On 12/15/06, Jim Razmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So something definitely changed with vim between the 3.9 and 4.0
releases. I'm digging into the vim cvs history for clues along with our
ports tree for clues.
3.9 shipped with Vim 6.4.6, 4.0 had Vim 7.0.42. Lots of stuff changed
between Vim6 a
On 15-Dec-06, at 8:42 PM, Denny White wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There are actually 2 problems. First one is, when using
ctrl-alt-f1 & so forth, it goes to the other console fine,
but when I try to switch back, all I see on the screen is
the output from the underlying
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a new 4.0 installation I am trying out the pkg_add update procedure for the
first time and it is giving me grief. Please look at the following output and
let me know how the tool is finding the situation so ambiguous and also how I
should proceed.
# pkg_add -vv -n
On 12/16/06, Craig Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:04:15AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
>
> long time back I did this on my firewalls
>
> http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/install.html
> http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/run-cache-x.html
>
Don't do that. DJB junk is not in ports for good re
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, December 15, 2006 11:17 pm
Subject: Re: package update trouble
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a new 4.0 installation I am trying out the pkg_add u
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cannot find updates for unarj-2.43 unrar-3.54p0
I installed both by ports (using an old install script for automating some
stuff; I guess back then these two did not exist as packages). Strangely,
pkg_info shows unarj but not unrar. Any comment
On 12/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On a new 4.0 installation I am trying out the pkg_add update procedure for the
first time and it is giving me grief. Please look at the following output and
let me know how the tool is finding the situation so ambiguous and also how I
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, December 15, 2006 11:17 pm
Subject: Re: package update trouble
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On a new 4.0 installation I am trying out the pkg_add update
> procedure for
Has anyone successfully gotten Vista to dual-boot with OpenBSD using
bcdedit? I found EasyBCD which will transfer control to Grub, but it
seems I shouldn't have to load Grub to boot OpenBSD.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There are actually 2 problems. First one is, when using
ctrl-alt-f1 & so forth, it goes to the other console fine,
but when I try to switch back, all I see on the screen is
the output from the underlying x rather than the desktop.
The other problem i
On a new 4.0 installation I am trying out the pkg_add update procedure for the
first time and it is giving me grief. Please look at the following output and
let me know how the tool is finding the situation so ambiguous and also how I
should proceed.
# pkg_add -vv -n -u clamav-0.88.5
Error fro
I'm trying to protect my mail server by adding some rudimentary options
to inbound SMTP connections on my 3.9 stable firewall. I have the
following in my pf.conf;
SMTP_OPT = "(max 10, source-track rule, max-src-states 1, max-src-nodes
7, tcp.established 60)"
pass in quick on $INTERNET_IF prot
On 12/15/06, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone point me to a source of information on the percentaged
of DNS servers by OS?
I don't know if there is a source of information for that, but this
suggests the high level breakdown pretty well:
http://mydns.bboy.net/survey/
DS
Can anyone point me to a source of information on the percentaged
of DNS servers by OS?
--
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
* Sideris Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061214 20:50]:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:29:58PM -0500, Jim Razmus wrote:
> > Someone hit me with a clue-by-four.
> >
> > On both 4.0 release and -current (13/12/2006) I find "vim -y" does not
> > work as it did on 3.9. Likely a question for the vim lists
- Original Message -
From: Markus Bergkvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, December 15, 2006 7:11 pm
Subject: Re: dhcpd question
To: misc@openbsd.org
> I noticed no-one has suggested dnsmasq, any reason for that?
> Just curious.
>
> /Markus
>
>
> Craig Skinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec
On 12/16/06, Jonathan Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 04:14:14PM +0800, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> On 12/14/06, earx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >ralink is the worst radio chipset in term of radio performance
> >but the best documented for driver :(
>
> I probably missed s
using the current snapshot from 12/14 on Macppc, using a Tibook 400,
using mixerctl to set the output volumes to 0 results in low volume,
instead of no volume.
$ mixerctl -a
outputs.select=speaker
outputs.speaker=0,0
outputs.headphones=0,0
source=cd
master=0,0
What else should I be looking at?
Try something like this:
rsync -avvHR /source/. /destination
The -vv is optional, but will print a line for each file as it is being
copied. If the copy is interrupted partway through, just run it again
and it'll pick up where it left off. If you don't have rsync installed,
look for it in pack
Thoughts? Strategies? Ideas?
---
Ask the machine directly? Ask an adjacent machine?
Adjacent machine strat:
If the monitoring machine is directly connected to the same ethernet
segment, one could use pcap(3) to examine multicast packets. There are
no utils I know of that do this, so a few lines
I noticed no-one has suggested dnsmasq, any reason for that? Just curious.
/Markus
Craig Skinner wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:04:15AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
long time back I did this on my firewalls
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/install.html
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/run-cache-x.html
Don't
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:47:32PM +, Craig Skinner wrote:
> Don't do that. DJB junk is not in ports for good reasons.
As far as I know, DJB software is not in ports because his opinions on
licensing and filesystem hierarchy are very different from Theo's (and
most everybody else's) not becaus
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 04:07:24PM -0500, Zachary Miscikoski wrote:
> I know many of you will laugh at this, but is there any ARCNet support under
> OpenBSD?
>
from http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net/Attic/if_arcsubr.c:
Revision 1.24, Tue Jul 18 11:52:12 2006 UTC (4 months, 4 week
On Fridayen den 15 December 2006 19:56, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Dear list members,
>
> i am searching for reports from ones running openbsd 4.0 on the
> followig hardware:
>
> 0) HP Proliant 320 G5
> 1) HP Proliant 320s
> 2) HP Proliant 360 G5
> 3) Dell PowerEdge 860
> 4) Dell PowerEdge 1950
> 5) IBM
You might need to compile a kernel with a large default
data segment size, make sure tmp has enough room, or
set TMPDIR/TEMPDIR for restore.
Dump/resture should DTRT.
rsync -H will as well, but again, going back to needing lots of memory to
store all that hardlink info...
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006
> Is it really possible to create two instances using the rc.conf.local file?
> I tried to, but the rc creates only the last instance.
No you need to put a second startup line in /etc/rc.local
In other words.
ftpproxy_flags="" in /etc/rc.conf.local
and the following line in /etc/rc.local
/usr
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Matthias Bertschy wrote:
>5) dump to file: successful but
>5') restore from file: stops even before starting due to a "no memory for
> entry table" error (there is still a lot of unused memory and swap - and no
> ulimit)
ulimit for memory usage is never unlimited. Loo
Dear friends,
I have a question about the ftp-proxy. Anyone can help me?
Situation:
* clients behind a NAT needs access to external FTP servers
* clients on the Internet need access to my internal FTP server
* OBSD 4.0 (NAT)
Accordingly to the document http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ftp.html, I c
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:04:15AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
>
> long time back I did this on my firewalls
>
> http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/install.html
> http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/run-cache-x.html
>
Don't do that. DJB junk is not in ports for good reasons.
Bind is patched and chrooted in base. It wont
Ahhh I was enlightened by you and Andy Hayward ;)
If it is memory consumption is the problem, adding a swapfile
via swapon could help.
Andreas.
On 12/15/06, Jaye Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You might need to compile a kernel with a large default
data segment size, make sure tmp has eno
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Matthias Bertschy wrote:
> OpenBSD 3.7 - i386
> Pentium 4 3GHz - 1GB RAM - 2GB swap
>
> Hello list,
>
> For the past 3 weeks, I have been working on a difficult problem: moving a
> backuppc (http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/) pool from a RAID0 to a big disk,
> in order to fre
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, James Herbert (Lists) wrote:
I can use supersede routers to add an alternative route, as long as the
gw that I'm using is reachable.
-Otto
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 09:39:12AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
> Actually, come to think of it, if I could get away with it, I'd
> change the dumb shit's email to another address. give him a week to
> tell his friends it has moved, and then add him as as a greytrap
> address. they you use his stup
On 12/15/06, Andreas Maus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just a wild guess ...
Do you tried rsync?
(Although I don't know how rsync deals with _hard_ links).
rsync --archive --hard-links ...
-- ach
Hi.
Just a wild guess ...
Do you tried rsync?
(Although I don't know how rsync deals with _hard_ links).
HTH,
Andreas.
On 12/15/06, Matthias Bertschy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OpenBSD 3.7 - i386
Pentium 4 3GHz - 1GB RAM - 2GB swap
Hello list,
For the past 3 weeks, I have been working on a
Have you tried using cpio in passthrough mode? I've used CPIO on big
systems before with success, although admittedly not on OpenBSD ..
Matthias Bertschy wrote:
OpenBSD 3.7 - i386
Pentium 4 3GHz - 1GB RAM - 2GB swap
Hello list,
For the past 3 weeks, I have been working on a difficult problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2006 15:26 schrieb Vijay Sankar:
>> Sorry, I meant to write smbldap-useradd.
>>
>> FWIW, all I had to do were the following three steps:
>>
>> 1) added an OpenBSD user account called FTL37$
>> 2) smbldap-useradd -w FTL37$
>> 3) did a smb
OpenBSD 3.7 - i386
Pentium 4 3GHz - 1GB RAM - 2GB swap
Hello list,
For the past 3 weeks, I have been working on a difficult problem: moving
a backuppc (http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/) pool from a RAID0 to a big
disk, in order to free the RAID0 before rebuilding a RAID5.
The RAID0 has one p
On Dec 12, 2006, at 11:46 PM, Brian Keefer wrote:
OK, so just to be clear I'm not a terribly clever person. I have
no idea what I should be looking for to diagnose this issue. It's
entirely possible that I have something configured stupidly/wrong,
etc or that the answer is right in front
James Herbert (Lists) wrote:
> Hi misc!
>
> I have a home router which is connected to a DSL line as its primary
> connection, with static IPs and the like. I have a secondary cable
> connection with a dynamic IP, and I have to use dhcp to get the IP for
> this link.
>
> I have the following in my
Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
What release are you running?
I don't have supersede rules in my config but my request line is the
same. It works for a firewall with 3 dsl lines with 2 dhcp interfaces.
I had it working on 3.9 and 4.0.
Regards,
Wijnand
Sorry, I'm running 4.0-stable. Here's my dmesg:
Hello misc,
I was recently tasked with creating a firewall for our production
servers and workgroup. The server I was given has a Supermicro H8DAR-T
motherboard, with a Marvell 88SX6041 SATA controller.
http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/motherboard/Opteron/8132/H8DAR-T.cfm
I'd like to install Ope
I know many of you will laugh at this, but is there any ARCNet support under
OpenBSD?
What release are you running?
I don't have supersede rules in my config but my request line is the
same. It works for a firewall with 3 dsl lines with 2 dhcp interfaces.
I had it working on 3.9 and 4.0.
Regards,
Wijnand
Hi misc!
I have a home router which is connected to a DSL line as its primary
connection, with static IPs and the like. I have a secondary cable
connection with a dynamic IP, and I have to use dhcp to get the IP for
this link.
I have the following in my dhclient.conf:
send host-name "paladi
On Dec 15, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Dear list members,
i am searching for reports from ones running openbsd 4.0 on the
followig hardware:
0) HP Proliant 320 G5
1) HP Proliant 320s
2) HP Proliant 360 G5
3) Dell PowerEdge 860
4) Dell PowerEdge 1950
5) IBM eSystem x306m
6) IBM System
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 09:22:47PM +0100, Erik Wikstr?m wrote:
> I have three NICs in the box, two rl(4) and one ath(4), rl1 is connected
> to the Internet and rl0 and ath0 are the local networks. As I understand
> things I need to bridge the two local NICs somehow to be able to access
> compute
Dear list members,
i am searching for reports from ones running openbsd 4.0 on the
followig hardware:
0) HP Proliant 320 G5
1) HP Proliant 320s
2) HP Proliant 360 G5
3) Dell PowerEdge 860
4) Dell PowerEdge 1950
5) IBM eSystem x306m
6) IBM System X3550
Are they fully supported Network/RAID/SCSI
Hi,
not long ago, duplex information was added to if_link_state. Today, I
took a closer look and it looks like my
sk0 at skc0 port A, address 00:11:95:ff:28:1d
eephy0 at sk0 phy 0: Marvell 88E1011 Gigabit PHY, rev. 3
does not set it to > 2, even though SIOCGIFMEDIA's output contains
IFM_FDX
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 04:14:14PM +0800, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> On 12/14/06, earx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >ralink is the worst radio chipset in term of radio performance
> >but the best documented for driver :(
>
> I probably missed something here, except for some Linux drivers, I
> didn'
What's the dust like, industrial, academic or commercial office? Was that
last one stupid?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Jan Prunk
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:30 AM
> To: misc@openbsd.org; freebsd-chat@freebsd.org;
> debia
hi,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:50:18PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> I am interested too! If possible, let me know what feedback you got.
>
i got one report for the DL385 G2, which seems to share the same new
platform as the DL365 and DL385 G2.
it uses the new dual port bnx(4) gigabit chipset in
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Greg Thomas wrote:
> On 12/14/06, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Greg Thomas wrote:
> >
> > > On 12/14/06, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > At 09:22 PM 12/14/2006 +0100, Erik Wikstrvm wrote:
> > > > Your wireless router is pro
Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2006 15:26 schrieb Vijay Sankar:
> Sorry, I meant to write smbldap-useradd.
>
> FWIW, all I had to do were the following three steps:
>
> 1) added an OpenBSD user account called FTL37$
> 2) smbldap-useradd -w FTL37$
> 3) did a smbpasswd -a FTL37$
>
With the normal users th
I am interested too! If possible, let me know what feedback you got.
thanks in advance.
best regards.
On 12/15/06, Reyk Floeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi,
i'm looking for OpenBSD test reports on the new HP ProLiant DL365 and
DL385 G2 series servers (the new opteron servers, not the intel
hi,
i'm looking for OpenBSD test reports on the new HP ProLiant DL365 and
DL385 G2 series servers (the new opteron servers, not the intel
stuff). i'm trying to get demo boxes but this will unfortunately take
some more time... :(.
i would appreciate to get a dmesg, please contact me if you have
a
Hi Fred,
thanks for the information about xorg.conf... I was really wondering
how comes xorg can work without .conf It's the first time in my
7-years-unix life that I see this.
Unfortunately your email came too late, after I had already spent some
2 hours configuring per hand xorg.conf... now it
Sorry, I meant to write smbldap-useradd.
FWIW, all I had to do were the following three steps:
1) added an OpenBSD user account called FTL37$
2) smbldap-useradd -w FTL37$
3) did a smbpasswd -a FTL37$
Currently I am using samba-3.0.21bp3-ldap and samba-docs-3.0.21b
packages on OpenBSD 3.9.
Rely
Hello !
Our company is doing a yearly cleanup. There are 4 Digital DEC VT-420
terminals for waste. The cleanup should happen sometime soon in the
next few weeks. So if anyone would like to get one of them please
contact me on my email, as I cannot store them for a long time, since
I don't have en
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 08:51:33PM +1100, Damien Miller wrote:
> So far for all you people who have complained about lousy ral(4)
> range or reception, only one of you has posted a dmesg (and even it was
> incomplete) and none of you have posted your interface config.
>
> Don't let this interrupt y
Did you add the workstation account using smbldap-adduser -w?
Here is the result from an ldapsearch for a workstation in a domain
called FORETELL. The PDC is a samba server (running on OpenBSD, setup
using only packages from the OpenBSD CD or downloaded from
ftp://mirror.arcticnetwork.ca/pub/OpenB
Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2006 14:03 schrieb Vijay Sankar:
> Did you add the workstation account using smbldap-adduser -w?
>
my entry for adding machine accounts in smb.conf is
add machine script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w "%u"
smbldap-adduser does not exist in my smbldap-tools
> Here
On 15/12/06, Chris C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 15 December 2006 06:00, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:09:22PM -0800, Greg Thomas wrote:
> > On 12/14/06, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >At 09:22 PM 12/14/2006 +0100, Erik Wikstrvm wrote:
> > >>I've get
At 09:22 PM 12/14/2006 +0100, Erik Wikstrvm wrote:
I've get an box laying in my basement running OpenBSD 3.7 (probably
should upgrade that some time but I've never taken the time) acting
as gateway for both wired and wireless networks. Everything has
been working flawlessly except one thin
Damien, no problem, thanks for your help ! Thomas
complete dmesg
OpenBSD 4.0 (GENERIC) #1107: Sat Sep 16 19:15:58 MDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 800MHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class, 0KB L2
zcpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PA
Timo Schoeler schrieb:
> just wanted to tell that in the next issue (January 2007; will be
> available from Dec 14th) of the german magazine iX [0] there's an
> article on the release of OpenBSD 4.0.
>
> It covers new features in OpenBSD 4.0 as well as some ethical issues wrt
> blobs.
>
> [0] --
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Dr. Harry Knitter wrote:
Does somebody have any hints for me how to get my clients into the samba
domain?
Congratulations, you won the "what the hell does it have to do with
OpenBSD" price!
When you have an OpenBSD related problem, do you go ask on samba mailing
lists..
I have set up samba and openldap. Openldap was populated with smbldap-tools.
Either samba and openldap run fine and I can access my samba shares from a
Windows client in a peer-to-peer connection. The logs show me that the
authentication is done via ldap.
However, when I try to add a Windows box
Greetings,
Early October I bought this Samsung DVD/CD burner [1]
(OEM) from newegg. I put in a computer I was going
to put 4.0 on.
After installing 4.0 and updating source with cvs
-rOPENBSD_4_0 I made a release. I attempted to burn
a CD so I can use for upgrading my other i386 systems
as well.
So far for all you people who have complained about lousy ral(4)
range or reception, only one of you has posted a dmesg (and even it was
incomplete) and none of you have posted your interface config.
Don't let this interrupt your complain-fest, but if you want to move
beyond whinging and start try
Erik,
From dhcp.conf:
subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
Wouldn't netmask 255.255.0.0 work better?
-- ach
On 12/14/06, earx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ralink is the worst radio chipset in term of radio performance
but the best documented for driver :(
I probably missed something here, except for some Linux drivers, I
didn't remember Ralink had released any formal documents about its
MACs and RFs.
On 2006/12/14 16:33, rootrider wrote:
> Traffic is being assigned to the nick_int queue, and inbound
> (from the internet to the lan) traffic is being limited... to my
> surprise. That doesn't even make any sense to me.
Use the same name for queues on each interface, e.g.
altq on $ext_if cbq ba
73 matches
Mail list logo
