On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:42:35 -0400
Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ken Gunderson wrote:
> > Greets:
> >
> > I've been exploring root on raidframe w/a pair of mirrored disks. Once
> > I bring something like this up I then go ahead and do my best to break
> > it, test out recovery scenar
per engelbrecht wrote:
> This is really (really) great news.
> Been blasting through a few servers but so fare, unfortunately, without
> any ipmi? in any of the dmesg. Will try the bigger irons in a few hours.
> Looking forward to using it though. Thank you guys.
I haven't had a chance to test it
Ken Gunderson wrote:
> Greets:
>
> I've been exploring root on raidframe w/a pair of mirrored disks. Once
> I bring something like this up I then go ahead and do my best to break
> it, test out recovery scenarios, etc.
smart. VERY smart. :)
> Which brings me to the question
> at hand.
>
> Fol
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:43:26 +0200
Rogier Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/23/05, Ken Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now my question is whether there is some way to shorten
> > this delay that I'm missing?
>
> Did you read through the list archives? This matter is well-discuss
Marco Peereboom wrote:
Folks who keep track of cvs changes might have noticed a barrage of commits
regarding ipmi(4). The driver is functionally complete but needs wide testing
on both amd64 and i386 architectures. Jordan Hargrave (jordan@) wrote most of
the code.
Let's talk a bit about ipmi(4
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 05:15:29PM -0600, Sibastien Taylor wrote:
> I am having problems having two SATA disks recognized by OpenBSD, the
> 6300ESB
> controller is found and seems to be configured properly but I get the
> error:
>
> pciide2: couldn't map channel 0 cmd regs
> pciide2: couldn't
On Sunday 23 October 2005 05:58 pm, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> --On 23 October 2005 16:52 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> generally with a filtering bridge, you would want to pass all
> >> traffic on one of the interfaces ('set skip on XX' or a 'pass on
> >> XX' rule), and just make rules app
I am having problems having two SATA disks recognized by OpenBSD, the
6300ESB
controller is found and seems to be configured properly but I get the
error:
pciide2: couldn't map channel 0 cmd regs
pciide2: couldn't map channel 1 cmd regs
I'm assuming that this is from failing to DMA map the t
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Monah Baki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
Until 4 days ago, I no longer receive email on my server. I thought it was my
provider (cox) since they
block inbound and outbound smtp.
If I telnet from the outside to my server on port 110 & 143,
110 and 143 are POP and IM
On 10/23/05, Monah Baki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Until 4 days ago, I no longer receive email on my server. I thought it was
> my provider (cox) since they block inbound and outbound smtp.
In the first case, you're out of luck unless you find an external
party that can relay your e-mail to you
Hi all,
Until 4 days ago, I no longer receive email on my server. I thought it was my
provider (cox) since they
block inbound and outbound smtp.
When I send email from the outside, nothing shows up in my /var/mail/maillog, I
then get an email 3
days later "connection timed out with my server.
--On 23 October 2005 16:52 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
generally with a filtering bridge, you would want to pass all
traffic on one of the interfaces ('set skip on XX' or a 'pass on
XX' rule), and just make rules apply to the other interface.
Whether or not this is what you're doing, isn'
>generally with a filtering bridge, you would want to pass all traffic
>on one of the interfaces ('set skip on XX' or a 'pass on XX' rule), and
>just make rules apply to the other interface. Whether or not this is
>what you're doing, isn't clear from your message.
>
Thanks. Determinable from t
On 10/23/05, Ken Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now my question is whether there is some way to shorten
> this delay that I'm missing?
Did you read through the list archives? This matter is well-discussed.
Other OS'es, such as NetBSD, use a different way for the checking of
parity (i.e. in
Please guys, can we stop this fight over who does what and how to be
accessible from where.
In the interest of bringing peace back on misc@ I will extend the offer
to host this on high capacity network if the community really want it.
More then once the community always say, yes this is great
Greets:
I've been exploring root on raidframe w/a pair of mirrored disks. Once
I bring something like this up I then go ahead and do my best to break
it, test out recovery scenarios, etc. Which brings me to the question
at hand.
Following a hard failure the system must perfomr a parity check on
Hi,
A little while back I got OpenOffice.org 2.0 to work on OpenBSD 3.8
snapshots. I didn't use the linux proc and I didn't install the RPM's.
I used rpm2cpio to convert the RPM's, then I used cpio to extract the
achives.
I enabled linux emulation and then just ran the soffice.bin file.
Ev
On 10/23/05, Sigfred Heversen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
> > Please STOP the discussion about document formats in this thread.
> > You're taking my time complaing on the document format (pdf).
> > In my first post I wrote that I want feedback on the document and nothing
>
Hi guys,
Just wanted to mention that during installation of last snapshot from
openbsd.informatik.uni-erlangen.de, when it's time to configure the
gigabit ethernet card with DHCP the following message appears:
re0: watchdog timeout
re0: watchdog timeout
re0: watchdog timeout
eventually it do
Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
Please STOP the discussion about document formats in this thread.
You're taking my time complaing on the document format (pdf).
In my first post I wrote that I want feedback on the document and nothing else.
I understand your frustation that your thread has been hijacked
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 11:13:07AM -0400, Michael Shalayeff wrote:
> re
> everybody who experienced problems w/ the mention chipsets
> on the mobos such as audio not interrupting properly and stuff.
> please try the changes i just put into sys/arch/i386/pci/.
> (suppose bias according to your local
Digging through the backlog, and found this unanswered...
Joe S wrote:
> Since some quad nics share 1 interrupt, what kind of performance impact
> would I be dealing with versus using 4 indiviual nics?
>
> Debating wehter to use a Phobox P430TX quad dc nic or individual fxp0 nics.
Just test it
** Reply to message from Bachman Kharazmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 22
Oct 2005 23:44:13 +0200
>Please STOP the discussion about document formats in this thread.
>You're taking my time complaing on the document format (pdf).
I do _not_ want to discourage anyone from creating new, useful
documen
--On 23 October 2005 08:30 -0400, Darrel wrote:
My ruleset is basic, about like:
"about like" isn't nearly as good as directly including the whole file.
to be complete you might also include 'ifconfig', 'brconfig -a' and
'netstat -rn -finet' to give us a better idea of the network (if you
ab
--On 23 October 2005 11:29 +0200, LukC!E! Macura wrote:
When I look into BIOS, there is no possibility to do good irq routing.
BIOS groups almost all devices to irq3 :(
try a .mp kernel (even if you have 1 processor).
thanks for the replies, the solution I found was to insert the
following line into /etc/dhcpd.conf
next-server
if this line isn't in then the obsd machine displayed 0.0.0.0 as the
server ip.
thanks for the replies
poncenby
On 23 Oct 2005, at 11:04, Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
How to use bo
Last spring I installed BSD onto a computer. Okay, so far. Now I have
installed BSD onto five computers. One of them is a OpenBSD 3.8 bridge on an
old i386.
The Packet Firewall rules all seemed logical, until I made the firewall; i.e,
bridge. Even though filtering is set to take place on th
Two sections added.
-How to run X on clients
-Giving Internet access to clients
/bkw
On 10/22/05, Bachman Kharazmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://bkw.lindesign.se/tmp/diskless.pdf
> Please read my step-by-step tutorial and give me feedback.
>
> I really hope it will be useful to the OpenBSD
On 10/23/05, Bachman Kharazmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And about keeping them synced, master.passwd is the most important
> thing for keeping the 'accounts' intact.
You may want to look into the yp(8) subsystem. For the enviroment you
describe, this may be what you're looking for to keep many
How to use boot pxeboot is described in the doc I wrote two days ago,
you can find a link to it in the list. You'll find examples that I
hope will help.
gl
/bkw
On 10/23/05, poncenby smythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello list, help for the following problem would be greatly
> appreciated, it's
On 10/23/05, Matthew Weigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, except that hard links are filesystem specific, you can't cross
> filesystem boundaries with one.
>
> Also, depending on design, you probably actually want a single RO
> filesystem to serve as / for all diskless clients, and have smalle
Hello all,
Thank you for hint, amd64 architecture does work on our HW !
Everything was instaled fine (I instaled latest snapshot). But we have
another problem.
When I look into BIOS, there is no possibility to do good irq routing.
BIOS groups almost all devices to irq3 :( I can change irq, but I
Mike Hernandez wrote:
> On 10/21/05, Ramiro Aceves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Hi OpenBSD fans!
>>
>>My 3.8 CD preorder is sent also!
>>I am waiting nervous for the 3.8 release!
>
>
> Nervous? You must mean anxious :) One of the main reasons I love
> OpenBSD is because there is so much less t
33 matches
Mail list logo
