Joachim Schipper wrote:
> 'not configured' typically means the kernel knows what it is, but
> doesn't know what to do with it.
More specifically, it means that the kernel knows the PCI device's ID
and vendor, but doesn't have a driver to hook it to.
FreeBSD supports it with the ips driver and it a
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 11:59:13PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> How about this? If I see things correctly, the ATEMP allocation should
> be cleaned up automatically Running a little test loop does not
> show a leak. Both bugs are fixed, and array entries are nice integer vals.
>
<...>
>
>
vladas wrote:
> making all in programs/Xserver/Xext/extmod...
> make: don't know how to make /usr/include/stdarg.h. Stop in
> /usr/Xbld/xc/program
> s/Xserver/Xext/extmod.
> *** Error code 2
You probably don't have the compiler installed at all. Did you install
comp39.tgz? If not, see section 4.
>You do know that headers can be forged right? So an automagic forward
>-> |/script -> blacklist from a pissed off user can end up
>blacklisting a legitimate MTA.
This is a good point, if you use the scripts I sent you may want to
modify them
to look for a password, should be simple enough.
M
I worked with a customer once that had a software based load
balancing solution. I liked the way it worked. While I was working
on the box if I was going to take the service down for maintenance I
could tell the local agent and the box was removed from the pool of
servers.
Anyone know o
Hey I got exactly what you are looking for, its pretty easy. You need
relaydb and procmail.
Setup a user called 'spam' then in /home/spam/ ...
# cat .forward
|/home/spam/procspam.sh
# cat .procmailrc
# .procmailrc
ORGMAIL=/var/mail/$LOGNAME
PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin
MAILDIR=$HOME/.mailspool
* Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060520 10:21]:
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 09:49:31AM -0400, Jim Razmus wrote:
> > Take a look at mail/relaydb in the ports tree. Also check the archives
> > as this has been discussed at depth and included several solutions.
>
> Why ports instead of packages?
On 2006/05/21 01:00, Martin Toft wrote:
> I have not heard about librthread and would rather like to try another player
> than
> hacking xmms to get smoother sound on my system. Can you tell me more about
> what is
> being worked on and by who?
You can read about rthreads here,
http://www.open
Thanks for the replies so far :)
Sorry for not replying faster, but here goes:
Emmanuel Jarri wrote:
The workaround I use is to increase buffer size to its maximum, i.e. 13MB,
with 50% to upper pre buffer.
It works quite nicely, but I feel it's a dirty workaround...
My xmms will not go higher
How about this? If I see things correctly, the ATEMP allocation should
be cleaned up automatically Running a little test loop does not
show a leak. Both bugs are fixed, and array entries are nice integer vals.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:189]$ cat t
typeset -i F=0
F[1]=1
F[2]=3
F[93]=293892
On Sat, 20 May 2006, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, 20 May 2006, Matthias Kilian wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 08:38:38PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > [typeset -i F and ${F[*]} weirdness]
> > > this looks like a bug,
> >
> > It's caused by the fact that for integers str_val() returns t
Joachim Schipper wrote:
'not configured' typically means the kernel knows what it is, but
doesn't know what to do with it.
More specifically, it means that the kernel knows the PCI device's ID
and vendor, but doesn't have a driver to hook it to.
FreeBSD supports it with the ips driver and it
On Sat, 20 May 2006, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 08:38:38PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> [typeset -i F and ${F[*]} weirdness]
> > this looks like a bug,
>
> It's caused by the fact that for integers str_val() returns the
> address of a static buffer and that the loop over th
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 05:46:42AM +0200, Jan Johansson wrote:
> andrew fresh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a supported sound card that supports digital outputs?
>
> I think your best bet is USB audio. I have a simple USB audio
> stick that does optic digital signal or headphones under O
* Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-20 21:48]:
> Depends on which bug you hit. If the BIOS shows it is a hotspare you're
> golden. If it does not show it as a hotspare you want to upgrade (or
> use the bios to create the hotspare).
no, that is incorrect.
even if the bios does hsow y
On Sat, 20 May 2006, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, 20 May 2006, jared r r spiegel wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 11:28:26AM -0400, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> > >
> > > i have half a mind that says otto@/kili@/ckuthe will come down
> > > and cluestick me about why what i am seeing is ex
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 08:38:38PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
[typeset -i F and ${F[*]} weirdness]
> this looks like a bug,
It's caused by the fact that for integers str_val() returns the
address of a static buffer and that the loop over the array elements
in varsub() just copies the pointer retu
Depends on which bug you hit. If the BIOS shows it is a hotspare you're
golden. If it does not show it as a hotspare you want to upgrade (or
use the bios to create the hotspare).
Gaby vanhegan wrote:
On 20 May 2006, at 16:28, Marco Peereboom wrote:
I fixed this in current. You can simply j
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 12:39:30AM +0600, Anton Maksimenkov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Reading through misc archives I found this post
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=112454454105020&w=2
> Currently I got number of IBM ServeRAID 4M controllers (plus
> batteries packs) in couple with some IB
(Sorry, previous was with not correct my sender's email, please reply
to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Reading through misc archives I found this post
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=112454454105020&w=2
Currently I got number of IBM ServeRAID 4M controllers (plus
batteries packs) in couple wi
Hi.
Reading through misc archives I found this post
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=112454454105020&w=2
Currently I got number of IBM ServeRAID 4M controllers (plus
batteries packs) in couple with some IBM machines (eServer 6BY and
some other models). It's dramatic for me because o
On Sat, 20 May 2006, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 11:28:26AM -0400, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> >
> > i have half a mind that says otto@/kili@/ckuthe will come down
> > and cluestick me about why what i am seeing is expected behaviour,
> > but the other half expects this
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:09:15AM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
> I have a simpler question: is there any plan to make installing
> xbase a requirement in the foreseeable future?
no. nothing in {base,comp,man,misc,game,etc}XX.tgz depends on anything
from xbaseXX.tgz, and that is extremely unlike
Is "hogging" a technical term? I'm not sure that wikipedia has the
right definition.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Bryan J. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 11:43 AM
To: Chris Adams
Cc: Linux Group HuntsVegas
Subject: Re: LUNA: Re: FC5 hogging RAM -- Na
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 11:28:26AM -0400, jared r r spiegel wrote:
>
> i have half a mind that says otto@/kili@/ckuthe will come down
> and cluestick me about why what i am seeing is expected behaviour,
> but the other half expects this to be not what should be happening.
the more i play w
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 03:45:35PM +0100, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
> On 20 May 2006, at 15:15, Joachim Schipper wrote:
>
> >> Something's got to give here. I suspect that I'm going to have to
> >> un-
> >> chroot the ftp daemon. Is there an ftpd somewhere that can prevent
> >> users from looking a
On 20 May 2006, at 17:56, Pancho Cole wrote:
> I use Pro FTP to chroot users to their home directories. see
> http://www.proftpd.org/
Yes, but the point is they also need to access another directory,
owned by them, but well outside of that chroot, all under one login.
Not using pro-ftpd,
> As mentioned before, I have a new server with the LSI MegaRaid
> SATA150-4 card. All works nicely at the moment, bar a slight problem
> with hot-spares.
>
> We configured a RAID-5 array with three 250Gb drives and one hot
> spare. We simulated a failure by yanking the cable out from driv
At 09:14 AM 5/20/2006, you wrote:
On 20 May 2006, at 00:44, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> move the files under /var/www, and nfs mount to 127.0.0.1 back
> into the homes? you probably want to look at amd for this.
> of course the ftpd could sit on another machine if you want.
This means that I'd n
Hi all!
Is there anyone out there using this controller successfully with
OpenBSD ?
In other word's : Is it supported by this OS ?
/Hans Almqvist
On 20 May 2006, at 16:28, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I fixed this in current. You can simply just upgrade the ami files
> to -current and build a 3.9 that is mostly RELEASE.
Was it a functional problem or just a cosmetic one? If I leave it as
it is, is it going to cause any real problems for
I fixed this in current. You can simply just upgrade the ami files to
-current and build a 3.9 that is mostly RELEASE.
Gaby vanhegan wrote:
Hi,
As mentioned before, I have a new server with the LSI MegaRaid
SATA150-4 card. All works nicely at the moment, bar a slight problem
with hot-spa
===
[/home/jrrs] $ uname -mrpsv
OpenBSD 3.9 GENERIC.MP#690 i386 AMD Athlon(tm) MP 2800+ ("AuthenticAMD"
686-class, 512KB L2 cache)
[/home/jrrs] $ echo $KSH_VERSION
@(#)PD KSH v5.2.14 99/07/13.2
[/home/jrrs] $ ls -l $(which ksh)
-r-xr-xr-x 3 root bin 324128 May 1 20:28 /bin/ksh
===
if i star
On 20 May 2006, at 15:15, Joachim Schipper wrote:
>> Something's got to give here. I suspect that I'm going to have to
>> un-
>> chroot the ftp daemon. Is there an ftpd somewhere that can prevent
>> users from looking at certain directories? For example, I would like
>> to limit access only t
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:39:57AM +0200, ip wrote:
> On 5/14/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >While wd1a does have a kernel, it does not have a proper root filesystem
> >- for instance, no /dev directory, or more specifically no /dev/console.
> >
> >Fix this, and also have
Hi,
As mentioned before, I have a new server with the LSI MegaRaid
SATA150-4 card. All works nicely at the moment, bar a slight problem
with hot-spares.
We configured a RAID-5 array with three 250Gb drives and one hot
spare. We simulated a failure by yanking the cable out from drive 2,
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 02:14:34PM +0100, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
> On 20 May 2006, at 00:44, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > move the files under /var/www, and nfs mount to 127.0.0.1 back
> > into the homes? you probably want to look at amd for this.
> > of course the ftpd could sit on another machine
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 09:49:31AM -0400, Jim Razmus wrote:
> Take a look at mail/relaydb in the ports tree. Also check the archives
> as this has been discussed at depth and included several solutions.
Why ports instead of packages? Notably since he's already tried relaydb
(and it doesn't do for
* Craig Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060520 07:19]:
> Hi all,
> I'm using spamd and it does a great job.
>
> What I'm trying to figure out is how to easily add the IP's of the
> sending mail server for the few
> spam that still get through.
>
> By easy, I mean for clients of mine who use Exchange
That was mailed to nmap-dev and the Portmaintainer with no reply so far:
Well I asked already for an Update for OpenBSD 3.9 STABLE but nmap 4.03 is
just avaiable for current...
Anyway there`s another issue (wich is NOT related to mem-leaks in 3.95
wich make nmap core-dump anyway):
Problem:
sudo n
On 20 May 2006, Jirtme Loyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to mount a OpenBSD image locally with write support on
> linux.
[...]
Don't do this; it will trash your filesystem. While read-only UFS
on Linux is relatively safe these days (it used to produce frequent
kernel pa
> You are asking in the wrong place. This is not an OpenBSD problem.
> Why would we know why linux screws up on this task?
>
> Perhaps you could ask you distro provider.
I was asking there in case that someone has ever hade this problem.
Thx ++ JErome
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type
On Sat, 20 May 2006 15:02:31 +0200, Jirtme Loyet wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm trying to mount a OpenBSD image locally with write support on linux.
>
>I've recompiled my kernel to enable this feature.
>
>I mount the image by:
>
>mount -t ufs -o ufstype=44bsd,loop,rw my_image.fs /mnt
>
>It mount well,
>But
On 20 May 2006, at 00:44, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> move the files under /var/www, and nfs mount to 127.0.0.1 back
> into the homes? you probably want to look at amd for this.
> of course the ftpd could sit on another machine if you want.
This means that I'd need an nfs mount point for each websi
Hello,
I'm trying to mount a OpenBSD image locally with write support on linux.
I've recompiled my kernel to enable this feature.
I mount the image by:
mount -t ufs -o ufstype=44bsd,loop,rw my_image.fs /mnt
It mount well,
But if I try: dd if=myfile of=/mnt/myfile bs=512 it freeze and I've to
r
On 5/20/06, Craig Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using spamd and it does a great job.
What I'm trying to figure out is how to easily add the IP's of the
sending mail server for the few
spam that still get through.
By easy, I mean for clients of mine who use Exchange/Outlook, whe
I'm replying to myself: I extracted the 3.9 source code in another
machine only, so I used the old 3.8 one...
Please, forgive me.
Thanks.
Federico Giannici wrote:
I have extracted the sources from the CDROM archive.
Upgraded to 3.9 -stable with:
cd /usr
cvs -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs checkou
Hi all,
I'm using spamd and it does a great job.
What I'm trying to figure out is how to easily add the IP's of the
sending mail server for the few
spam that still get through.
By easy, I mean for clients of mine who use Exchange/Outlook, where I
put a obsd box running spamd
in front of Exchange.
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 12:36:16PM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
> make: don't know how to make ../../machine/types.h. Stop in
Google for it. And read http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html.
Ciao,
Kili
--
In celebration and out of respect for Puffy, we will not be serving
sushi in t
I have extracted the sources from the CDROM archive.
Upgraded to 3.9 -stable with:
cd /usr
cvs -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_3_9
src/sys
And then I tried to compile the GENERIC kernel with the usual procedure,
but the following error appeared:
cc -Werror -Wall -Wstrict-pr
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:06:24PM +0200, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I hope this is the right place to post this.
>
> (...) I read the instructions for the second errata
> (ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/3.9/common/002_xorg.patch).
>
> It reads:
>
> Apply by doing:
>
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:09:15AM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
> On 19 May 2006, Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > no, I'm not suggesting that xbase be a port; I'm just offering some
> > perspective.
> >
> > as far as "biweekly question", that should be a clue that the people
> > asking the
On 19 May 2006, Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 02:43:36AM +0200, viq wrote:
> > Sorry if it sounds otherwise, I have no intention of telling
> > anyone what to do and how, just sharing some idea I had that could
> > possibly satisfy both sides of the argument, and
53 matches
Mail list logo
