Re: Patent jeopardizes IETF syslog standard

2006-07-02 Thread laurent FANIS
Greetings Couldn't resist asking but can they really patent : "sending "formatted" data over SSL" ? That is just plain ridiculous !! If i remember correctly the is also an RFC just for syslog under BSD. A lot of devices already have syslog build in (for instance my AP piece of crap USR has a sysl

Re: binding ftpd

2006-07-02 Thread Philip Guenther
On 7/3/06, Lawrence Horvath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there any way at all to bind ftpd to a single ip, i would like to keep ftpd running on one ip of my server while i setup and play with proftpd on another ip, the man page for ftpd says nothing about being able to bind but is there any othe

binding ftpd

2006-07-02 Thread Lawrence Horvath
Is there any way at all to bind ftpd to a single ip, i would like to keep ftpd running on one ip of my server while i setup and play with proftpd on another ip, the man page for ftpd says nothing about being able to bind but is there any other way, Jerry Rig it if you will. Thanks -- -Lawrence

Re: NTP timedelta sensor support in snapshot

2006-07-02 Thread Theo de Raadt
> I'm running a snapshot from 29.06.2006 on a soekris net4801 board. I > also recently bought a Globalsat BU-353 USB GPS receiver. When I attach > the receiver to the soekris board the kernel reports the following: > > uplcom0 at uhub0 port 1 > uplcom0: Prolific Technology Inc. USB-Serial Controll

Re: pf & isakmpd: NAT through encryption interface?

2006-07-02 Thread Matthew Closson
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Stephen Bosch wrote: Hi, Roy: Roy Morris wrote: Yes it does work! I guess I better hold on to these two boxes I have. Seems they are the only ones that do! lol I have A. clients on each end behind a vpn/pf box B. enc0 binat from internal client to public IP of other sid

NTP timedelta sensor support in snapshot

2006-07-02 Thread Bo Granlund
Hi, I'm running a snapshot from 29.06.2006 on a soekris net4801 board. I also recently bought a Globalsat BU-353 USB GPS receiver. When I attach the receiver to the soekris board the kernel reports the following: uplcom0 at uhub0 port 1 uplcom0: Prolific Technology Inc. USB-Serial Controller, rev

Re: Patent jeopardizes IETF syslog standard

2006-07-02 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 15:52:57 -0400, "Nick Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 7/1/06, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:54:14 +0300, "Alexey E. Suslikov" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >Patent jeopardizes IETF syslog standard. Read here >> >http://trends.ne

Re: Patent jeopardizes IETF syslog standard

2006-07-02 Thread Theo de Raadt
> Don't misunderstand me, CARP is an amazingly innovative and extremely > useful implementation of a redundancy protocol. It's technically better > than HSRP or any of the versions of VRRP but the problems till stands > that it is not an "official" protocol, which simply means adoption and > inter

Re: Patent jeopardizes IETF syslog standard

2006-07-02 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 18:55:46 -0400, Jim Razmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >* Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060702 15:58]: >> On 7/1/06, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:54:14 +0300, "Alexey E. Suslikov" >> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >>Patent jeopardiz

Re: Encrypting files

2006-07-02 Thread Travers Buda
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 10:57:42 -0600 "Chris Kuethe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bear in mind that if you're serious about keeping plaintext away from > people who you don't want to see it, this could get quite tricky. After a bout of homocidal paranoia and time spent wondering just what to do with

Re: A little script to remove packages don't needed

2006-07-02 Thread Andrés
I changed a couple of things: a) Now there's a license notice (template from /usr/src/share/misc/license.template). Nothing important, just to be sure. b) All packages which you didn't want to delete are saved to a file, so you will not have to answer "n" in future runs (to check the full list o

How to get a (working) screen editor inside bsd.rd?

2006-07-02 Thread Todd Pytel
I've got a RAIDFrame system for which I'm building a custom bsd.rd. That's basically fine - I understand how /usr/src/distrib works and how crunchgen is used to add files (like raidctl) to instbin on the kernel ramdisk. So I figure that as long as I'm at it, I'd like to have a real screen editor as

Re: Patent jeopardizes IETF syslog standard

2006-07-02 Thread Jim Razmus
* Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060702 15:58]: > On 7/1/06, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:54:14 +0300, "Alexey E. Suslikov" > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Patent jeopardizes IETF syslog standard. Read here > >>http://trends.newsforge.com/article.pl?si

Re: Boost OpenBSD security - Zophie for 3.9

2006-07-02 Thread Marcin Wilk
At 22:35 2006-07-02, you wrote: On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:20:49PM -0700, Greg Thomas wrote: > On 7/2/06, Tobias Ulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 03:13:59PM +0200, Tomasz Zielinski wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Zophie is patch that contains new security features for OpenBSD

Re: Encrypting files

2006-07-02 Thread Peter Philipp
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 10:25:35PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote: > Well, provided the BIOS (or equivalent) cannot be flashed from the > kernel, yes. > > Of course, worrying about this requires raging paranoia. But from a Paranoia isn't necessarily a bad thing. It motivates people to seek true o

Re: Boost OpenBSD security - Zophie for 3.9

2006-07-02 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:20:49PM -0700, Greg Thomas wrote: > On 7/2/06, Tobias Ulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 03:13:59PM +0200, Tomasz Zielinski wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Zophie is patch that contains new security features for OpenBSD 3.9. BSD >>> license. I have not

Re: starting Apache in SSL mode

2006-07-02 Thread FTP
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 05:03:52PM +0200, FTP wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:34:19PM +0200, FTP wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 03:55:16PM +0200, FTP wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 08:49:37AM -0400, Peter Blair wrote: > > > > SSL certificates for a hostname requires a unique IP addres

Re: Encrypting files

2006-07-02 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 03:59:41PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote: > On 7/2/06, Peter Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 02:56:03PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote: > >> How can you make a keylogger on UNIX? > >I think this was meant. (...) > Ah, okay, thank you! I see a lot go ac

Re: Encrypting files

2006-07-02 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 09:34:50PM +0200, Peter Philipp wrote: > On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 02:56:03PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote: > > I have some questions though: > > How can you make a keylogger on UNIX? I thought that UNIX segmented > > it's memory spaces, unlike Windows which has the problem of a

Re: Encrypting files

2006-07-02 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 02:56:03PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote: > On 7/2/06, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Bear in mind that if you're serious about keeping plaintext away from > >people who you don't want to see it, this could get quite tricky. > > > > > >And that's not even taking int

Re: Encrypting files

2006-07-02 Thread Nick Guenther
On 7/2/06, Peter Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 02:56:03PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote: > I have some questions though: > How can you make a keylogger on UNIX? I thought that UNIX segmented > it's memory spaces, unlike Windows which has the problem of a "global > key tr

Re: Patent jeopardizes IETF syslog standard

2006-07-02 Thread Nick Guenther
On 7/1/06, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:54:14 +0300, "Alexey E. Suslikov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Patent jeopardizes IETF syslog standard. Read here >http://trends.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/06/28/2320232 This sucks. It's no different than what Cisco d

Re: Encrypting files

2006-07-02 Thread Peter Philipp
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 02:56:03PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote: > I have some questions though: > How can you make a keylogger on UNIX? I thought that UNIX segmented > it's memory spaces, unlike Windows which has the problem of a "global > key trampoline" (I'm sorry, I read this somewhere once and d

Re: Boost OpenBSD security - Zophie for 3.9

2006-07-02 Thread Greg Thomas
On 7/2/06, Tobias Ulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 03:13:59PM +0200, Tomasz Zielinski wrote: > Hello, > > Zophie is patch that contains new security features for OpenBSD 3.9. BSD license. I have not tested it personaly, but probably it's worth to analyze it and maybe eve

Re: Encrypting files

2006-07-02 Thread Nick Guenther
On 7/2/06, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bear in mind that if you're serious about keeping plaintext away from people who you don't want to see it, this could get quite tricky. And that's not even taking into account that the thief might just put trojan horses all over your laptop bef

Re: Encrypting files

2006-07-02 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 10:57:42AM -0600, Chris Kuethe wrote: > Bear in mind that if you're serious about keeping plaintext away from > people who you don't want to see it, this could get quite tricky. > > What happens if an application generates temporary files? What happens > if an application s

Re: Encrypting files

2006-07-02 Thread Chris Kuethe
Bear in mind that if you're serious about keeping plaintext away from people who you don't want to see it, this could get quite tricky. What happens if an application generates temporary files? What happens if an application swaps? What happens if an application crashes and dumps core? What happe

Re: pf + altq syntax check plz

2006-07-02 Thread Jason Dixon
On Jul 2, 2006, at 11:38 AM, S t i n g r a y wrote: I am configuring altq & pf for the first time , & have a few problems here .. well i need to traffic shape between diffrent protocols as you can see in my pf.conf now i am stuck & confused what to do next as i have built this file with

Re: pf + altq syntax check plz

2006-07-02 Thread Jeff Quast
On 7/2/06, S t i n g r a y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am configuring altq & pf for the first time , & have a few problems here .. well i need to traffic shape between diffrent protocols as you can see in my pf.conf now i am stuck & confused what to do next as i have built this file with dif

ntpd gps clock

2006-07-02 Thread Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
Is there any way to run a my gps pps (pulse per second) clock off of obsd-current with Mills' ntpd? So far the gps is hooked up to a machine running nbsd, but I'd like to consolidate things. -wolfgang -- Wolfgang S. Rupprechthttp://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/

pf + altq syntax check plz

2006-07-02 Thread S t i n g r a y
I am configuring altq & pf for the first time , & have a few problems here .. well i need to traffic shape between diffrent protocols as you can see in my pf.conf now i am stuck & confused what to do next as i have built this file with diffrent ref from web. the im is the most common Instant m

Re: Boost OpenBSD security - Zophie for 3.9

2006-07-02 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 03:13:59PM +0200, Tomasz Zielinski wrote: > Hello, > > Zophie is patch that contains new security features for OpenBSD 3.9. BSD > license. I have not tested it personaly, but probably it's worth to analyze > it and maybe even incorporate. More info: http://www.0penbsd.com

Boost OpenBSD security - Zophie for 3.9

2006-07-02 Thread Tomasz Zielinski
Hello, Zophie is patch that contains new security features for OpenBSD 3.9. BSD license. I have not tested it personaly, but probably it's worth to analyze it and maybe even incorporate. More info: http://www.0penbsd.com/zophie.html, http://akcja.0penbsd.com/zosia/ -- Pozdrawienia/Regards Toma

Re: Encrypting files

2006-07-02 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:00:34PM +0200, Sigfred H?versen wrote: > Joachim Schipper wrote: > >On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 02:14:59AM +0200, Rico Secada wrote: > > > >>Hi > >> > >>I have been thinking about encrypting some private files on my laptop, > >>in case it gets stolen. > >> > >>I have no prior

Message ("Your message dated Sun, 2 Jul 2006 11:12:08 +0900...")

2006-07-02 Thread LISTS.UFL.EDU LISTSERV Server (14.4)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Jul 2006 11:12:08 +0900 with subject "Returned mail: see transcript for details" has been submitted to the moderator of the PALEOLIM list: "Thomas J. Whitmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

Re: Ports and BSD.MP question

2006-07-02 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:17:09PM +0300, Gabriel George POPA wrote: > Neah, Mozilla crashed again. What's the problem: > - the port? > - the libraries? > - ME? - Mozilla/Firefox [x] >Did this happened to other people too? On what OpenBSD > versions? How did they so

Re: Encrypting files

2006-07-02 Thread Sigfred Håversen
Joachim Schipper wrote: On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 02:14:59AM +0200, Rico Secada wrote: Hi I have been thinking about encrypting some private files on my laptop, in case it gets stolen. I have no prior experience in this field. I have been thinking about using "mcrypt" with blowfish, but is thi

Re: Ports and BSD.MP question

2006-07-02 Thread Gabriel George POPA
I use Mozilla 1.7.12. Help->About->About Plug-ins sais I have no plugins installed. And yes, indeed. It crashes especially on www.yahoo.com (when running javascripts) and when there are a lot of pictures. I really don't know what to do... Once I lost my bookmarks. There was a moment when

Re: Encrypting files

2006-07-02 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 02:14:59AM +0200, Rico Secada wrote: > Hi > > I have been thinking about encrypting some private files on my laptop, > in case it gets stolen. > > I have no prior experience in this field. > > I have been thinking about using "mcrypt" with blowfish, but is this a > good w

Re: Ports and BSD.MP question

2006-07-02 Thread Adam PAPAI
Gabriel George POPA wrote: Neah, Mozilla crashed again. What's the problem: - the port? - the libraries? - ME? Did this happened to other people too? On what OpenBSD versions? How did they solve this? I must say yes. :) Sometimes firefox crashs. What pages are r

Re: Ports and BSD.MP question

2006-07-02 Thread Gabriel George POPA
Neah, Mozilla crashed again. What's the problem: - the port? - the libraries? - ME? Did this happened to other people too? On what OpenBSD versions? How did they solve this?

Re: Encryption and Compression with ipsecctl?

2006-07-02 Thread Matthew R. Dempsky
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:43:21PM -0500, Todd T. Fries wrote: > IPcomp is known broken for at least two years, perhaps longer. Do not use it. What makes you say that? I can't find any mention of this in the man pages, on openbsd.org, or misc's archives.