On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 21:57:15 -0700, Josh Tolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>OpenBSD is written for uses
>where freedom, stability, adherence to standards, and security are the
>top concerns
You are pontificating your personal opinions on why OpenBSD is written
and what OpenBSD is used for to Ted U
Josh,
Agreed on all points. Oracle also likes to tie releases of their database
to specific versions of Linux, not just platform types. I had that issue
with 8i Release 2 on Red Hat.
However, Oracle does have instructions available on their Metalink support
site for installing on FreeBSD.
Orac
Running oracle on any unsupported platform is probably not the best
idea, not only because you won't get support, but also because running
it on a more secure platform will still leave you with lots of holes;
in other words, you're going to need something in front of the box to
protect it anyway. O
Nick Holland writes:
> First of all, I've been informed who Greg Oster is...a/the maintainer of
> RAIDframe.
Guilty as charged.
> So, let's start by acknowledging his superior knowledge in
> the area (possibly a little bias, but his knowledge of this topic is to
> be respected).
Well "super
On 12/4/05, Josh Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few more hours, assuming you have enough virtual memory (such as login.conf
> "staff") and at least 2G of free disk space in your workspace (by default,
> that's /usr/ports). If not, you'll be re-building. :-)
>
Thanks, it took about 5 hours
I started compiling Java 1.4.2 about 4 hours ago on my IBM T40 laptop
with a 700 MHz CPU and 256 MB RAM. How much longer is it going to
take? The FAQ says "after many hours" so I was just wondering how
long on my hardware. Is it going to be a couple more hours or a
couple days?
Thanks,
Greg
Ted Unangst wrote:
> put it in a different slot.
>
> On 12/1/05, Giancarlo Razzolini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Hi Folks,
>>
>> First of all, i would like to congratulate all the openbsd developers,
>>because it's a very good OS. I'm a newcomer, from the Linux world,
>>precisely slackwa
I opened a PR on this earlier this year. Seach my last name in
query-pr.
The Cisco 3000 supports SA Proposals with multiple discontiguous
subnets.
~BAS
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 20:54, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have a situation where a branch office with multiple,
> non-overlapping, non-aggr
Call for Papers, Participation, and Membership
Society for Advancement of Management, Inc. (SAM)*
April 6-9, 2006
Rosen Plaza Hotel - Orlando, Florida
Plan now to attend and or participate in the 2006 SAM International
Business Conference, April 6-9, 2006 in Orlando, Florida.
Simply submit your p
The thing emulates a USB keyboard. Trying toggling legacy emulation
mode in the BIOS.
~BAS
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 03:55, Xavier MilliC(s-Lacroix wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I 'm trying to install OBSD 3.8 on a Dell Poweredge 750 server using the Card
> DRAC III/XT (provides remote console/screen).
> But
If I were not running OpenBSD, the comments by Dave Faure below would lead
me to believe that my freshly installed (supposedly) single-user OpenBSD 3.8
system has been penetrated and the penetrating perp is rattling my cage. :-)
Does anyone else have ideas about what is causing this?
(I'm also g
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 15:12:10 -0800, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/4/05, Ioan Nemes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Run Oracle ONLY on the supported platforms!
>>
>>
> http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/oracle10g/index.html
>
> huh? why would you say that?
i
On 12/4/05, Ioan Nemes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Run Oracle ONLY on the supported platforms!
>
> http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/oracle10g/index.html
huh? why would you say that?
Run Oracle ONLY on the supported platforms!
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/oracle10g/index.html
Ioan
>>> Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/12/2005 09:14:25 am
>>>
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 09:49:21PM +, Frank Parsons wrote:
> Has anyone got Oracle 10g work
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 09:49:21PM +, Frank Parsons wrote:
> Has anyone got Oracle 10g working on OpenBSD 3.8?
>
> What is the general consensus of running Oracle on OpenBSD?
I have no experience with Oracle, but if you are going to be running
insecure software, why not choose a better-perfor
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 03:58:26PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> up toasting them, far from the end of the world. I can give you a very
> good explaination (or several) for why a disk powered down mid-write
> could be dammaged, it is really odd how RARELY this actually happens in
> real life. I co
Has anyone got Oracle 10g working on OpenBSD 3.8?
What is the general consensus of running Oracle on OpenBSD?
--
Frank
--On 04 December 2005 14:27 -0600, eric wrote:
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 11:39:01 -0800, Rodney Hopkins proclaimed...
I was looking at the pf.conf included with 3.8, and with the
addition of the following line:
set skip on { lo }
doesn't the lo part of the following line become redundant:
antis
eric wrote:
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 11:39:01 -0800, Rodney Hopkins proclaimed...
I was looking at the pf.conf included with 3.8, and with the
addition of the following line:
set skip on { lo }
doesn't the lo part of the following line become redundant:
antispoof quick for { lo $int_if }
It
On 04/12/05, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like you had FreeBSD on this system, removed it, put OpenBSD on
> the same partition, and OpenBSD saw and tried to use the FreeBSD
> disklabel, and choked on some of it.
>
> If that's the case, using the 'D' command of disklabel in the
First of all, I've been informed who Greg Oster is...a/the maintainer of
RAIDframe. So, let's start by acknowledging his superior knowledge in
the area (possibly a little bias, but his knowledge of this topic is to
be respected).
I am NOT A file system expert. I am barely file system aware. Som
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 11:39:01 -0800, Rodney Hopkins proclaimed...
> I was looking at the pf.conf included with 3.8, and with the
> addition of the following line:
>
> set skip on { lo }
>
> doesn't the lo part of the following line become redundant:
>
> antispoof quick for { lo $int_if }
It
I was looking at the pf.conf included with 3.8, and with the
addition of the following line:
set skip on { lo }
doesn't the lo part of the following line become redundant:
antispoof quick for { lo $int_if }
assuming both lines are uncommented?
Thanks.
Rodney Hopkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
On 12/4/05, Steve Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> Any issues I had printing from XP went away when I enabled LPR Byte
> counting in the LPR port settings.
>
Any ideas why that is?
Greg
Simon Morgan wrote:
> J.D. Bronson wixb.com> writes:
>> I think if I zero'd the drive 2x before install OBSD, this problem
>> wouldnt have happened.
>
> Thanks for the tip but I have other operating systems and partitions
> on the drive which I want to keep.
>
> I shouldn't need to do this shou
> On 12/3/05, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
> > In case you didn't know gpl 2 sucks shit and so does apache 2.
> > OpenBSD's version of apache is quite different than what they used to
> > ship since we forked it. Apache 2 is in ports.
Where? As I can see, It was 6 years ago un
Anyone have any suggestions relating to this ?
On 12/2/05, turha turha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/2/05, jared r r spiegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 05:36:24PM +0200, turha turha wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I'm trying to find out if it's possible to g
Hi,
I have installed 3.8 onto my good old Toshiba T4900CT. Everthing works
fine except my two wireless pcmcia cards.
The kernel traps, if i insert one of the wlan cards. Which of the
two cards i insert does not matter.
The same holds, if i start the laptop with one of the cards inserted
at boot
I learn by doing mistakes ! :)
Thank you,
Bruno.
On 12/3/05, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This has been discussed over and over and over and over and over and
> over and over. Look at the archives, no more NEW gpl code will be
> allowed in the tree. So besides gcc there is virt
Greg Thomas wrote:
Ok, I decided to switch from using a little Linksys 802.11b parallel
print server to using my OpenBSD box for printing to my one printer.
Printing locally works fine but I'm having trouble printing from XP.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ethant# cat /etc/printcap
# $OpenBSD:
J.D. Bronson wixb.com> writes:
> I think if I zero'd the drive 2x before install OBSD, this problem
> wouldnt have happened.
Thanks for the tip but I have other operating systems and partitions
on the drive which I want to keep.
I shouldn't need to do this should I? I mean, shouldn't fdisk and
hey markus,
thanks for your reply.
no traffic on enc0 without the nat statement. i too suspect, that its
not nat which is giving me headaches. our_fw and ASP_peer auth using a
pre-shared key, if thats what you were asking. the tunnel gets
established without any glitches. at least isakmpd in de
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 06:42:54PM -0600, Doug Carter wrote:
> I've been using a C program to control a custom radio on FreeBSD
> (5.2-5.4) for some time. This program uses the RS-232 RTS pin to
> key the half duplex radio transmitter. I am attempting to port
> this program to OpenBSD 3.8.
>
> O
smtp-vilter, the flexible and fast email content scanner for sendmail
based systems, can now interact with the pf packet filter on OpenBSD.
If a virus, spam or otherwise unwanted content is detected in an email
message, it can add the sending hosts IP address to a pf table. You
can then give this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> nat on enc0 inet from 192.168.A.A/24 to B.B.B.B/8 -> 172.C.C.C
Hi
What do you see if you don't use the nat statement? Do packets from
192.168 get sent to B.B over enc0? If not you still have some other
problem. How do you and ASP_peer authentica
Hi,
I have a problem debugging a core file of a web application server with
the gdb. The application server is written in objective c, running in a
GNUstep environment, the binary is compiled with debugging information
and is not stripped.
when I try to examine the file I load it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 3 Joachim Schipper contributed the following:
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:41:50PM -0600, Denny White wrote:
Have a question about the results of running
/usr/ports/infrastructure/build/./out-of-date.
Here is the output from it:
Make sure yo
37 matches
Mail list logo
