Szentivanyi Matyas wrote:
Hi Heinrich!
I think it's almost the best speed you can achieve from the device. I've
got the same type of Soekris with a SAMSUNG HM080HC HDD (which is the
slave).
This HDD supports perpendicular recording
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpendicular_recording). Highe
* Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-30 10:49:59]:
> Travers Buda wrote:
> > They're basically the same thing.
>
> No they're not. One run on the vendors hardware, the other run on your
> OS. Two entirely different things.
>
Sorry, I was being nebulous.
They're the same thing in the reg
Christoph Peus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> assumed that I have installed OpenBSD to an USB memory stick and the box
> is booting from this "drive" successfully and I've taken these
> precautions to avoid frequent writes to the write cycle limited memory
> stick:
> - there's no swap space configured
> - al
hi misc@,
the php5-gd-*-hardened-no_x11 package is the only php package missing to
complete implementing http://zenphoto.org/ pic blog tool for me.
however i can't seem to persuade the build system to build _only_ that
package for me - I can only generate the whole php5-extensions in one
sin
Travers Buda wrote:
> * Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-29 15:16:15]:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:30:01PM -0600, Travers Buda wrote:
>>> Well I think both are equally dangerous (binary firmware and
>>> binary drivers.) They're basically the same thing.
Not at all, see below...
Travers Buda wrote:
> They're basically the same thing.
No they're not. One run on the vendors hardware, the other run on your
OS. Two entirely different things.
---
Lars Hansson
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 02:56:44PM -0800, Daniel E. Hassler wrote:
> Is it reasonable to assume all of the dependencies for a package
> should also be available as either packages or via ports?
Yes. Some ports have licenses which prohibit redistribution as
packages, though, so N(ports) > N(package
On 1/29/07, Daniel E. Hassler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Is it reasonable to assume all of the dependencies for a package should
also be available as either packages or via ports?
In my experience, yes. In most cases a package, although there exist
some ports that can't be packaged for red
Hi,
Is it reasonable to assume all of the dependencies for a package should
also be available as either packages or via ports?
I'm trying to install p5-Mail-Box-2.018. - "p5-Mail-Box-2.018:Can't
find p5-Convert-BinHex-1.119"
I can't find p5-Convert-BinHex-1.119 in either packages or ports.
p5
i believe if you do not specify the realtime in the qd queue it
assumes 100% this creating a math issue, try giving qd a realtime
limit
On 1/22/07, Piotr Lukawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear misc@openbsd.org,
I wanted to share bandwidth 512Kb between 4 users with guaranted
bandwidth 20Kb
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:19:11PM +0100, Igor Sobrado wrote:
>
> I can send the patches to Brian Kernighan, asking him to apply
> these changes to the awk(1) source code. Do you agree? If you
> prefer sending the patches yourself, let me know.
>
the changes will be sent upstream next time we
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> ah, ok. it is not 4 options (-s, -a, -f, and -e), but one (-safe, as in
> "not in danger"). that's why it is described as a "...first (and not
> very reliable) approximation to a ``safe'' version of awk."
>
> you are confusing that with the -f option, w
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 03:52:03PM -0600, Travers Buda wrote:
> Well there is that proof-of-concept that debuted at BlackHat where
> those researchers compromised the OS of a macintosh. I was under the
> impression that they compromised it via the firmware, but it is
> equally possible it was achi
* Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-29 15:16:15]:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:30:01PM -0600, Travers Buda wrote:
> > Well I think both are equally dangerous (binary firmware and binary
> > drivers.) They're basically the same thing.
>
> My understanding has always been that a bad b
In a private email, Philip Guenther has observed that awk does not
completely folow the POSIX option guidelines. [-safe] is not
[-s,-a,-f,-e] but a single option!
The right patch is then:
--- main.c.orig Mon Jan 29 15:01:20 2007
+++ main.c Mon Jan 29 15:52:47 2007
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:00:51PM +0100, Igor Sobrado wrote:
>
> Changes introduced by this patch:
>
> - adds three spaces after the tab character to improve readability
> of the usage message.
i prefer just to use a single tab to start a new line. otherwise we end
up with lots of usage()
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:16:55PM +0100, Igor Sobrado wrote:
>
> I think that the "-f" option requires an argument. The argument
> is not optional, though. It seems that the case block that manages
> this option requires an argument. If the argument to "-f" is
> optional it can be written as "
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:30:01PM -0600, Travers Buda wrote:
> Well I think both are equally dangerous (binary firmware and binary
> drivers.) They're basically the same thing.
My understanding has always been that a bad binary driver can corrupt
main memory, but a bad binary firmware is limited
Hi Jason.
Sorry for sending the patches before answering to your email.
As I am not subscribed to this mailing list I have not read
your answer before working on the patches.
I think that the "-f" option requires an argument. The argument
is not optional, though. It seems that the case block th
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Aaron Martinez wrote:
>
> For instance, i don't run telnetd anywhere and so if a connection to
> port 23 is made, i would like to add the connecting machine's IP to a
> 'bad_guys' table on the fly so subsequent connects will be dropped. For
> the life of me
Hi Jason.
Thank you very much for managing these small bugs so fast.
The first patch is for main.c:
--- main.c Mon Jan 29 15:01:20 2007
+++ main.c Mon Jan 29 15:04:28 2007
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@
setlocale(LC_NUMERIC, "C"); /* for parsing cmdline & prog */
cmdname = __progna
* Trond Danielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-29 18:30:05]:
> 2007/1/29, Vim Visual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >Which cards in that list are comparable in quality to the intel 2200BG
> >but do not require blobs?
> >
>
> The ipw2200 is not the only one that requires a binary firmware to be
> load
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 09:11:26PM +0100, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> Looking carefully at the switch () {...} structure in main.c
> it seems that the option "-f" requires an argument: iff the argument
> to "-f" is optional I would write:
>
> awk [-sae] [-V] [-d[n]] [-F fs] [-v var=value] [prog | -f [
Jason, you are very fast!
I will download the new main.c as soon as I arrive at home and remove
the case for the "-m" option. I will remove the "f" option in "[-safe]"
as it seems that the argument to it is not optional.
I will submit the patch, based on the updated code, later. Two changes:
Looking carefully at the switch () {...} structure in main.c
it seems that the option "-f" requires an argument: iff the argument
to "-f" is optional I would write:
awk [-sae] [-V] [-d[n]] [-F fs] [-v var=value] [prog | -f [progfile]]
file ...
But it does not look as an optional argument,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 07:37:04PM +0100, Igor Sobrado wrote:
>
> As a second change, I would suggest changing the usage message
> in the binary to fit on a standard 80 columns display. In short,
> I propose:
>
> - synchronizing the usage message returned by awk(1) and the
> synopsis in th
NEWSLETTER N0 5 DAL 29 GENNAIO AL 4 FEBBRAIO 2007
LE NEWS DELLA SETTIMANA
29/01/2007
Terme On Ice MONTECATINI TERME
(Folklore)
30/01/2007
Mostra sul massacro di Nanjing MONTECATINI TERME
(Mostre)
30/01/2007
Mac,n MONSUMMANO TERME
(Mostre)
31/01/2007
Vintage Selection FIRENZE
(Mostre)
* Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-29 18:46]:
> Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
> >On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:20:50 +0100
> >Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Which would mean, I send a SYN to my load balancer, which forwards
> >>the SYN to one of my webservers, and the webser
Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
> on my Soekris 4801-60 i have a FUJITSU MHV2120AT running as slave. The
>
> 104857600 bytes transferred in 11.980 secs (8752083 bytes/sec)
8MB/sec isn't particularly bad for a notebook drive, and I get very
similar numbers on my own 4801-60 w/ Samsung MP0402H drive:
wd0 at
* Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-29 11:49]:
>
> On Jan 29, 2007, at 9:00 AM, Bob Beck wrote:
>
> > a 501(c) has to spend most of it's money in the
> >united states. This is not helpful to us.
> >
> > A Canadian solution is in the works.
>
> Hmm, that must be a "501(a)" :-)
On Jan 29, 2007, at 9:00 AM, Bob Beck wrote:
> a 501(c) has to spend most of it's money in the
> united states. This is not helpful to us.
>
> A Canadian solution is in the works.
Hmm, that must be a "501(a)" :-)
--
Jack J. Woehr
Director of Development
Absolute Performance, Inc.
[EMAIL
Thanks a lot for all the replies, public and private (especially Berk
for detailed explanations). It turns out that my nat rule was not
complete/correct (just as all of the replies had implied this
possibility).
So, for the record, the rules I'm using right now are as follows, and
work perfectly:
Hello.
Just a though... I was writing a simple awk(1) script and looked
at the options supported by this utility in the hope to make the code
cleaner. It seems that there is a big difference between the synopsis
in the manual page:
awk [-safe] [-V] [-d[n]] [-F fs] [-v var=value] [prog | -f pr
You can read here : http://vendorwatch.org/index.php?title=Blob
"Blobs are vendor-compiled binary drivers without any source code.
Hardware makers like them because they obscure the details of how to
make their hardware work. They hide bugs and workarounds for bugs.
Newer versions of blobs can we
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, John . wrote:
> Hello list
>
> When XF4 is brought to -stable, does the machine have to be rebooted
> for the changes to take effect? It doesn't say so explicitly in the
> FAQ.
>
> cheers
It should suffice to stop X and restart it. That includes xdm.
Dave
--
"I believe
Hello,
I have a number of port replicators I (finally) got permission to send
off to OpenBSD devs. I thought I saw someone asking for one on the
hardware wanted page, but now that I look again, I don't see it. Any
takers? Here's what I have:
* Thinkpad X4 UltraBase Dock (new)
* Thinkpa
Hi list,
on my Soekris 4801-60 i have a FUJITSU MHV2120AT running as slave. The
performance is poor:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [/data] # time dd if=100Mb.dat of=/dev/null
204800+0 records in
204800+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 11.980 secs (8752083 bytes/sec)
real0m12.042s
user0m
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Sean Kennedy wrote:
> Understood, -- Just being pedantic, before I move to -rstable, I usually do a
> build with -rOPENBSD_X_x first when I do a Vanilla system.
> Answer of "Use -rstable." is your answer.
> libssl/crypto has issues with -rOPENBSD_4_0.
To be clear, your prob
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:07:17PM +, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:17:14PM +, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> >> Brian Candler wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:36:38AM -0800, Joe wrote:
> whats sad is how many people will never let go of NAT
2007/1/29, Vim Visual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Which cards in that list are comparable in quality to the intel 2200BG
but do not require blobs?
The ipw2200 is not the only one that requires a binary firmware to be
loaded into network card to be funtional. Others may disagree, but I
think there is
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tom Cosgrove writes:
>
> What is happening here is that when you enter
>
> ibase=16
> l(0.1)
>
> you get "0.0" passed to the l() function, which gives -infinity. (I
> would call that the expected result under the circumstances.)
>
> If you enter
>
>
On 01/29/07 17:07, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Juniper doesn't provide 6to4, ah as they can't do that in hardware.
I presume they believe it's too expensive or believe too few customers
want to pay for it or or or. In general everything that can be
programmed in softwware can be done "in hardware"
Please, drop my last example about how bc works on Solaris... bc was
on base 16, not on base 10, when run that test... it seems this is a bad
and very long day! :-)
$ bc -l
l(0.0625000)
-2.77258872223978123766
Now all is clear,
Igor.
Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:20:50 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which would mean, I send a SYN to my load balancer, which forwards
the SYN to one of my webservers, and the webserver would send a
SYN-ACK back to me. But my machine, obviously can't do a
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:34:51 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
> > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:20:50 +0100
> > Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Which would mean, I send a SYN to my load balancer, which forwards
> >> the SYN to one
Hi,
Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:21:13 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, one thing is bothering me.
Obviously, my apache access logs on those load balanced machines can
only show the IP address of my load balancer, not the real remote ip
of the
When I was building the gtk+2-2.8.20 from ports tree, i got the error:
: undefined reference to `gtk_icon_view_set_reorderable'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
gmake[5]: *** [gtk-demo] Error 1
gmake[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/gtk+2/w-gtk+2-2.8.20/gtk+-2.8.20
/demos/gtk-demo'
gmake[4
* Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-29 09:49]:
> Hi OpenBSD'lers,
>
> I'm about to use OpenBSD's pf(4) for load balancing some webservers. So
> far, everything is looking just perfect.
> Compared to pound, pf(4) is incredibly fast with few CPU and memory usage.
> So I'd say: Thats great
Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:34:51 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You could also do an ugly hack which would consist of attaching a
second network on your servers and load balancers (provided they are in
the same (v)?lan) like 172.16.1.0/24 and use tha
Hej Berk,
Berk D. Demir schrieb:
Marian Hettwer wrote:
However, one thing is bothering me.
Obviously, my apache access logs on those load balanced machines can
only show the IP address of my load balancer, not the real remote ip
of the request.
This is, to my knowledge, due to the fact that
On 2007/01/29 16:21, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> Is there any possible way to get the real ip addresses in my apache
> access log?
Readers who didn't see the earlier posts about setting this up, they're
here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=116905272009036&w=2
- it's not the standard s
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:20:50 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Which would mean, I send a SYN to my load balancer, which forwards
> the SYN to one of my webservers, and the webserver would send a
> SYN-ACK back to me. But my machine, obviously can't do anything with
> a SYN-ACK
Hello list
When XF4 is brought to -stable, does the machine have to be rebooted
for the changes to take effect? It doesn't say so explicitly in the
FAQ.
cheers
--
John
[changed subject to something more related ;) ]
Brian Candler wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:17:14PM +, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>>> And if you need to change ISP, and
>>> therefore get a new address allocation, many people would rather just put
in
>>> some NAT at the border than take the pai
>>> Igor Sobrado 29-Jan-07 14:36 >>>
>
> But I want to note that the difference between Solaris' bc and
> the bc flavours available on NetBSD (GNU bc) and OpenBSD (its own bc
> implementation) for numbers near zero is probably a bug.
>
> In fact, Solaris' bc returns comparable numbers for l(0.1) a
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:17:14PM +, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> Brian Candler wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:36:38AM -0800, Joe wrote:
whats sad is how many people will never let go of NAT after they migrate
to ipv6.
>>> It's not sad; for many people it wou
And the other thing people forget who try to "helpfully" set
us up a 501(c) in the US is that most of our expenses are *NOT* in the
united states. and a 501(c) has to spend most of it's money in the
united states. This is not helpful to us.
A Canadian solution is in the works.
Understood, -- Just being pedantic, before I move to -rstable, I usually do
a build with -rOPENBSD_X_x first when I do a Vanilla system.
Answer of "Use -rstable." is your answer.
libssl/crypto has issues with -rOPENBSD_4_0.
Cross Posting to misc@ to satisfy request. Still posting to tech@ so I
Marian Hettwer wrote:
However, one thing is bothering me.
Obviously, my apache access logs on those load balanced machines can
only show the IP address of my load balancer, not the real remote ip of
the request.
This is, to my knowledge, due to the fact that pf(4) is working on the
TCP layer
Marian Hettwer wrote:
Hi OpenBSD'lers,
I'm about to use OpenBSD's pf(4) for load balancing some webservers.
So far, everything is looking just perfect.
Compared to pound, pf(4) is incredibly fast with few CPU and memory
usage.
So I'd say: Thats great :)
However, one thing is bothering me.
Ob
Or missing interrupts...
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:29:52PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Mark Zimmerman wrote:
> > You will notice the sucky DMA of the Jetway board in all of them.
> ...
> > wd0a: aborted command, interface CRC error reading fsbn 671456 of 671456-0
> > (wd0 bn 5571281; cn 5527
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:21:13 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, one thing is bothering me.
> Obviously, my apache access logs on those load balanced machines can
> only show the IP address of my load balancer, not the real remote ip
> of the request.
Why are you rewriting
Gregory Edigarov schrieb:
Marian Hettwer wrote:
Okay... anybody with any usable suggestions?
There's the X-Forwarded-to Information in a http header, which can be
set via some software load balancers. However, those are operating on
the application layer, which pf isn't... too bad.
Uhmm...
Mark Zimmerman wrote:
> You will notice the sucky DMA of the Jetway board in all of them.
...
> wd0a: aborted command, interface CRC error reading fsbn 671456 of 671456-0
> (wd0 bn 5571281; cn 5527 tn 1 sn 2), retrying
> wd0: transfer error, downgrading to Ultra-DMA mode 4
> wd0(pciide1:0:0): usi
Hi all,
Somebody can send me some samples of ifstated.conf using two dsl
lines? I have two redundant OpenBSD 4.0 firewalls on I need to implement
ifstated but with only man pages isn't very clear how can I configure
this to redirect all traffic to one line if another goes down and
anothe
>If I add this to your main() I can send larger messages:
>
> int len;
>
socklen_t optlen = sizeof(len);
>
> ...
>len = 4096;
> if
(setsockopt(c_socket, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF, &len, optlen) == -1)
>
err(1, "setsockopt");
>if (getsockopt(c_socket, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF,
&len, &optl
Mark Zimmerman wrote:
> I almost didn't submit this because there were no outright failures, but
> then I noticed that with acpi enabled, the hw.setperf sysctl is missing.
> Without acpi, it is present and works properly.
This is because the "traditional" EST mechanism is currently disabled
when A
Hi OpenBSD'lers,
I'm about to use OpenBSD's pf(4) for load balancing some webservers. So
far, everything is looking just perfect.
Compared to pound, pf(4) is incredibly fast with few CPU and memory usage.
So I'd say: Thats great :)
However, one thing is bothering me.
Obviously, my apache acces
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Otto Moerbeek writes:
>
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Igor Sobrado wrote:
>
> > (I suppose that setting obase=10 after setting the input base to 16d
> > means that the output base is set to 0x10...)
>
> indeed.
>
> In the last example Solaris does no seem to truncate 0.
Good morning misc@
In some private emails with gwk@, he has said
that he'd like to work on getting SMP on the
macppc platform working, but lacks a good, fast
machine with which to do the work.
That's where we come in. I'm looking around, and
we can get a useful machine to him on the cheap.
If yo
Nobody likes Mandriva.
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 07:56:04PM -0800, Reza Muhammad wrote:
> Dear Lists.
>
> I have one bridge PF machine for packet queue and
> prio,
> and few new install Mandriva2007 (linux kernel) that
> couldn not browse the web (the other protocol work OK)
> if the rules keep st
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> Of course, Karel Kulhavy is the one to provide feedback on this patch.
> But I have tried it too (after upgrading src/usr.bin/bc) and seems to
> be working fine for this case (NetBSD and Solaris are running their own
> flavours of bc):
>
>
On Sunday 28 January 2007 18:26, Soner Tari wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 16:39 -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> > On Sunday 28 January 2007 03:03, Soner Tari wrote:
> > > I'm running Postfix on OpenBSD and have multiple external links
> > > on the same box. I want outgoing smtp connections to be rout
Hi,
I want to use the ifstated daemon.
I have Googled around and read the man page (not very clear) but not
understood how to use the ifstated.conf file.
All I want to do is monitoring the output of 'netstat -nr' and if the
output changes, and to kill the isakmpd daemon and restart it.
Does
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Michael Schmidt wrote:
> I want to be hoonest, I am not involved in bc problems, but reading these
> mails, just as an idea:
>
> Why not creating a new bc, or in other words changing the bc of today and
> correcting that math stuff. Name the new, corrected bc something like b
Hi again.
Of course, Karel Kulhavy is the one to provide feedback on this patch.
But I have tried it too (after upgrading src/usr.bin/bc) and seems to
be working fine for this case (NetBSD and Solaris are running their own
flavours of bc):
For OpenBSD:
$ bc -l
ibase=4
obase=10
scale=100
l(1.031)
Igor Sobrado wrote:
I have tested these base 11 to base 10 translations on other bc
versions and all show the same behaviour. I agree, this behaviour
is historically consistent. But this handling of non-decimal
fractions is wrong from the point of view of mathematics. In other
words:
- 0.1 p
Hi Johan and all,
fortunately the seller made the mistake in the web page where I found
the laptop and he wrote that it's a centrino and in the wikipedia you
can read:
"To qualify for a Centrino label, vendors must use all three Intel
qualified parts for laptop, otherwise using only the processo
NEWSLETTER N0 5 DAL 29 GENNAIO AL 4 FEBBRAIO 2007
LE NEWS DELLA SETTIMANA
29/01/2007
Terme On Ice MONTECATINI TERME
(Folklore)
30/01/2007
Mostra sul massacro di Nanjing MONTECATINI TERME
(Mostre)
30/01/2007
Mac,n MONSUMMANO TERME
(Mostre)
31/01/2007
Vintage Selection FIRENZE
(Mostre)
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Otto Moerbeek writes:
>
> bc hase some more unexpected things for the casual user:
>
> scale=4
> 1/3 produces 0.
> 2/3 produces 0.
Not so unexpected -- a mathematician would work out 0. and 0.6667
respectively, but your excellent example is what we wou
Here's a complete diff. Not that it is relative the whitespace cleanup
diff I comitted a few hours ago. So make sure your tree is up-to-date
before patching.
-Otto
Index: bc.library
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/bc/bc.librar
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Igor Sobrado wrote:
> [copied and pasted, I am currently not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Note that some of your tests still
> > produce strange results, but that is due to weird handling of
> > non-decimal fractions wrt sc
Hi,
assumed that I have installed OpenBSD to an USB memory stick and the box
is booting from this "drive" successfully and I've taken these
precautions to avoid frequent writes to the write cycle limited memory
stick:
- there's no swap space configured
- all logging is redirected to an extern
hey all,
first of all: i'm not subscribed to the mailinglist, so please send
replies to me personally too. thanks! :)
what's this mail about? i'll explain how the network is setup.
internet (0.0.0.0/0)
|
openbsdcluster -- windows management (192.168.2.0/24)
|
management network (192.168
On Sunday 28 January 2007 22:21, you wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 11:28:27AM -0800, Joe wrote:
> > Some more tests:
> >
> > # dd if=/dev/zero of=./testfile count=100
> > 100+0 records in
> > 100+0 records out
> > 51200 bytes transferred in 16.354 secs (31306797 bytes/sec)
> >
[copied and pasted, I am currently not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Note that some of your tests still
> produce strange results, but that is due to weird handling of
> non-decimal fractions wrt scale:
>
> For example, with ibase=11
> 0.1 produces 0.0
> > > and few new install Mandriva2007 (linux kernel) that
> > > couldn not browse the web (the other protocol work OK)
> > > if the rules keep state in PF machine is activated.
> >
> > use 'flags S/SA keep state'
> >
> thanks for nice replay.. but it still doesnt work.
> I believe that problem
Andreas,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 09:45:14AM +, Andreas Kahari wrote:
> I had the same problem ("FSD does not lie within the partition!" when
> trying to mount a UDF DVD disc). I applied the patch below from Pedro
> to a current i386 system, but that resulted in a locked system
> (everything w
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:17:14PM +, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > And if you need to change ISP, and
> > therefore get a new address allocation, many people would rather just put in
> > some NAT at the border than take the pain of network renumbering (which IPv6
> > doesn't make any easier than IP
--- Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007/01/28 19:56, Reza Muhammad wrote:
> > and few new install Mandriva2007 (linux kernel)
> that
> > couldn not browse the web (the other protocol work
> OK)
> > if the rules keep state in PF machine is
> activated.
>
> use 'flags S/SA keep s
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 09:19:50AM +0100, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> Salut,
>
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:26:11PM +0100, Almir Karic wrote:
> > they said the SAME thing about ipv4 :/
>
> The big problems of IPv4 aren't address space problems but performance
> problems. There are two big issue
Replying to a somewhat old message...
I had the same problem ("FSD does not lie within the partition!" when
trying to mount a UDF DVD disc). I applied the patch below from Pedro
to a current i386 system, but that resulted in a locked system
(everything waiting in 'inode') when trying to mount th
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> >
> > > I just found three bugs in the OpenBSD 4.0 "bc" program.
> >
> >
> > All three bugs seem to related to the use of a non-decimal input base
> > in comb
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 05:32:41PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-28 16:07]:
> > bioctl -h ciss0 gives me
> >
> > bioctl: Can't locate ciss0 device via /dev/bio
>
> ciss doesn't support bio yet.
rtfm
bio(4) support is only possible for one volume righ
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
>
> > I just found three bugs in the OpenBSD 4.0 "bc" program.
>
>
> All three bugs seem to related to the use of a non-decimal input base
> in combination with using the -l lib.
>
> This is because the stor
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> I just found three bugs in the OpenBSD 4.0 "bc" program.
All three bugs seem to related to the use of a non-decimal input base
in combination with using the -l lib.
This is because the stored routines interpret the number according to
the base at exe
On 2007/01/28 19:56, Reza Muhammad wrote:
> and few new install Mandriva2007 (linux kernel) that
> couldn not browse the web (the other protocol work OK)
> if the rules keep state in PF machine is activated.
use 'flags S/SA keep state'
Salut,
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:26:11PM +0100, Almir Karic wrote:
> they said the SAME thing about ipv4 :/
The big problems of IPv4 aren't address space problems but performance
problems. There are two big issues:
1. deaggregation. A lot of small nets clog up the pipe which don't have
t
I just found three bugs in the OpenBSD 4.0 "bc" program.
0) some "evil" numbers make bc hang:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ bc -l
ibase=4
obase=10
scale=100
l(1.031)
.023311001002311221102233202
(immediate reply)
l(1.03)
[ - HANG at least for 11 minutes - ]
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATEWAIT
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Daniel Cid wrote:
> I have been trying to increase the maximum allowed size for a message
> when
> using unix domain sockets without any success...
>
> Whenever I send anything
> larger than 2048, it fails with EMSGSIZE. I looked
> at multiple sysctls and no
> one seems to be
100 matches
Mail list logo
