On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Lars Hansson wrote:
> On Monday 20 February 2006 20:07, you wrote:
> > To completely disable an account, change its password to *, or remove it.
>
> You can still log in with ssh and keys to an account with * as the password so
> that doesnt completely disable it.
OK, to mak
Marcus Barczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just recently acquired a cast off Sun DDS3 SCSI tape drive. It's an
> external unit and connected to my internal Adaptec 2940UW controller.
> The problem i'm experiencing is anytime I try issuing a command with
> mt for instance:
>
> % mt -f /dev/rst
> hosts contains (amongst others):
> some.remote.com NNN.NNN.NN.NNN some
>
looks a little funny to me... might work better as
NNN.NNN.NN.NNNsome.remote.com some
or possibly
NNN.NNN.NN.NNNsome some.remote.com
otherwise it seems to disregard the entry in /etc/hosts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 20, 2006, at 9:57 PM, Lars Hansson wrote:
On Monday 20 February 2006 20:07, you wrote:
To completely disable an account, change its password to *, or
remove it.
You can still log in with ssh and keys to an account with * as the
passwor
I like this idea.
But one question:
is it possible for the OpenBSD box to access all these "hidden"
partitions through SMB as one large storage space possibly with some
kind of error protection?
This sound like it might be more of a Samba question... But I'll ask
here anyways.
thanks
Daniel A
On 2/20/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running current on a home lan of several computers.
> Running bind-9.3.2 (not on the obsd box)
>
> Trying to understand the various ways of using keywords in
> /etc/resolv.conf.
>
> On my setup the obsd box resolv.conf looks like:
>
> dom
On Monday 20 February 2006 20:07, you wrote:
> To completely disable an account, change its password to *, or remove it.
You can still log in with ssh and keys to an account with * as the password so
that doesnt completely disable it.
---
Lars Hansson
On Thursday 16 February 2006 01:58, A Rossi wrote:
>My client didn't really like the idea of just making a windows
>partition and disallowing the users from accessing it with
> permissions, because then they'd know about something... And some
> might complain about it being "broken" - they have
We have been running a pair of firewalls under 3.3 for quite some time, and
just upgraded them to 3.8. Before the upgrade, they would typically run at
about 35-40% interrupts. After the upgrade, they are running at 90-95%
interrupt utilization.
It looks like a lot of changes have been made to the
Hi Guys,
Just recently acquired a cast off Sun DDS3 SCSI tape drive. It's an
external unit and connected to my internal Adaptec 2940UW
controller. The problem i'm experiencing is anytime I try issuing a
command with mt for instance:
% mt -f /dev/rst0 status
The mt process will just han
Hi Guys,
Just recently acquired a cast off Sun DDS3 SCSI tape drive. It's an external
unit and connected to my internal Adaptec 2940UW controller. The problem i'm
experiencing is anytime I try issuing a command with mt for instance:
% mt -f /dev/rst0 status
The mt process will just hang, the
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:38:32AM -0800, Benjamin Collins wrote:
> Anyone know what chipset is used in the awlc3026 card? It's on sale at
> Fry's for $8, and I wanted to get it for use in my OpenBSD laptop.
>
> Even better, anyone have a dmesg with this card listed?
Marvell Libertas according t
Same deal on a IP120, thankfully for me my IP120 is local, as such on
the rare occasion that I need to reboot it I simply 'halt' it then hit
the reset switch.
On 2006/02/20 22:34, Edgars wrote:
> So, nobody knows? :(
You waited only half a day, which doesn't give people much time to
respond. Choose one of these options:
- Relax and wait a while, though by repeating the question you
made it less likely you'll get an answer.
- Search better. There are p
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 2/20/06, Craig McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am presuming that it wouldn't be a good idea to set machdep.userldt
to 1, by default and that I should enable it and disable it, as and
when I need to make use of it. So far, I only need it for the
win32-codecs package.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 10:34:03PM +0200, Edgars wrote:
> So, nobody knows? :(
>
> > Hello!
> > I want to know about this RAID controller, is it supported or no?
> > On hw page i didn't find him, but in google and monkey.org i found that
> > somebody tried it with OpenBSD 3.4
> > http://www.intel
So, nobody knows? :(
> Hello!
> I want to know about this RAID controller, is it supported or no?
> On hw page i didn't find him, but in google and monkey.org i found that
> somebody tried it with OpenBSD 3.4
> http://www.intel.com/design/servers/raid/srcu42l/index.htm
On 2/20/06, Craig McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am presuming that it wouldn't be a good idea to set machdep.userldt
> to 1, by default and that I should enable it and disable it, as and
> when I need to make use of it. So far, I only need it for the
> win32-codecs package.
>
> I would as
Hi,
I am trying to figure out why the performance of PERC 4/SC RAID controller is
so poor. I've searched the archives
but nothing usefull came up. I'm running OpenBSD 3.8-release on a Dell
PowerEdge 1800 server, RAID 5.
# time (dd if=/dev/zero of=x bs=1m count=100; sync; sync)
100+0 records in
On 2006/02/20 12:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> lookup This keyword is used by the library routines gethostbyname(3)
>and gethostbyaddr(3).
nslookup is the wrong program to test from, it doesn't use
these library routines.
Running current on a home lan of several computers.
Running bind-9.3.2 (not on the obsd box)
Trying to understand the various ways of using keywords in
/etc/resolv.conf.
On my setup the obsd box resolv.conf looks like:
domain local.net0
nameserver 192.168.0.4 # local lan name server
name
Jeff Quast wrote:
The lock-ups may have been related to the caveat in the manual page
for emu(4), which I have since removed from the system for this very
reason.
Well, I didn't realise that one. I've always sworn by Creative cards
up until now and I have a fair few SBLive cards here :( Looks
On 2/20/06, Craig McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I've been googling around for the answer to this, but can't find
> anything concrete to answer it one way or another, or at least not
> that I understood. ;)
>
> I am presuming that it wouldn't be a good idea to set machdep.userld
Hi all.
I've been googling around for the answer to this, but can't find
anything concrete to answer it one way or another, or at least not that
I understood. ;)
I am presuming that it wouldn't be a good idea to set machdep.userldt to
1, by default and that I should enable it and disable it,
Hi all.
I've been googling around for the answer to this, but can't find
anything concrete to answer it one way or another, or at least not
that I understood. ;)
I am presuming that it wouldn't be a good idea to set machdep.userldt
to 1, by default and that I should enable it and disable it, as
Anyone know what chipset is used in the awlc3026 card? It's on sale at
Fry's for $8, and I wanted to get it for use in my OpenBSD laptop.
Even better, anyone have a dmesg with this card listed?
bc
--
Benjamin Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 20/02/06, Hannah Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:49:01PM +, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> >[...]
>
> >> If this is a common state of affairs, you can always raise the
> >> percentage of memory used for the buffer cache in the kernel, using
> >>
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:49:01PM +, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
...
> Although the documentation says that it defaults to 5%, it actually
> seems to default to 10% on amd64, alpha, hppa and hppa64.
>
> Why it's not made to default to 10% on i386 too if enough memory is available?
becaus
For the archives, I noticed some commits to ifstated for 3.9-beta so I built
the 3.9-beta ifstated on a 3.8-stable box. Ifstated seems to be much more
reliable now. Thanks!
-Steve S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm trying to use ifstated to determine the state (up or
> down) of my
Hello!
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:49:01PM +, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
>[...]
>> If this is a common state of affairs, you can always raise the
>> percentage of memory used for the buffer cache in the kernel, using
>> config -e: config -e -o /bsd.new /bsd
>> then the command
>> c
On 20/02/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006/02/20 13:17, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > And 512MB, I must add, is the de facto minimum today for any machine,
>
> For Windows PCs, maybe... Of the machines I have running OpenBSD, 64MB
> is the most common RAM size, and those
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 06:11:41PM -0500, Matthew Closson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If you enable RFC3706 - Dead Peer Detection in isakmpd.conf, what is the
> result of a peer-failing the DPD check. Will it Start over with Phase1
> negotiations again for that ISAKMP peer, or will it simply remove the
On 20/02/06, Hannah Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:17:05PM +, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> >[...]
>
> >Yes, there is always some compromise. But in this specific case we
> >have much less than even a fifth of memory actually being used for
> >pro
*** eSafe detected hostile content in this email. ***
Time: 20 Feb 2006 14:59:09
Scan result: Mail modified to remove malicious content
Protocol: SMTP in
File Name\Mail Subject: Re: Is that your document?
Source: 10.222.88.88
Destination: 193.77.229.135
Mail Sender: misc@openbsd.org
Mail Recipie
This is probably a dumb question, but I can't seem to track down the
answer in the docs or the archives. If one were to use static-port
with a nat rule, what happens when multiple clients match the same
source port?
P.S. Am I mistaken in noticing that the rdr syntax section in
pf.conf (
Hi Hannah,
On 2006.02.20, at 11:21 PM, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Just one "effect" you have to care for, on Linux (which *has* a
unified
VM/buffer cache system) we mkdir many directories (e.g. hashed buckets
like squid uses them, just a few more, 256 * 256, to be precise).
It was
quite long
On 2006/02/20 13:17, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> And 512MB, I must add, is the de facto minimum today for any machine,
For Windows PCs, maybe... Of the machines I have running OpenBSD, 64MB
is the most common RAM size, and those boxes are doing useful work.
> making this even lack of tune-up
Hello!
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:17:05PM +, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
>[...]
>Yes, there is always some compromise. But in this specific case we
>have much less than even a fifth of memory actually being used for
>programmes and kernel etc. Some of the rest is used for cache, but it
>sti
if it's unacceptable to you, either don't use openbsd or submit a patch.
Hi!
On 20/02/06, Hannah Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 03:40:48PM +, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> >I have a box with 512MB of RAM, which is running a snapshot from 2006-02-13.
>
> >The box does not get used much, so most of the RAM stays still, i.e
Hello!
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 03:40:48PM +, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
>I have a box with 512MB of RAM, which is running a snapshot from 2006-02-13.
>The box does not get used much, so most of the RAM stays still, i.e.
>not used by the userland.
>I am now quite surprised why OpenBSD does
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, MK wrote:
> Maybe I'm wrong but in man pages is nothing about difference between these two
> shells. Of course I had firstly searched man pages before I asked my question
> here.
>
> from manpages:
>
> "nologin displays a message that an account is not available and exits
>
Maybe I'm wrong but in man pages is nothing about difference between these
two shells. Of course I had firstly searched man pages before I asked my
question here.
from manpages:
"nologin displays a message that an account is not available and exits
non-zero. It is intended as a replacemen
On Monday 20 February 2006 02:52, Reid Nichol wrote:
> I had something like this problem awhile ago. It had to do with
> something regarding the default max-mss values. Don't know the exact
> details, but changing the scrub lines to the below solved my issue,
> perhaps yours too.
>
>
> scrub in a
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 02:36:36AM -0500, Brad Ely wrote:
> The man page (and usage message) for ifconfig on 3.8-beta seems to
> be out of date with respect to the current behavior when deleting
> a tunnel.
>
> # ifconfig tun0 create
> # ifconfig tun0
> tun0: flags=10 mtu 3000
> groups: tu
> > Using OpenBSD-v3.8 and v3.9-BETA on i386 together with tor, privoxy
> > stops working alfways after a few minutes up to a few hours. 'Stop
> > working' means either the privoxy process isn't running
> anymore (so it
> > needs to be restarted) or the process is running but no
> data stream is
Hello!
I want to know about this RAID controller, is it supported or no?
On hw page i didn't find him, but in google and monkey.org i found that
somebody tried it with OpenBSD 3.4
http://www.intel.com/design/servers/raid/srcu42l/index.htm
47 matches
Mail list logo
