DHCP, CARP, and VLANs

I am having some serious difficulty with dhcp, carp, and vlans. I have two OpenBSD/i386 3.9-stable firewalls running GENERIC. I am using them to replace a failing Cisco Catalyst 3550 switch that was doing the VLAN routing. The boxes are working great as far as the VLAN routing goes but DHCP is not

Re: Oldest Server you run

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Falk Husemann > Sent: 12 October 2006 08:55 PM > To: misc@openbsd.org > Subject: Oldest Server you run > > Hello List! > We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to > know what

IPX

Hello misc, I need some support here, I need to configure an IPX network on my oBSD box, because I have a program that only communicates by IPX and the oBSD box is between these 2 LANs that uses this program, someone can point me the directions?! I'm kind of lost here... -- Cordialmente Ricardo L

Re: pf: 'block drop' used, but ICMP unreachables returned anyway...

On 10/13/06, Joe Gibbens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm guessing its because the default state policy is floating. Just looking at the rules provided, the traffic should be able to pass through. Funny you should mention that because this is what I initially thought (that at #2 traffic should p

Re: Oldest Server you run

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Jason George wrote: I can't believe people with PIIs and PIIIs even responded to this thread, however. You GOT to be kidding me...That ain't old. That's almost as new as I get! Exactly. Today on my way to work I found a Pentium 100mhz, 48MB EDO, 480MB hdd in a ditch o

Re: pf: 'block drop' used, but ICMP unreachables returned anyway...

I'm guessing its because the default state policy is floating. Just looking at the rules provided, the traffic should be able to pass through. Try either pulling the "keep state" option, or setting the state policy to if-bound, and see what happens. So if it should be working now, why isn't it?

Re: Oldest Server you run

>I can't believe people with PIIs and PIIIs even responded to this >thread, however. You GOT to be kidding me...That ain't old. That's >almost as new as I get! Exactly. # sysctl hw hw.machine=sparc hw.model=SUNW,SPARCclassic, TMS390S10 @ 50 MHz, on-chip FPU hw.ncpu=1 hw.byteorder=4321 hw.phys

pf: 'block drop' used, but ICMP unreachables returned anyway...

Consider the following setup (OpenBSD 4.0-current): Win PC > (vlan1) [OpenSD FW] (vlan0) > Host 1. With the following pf ruleset: set skip on { lo0 } scrub all fragment reassemble block drop all A ping command on the Windows PC towards the Host (172.23.1.21) gives the following (expect

Re: Oldest Server you run

Gordon Grieder wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:22:43PM -0400, Steve Shockley wrote: >> Bryan Irvine wrote: >> > You win. >> >> I'm waiting for Nick Holland to chime in... he's probably got an SE/30 >> in production, or maybe a VAXstation 2000. > > Nick replied ages ago but his machine is sti

Re: RMS vs TdR (WAS: Re: OLPC)

Breen, On 13/10/2006, at 1:20 AM, Breen Ouellette wrote: Hmm. Let's see. Jack's original post is listed in its entirety below. I do not see any quotes around the word interesting. If you read it then you may agree that his meaning is obvious, you may not. I replied to this... http://marc.

Re: Oldest Server you run

On Friday 13 October 2006 02:54, Falk Husemann wrote: > We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to > know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? Some ancient whitebox PC: OpenBSD 3.7 (GENERIC) #50: Sun Mar 20 00:01:57 MST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/

ospf and carp

Is it feasible to run ospf on a carp pair of firewalls? Is there any documntation as to how to do this? -- Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel in OpenBSD

On Friday 13 October 2006 04:25, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > Precisely which parts of the community-edition guidelines are you so > strongly defending? He is defending it? I could have sworn he only said OpenBSD is complying with the guidelines. --- Lars Hansson

Re: problems using HFSC with pf

yes, but you have to understand my problem , i am very new to openbsd & PF and have no unix admins in surroundings, neither has any unix training places , all my learning comes from google & mailing lists such as this. i do try googling before posting & only port if have have many doubts. currelt

Re: Oldest Server you run

i am currently running OpenBSD server on a 933MHZ 512MB RAM with PF + squid + squidguard + ALTQ with users upto 200 + with easy, one of the primary reasons i switch to OpebBSD from windows. such great resourse managment :) regards *:$., 88,.$:*(((*$ Stingray *:$., 88,.$:*((*$

Re: Oldest Server you run

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:22:43PM -0400, Steve Shockley wrote: > Bryan Irvine wrote: > > You win. > > I'm waiting for Nick Holland to chime in... he's probably got an SE/30 > in production, or maybe a VAXstation 2000. Nick replied ages ago but his machine is still processing the outgoing mail.

Re: Oldest Server you run

Bryan Irvine wrote: You win. I'm waiting for Nick Holland to chime in... he's probably got an SE/30 in production, or maybe a VAXstation 2000.

Re: problems using HFSC with pf

i am currently using CBQ but i wanted a feature like wanted to shif the que from high priority to lower after a spec period of time, as i have some dirty users which have nothing to do but download HTTP contents from internet. *:$., 88,.$:*(((*$ Stingray *:$., 88,.$:*((*$ -

Re: Oldest Server you run

> We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would > like to know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? As most others started out on the details, i will start with the generalities: Unless you have special needs or you must serve some large or very busy network, taking w

Re: Oldest Server you run

$ sysctl hw hw.machine = intellivision hw.model = General Instrument CP1610 16-bit @ 895 kHz , absolutely no FPU hw.ncpu = 1 hw.byteorder = 4321 hw.physmem = 1352 bytes hw.usermem = 0 hw.pagesize = 0 hw.disknames = cartridge1 hw.diskcount = 0 $ uname -a Open

Re: Oldest Server you run

You win. On 10/12/06, Robert Waldner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:12:19 CDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I think I am winning at this point: >$ sysctl hw >hw.machine = i386 $ sysctl hw hw.machine = sparc hw.model = Sun 4/65, MB86900/1A or L64801 @ 25 MHz, WTL3170/2 FPU hw

Re: Oldest Server you run

On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:12:19 CDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I think I am winning at this point: >$ sysctl hw >hw.machine = i386 $ sysctl hw hw.machine = sparc hw.model = Sun 4/65, MB86900/1A or L64801 @ 25 MHz, WTL3170/2 FPU hw.ncpu = 1 hw.byteorder = 4321 hw.physmem = 54476800 hw.usermem = 53579

Re: Getting custom code to execute on an invalid password

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu 12.Oct'06 at 15:37:38 -0700 > Hello everyone. > > My question is simple: > > For each user on my system I have a list of passwords which they > should never, ever enter. If someone enters a password which is on > this list I know that their passwords have been c

Re: layer-7 pf loadbalancing

bumer. anyone know of any alternatives that can run on openbsd? Raymond Pasco wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:26:01PM -0700, Alexander Lind wrote: > >> does anyone know if there are any plans for adding layer-7 support to >> openbsds pf? >> > As far as I know, the pf developers conside

Re: Oldest Server you run

Ha ha ha, this is amusing seeing some of the replies. Here's my home firewall; not the oldest mentioned but still in the upper percentiles. Digital (remember that brand) P2-166 32 megs RAM 3 gig hard drive 3 NICs; one internal, 2 generic cheapie PCI cards No xwindows; runs like a charm I used t

Re: layer-7 pf loadbalancing

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:26:01PM -0700, Alexander Lind wrote: > does anyone know if there are any plans for adding layer-7 support to > openbsds pf? As far as I know, the pf developers consider anything in layer 7 outside the scope of pf, so no. -- Raymond Pasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mobile: +1 86

Re: Oldest Server you run

On 12/10/06, Claus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/12/2006 1:54 PM, Falk Husemann wrote: > Hello List! > We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to > know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? (0) gotta love selective quoting: I don't get this question

Re: Oldest Server you run

Falk Husemann wrote: > Hello List! > We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to > know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? > > > As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard > disk and a connection to the internet. So no Newton or to

Re: OpenBSD 4.0 as a PostgreSQL Database Server

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:08:36PM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > For those of you that are knowledgeable, and have the time to respond > > does anyone see any troubles with this hardware selection? > I am mostly concerned with the raid Controller selection I am > expecting it to have raid 5 acro

Getting custom code to execute on an invalid password

Hello everyone. My question is simple: For each user on my system I have a list of passwords which they should never, ever enter. If someone enters a password which is on this list I know that their passwords have been compromised and their account should be immediately disabled. I'd like to

Re: Oldest Server you run

Falk Husemann wrote: We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? We use an old Pentium 200 MHz, 32 MB RAM, two NICs, to seal of an old unpatched Windows 98 "server" from the rest of our network... (I can't do an

Re: Redundant over two ethernet switches

I've used trunk to make redundancy possible between two switches on the same subnet (single shared virtual IP, and no STP usage). from what I can read in the trunk man, http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=trunk&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html failover i

Re: Redundant over two ethernet switches

On 2006/10/12 23:47, Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote: > Let's say we have two switches on the same subnet with RSTP (Rapid Spanning > Tree) on. If I want to connect an OpenBSD server 3.9 or 4.0 (with TWO intel > NIC:s and ONE IP address) two both these switches (redundancy purpose not > speed) I think I

Re: Oldest Server you run

> On Thursday 12 October 2006 13:54, Falk Husemann wrote: >> Hello List! >> We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to >> know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? > > hw.machine = abacus > hw.model = Laquer Beads 20x7 ("GenuineWood" Teak-class) > hw.ncpu =

Re: problems using HFSC with pf

On 12/10/06, Jon Simola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/12/06, S t i n g r a y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i am facing problems using hfsc with PF. That would be the first problem. Mention of HFSC was scrubbed from the PF FAQ at http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/queueing.html for good reason. Eve

Re: Swedish speakers -- OpenBSD and IBM Tivoli TSM BA

I'd like to thank you all very much for your responses! :) Installing the older version v4r2 as per your translations appears to have worked, though I first had problems with it conflicting with my earlier attempts at getting v5r3 to work (I really need to learn more about Linux and the deb/rpm p

Re: Oldest Server you run

I think I am winning at this point: $ sysctl hw hw.machine = i386 hw.model = Intel Pentium Pro ("GenuineIntel" 686-class, 256KB L2 cache) hw.ncpu = 1 hw.byteorder = 1234 hw.physmem = 133804032 hw.usermem = 133410816 hw.pagesize = 4096 $ This is an old pentium pro box. Dmesg lists it at 194mhz.

Re: Oldest Server you run

I have a digital AlphaServer 1000 4/200 I would LOVE to load OpenBSD on. I haven't succeeded yet. It is happily running FreeBSD currently. I'll give OpenBSD another stab soon though :) I run OpenBSD on my little laptop which is a pentium 100 maxed at 40 megs of ram. Runs like a champ. I use i

Re: Oldest Server you run

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:54:35PM +0200, Falk Husemann wrote: > Hello List! > We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to > know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? At my place of work, I have an old "cakebox" Sparc IPX 25 (40??)MHz with 16 MB RAM, 2GB

Re: Swedish speakers -- OpenBSD and IBM Tivoli TSM BA

For the benefit of the archives: I also did touch /emul/linux/etc/mtab in the process, which I didn't see documented in this context, but an error message screamed about /etc/mtab missing, so there. On 12/10/06, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to thank you all very much for your res

Redundant over two ethernet switches

Hi Let's say we have two switches on the same subnet with RSTP (Rapid Spanning Tree) on. If I want to connect an OpenBSD server 3.9 or 4.0 (with TWO intel NIC:s and ONE IP address) two both these switches (redundancy purpose not speed) I think I need some extra features on the NIC driver. Acc

Re: best hardware plataform for openbsd

On 2006/10/13 02:24, Jeffrey Lim wrote: > On 10/8/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 2006/10/07 19:29, Gustavo Rios wrote: > >> I am evaluating processor hardware for using with openbsd. Two options > >> of course: Intel and AMD. > > > >There are more options than just those. mac

Re: Oldest Server you run

On Thursday 12 October 2006 13:54, Falk Husemann wrote: >Hello List! >We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to >know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? My home mail server was originally a 33 Mhz 486, but once 66 MHz CPUs became free i acquired one and

Re: Oldest Server you run

> I also have an industrial 386SX with 32Mb RAM that > used to run 3.1 or 3.2, > back in the day when FPU emulation still kinda > worked. It was useless as a > box and dog slow, I have it for sheer geek factor > only. :) Currently, I have my sparc IPX running as a firewall and recently retired a Q

Re: Oldest Server you run

On 10/12/06, Falk Husemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello List! We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? Off the top of my head I'd have to say the oldest is our DNS cluster. They are all 143Mhz Sun Ultra 1's

layer-7 pf loadbalancing

hi all i tried googling for references to layer-7 load balancing support in openbsd:s pf, but came up with nothing. does anyone know if there are any plans for adding layer-7 support to openbsds pf? thanks alec

Re: Oldest Server you run

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:54:35PM +0200, Falk Husemann wrote: > Hello List! > We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to > know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? > > > As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard > disk and a

Re: Oldest Server you run

On 10/12/2006 1:54 PM, Falk Husemann wrote: Hello List! We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard disk and a connection to the internet. So n

Re: Intel breaking patents - related to closed documentation?

Breen Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just spotted this in the news: > > http://news.com.com/Transmeta+sues+Intel+for+patent+infringement/2100-1006_3-6124965.html?tag=nefd.top > > If Intel makes a habit of stealing patented technology would open access > to their hardware documentation

Re: Oldest Server you run

On Thursday 12 October 2006 14:54, Falk Husemann wrote: > Hello List! > We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to > know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? > > > As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard > disk and a connection to

Re: Oldest Server you run

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:54:35PM +0200, Falk Husemann wrote: > Hello List! > We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to > know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? > > > As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard > disk and a

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel in OpenBSD

On 12/10/06, Kurt Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/community-edition-policy.html OpenBSD is complying with the published guidelines for the community edition. That is the only point that matters. If the Mozilla Foundation thinks differently, I'

Re: Oldest Server you run

At 03:21 PM 10/12/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet wrote: I doubt this will count as the oldest, but we're using a Pentium III 500 mhz for our Firewall. Pentium III 500 mhz - 512mb ram - (2) 20gb hard drives, in RAID 1 - Realtek NIC PII - 350Mhz - 64M - 4G disk - Intel NIC

Re: Oldest Server you run

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Falk Husemann > Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 8:55 PM > To: misc@openbsd.org > Subject: Oldest Server you run > > Hello List! > We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would > like

Re: Oldest Server you run

$ sysctl hw hw.machine=i386 hw.model=Intel Pentium III ("GenuineIntel" 686-class, 512KB L2 cache) hw.ncpu=2 hw.byteorder=1234 hw.physmem=268001280 hw.usermem=267599872 hw.pagesize=4096 hw.disknames=sd0,sd1,sd2,cd0,fd0 hw.diskcount=5 hw.cpuspeed=449 On 10/12/06, Falk Husemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Oldest Server you run

The machine! hw.machine=i386 hw.model=Cyrix 486DLC (486-class) hw.ncpu=1 hw.byteorder=1234 hw.physmem=49917952 hw.usermem=49684480 hw.pagesize=4096 hw.disknames=wd0 hw.diskcount=1 # uname -a OpenBSD anand..com.ar 3.9 GENERIC#617 i386 Daniel On 10/12/06, Falk Husemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: Oldest Server you run

# sysctl hw hw.machine=i386 hw.model=Intel Pentium II ("GenuineIntel" 686-class, 512KB L2 cache) hw.ncpu=1 hw.byteorder=1234 hw.physmem=200908800 hw.usermem=200519680 hw.pagesize=4096 hw.disknames=wd0,cd0 hw.diskcount=2 hw.cpuspeed=448 I run OpenBGPD on it with 4 full peers as a route server. An

Re: Oldest Server you run

Intel Pentium 1 166 Mhz (with mmx!) 32 MB RAM Network: 1 x fxp & 1 x ne Hard Disk: Western Digital 80 GB IDE Connection internet: 15 mbit cable http://redshift.mine.nu:8080/~glenn/phpsysinfo/ Falk Husemann wrote: Hello List! We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to

Re: Oldest Server you run

> > We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to > > know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? > > > > As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard > > disk and a connection to the internet. cpu0: Intel Pentium (P54C) ("GenuineIntel" 586

Re: Oldest Server you run

Will H. Backman wrote: > The oldest one I have in production is a PIII 667 from 2001. Not that > old I guess. I was going to stay silent, but... I have a Sparc 5 at home that runs like a champ. Part of that is that the Sparc 5 took a lot of memory for its time, and I've maxed it at 256MB. --

Re: Oldest Server you run

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:54:35PM +0200, Falk Husemann wrote: | Hello List! | We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to | know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? Oldest box I have is a 80486DX2 @66MHz w/ 16M RAM. It has two 10Mbit NICs and a 250MB disk

Re: Oldest Server you run

Hi, Mine is not that old either. I'm using an IBM 350 as a firewall/Router P133 93b RAM 1.2 gb HD Works fine Dylan On 10/12/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I doubt this will count as the oldest, but we're using a Pentium III 500 > mhz for our Firewall. > >

High availability software for OpenBSD?

I am looking for something comparable to Ultra Monkey (Linux) that runs on OpenBSD. Anyone? Peter Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: Oldest Server you run

Falk Husemann wrote: Hello List! We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard disk and a connection to the internet. So no Newton or toaster (at

Re: problems using HFSC with pf

On 10/12/06, S t i n g r a y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i am facing problems using hfsc with PF. That would be the first problem. Mention of HFSC was scrubbed from the PF FAQ at http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/queueing.html for good reason. Everything I learned about HFSC was from other web site

Re: Oldest Server you run

My server is kind of old but runs OpenBSD like a charm. # sysctl hw hw.machine=i386 hw.model=Intel Celeron ("GenuineIntel" 686-class, 128KB L2 cache) hw.ncpu=1 hw.byteorder=1234 hw.physmem=268017664 hw.usermem=267587584 hw.pagesize=4096 hw.disknames=wd0,cd0,fd0 hw.diskcount=3 hw.cpuspeed=401 Flo

Re: Simple Networking Newbie questions

On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:39:35 +0200, "Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:49:58PM +0200, Marius Van Deventer - > Umzimkulu > > wrote: > > > > > I use tun for ppp and gprs connections. > > > > A lil bit elaboration with details will help I am su

Re: Swedish speakers -- OpenBSD and IBM Tivoli TSM BA

My swedish ain't so guud but Stefan's solution appears to have been: - Install RedHat library from OpenBSD package /usr/local/emul/redhat and link it to /emul/linux. - He used (under OBSD 3.7) the RPM version from Slackware 10.1 - He did a /usr/local/emul/redhat/bin/rpm -initd

Re: Oldest Server you run

I doubt this will count as the oldest, but we're using a Pentium III 500 mhz for our Firewall. Pentium III 500 mhz 512mb ram (2) 20gb hard drives, in RAID 1 Realtek NIC Patrick Falk Husemann wrote: Hello List! We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to know what

Re: Swedish speakers -- OpenBSD and IBM Tivoli TSM BA

Does anybody out there have a working knowledge of Swedish? The only (hopefully) useful search result I could find was this page, but it appears to be in Swedish: Quick summary: (The guy doing the test is "Stefan". His contact info is on the archive page) Marcus

Re: Dell PowerEdge 1950 compat

Alejandro Lozanoff wrote: Hello list, Following the search for supported hardware for our OpenBSD servers... Has anyone tried OpenBSD on any of these machines? I guess it should work on 4.0, i see that mfi(4) supports the Dell SAS controllers that this model use. Just wondering if anyone tri

Re: Swedish speakers -- OpenBSD and IBM Tivoli TSM BA

Doh. There was no reply five minutes ago.. Oh well.. :) /Anders

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel in OpenBSD

Henrik Enberg wrote: Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:11:52 -0400 From: Kurt Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Thursday 12 October 2006 10:13 am, Tobias Ulmer wrote: We are modifying the source code, which is ok with the "porting software" paragraph in the document above, but contradicts with a priva

Oldest Server you run

Hello List! We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD? As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard disk and a connection to the internet. So no Newton or toaster (at least not if ther

Re: problems using HFSC with pf

S t i n g r a y wrote: pfctl: the sum of the child bandwidth higher than parent "root_fxp0" pfctl: linkshare sc exceeds parent's sc > [... cut ...] altq on $extif hfsc bandwidth 512Kb queue { www, msn, https, smtp, def } queue www bandwidth 20% queue msn bandwidth 20% queue https bandwidth 20

Re: Swedish speakers -- OpenBSD and IBM Tivoli TSM BA

Don't know anything about TSM-clients but I'm swedish so here is a translation of the important part. - I've fought with the TSM-client on OpenBSD 3.7 and it's starts but I have done any backups yet. There is a little problem with dependencies but I did the following: Installed the RedHat-l

Re: problems using HFSC with pf

On 10/12/06, S t i n g r a y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i am facing problems using hfsc with PF. do you see anything wrong with this ? is there a bug in this ? I don't mean to be rude but you *really* need to start learning how to look into these things by yourself. It will help you out

Re: best hardware plataform for openbsd

On 10/8/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2006/10/07 19:29, Gustavo Rios wrote: > I am evaluating processor hardware for using with openbsd. Two options > of course: Intel and AMD. There are more options than just those. macppc and sparc64 are amongst the faster arch's too is

Re: Version 4.0 release

> I'm not saying OpenBSD is a bad operating system. Far from it. However I > would only use it for routers, firewalls, bridges, etc... Anything that > has to do with networking because after all, OpenBSD's networking is > great. Outside these areas OpenBSD is just too slow and doesn't support > eno

Re: Dell PowerEdge 1950 compat

Oops! Sorry for the noise, for some reason i dont have that message on my local newsgrouped misc where i searched. Thanks anyway! Alejandro. Quoting Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Just a few days ago someone asked the same question. Yes they are fully supported and I have several depl

Re: Dell PowerEdge 1950 compat

Just a few days ago someone asked the same question. Yes they are fully supported and I have several deployed. On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:20:23PM -0400, Alejandro Lozanoff wrote: > Hello list, > > Following the search for supported hardware for our OpenBSD servers... > Has anyone tried OpenBSD

Re: Dell PowerEdge 1950 compat

Hey Alejandro, > Has anyone tried OpenBSD on any of these machines? Marco did. At least, he said so here two days ago: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=116048164710924&w=2 The archive is your friend, not your foe. :-) HTH... Nico

Re: Swedish speakers -- OpenBSD and IBM Tivoli TSM BA

* ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-12 10:26]: > Hi, > Does anybody out there have a working knowledge of Swedish? > > I find myself having to use the Tivoli Storage Manager Backup/Archive > client (dsmc). > > As much as I would prefer a free solution, this is the only offsite > backup supported

Dell PowerEdge 1950 compat

Hello list, Following the search for supported hardware for our OpenBSD servers... Has anyone tried OpenBSD on any of these machines? I guess it should work on 4.0, i see that mfi(4) supports the Dell SAS controllers that this model use. Just wondering if anyone tried them and had any pr

problems using HFSC with pf

i am facing problems using hfsc with PF. pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf pfctl: the sum of the child bandwidth higher than parent "root_fxp0" pfctl: linkshare sc exceeds parent's sc /etc/pf.conf:21: errors in queue definition pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded althoug my pf.conf looks

Re: Swedish speakers -- OpenBSD and IBM Tivoli TSM BA

Hi. I happen to also run Tivoli/TSM. As far as I know there is no native OpenBSD Tivoli client. and for disaster recovery purposes (if that's all you are using it for) you don't really need one - the tivoli client does object by object (read that - file by file) backup w

Re: RMS vs TdR (WAS: Re: OLPC)

So... RMS vs. TdR in a hot jello grudge match... who comes out on top? Sorry, sometimes I just can't help myself. For the most part, this whole thread seems just that silly.

Re: open source PLCs?

At 08:51 AM 10/12/2006 -0500, you wrote: i did see that there were a great many hits on google before posting and have been sifting through what's already available for a few hours now. i wanted to see if anyone could suggest something in particular as being "better". the qualifier of "any" was a

Re: blurb blurb

> > We, the authors of this work, are giving it away to you, dear > > reader (and to everyone else), as an opportunity, not as a > > service. Do with it whatever you want. We welcome your > > contributions, and we owe you nothing. > > This fails to grant the rights explicitly ide

Re: New 200MHz ARM9 thingy with WiFi

> Will these work with the OpenBSD/armish? the boards supported by armish are reasonably close to the intel development board (redboot/pci-x). this little board is quite a different thing.

Intel breaking patents - related to closed documentation?

I just spotted this in the news: http://news.com.com/Transmeta+sues+Intel+for+patent+infringement/2100-1006_3-6124965.html?tag=nefd.top If Intel makes a habit of stealing patented technology would open access to their hardware documentation then make it easier for the patent holder to sue? The

Swedish speakers -- OpenBSD and IBM Tivoli TSM BA

Hi, Does anybody out there have a working knowledge of Swedish? I find myself having to use the Tivoli Storage Manager Backup/Archive client (dsmc). As much as I would prefer a free solution, this is the only offsite backup supported in my organisaton and if I want to maintain an OpenBSD server,

Re: Version 4.0 release

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 05:19:24PM +0200, Artur Grabowski wrote: > Girish Venkatachalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Like many things in computing it just depends on what one is most > > > comfortable with and using the right tool for the right job. One time > > > that is events, the other

Re: RMS vs TdR (WAS: Re: OLPC)

Shane J Pearson wrote: You find a lot of things "obvious" for a guy who is so presumptuous. For the record, I respect the intentions of RMS and I highly respect the intentions and practical thinking of Theo, the OpenBSD project, the developers and much of the user base. I've been enjoying Open

Re: Version 4.0 release

Girish Venkatachalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Like many things in computing it just depends on what one is most > > comfortable with and using the right tool for the right job. One time > > that is events, the other time that is threads... > > > > Greets, > > Jeroen > > > Disagreed. Your

Re: New 200MHz ARM9 thingy with WiFi

Alexey Suslikov wrote: Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just FYI. TS-WIFIBOX Tiny WiFi Box Application Kit for $249. * Internal TS-7400 SoM engine * Ultra-Fast Bootup Firmware * 200 MHz ARM9 processor with MMU * Internal 802.11g WiFi with external antenna * Industrial quality design o Rugged aluminum e

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel in OpenBSD

On Thursday 12 October 2006 10:13 am, Tobias Ulmer wrote: > We are modifying the source code, which is ok with the "porting > software" paragraph in the document above, but contradicts with a > private mail from Mike Connor where he writes about patching of > app source violates their trademark. Oh

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel in OpenBSD

On 12/10/06, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David Sampson wrote: > Due to the recent flair over the use of the Firefox logo, the GNU camp > has decided to fork the entire project, into IceWeasel. The idea here > is that they can't use the FF logo freely, so of course they must fork > it. I

Re: best hardware plataform for openbsd

On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Cabillot Julien wrote: > It's no very expensive, the "electric consumption" (I don't know if this > expression is ok), the size, ... > > On 10/12/06, Mark Bucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: SNIP > > What advantages do you see from building a DNS server using > > armish? >

Re: best hardware plataform for openbsd

On 2006/10/12 15:42, Cabillot Julien wrote: > It's no very expensive, the "electric consumption" (I don't know if this > expression is ok), the size, ... ... socketed RAM, serial console :-)

  1   2   >