Re: Mir on LTS { was RFC: Move to C++14 }

2015-02-17 Thread Robert Carr
>> - Does Mir (and the downstreams) really need to support Trusty? I can't really comment. I'm not so sure graphics platform developers would target the LTS though as they wouldn't expect anyone to run their code on the LTS (?). >> For the latter, I can imagine we could backport the Mir trunk to

Mir on LTS { was RFC: Move to C++14 }

2015-02-17 Thread Cemil Azizoglu
We had a discussion on supporting LTS at the standup today. We see a number of issues : - Supporting the LTS (Trusty) Mir codebase would not be useful due to the huge amount of development effort that has gone into Mir since the LTS release. Many interfaces changed, features added, codebase reorge