not even avaiable at the mainserver.
>
> http://www.openssh.org/openbsd.html
> -> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/
>
> Nor is it mentioned at the Website, nor is there an announcement Mai
OMG.
Look, here :
MD5 (openssh-4.6.tar.gz) = 9b569905d3bb478dc4f87dbeacdb1548
Are you happy now ? This consult of my superpowers will cost you $1000
to be transferred to the OpenBSD project.
Go read the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailinglist. How hard can it be ?!
Read up on [EMAIL PROTECTED], the update
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:42:37PM +0100, Sebastian Rother wrote:
> Guys...
>
> It`s not even avaiable at the mainserver.
>
> http://www.openssh.org/openbsd.html
> -> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/
>
> Nor is it mentioned at the Website, nor is there an announcement Mail.
> So don4t
Guys...
It`s not even avaiable at the mainserver.
http://www.openssh.org/openbsd.html
-> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/
Nor is it mentioned at the Website, nor is there an announcement Mail.
So don4t tell me something about mirrors and foo if you didn`t even
take at look at the main
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:10:34PM +0100, Sebastian Rother wrote:
| I just wanted to ask if OpenSSH 4.6 was released already?!
It is. Check your local mirror. Is that so hard to do ? Harder, in
fact, than sending an e-mail with your doubts and concerns ?
| www.undeadly.org claims it`s released bu
On 03/09/07 at 20:10, Sebastian Rother wrote:
>So is OpenSSH 4.6 released or is this a kind of april fool or propably
>a news wich leaked and got released too early?
"OpenSSH 4.6 has just been released. It will be available from the
mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/ shortly.".
Patience is
I just wanted to ask if OpenSSH 4.6 was released already?!
www.undeadly.org claims it`s released but it`s questionable.
There was no mail to misc@, the openssh-Website still declares 4.5 as
the latest release and the code was not tagged for OpenBSD 4.0 in the
CVS (pointed out by 2 comments at und
On 3/9/07, Dustin Lundquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm looking for a way to limit ssh access by root to public key
authentication from a single network without affecting other users ssh
access. So far the best solution I've come up with is to run two instances
of sshd, is there are more elega
I'm re-working my firewall (3.9 release for now) to use the hfsc scheduler
to give each of my users an inbound and outbound traffic queue. Has anyone
tried running > 64 queues/interface on i386? Have you found any practical
scale limits or unintended consequences of increasing hfsc_max_classes?
H
Have you looked at OpenSSH 4.6?
"This version has some really nice new features, like per-user
authentication config. "
Cheers,
Edy
- Original Message -
From: "Dustin Lundquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "misc"
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 2:21 AM
Subject: Limiting root ssh without
I'm looking for a way to limit ssh access by root to public key
authentication from a single network without affecting other users ssh
access. So far the best solution I've come up with is to run two instances
of sshd, is there are more elegant way?
Thanks,
Dustin Lundquist
On 3/9/07, J. A. Landamore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know the sector numbers where the errors are, hence I know the partition.
To find the file affected by the bad sectors can I assume that there is
one inode per 16 sectors and the inode number always increases as you
increase the sector numbe
Is this an idea?
http://www.tritium.co.uk/
# Han
Great !
I have added the flags and it's working ! I habe some slowdown on the
connection, but I will look future to this and hope to correct the complet
problem soon.
Thank's a lot !
Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2007/03/09 01:26, Claude Brassel wrote:
>> I have try some new linux distro (op
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:39:31AM -0500, Jose Fragoso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I could not find this interface in the OpenBSD 4.0 HCL. Nevertheless,
> I would like to know if anyone has managed to work with this NIC
> under OpenBSD. I am just trying to avoid buying hardware that will
> not work.
>
> Tha
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> So, I thought to asked valuable feedback if possible.
I've had 'perlfect search' running for a couple of years on several web
sites. It's perl (surprise), so customization is trivial. And it's fast.
http://www.perlfect.com/freescripts/search/
--
Stephan A. Rickauer
> Another (interesting?) thing is that when I manually configure the
> mediaoptions
>
> (ifconfig sis0 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex )
If you do that, and the switch autodetects, it will certainly
cause a duplex mismatch.
Could be bad nics, bad switch, bad cables, or something else
Jon Radel wrote:
Duplex mismatch between OpenBSD router NICs and switch ports plugged
into? Can make a horrible mess of packet loss rates and throughput.
Also see what OpenBSD has to say about NIC error rates.
--Jon Radel
Steve Glaus wrote:
Looking at my dmesg's I noticed the following li
I have a disk that occassionally (once a month) shows an error, and
running smartctl tells me there are a few bad sectors.
I know the sector numbers where the errors are, hence I know the partition.
To find the file affected by the bad sectors can I assume that there is
one inode per 16 sectors an
When configuring the disk what do I do about the swap partition? There
used to be (many years ago) a mkswap command but it is now absent. Do I just
use newfs or is the fact that the disklabel fstype entry is swap enough
and I leave it with no filesystem on it?
mkswap is a linux thing; other op
On 2007/03/09 13:27, J. A. Landamore wrote:
> Just to keep my mind active, I'm hand rolling my latest install rather
> than relying on the install program. (mad fool)
It might be useful to see how it does things:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/distrib/miniroot/
http://www.openbsd.o
Just to keep my mind active, I'm hand rolling my latest install rather
than relying on the install program. (mad fool)
When configuring the disk what do I do about the swap partition? There
used to be (many years ago) a mkswap command but it is now absent. Do I just
use newfs or is the fact that
If you can't find a card with the transmit power you want, you may be able to
get the range you're looking for from antenna gain and type.
Here is some info if you go the antenna route to improve gain.
Note a directional antenna is the best, but then you have
to be pointing in the direction..
Maurice Janssen wrote:
On Thursday, March 8, 2007 at 18:58:00 +0100, carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
I have a extrange problem. Last week, I have installed a new OpenBSD
server for our new datacenter. I had configured two nics to use as a
bridge and I assigned an IP to one of this interfaces, like
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:28:59AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2007/03/09 01:26, Claude Brassel wrote:
> > I have try some new linux distro (opensuse 10.2, mandriva 2007) so if I try
> > to join a host through the vpn it's working only for "small packets" in ex:
> > the telnet login sessio
On 3/9/07, Claude Brassel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm using two openbsd VPN gateways between my home and my office, everything
work's fine, but ..
I have try some new linux distro (opensuse 10.2, mandriva 2007) so if I try
to join a host through the vpn it's working only for "small pa
On 2007/03/09 01:26, Claude Brassel wrote:
> I have try some new linux distro (opensuse 10.2, mandriva 2007) so if I try
> to join a host through the vpn it's working only for "small packets" in ex:
> the telnet login session work's great, but if I try some "ls" or everithing
> else that produce a
Le Vendredi 9 Mars 2007 03:31, Sebastian Benoit a icrit :
> Peter([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2007.03.09 02:56:07 +:
> > but I have found that if a package is dubiously named (such as "db") then
> > it hangs with:
> >
> > "Ambiguous: db could be db-3.1.17p6 db-4.2.52p8"
>
> There is nothing dubious a
Hello,
I'm using two openbsd VPN gateways between my home and my office, everything
work's fine, but ..
I have try some new linux distro (opensuse 10.2, mandriva 2007) so if I try
to join a host through the vpn it's working only for "small packets" in ex:
the telnet login session work's great, bu
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 00:17 +0100, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
> > HVM is not good for non-Windows guests. Without accelerated guest
> > drivers disk and network I/O is very limited. Xen Enterprise ships with
> > optimized guest drivers for Windows.
> Then it is a useless feature in my opinion.
This is
Peter([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2007.03.09 02:56:07 +:
> but I have found that if a package is dubiously named (such as "db") then it
> hangs with:
>
> "Ambiguous: db could be db-3.1.17p6 db-4.2.52p8"
There is nothing dubious about it. There are simply two versions of "db"
available. pkg_add sim
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Steve Glaus wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm at my wits end here with this and I don't know who to ask..
For about a week now my OpenBSD router has been acting up in the
strangest ways. Route's dissapear, ethernet speeds crawl to a halt and
other wierdness.. I'm about to wipe this
48 matches
Mail list logo
