On 9/29/06, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"The PayPal service may not be used solely for the purpose of transferring
money from one individual to another without an underlying transaction for the
sale of goods or services."
-- User Agreement for PayPal Service,
2.2 PayPal is only a
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
I just committed this fix; powerpc stacks are a bit weird in that they
need access above to stack pointer; while the stack grows down. With
the more strict mmap()ed stacks that kurt@ committed recently, this
got broken.
Allright. It seems better with y
"The PayPal service may not be used solely for the purpose of transferring
money from one individual to another without an underlying transaction for the
sale of goods or services."
-- User Agreement for PayPal Service,
2.2 PayPal is only a Payment Service Provider.
http://openbsd.org/donation
Thanks a lot for your answer!
I didn`t read the source (because sualy the answer is provided in the
manpages..)!
And also thansk a lot for your explantation! =)
Request: Could it get noticed in the mnapage that vnconfig does the pkcs#5
stuff.
Kind regards and thanks(!),
Sebastian!
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I`m testing OpenBSD 4.0 on my laptop because I wanna install a Beta a
> Server soon.
>
> I`ve read about the -K option wich is provided now by vnconfig.
> I also read the manpage of OpenSSL but I didn`t found anything about "PKCS
> #5 PBKDF2".
>
>
I`m testing OpenBSD 4.0 on my laptop because I wanna install a Beta a
Server soon.
I`ve read about the -K option wich is provided now by vnconfig.
I also read the manpage of OpenSSL but I didn`t found anything about "PKCS
#5 PBKDF2".
Could somebody please give me a hint how to create such a file
On Sep 29, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Option "UseBIOS" "boolean"
Thank you very much! That fixed it. I didn't realize there was a man
page for the savage driver. I should have looked harder.
Bryan
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:40:04 -0600
Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/28/06, Paul Stoeber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Should a userland program be allowed to depend on errno==0 on entry
> > > to main()? (At least one in the tree does.)
> >
> > checking errno is the wrong way
On Sep 29, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> if nothing told you to look at it, don't look at it.
Exactly.
--
Jack J. Woehr
Director of Development
Absolute Performance, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
303-443-7000 ext. 527
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 11:16:44AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 28.09.2006 at 09:47:51 -0400, James Strandboge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Its extra work, but you could setup completely different chroots for
> > each domain. This way each domain is isolated and you can ta
Anyone know the story with metawire?
--Bryan
> On 9/28/06, Paul Stoeber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Should a userland program be allowed to depend on errno==0 on entry
> > to main()? (At least one in the tree does.)
>
> checking errno is the wrong way to ascertain whether a function had a
> problem, so this shouldn't be a problem for a w
On 9/28/06, Paul Stoeber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should a userland program be allowed to depend on errno==0 on entry
to main()? (At least one in the tree does.)
checking errno is the wrong way to ascertain whether a function had a
problem, so this shouldn't be a problem for a well written p
ICMan wrote:
> Try the following modelines:
>
> Modeline "1280x600" 77.82 1280 1344 1480 1680 600 601 604 626
> Modeline "1280x600" 76.04 1280 1336 1472 1664 600 601 604 626
> Modeline "1280x600" 75.00 1280 1336 1472 1664 600 601 604 626
>
> If they don't work with the VESA driver, lo
Joachim Schipper wrote:
I understand LSI comes highly recommended by people who should know.
Intel SRCS16 and LSI MegaRAID SATA controllers both attached by ami(4)
driver.
LSI is known to produce above the average equipment so they can be
desired. OTOH, Intel is not just another company.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 03:09:50PM +0200, Francois Slabbert wrote:
> hi misc,
>
> i'm looking to purchase a sata raid controller, and have shortlisted it
> down to two models for no particular reason other than the controllers
> being supported by openbsd, being 'afordable',compatible with the
On Friday 29 September 2006 09:09, Francois Slabbert wrote:
> hi misc,
>
> i'm looking to purchase a sata raid controller, and have shortlisted it
> down to two models for no particular reason other than the controllers
> being supported by openbsd, being 'afordable',compatible with the
> equipment
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:39:35AM +0200, Pete Vickers wrote:
>
> While I'm there though, is there any reason (other than historical)
> for the following to anomalies:
>
> - the installer script turns sshd on in /etc/rc.conf rather than /etc/
> rc.conf.local
sshd is enabled by default. There
Hello,
I'm using the lsi controller and it works nice for me.
$ sudo bioctl -h ami0
Volume Status Size Device
ami0 0 Online 699G sd0 RAID5
0 Online 233G 0:0.0 noencl
1 Online 233G 0:1.0 noencl
2 Online
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:48:26PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 12:52:41PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:55:30AM +0200, Aiko Barz wrote:
> > > The issue: If my users start to install a php-Filebrowser, they are
> > > able to access the oth
I just committed this fix; powerpc stacks are a bit weird in that they
need access above to stack pointer; while the stack grows down. With
the more strict mmap()ed stacks that kurt@ committed recently, this
got broken.
-Otto
Index: uthread_machdep.c
Raja Subramanian wrote:
On 9/29/06, Bryan Vyhmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am in the process of installing OpenBSD/3.9-stable on my Toshiba
Libretto L1. I can only get X to use 800x600 when it should be using
1280x600.
I successfully ran XFree86 at 1200x600 on Debian Sarge on my L1.
Many thanks Berk.
Berk D. Demir wrote:
carlopmart wrote:
Sorry, I would like to say para-virtualized. I test it 4.0 beta under
VT hardware and works pretty well.
Then the answer is "no".
Xen port of OpenBSD is in an experimental stage AFAIK.
There's a mercurial repo. at http://hg.recoil.org/
carlopmart wrote:
Sorry, I would like to say para-virtualized. I test it 4.0 beta under VT
hardware and works pretty well.
Then the answer is "no".
Xen port of OpenBSD is in an experimental stage AFAIK.
There's a mercurial repo. at http://hg.recoil.org/openbsd-xen-sys.hg
It seems pretty active
Sorry, I would like to say para-virtualized. I test it 4.0 beta under VT
hardware and works pretty well.
Berk D. Demir wrote:
carlopmart wrote:
One question: will be possible to install OpenBSD 4.0 as a domU under
a redhat/debian Xen based server???
Has nothing to do with OpenBSD version. V
On 9/29/06, Bryan Vyhmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am in the process of installing OpenBSD/3.9-stable on my Toshiba
Libretto L1. I can only get X to use 800x600 when it should be using
1280x600.
I successfully ran XFree86 at 1200x600 on Debian Sarge on my L1.
I lost the charger and have
hi misc,
i'm looking to purchase a sata raid controller, and have shortlisted it
down to two models for no particular reason other than the controllers
being supported by openbsd, being 'afordable',compatible with the
equipment i already have and available in a third world country. the two
op
carlopmart wrote:
One question: will be possible to install OpenBSD 4.0 as a domU under a
redhat/debian Xen based server???
Has nothing to do with OpenBSD version. Virtualization layer is mostly
managed by CPU (CPUs w/ Intel VT Extenstions or AMD's SVM extensions)
Have a look at
http://en.wi
Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
...
> (--) SAVAGE(0): 1280x600 TFT LCD panel detected and active
> (--) SAVAGE(0): - Limiting video mode to 1280x600
> (--) SAVAGE(0): Found 13 modes at this depth:
> [10f] 320 x 200, 70Hz
> [112] 640 x 480, 60Hz, 72Hz, 75Hz, 85Hz, 100Hz
> [115] 800 x 600, 60Hz,
One question: will be possible to install OpenBSD 4.0 as a domU under a
redhat/debian Xen based server???
Thanks.
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 11:07:33AM -0500, James Blasius wrote:
I listened to Christoph Egger's podcast on openbsd + xen. Yowza. Is this a
4.1 timeframe ite
Joachim Schipper wrote:
I haven't seen code for Xen integration come by at source-changes, so I
presume so.
Host support may be further off.
BTW. With Xen 3.0, if you have an Intel VTx enabled CPU (e.g. Pentium
D930) it's possible to run unmodified (legacy in Xen terminology)
operating system
On 2006/09/29 11:16, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Thu, 28.09.2006 at 09:47:51 -0400, James Strandboge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Its extra work, but you could setup completely different chroots for
> > each domain. This way each domain is isolated and you can tailor each
> > one to the user's n
Hello,
On Thu, 28.09.2006 at 09:47:51 -0400, James Strandboge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Its extra work, but you could setup completely different chroots for
> each domain. This way each domain is isolated and you can tailor each
> one to the user's needs.
with this, you quickly run into the
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 02:28:54PM -0700, Joe wrote:
> Joe wrote:
> >Is it possible to configure ISAKMP (500/udp) to listen on another port,
> >such as 53/udp?
> >
> >I want to do this because some wireless networks permit outbound port
> >53/udp and nothing else...
>
> Nevermind. I just realized
On 28. sep. 2006, at 02.30, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Following OpenBSD's automatic generation of ssh and isakmp
keys, prehaps the following would be a worthwhile addition to
/etc/rc to generate a key/config for rndc/named.
/etc/rc already
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Marc Espie wrote:
> Guys, come on, you know there's a config.log generated by configure.
> Why don't you give us the relevant excerpts ? e.g, what it's actually
Hum... because we're slackers ;-)
Here you go...
--
Antoine
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type APPLICAT
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 09:15:49AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Douglas F. Calvert wrote:
> >checking for pthread_create/pthread_join... no
> >checking for pthread_create/pthread_join in -lpthread... no
> >checking for pthread_create/pthread_join in -lpthread32... no
> >che
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Douglas F. Calvert wrote:
checking for pthread_create/pthread_join... no
checking for pthread_create/pthread_join in -lpthread... no
checking for pthread_create/pthread_join in -lpthread32... no
checking for pthread_create/pthread_join in -lpthreads... no
checking for pthread
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html
Look at the last paragraph.
On 9/28/06, S t i n g r a y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a firewall running on a 512k external link .. everything is running
> fine ..
> now i want to add another 512k external link to the same machine. for some
> reaso
39 matches
Mail list logo