On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 18:57:37 -0400, Daniel Ouellet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>This may comes at a surprise, but please read all and see if there is
>any interests in doing full BSD license VoIP system.
>
>There is a few reasons for this and yes a selfish one as well.
>
>Like the OpenB
> Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
>>On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 12:43:13AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I'm sorry maybe somebody else noticed that "problem" already but I
>>> noticed
>>>that mplayer displays nothing if I wanna watch a movie. I can hear the
>>>sound but there nothing visual (realy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
:) Hah.
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 20:12:39 -0700 Raymond Lillard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dear auto...
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Theo,
>>
>> Perhaps your a bit "ininformed" yourself.. unless the
There is a word "uninformed".
I do not think that Theo intended to use that word.
"Disinformed" and "Misinformed" are closer but do not convey the intent.
Words enter the language because they are used in a context which makes
their meaning rather obvious and other words fail to express correctly.
Perhaps your a bit "ininformed" yourself.. unless there is some
weird canadian/US translation going on here, I am pretty sure that
the word you were looking for was infact, "uninformed". :)
Oh shit! Theo didn't proof read his e-mail! The two keys are right next to
each other man, no need to bug
Dear auto...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo,
Perhaps your a bit "ininformed" yourself.. unless there is some
weird canadian/US translation going on here, I am pretty sure that
the word you were looking for was infact, "uninformed". :)
Nor is there any su
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 12:43:13AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry maybe somebody else noticed that "problem" already but I noticed
that mplayer displays nothing if I wanna watch a movie. I can hear the
sound but there nothing visual (realy nothing, just sound outpu
Can Erkin Acar dixit:
>There should be no need for this in -current
Thanks, will try.
//mirabile
--
> Hi, does anyone sell openbsd stickers by themselves and not packaged
> with other products?
No, the only way I've seen them sold is for $40 with a free OpenBSD CD.
-- Haroon Khalid and
On Saturday 30 April 2005 08:40 pm, 2ds wrote:
> hi,
>
> I just installed a copy of open bsd 3.6 to be used as a traffic shaper
> and i can't
> even get it to route packets between interfaces.
>
> I set net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
>
> both of the network cards seem to be correctly configured
>
> lo0:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo,
Perhaps your a bit "ininformed" yourself.. unless there is some
weird canadian/US translation going on here, I am pretty sure that
the word you were looking for was infact, "uninformed". :)
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:03:01 -0700 Theo de Raadt
<[EMA
> > >> track and keep up to date another openbsd patch that sendmail won't
> > >> integrate into their tree. We already know that Postfix and qmail don't
>
> > Sorry for not being clear, but I was using it as an example. There are
> > many cases of organizations not accepting patches from the op
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005, Christopher Hylarides wrote:
>> An OpenSMTPd would surprise me, but it doesn't mean that as we write,
>> some
>> OpenBSD developer isn't just about to say "that does it!" with having to
>> track and keep up to date another openbsd patch that sendmail won't
>> integrate into
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005, Christopher Hylarides wrote:
> >> track and keep up to date another openbsd patch that sendmail won't
> >> integrate into their tree. We already know that Postfix and qmail don't
> Sorry for not being clear, but I was using it as an example. There are
> many cases of organ
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005, Christopher Hylarides wrote:
> An OpenSMTPd would surprise me, but it doesn't mean that as we write, some
> OpenBSD developer isn't just about to say "that does it!" with having to
> track and keep up to date another openbsd patch that sendmail won't
> integrate into their tr
> While I'm not a developer, I do beleive it scales reasonably well writing
> their own implementations.
Scaling isn't really our concern; I barely know what the word means.
There is one group of people who we do know scales.
Whiners. They scale really well.
> I don't have any point to make on the value of these
> projects, however "does this scale?"
How does it scale that we have to listen to your ininformed
gibberish day in day out?
hi,
I just installed a copy of open bsd 3.6 to be used as a traffic shaper
and i can't
even get it to route packets between interfaces.
I set net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
both of the network cards seem to be correctly configured
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 33224
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 02:30:28PM -0700, Ben Goren wrote:
> BTW, I just checked out the OpenCVS page. You know, it used to be that
> people would join a project and commit fixes or enhancements, rather
> than fork first and ask questions later. Is this really the best use
> of developer resource
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:22:48 -0500
Jeff Bachtel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, I just checked out the OpenCVS page. You know, it used to be that
> people would join a project and commit fixes or enhancements, rather
> than fork first and ask questions later. Is this really the best use
> of deve
On Saturday 30 April 2005 06:01 pm, adrian kok wrote:
> 1/ Why are there 3 ipaddresses in this log
> what is source and destination address?
Because you have gotten an ICMP error message that includes an IP in the
data.
> 2/ 172.17.217.168 should be private ip and that
> address
> should not be
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 02:30:28PM -0700, Ben Goren wrote:
> As much as I'm sure Theo would love to get rid of gcc and
> friends...damn, that's a big undertaking. I don't think it's the sort
> of thing that would happen at a hackathon. If I had to guess, it'd be
> made the main point of some fut
Dual core should be supported by the AMD64 bsd.mp kernel.
On 4/30/05, Johan M:son Lindman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 30 April 2005 19.51, you wrote:
> > > Does OpenBSD support Intel Xeon 64Bit processors?
> >
> > Of course.
>
> What about dual core AMD64?
> Any decision wether to su
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:56:09AM +0200, Johan M:son Lindman wrote:
> On Saturday 30 April 2005 19.51, you wrote:
> > > Does OpenBSD support Intel Xeon 64Bit processors?
> >
> > Of course.
>
> What about dual core AMD64?
> Any decision wether to support that?
dual-core chips are a drop-in replac
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 12:43:13AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm sorry maybe somebody else noticed that "problem" already but I noticed
> that mplayer displays nothing if I wanna watch a movie. I can hear the
> sound but there nothing visual (realy nothing, just sound output).
"a movie" is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm sorry maybe somebody else noticed that "problem" already but I noticed
> that mplayer displays nothing if I wanna watch a movie. I can hear the
> sound but there nothing visual (realy nothing, just sound output).
>
> I did the same things like on 3.6 and installed mp
On Saturday 30 April 2005 19.51, you wrote:
> > Does OpenBSD support Intel Xeon 64Bit processors?
>
> Of course.
What about dual core AMD64?
Any decision wether to support that?
Hi all,
This may comes at a surprise, but please read all and see if there is
any interests in doing full BSD license VoIP system.
There is a few reasons for this and yes a selfish one as well.
Like the OpenBGPd provide replacement for Cisco and I enjoy this and
allow me to slowly breath a bit w
Hi all
I got the firewall log but don't understand it
1/ Why are there 3 ipaddresses in this log
what is source and destination address?
2/ 172.17.217.168 should be private ip and that
address
should not be in public network
How is it related to address 68.50.185.xxx?
What is happening here?
T
Rick Barter wrote:
Rick Barter wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Something else... today I had a chance to checkout a new wireframe
puffy tshirt. The texture of them is incredible, blind people will
appreciate the shirts a lot, heck they are just plain sexy. We should
have made a wireframe blowfish tsh
I'm sorry maybe somebody else noticed that "problem" already but I noticed
that mplayer displays nothing if I wanna watch a movie. I can hear the
sound but there nothing visual (realy nothing, just sound output).
I did the same things like on 3.6 and installed mplayer from the ports but
seams it's
30 matches
Mail list logo
